Canon Inc., Canon U.s.a., Inc., Canon Virginia, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________

CANON INC., CANON U.S.A., INC., CANON
VIRGINIA, INC.,
Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee

ASTER GRAPHICS, INC., JIANGXI YIBO E-TECH
COMPANY LIMITED, ASTER GRAPHICS
COMPANY, LTD., NINESTAR CORPORATION,
NINESTAR IMAGE TECH LIMITED, NINESTAR
TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD., STATIC
CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., PRINT-RITE N.A.,
INC., UNION TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
(M.C.O.) CO. LTD., PRINT-RITE UNICORN IMAGE
PRODUCTS CO. LTD.,
Intervenors
______________________

2019-1950
______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1106.
______________________

JUDGMENT
______________________
Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 1 Filed: 04/20/2020

MICHAEL P. SANDONATO, Venable LLP, New York, NY,
argued for appellants. Also represented by SETH
BOESHORE, DENNIS MCMAHON, ANDREW KUTAS; EDMUND
JOHN HAUGHEY, III, Washington, DC.

CLINT A. GERDINE, Office of the General Counsel,
United States International Trade Commission, Washing-
ton, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC
L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A.
ROSENZWEIG.

NICOLE A. SAHARSKY, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for all intervenors. Intervenors Ninestar Cor-
poration, Ninestar Image Tech Limited, Ninestar Technol-
ogy Company, Ltd., Static Control Components, Inc. also
represented by G
ARY HNATH, BRYAN NESE, MINH NGUYEN-
DANG; LEI MEI, EDWARD NAIDICH, Mei & Mark LLP, Wash-
ington, DC.

BARBARA A. MURPHY, Foster, Murphy, Altman &
Nickel, PC, Washington, DC, for intervenors Aster
Graphics, Inc., Jiangxi Yibo E-Tech Company Limited, As-
ter Graphics Company, Ltd. Also represented by S
USAN
KOEGEL.

STEVEN EUGENE ADKINS, McGuireWoods LLP, Wash-
ington, DC, for intervenors Print-Rite N.A., Inc., Union
Technology International (M.C.O.) Co. Ltd., Print-Rite
Unicorn Image Products Co. Ltd. Also represented by
B
ENJAMIN C. HSING, New York, NY.
______________________

T
HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O
RDERED and ADJUDGED:

Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 2 Filed: 04/20/2020

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Cir-
cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 20, 2020
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1950 Document: 86 Page: 3 Filed: 04/20/2020