Wireless Ink Corporation v. Google, Inc., Youtube, LLC, and Facebook, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
WIRELESS INK CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GOOGLE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, AND
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
YOUTUBE, INC., AND MYSPACE, INC.,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WIRELESS INK CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FACEBOOK, INC. AND GOOGLE, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2013-1683, -1684
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York in Nos. 11-cv-01751 and
10-cv-01841, Judge P. Kevin Castel.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
J EREMY S. P ITCOCK, The Pitcock Law Group, of New
York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of coun-
sel on the brief was P APOOL S. CHAUDHARI, Chaudhari
Law, PLLC, of Wylie, Texas.
J OHN CHRISTOPHER R OZENDAAL , Kellogg, Huber, Han-
sen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C., of Washington, DC,
argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief
for Facebook, Inc., were MICHAEL E. J OFFRE and MELANIE
L. BOSTWICK. Of counsel on the brief for Facebook, Inc.,
were HEIDI L. K EEFE , MARK R. WEINSTEIN, and ELIZABETH
L. STAMESHKIN, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California. On
the brief for Google, Inc. and YouTube, LLC, were K EVIN
X. MCG ANN, AARON CHASE, and ADAM G AHTAN, White &
Case LLP, of New York, New York.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE and CHEN,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
July 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --