Ak Steel Corporation v. United States

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
AK STEEL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
AND
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORPORATION AND
NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
OUTOKUMPU MEXINOX S.A. DE C.V. (formerly
known as Thyssenkrupp Mexinox S.A. de C.V.) AND
MEXINOX USA, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2013-1136
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International
Trade in No. 11-CV-0366, Senior Judge Nicholas Tsou-
calas.
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

JUDGMENT
______________________
K ATHLEEN W. CANNON, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP,
of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With
her on the brief were D AVID A. HARTQUIST and R. ALAN
L UBERDA . Of counsel was Grace W. Kim.
K ARL S. VON S CHRILTZ, Attorney, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,
of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United
States. With him on the brief were P AUL R. BARDOS ,
Acting General Counsel, and N EAL J. REYNOLDS , Assis-
tant General Counsel for Litigation.
CRAIG A. L EWIS , Hogan Lovells US LLP, of Washing-
ton, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Outokumpu
Mexinox S.A. de C.V., et al. With him on the brief were
L EWIS E. L EIBOWITZ and WESLEY V. CARRINGTON.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (O’MALLEY , WALLACH , and T ARANTO,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --