MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Formerly known as Schering Corporation v. Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,
Formerly known as Schering Corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
APOTEX INC. AND APOTEX CORP.,
Defendants-Cross Appellants.
______________________
2012-1516,-1543
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey in No. 09-CV-6373, Judge Peter G.
Sheridan.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
RICHARD L. STANLEY , Law Office of Richard Stanley,
of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the
brief were P AUL D. M ATUKAITIS , EDWARD W. MURRAY and
MARY J. MORRY , Merick & Co. Inc., of Rahway, New
Jersey; and N ICOLAS G. BARZOUKAS , J OSHUA P. D AVIS ,
AUDREY L. MANESS and J USTIN CONSTANT , Weil, Gotshal
& Manges LLP, of Houston, Texas; and J OHN F. L YNCH , of
Port Ludlow, Washington. Of counsel were J ILLIAN A.

-- 1 of 2 --

MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP v. APOTEX INC 2
CENTANNI, D AVID E. D EL ORENZI and SHEILA F. MCSHANE,
of Gibbons, P.C., of Newark, NJ; and K EVIN S. K UDLAC,
and RENER T REVIN, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of
Houston, Texas.
D EANNE M. MAZZOCHI, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi
Siwik LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-
cross appellants. With him on the brief were WILLIAM A.
RAKOCZY , P AUL J. MOLINOM , A NDREW M. ALUL , R OY
CHAMCHARAS , MATTHEW V. ANDERSON and YIXIN H. T ANG.
Of counsel was ARNOLD B. CALMANN, Saiber LLC, of
Newark, New Jersey
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, CLEVENGER , and M OORE, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
June 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
]

-- 2 of 2 --