Emcore Corporation v. International Trade Commission

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
EMCORE CORPORATION
Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
and
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES FIBER IP (SINGAPORE)
PTE. LTD., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP
(SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., and AVAGO
TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
Intervenors.
____________________
2011-1069
______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-669
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
FREDERICK A. LORIG , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for the
appellant. With him on the brief was SIDFORD LEWIS
BROWN . Of counsel on the brief were LOUIS S. M ASTRIANI
and D ANIEL F. S MITH , Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg,
LLP, of Washington, DC.

-- 1 of 2 --

CLINT A. G ERDINE, Attorney, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,
of Washington, DC. With him on the brief were JAMES M.
LYONS , General Counsel and ANDREA C. C ASSON ,
Assistant General Counsel.
RICHARD S. FLORSHEIM, Foley & Lardner, LLP, of
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for intervenors. With him
on the brief were CYNTHIA J. F RANECKI; J OHN C. VETTER,
of Miami, Florida; G EORGE E. Q UILLIN , of Washington,
DC; and GINA A. BIBBY, of Palo Alto, California. Of
counsel were ROBERT F. K RAMER , Novak Duuce + Quigg,
LLP, of San Francisco, California, and JEROLD I.
SCHNEIFER , of West Palm Beach, Florida.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (BRYSON , M OORE, and REYNA , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 14, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --