in Re Ricoh Company, Ltd. Patent Litigation Synopsys, Inc. v. Ricoh Company, Ltd.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT
LITIGATION
______________________________________________
SYNOPSYS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________________
RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC
SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC.,
MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH,
INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
__________________
2010-1415
__________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge

-- 1 of 2 --

James Ware.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CARTER G. PHILLIPS , Sidley Austin, LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee and
defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for plaintiff-
appellee were RICHARD D. K LINGLER and RACHEL H.
TOWNSEND . Also on the brief were RON E. SHULMAN ,
TERRENCE J.P. K EARNEY and R ICHARD G. FRENKEL, Wilson
Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, California, for
plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees.
G ARY M. H OFFMAN , Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant and
plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were K ENNETH
W. BROTHERS and E RIC O LIVER .
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (BRYSON , D YK , and PROST, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --