Opposition No. 92/045,643) INTERNATIONAL FLORA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. v. Desert Whale Jojoba Company, Inc.

2007-1154Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit10 sept. 2007

Texte intégral

NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1154
(Opposition No. 92/045,643)
INTERNATIONAL FLORA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
Appellant,
v.
DESERT WHALE JOJOBA COMPANY, INC.,
Appellee.
Geoffrey S. Kercsmar, The Kercsmar Law Firm, P.C., of Scottsdale, Arizona,
argued for appellant. On the brief was Douglas W. Gilmore, Noblitt & Gilmore, LLC, of
Scottsdale, Arizona.
Dale F. Regelman, Chandler & Udall, LLP, of Tucson, Arizona, for the appellee.
With him on the brief was Quan L. Nguyen.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Trial & Appeal Board

-- 1 of 2 --

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1154
(Opposition No. 92/045,643)
INTERNATIONAL FLORA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
Appellant,
v.
DESERT WHALE JOJOBA COMPANY, INC.,
Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, DYK, Circuit
Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: September 10, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.