USA v. Cedric Deshaun Banks

19-14995Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit28 avr. 2021

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-14995
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00285-CG-N-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRIC DESHAUN BANKS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(April 28, 2021)
Before JILL PRYOR, LAGOA and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 19-14995 Date Filed: 04/28/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
William K. Bradford, appointed counsel for Cedric Deshaun Banks in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Banks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Further, the
government’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on a valid appeal waiver and
Banks’s motion to discharge counsel and proceed pro se are DENIED as moot.
USCA11 Case: 19-14995 Date Filed: 04/28/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.