USA v. Arnold Clayton

14-14279Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit8 avr. 2015

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14279
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00002-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARNOLD CLAYTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 8, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Truncale, counsel for Arnold Clayton, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Clayton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.