USA v. David T. Conner

13-13495Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit3 avr. 2014

Texte intégral

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13495
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00055-JRH-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID T. CONNER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(April 3, 2014)
Before WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-13495 Date Filed: 04/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Andrew Magruder, appointed counsel for David T. Conner in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Conner’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-13495 Date Filed: 04/03/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.