Kevin McMasters v. Gary Morgan, et al

11-11241Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit29 août 2011

Texte intégral

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 29, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-11241
Non-Argument Calendar
D. C. Docket Nos. 0:10-cv-60373-FAM, 08-01849-RBR-A
In Re: GARY MORGAN,
Debtor.
KEVIN MCMASTERS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GARY MORGAN,
SONEET R. KAPILA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
(August 29, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal of the district court’s decision affirming the decision of the
bankruptcy court approving a Stipulation to Compromise Controversy over the
objection of a creditor of the Debtor’s estate, appellant McMaster. In his brief,
appellant states the issue here as follows: “Did the bankruptcy court err in
overruling an objection and approving a settlement of an adversary proceeding
[brought by the Trustee against the Debtor] that effectively allowed the Debtor to
purchase his discharge?”
The bankruptcy court approved the settlement because it was the Trustee’s
best business judgment that the settlement be approved. We find no basis in the
record for questioning the Trustee’s judgment. Appellant’s argument that the
district court’s decision should be reversed on the ground that the bankruptcy
court erred in overruling appellant’s objection is meritless.
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.