Edward Henry Lombana-Cano v. U.S. Attorney General

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 10, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-14873
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
Agency No. A095-264-557
EDWARD HENRY LOMBANA-CANO,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner,
versus
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllRespondent.
________________________
Petition for Review of a Decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
________________________
(June 10, 2011)
Before PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

Edward Henry Lombana-Cano, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions
this Court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals that denied
Lombana-Cano’s motion to reconsider. We deny the petition.
Lombana-Cano failed to specify in his motion to reconsider any errors of
fact and law in the decision of the Board. In his motion, Lombana-Cano repeated
the arguments from his appeal that he had suffered past persecution and feared
future persecution on account of a political opinion that the Revolutionary Armed
Forces of Colombia attributed to him as a dentist working for the Colombian
government. Lombana-Cano v. U.S. Att’y Gen., No. 09-12418, slip op. at 2 (11th
Cir. Jan. 7, 2010). By “merely reiterating arguments previously presented to the
[Board],” Lombana-Cano failed to “‘specify[] . . . errors of fact or law’ as required
for a successful motion to reconsider.” Calle v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 504 F.3d 1324,
1329 (11th Cir. 2007) (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1)). The Board did not abuse
its discretion by denying Lombana-Cano’s motion to reconsider.
Lombana-Cano’s petition for review is DENIED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --