USA v. Bryant Bernard Evans

09-14766Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit4 oct. 2010

Texte intégral

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
OCTOBER 4, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-14766
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 09-00138-CR-RDP-TMP
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRYANT BERNARD EVANS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(October 4, 2010)
Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James M. Kendrick, appointed counsel for Bryant Bernard Evans in this

-- 1 of 2 --

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Evans’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.