PERB Order No. J003E•San Francisco Unified School District (PERB J003E)
San Francisco Unified School District (PERB J003E)
PERB Order No. J003ECalperb21 déc. 1977
Texte intégral
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECISION OF THE EDUCATIONAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Employer, PETITIONER, and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 960, SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS DIVISION, Employee Organization, and UNITED ADMINISTRATORS OF SAN FRANCISCO, Employee Organization, and SAN FRANCISCO CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, Employee Organization, and SAN FRANCISCO FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO, Employee Organization. Case No. SF-R-419 EERB Decision No. 23 EERB Order No. JR-3 December 21, 1977 ORDER DECLINING REQUEST TO JOIN IN JUDICIAL REVIEW Pursuant to Government Code Section 3542(a)(1), the Educational Employment Relations Board hereby declines request of petitioner in the above-captioned case to join in judicial review of EERB unit determination decision #23. The Board finds that the petitioner has an unfair practice remedy available. Educational Employment Relations Board by STEPHEN BARBER Executive Assistant to the Board Jerilou H. Cossack, Member, concurring. I agree with my colleagues that we should not join in the request for judicial review. However, the fact that the employer may resort to the unfair
practice procedures by refusing to negotiate with the duly selected exclusive representative plays no part in my decision. As I stated in Grossmont Union High School District,1 A primary purpose of administrative agencies is to provide a method for adjudicating and resolving disputes without resort to the already crowded courts. This Board is expected to make difficult and precedential decisions to facilitate an orderly and efficient system of public school employer-employee relations. If every major unit decision is certified for judicial review, we will become merely an additional level of bureaucracy which must be gotten through prior to inevitable resort to the courts. I find nothing which renders this case one of "special importance." Jerilou. H. Cossack, Member 1EERB Order No. JR-2, July 25, 1977. -2-
Vous vous demandez comment ce texte s’applique à votre situation ?
Consultation gratuite, sans engagement
Décrivez votre situation. Notre équipe vous recontactera par e-mail pour votre consultation.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.