San Francisco Unified School District (PERB A200E)

STATE
	OF
	CALIFORNIA
DECISION
	OF 	THE
PUBLIC
	EMPLOYMENT
	RELATIONS
	BOARD
SAN
	FRANCISCO
	CLASSROOM
	TEACHERS
ASSOCIATION, 	CTA/NEA,
Charging
	Party,
v.
SAN
	FRANCISCO 	UNIFIED
	SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
____________________
)
Case
	No.
	SF-CE-1247
Administrative
	Appeal
PERB
	Order
	No.
	Ad-200
December
	6,
	1989
Appearances:	
CalifornLa
	Teachers
	Association
	by
	Ramon 	E.
	Romero,
Attorney, 	for
	San
	Francisco
	Classroom
	Teachers
	Association,
CTA/NEA;
	Richards,
	Watson	
&	
Gershon
	by 	Lee
	T.
	Paterson, 	Attorney,
for
	San
	Francisco 	Unified
	School
	District.
Before
	Hesse,
	Chairperson;
	Shank
	and
	Camilli,
	Members.
DECISION
	AND
	ORDER
CAMILLI, 	Member:
	Following
	the 	issuance 	of
	a
	proposed
decision
	by
	an
	administrative
	law
	judge
	(ALJ)
	of 	the 	Public
Employment
	Relations
	Board
	(PERB
	or
	Board),
	the
	San
	Francisco
Unified
	School
	District 	(District),
	pursuant 	to
	Regulation
32300,
1
filed
	timely 	exceptions 	to 	the
	ALJ 1 s
	proposed
	decision
and
	order. 	Thereafter, 	the
	San
	Francisco
	Classroom 	Teachers
Association,
	CTA/NEA
	(Association), 	pursuant 	to
	Regulation
	32300,
filed
	timely 	exceptions
	to 	the 	proposed
	decision
	and
	order 	of 	the
ALJ, 	and
	therein 	also
	responded
	to 	the
	District's
	exceptions,
pursuant 	to 	Regulation
	32310.
1PERB
	Regulations 	are 	codified 	at 	California 	AdministrativeCode,
	title
	8, 	section
	31001
	et 	seq.

Subsequently,
	the 	Association 	requested
	a
	withdrawal
	of
	its
underlying
	unfair
	labor
	practice
	charge
	and
	exceptions
	to 	the
proposed
	decision,
	and
	requested 	the
	complaint
	in
	this
	case
	be
dismissed.
	The
	District 	is
	in
	agreement
	with
	the
	above
	request,
and
	has
	requested
	withdrawal
	of
	its
	exceptions
	as
	well.
	The
Board
	has
	considered 	the 	request 	for
	withdrawal
	and
	concurs
	that
a
	withdrawal
	is
	in
	the
	best
	interest
	of
	the
	parties
	and
	is
consistent
	with
	the
	purposes
	of 	the
	Educational
	Employment
Relations
	Act.
	Accordingly,
	the
	Board
	grants 	the
	parties'
requests 	to
	withdraw,
	with
	prejudice, 	the
	unfair 	practice
	charge
and
	their
	exceptions
	to 	the
	proposed
	decision.
It
	is
	hereby
	ORDERED
	that
	the
	unfair 	practice
	charge 	and
	the
complaint
	therein
	is
	DISMISSED
	WITH
	PREJUDICE,
	and
	the
	proposed
decision
	is
	set
	aside.
Chairperson
	Hesse 	and
	Member
	Shank
	joined
	in
	this
	Decision.
2