projets

Revision allowed on interpretation of § 17 KHEntgG for aid eligibility

BVerwG 5 B 58/12, 5 B 58/12 (5 C 26/13)Bverwg / 5e division19 juin 2013Granted

Ouvrir la source

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the defendant’s complaint and allowed the revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning the interpretation of § 17(2) sentence 1 half-sentence 2 KHEntgG, specifically whether expenses for elective hospital services are eligible for civil-service aid. No merits decision was taken; the ruling concerns only admission of the revision.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for fundamental significance; interpretation of § 17 Abs. 2 sentence 1 half-sentence 2 KHEntgG in relation to civil-service aid for elective hospital services. Revision is to be allowed where the dispute raises an unresolved question of statutory interpretation whose clarification is capable of affecting the legal assessment beyond the individual case. It is sufficient that the proposed revision can serve to clarify the scope of aid eligibility of expenses for elective services; a merits determination is not required at the admission stage.

Texte intégral

BVerwG — 5 B 58/12, 5 B 58/12 (5 C 26/13), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-06-19

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 58/12, 5 B 58/12 (5 C 26/13)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 17 Abs 2 S 1 Halbs 2 KHEntgG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 17. April 2012, Az: 2 S 1730/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Beihilfe; Wahlleistung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, Fragen der Auslegung des § 17 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbs. 2 KHEntgG im Hinblick auf die Beihilfefähigkeit von Aufwendungen für Wahlleistungen zu klären.

Mots-clés

revisionfundamental significanceaid eligibilityelective servicesstatutory interpretation

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether revision should be allowed for fundamental significance regarding the interpretation of § 17(2) sentence 1 half-sentence 2 KHEntgG and the aid eligibility of expenses for elective services.

Solution extraite

Revision is to be allowed because the case raises a question of fundamental importance concerning the interpretation of § 17(2) sentence 1 half-sentence 2 KHEntgG in relation to the aid eligibility of expenses for elective services.

Motifs extraits

The complaint is admissible and well-founded; the proposed revision may clarify unresolved interpretive questions with broader significance.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.