projets

Revision admitted on requirements for changing a delegation by public-law contract

BVerwG 3 B 12/10, 3 B 12/10 (3 C 23/10)Bverwg / 3e division1 juil. 2010Granted

Ouvrir la source

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint against non-admission of revision. It held that the case has fundamental significance because the revision proceedings can clarify what requirements apply to a public-law contract that changes a delegation of sovereign powers so that a different person becomes the delegate. The court also determined the value in dispute for the revision proceedings under the Court Costs Act.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for fundamental significance in a case concerning the amendment of a delegation by public-law contract: Fundamental significance exists where the revision proceedings are likely to clarify unresolved requirements for a public-law contract by which a delegation of sovereign powers is altered so that a different person replaces the previous delegate. For the admission of revision, it suffices that a clarifying answer to the legal question is expected in the revision proceedings (consid. 1).

Texte intégral

BVerwG — 3 B 12/10, 3 B 12/10 (3 C 23/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-07-01

Aktenzeichen: 3 B 12/10, 3 B 12/10 (3 C 23/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Hessischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 4. November 2009, Az: 5 A 2308/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 3. Senat

Titelzeile

Änderung einer Beleihung durch öffentlich-rechtlichen Vertrag; Revisionszulassung zur Klärung der Anforderungen

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne von § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO. Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben zu klären, welche Anforderungen an einen öffentlich-rechtlichen Vertrag zu stellen sind, durch den eine Beleihung mit hoheitlichen Befugnissen dahin geändert werden soll, dass an die Stelle des bisherigen Beliehenen eine andere Person tritt.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 3 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Mots-clés

revision admissibilityfundamental significancepublic-law contractdelegation of sovereign powerscourt costsvalue in dispute

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether revision should be admitted because the case has fundamental significance regarding the requirements for a public-law contract changing a delegation of sovereign powers so that another person replaces the current delegate.

Solution extraite

Yes. The complaint was well-founded because the case raises a question of fundamental importance under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Motifs extraits

The revision proceedings are likely to allow clarification of what requirements apply to a public-law contract intended to modify a delegation of sovereign powers by substituting a new delegate for the former one.

Question juridique clé

How the value in dispute for the revision proceedings is to be set.

Solution extraite

The value in dispute follows the statutory rules governing court fees and dispute value.

Motifs extraits

The court based the assessment on the provisions of the Court Costs Act cited in the decision.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.