projets

Exclusion of compensation benefits; revision admitted

BVerwG 5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10)Bverwg / 5e division30 juin 2010Granted

Ouvrir la source

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant’s complaint and admitted the revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance, namely the scope of the exclusion ground in § 1(3) No. 1 AusglLeistG. The court thus enabled further clarification of that provision in the revision proceedings. The underlying dispute concerned compensation benefits, but the order addressed only the admissibility of revision, not the merits.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 132(2) No. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance; a complaint is well-founded where the case is capable of clarifying the reach of a statutory exclusion ground. Fundamental importance exists when a legal question of general significance requires further doctrinal clarification in revision. Here, the scope of the exclusion ground in § 1(3) No. 1 AusglLeistG warranted such clarification (consid. 1-2).

Texte intégral

BVerwG — 5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-06-30

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 62/09, 5 B 62/09 (5 C 18/10)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 1 Abs 3 Nr 1 AusglLeistG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Dresden, 4. August 2009, Az: 7 K 2230/06, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Ausschluss von Ausgleichsleistungen

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Reichweite des Ausschlussgrundes in § 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 AusglLeistG geben.

Mots-clés

revision admissibilityfundamental importancecompensation benefitsexclusion groundadministrative procedure

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the revision should be admitted for fundamental importance under § 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.

Solution extraite

Yes. The complaint was admissible and well-founded; the revision was admitted because the case could clarify the scope of the exclusion ground in § 1(3) No. 1 AusglLeistG.

Motifs extraits

The legal question concerning the reach of the exclusion provision was considered to have fundamental significance and to warrant further clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.