BVerwG 2 B 33/15, 2 B 33/15 (2 C 19/15)•Revision allowed due to divergence on age limits in public service
BVerwG 2 B 33/15, 2 B 33/15 (2 C 19/15)Bverwg / 2e division4 sept. 2015Granted
Extrait par Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court admitted the claimant's revision. It held that the Higher Administrative Court's decision in the dispute over maximum age limits for entry into public service diverged from the Federal Constitutional Court's later order of 21 April 2015, so the requirements of Section 132(2) No. 2 VwGO were met. The court also stated the statutory basis for the dispute value in the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO; revision admissibility by reason of divergence: A deviation exists where the challenged appellate judgment rests on a legal proposition that is incompatible with a later binding constitutional court decision on the same decisive legal issue. For the purpose of admitting revision, it is sufficient that the divergence concerns a dispositive point of law; a mere differing assessment of the facts is not enough. The dispute value in complaint and revision proceedings is determined according to the applicable GKG provisions cited by the court.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2015-09-04
Aktenzeichen: 2 B 33/15, 2 B 33/15 (2 C 19/15)
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:040915B2B33.15.0
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 2 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 2. Dezember 2010, Az: 6 A 1695/10, Beschlussvorgehend VG Köln, 7. Juli 2010, Az: 3 K 5879/09
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat
Revisionszulassung; Einstellungshöchstaltersgrenzen im Öffentlichen Dienst
1 Die Revision der Klägerin ist zuzulassen, weil der Beschluss des Oberverwaltungsgerichts von dem zwischenzeitlich ergangenen Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 21. April 2015 - 2 BvR 1989/12 - abweicht (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO).
2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. §§ 40, 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 1 Nr. 2 GKG in der Fassung vom 5. Mai 2004 (BGBl. I S. 718); die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 6 Satz 1 Nr. 2 GKG.
Extrait par Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted because the appellate judgment diverged from later constitutional case law.
Revision was admitted because the OVG decision departed from the Federal Constitutional Court's subsequent order of 2015-04-21.
A divergence within the meaning of Section 132(2) No. 2 VwGO was present.
Determination of the dispute value for the complaint and revision proceedings.
The court fixed the dispute value for the complaint proceedings and provisionally fixed it for the revision proceedings under the cited GKG provisions.
The value assessment followed the statutory rules on dispute value.
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.