PAUSENSPASS: lack of distinctiveness for trademark

BPatG 25 W (pat) 579/12Tribunal fédéral des brevets / Division 2522 nov. 2012Dismissed

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Federal Patent Court decided a trademark appeal concerning the word mark “PAUSENSPASS”. It held that the sign is not registrable because the relevant public will understand it as a descriptive or promotional expression rather than as an indication of origin. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Regeste Omnilex

§ 8 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 MarkenG; distinctiveness of word marks: a sign is excluded from protection if the relevant public will perceive it merely as a descriptive or promotional statement and not as a badge of origin. For the assessment, the overall impression of the sign in relation to the goods or services is decisive; a minimum of distinctiveness suffices, but purely laudatory or commonplace expressions do not meet this threshold.

Texte intégral

BPatG — 25 W (pat) 579/12, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-11-22

Aktenzeichen: 25 W (pat) 579/12

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 8 Abs 2 Nr 1 MarkenG

Spruchkörper: 25. Senat

Titelzeile

Markenbeschwerdeverfahren – "PAUSENSPASS" – keine Unterscheidungskraft

Mots-clés

trademark distinctivenessdescriptive signpromotional expressionword markregistration refusal

Extrait par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the sign “PAUSENSPASS” is incapable of registration because it lacks distinctiveness under § 8(2) No. 1 MarkenG.

Solution extraite

The sign was found to lack the distinctiveness required for trademark protection.

Motifs extraits

The designation is understood as a descriptive, promotional expression and is not perceived by the relevant public as an indication of commercial origin.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.