Non-admission of license revocation for mixed alcohol and cannabis use

BVerfG 1 BvR 234/14Bverfg / 1. Senat 2. Kammer3 juil. 2014Inadmissible

Ouvrir la source

Résumé

The Federal Constitutional Court, sitting as a chamber, did not admit the constitutional complaint against the revocation of a driving licence following mixed alcohol and cannabis use. The complaint was rejected without reasons under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG. The challenged judgments of the Administrative Court Regensburg and the Federal Administrative Court remained untouched.

Regest

§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint without reasons. A chamber may refuse to admit a constitutional complaint by unanalyzed order if the statutory admission requirements are not met. In such a case, the Court need not set out substantive constitutional review of the underlying administrative-court judgments; the non-admission order leaves the lower-court decisions in force. The decision is procedural and does not contain a merits assessment of the contested measure.

Texte intégral

BVerfG — 1 BvR 234/14, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-07-03

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 234/14

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 11 FeV 2010, § 3 Abs 1 S 1 StVG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BVerwG, 14. November 2013, Az: 3 C 32/12, Urteilvorgehend VG Regensburg, 17. Dezember 2010, Az: RO 8 K 10.476, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 2. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahme ohne Begründung: Fahrerlaubnisentziehung bei Mischkonsum von Alkohol und Cannabis

Mots-clés

constitutional complaintnon-admissiondriving licencecannabisalcoholmixed consumptionadministrative review