BVerfG 1 BvR 2509/10•Repeat interim order in paternity testing proceedings
BVerfG 1 BvR 2509/10Bverfg / 1. Senat 2. Kammer16 mars 2011Granted
Extrait par Omnilex
In a constitutional complaint concerning paternity-determination measures, the Federal Constitutional Court repeated its earlier interim order. The order of 7 October 2010, which suspended enforcement and required the applicant to tolerate investigative measures, was extended for a further six months, at the latest until the main complaint is decided.
§ 32 Abs. 6 S. 2 BVerfGG; repetition of an interim order pending constitutional review: where provisional relief has been granted in constitutional complaint proceedings and the need for protection continues, the Court may extend the interim arrangement for a limited period until the merits decision. In family-law paternity proceedings, the provisional balance may include both suspension of enforcement and the duty to tolerate investigative measures; the measure remains strictly temporary and may be repeated only so long as the main proceedings have not been decided.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-03-16
Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 2509/10
Dokumenttyp: Einstweilige Anordnung
Normen: Art 6 Abs 2 S 1 GG, §§ 1600ff BGB, § 1592 Nr 2 BGB, § 1600 Abs 1 Nr 5 BGB, § 1600 Abs 3 BGB, § 32 Abs 6 S 2 BVerfGG, § 372a Abs 1 ZPO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend OLG Hamm, 25. August 2010, Az: 12 UF 129/10, Beschlussvorgehend AG Gelsenkirchen, 2. Juni 2010, Az: 24 F 484/09, Zwischenbeschlussvorgehend BVerfG, 7. Oktober 2010, Az: 1 BvR 2509/10, Einstweilige Anordnungnachgehend BVerfG, 7. September 2011, Az: 1 BvR 2509/10, Einstweilige Anordnung
Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 2. Kammer
Wiederholung einer eA: Aussetzung der Vollziehung, Untersuchungen im Rahmen eines Vaterschaftsfeststellungsverfahrens zu dulden
Die einstweilige Anordnung vom 7. Oktober 2010 wird für die Dauer von weiteren sechs Monaten, längstens bis zur Entscheidung über die Verfassungsbeschwerde, wiederholt.
Extrait par Omnilex
Whether the earlier interim order should be extended pending the constitutional complaint.
The interim order of 7 October 2010 was repeated for a further six months, at the latest until the constitutional complaint is decided.
The Court maintained the provisional balance by continuing the suspension of enforcement and the obligation to tolerate investigative measures in the paternity case until the main constitutional review is completed.
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.