BAG 4 AZR 144/10•Revision allowed; appeal dismissed in labor law dispute
BAG 4 AZR 144/10Bag / 4e division16 nov. 2011Modified
Extrait par Omnilex
In this labour-law revision case, the Federal Labour Court set aside the judgment of the State Labour Court Hamm and rejected the plaintiff's appeal against the judgment of the Labour Court Hagen. The court issued no findings of fact or reasons because the parties waived them in view of a parallel proceeding. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labour Court may decide accordingly without a full statement of reasons. On revision, the appellate judgment may be set aside and the appeal against the first-instance judgment dismissed; the costs follow the outcome.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-16
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 144/10
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Hagen (Westfalen), 21. August 2008, Az: 4 Ca 916/08, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm (Westfalen), 3. November 2009, Az: 14 Sa 264/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Berufung der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Hagen vom 21. August 2008 - 4 Ca 916/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 781/09 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG ,§ 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Bepler | Winter | Treber | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| von Dassel | J. Ratayczak |
Extrait par Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision should succeed against the appellate judgment
The revision was successful; the appellate judgment was set aside.
The court disposed of the case without stating facts or reasons, in light of a parallel proceeding, and followed the dispositive result indicated by the tenor.
Whether the plaintiff's appeal against the first-instance judgment should remain successful
No. The plaintiff's appeal was rejected.
After setting aside the appellate judgment, the court reinstated the first-instance result by rejecting the plaintiff's appeal.
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.