94 II 1382/16 BerH•No reimbursement for copies made outside the court file
94 II 1382/16 BerHTribunal de première instance5 déc. 2016Droit civilRejeté
Extrait par Omnilex
A lawyer, acting as the representative seeking review, challenged the Bonn Local Court's decision of October 28, 2016. The court dismissed the review request. It held that making copies of documents that are not part of the court file in the course of a client mandate does not establish a right to recover those costs from either the opposing party or the state treasury. No court fees were charged, and no out-of-court costs were reimbursed.
The preparation by counsel, in the course of a client mandate, of copies of documents that do not form part of the court file does not give rise to a claim for reimbursement of those expenses against the opposing party or the state treasury. The costs of such copying are not recoverable merely because the copying occurred in connection with legal representation.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-12-05
Aktenzeichen: 94 II 1382/16 BerH
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2016:1205.94II1382.16BERH.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 94. Beratungshilfeabteilung
Fertigt ein Rechtsanwalt im Rahmen eines Mandatsverhältnisses Kopien nicht zu den Akten gehörender Schriftstücke, begründet dies kein Kostenerstattungsanspruch gegen die Gegenseite oder die Landeskasse
wird die Erinnerung des Verfahrensbevollmächtigten - als Erinnerungsführer - vom 09.11.2016 gegen die Entscheidung vom 28.10.2016 zurückgewiesen.
Gerichtskosten werden nicht erhoben, außergerichtliche Kosten nicht erstattet.
Whether a lawyer may recover the cost of copies of documents outside the court file from the opposing party or the state treasury.
No reimbursement is due for such copies.
Making copies of documents outside the court file in the course of a client mandate does not create a cost-reimbursement claim against the opposing party or the state treasury.
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.