Whether the appeal satisfied the formal requirements of reasoning and conclusions.
The appeal did not meet the statutory requirements because it contained no usable motivation or conclusions and the defects were not cured after a formal warning.
Under Art. 61 let. b LPGA and Art. 79 para. 1 LPA-VD, an appeal must state the facts, reasons, and conclusions; if deficient, the court must set a deadline and warn that non-compliance leads to inadmissibility. The appellant failed to respond.