Question juridique clé
Whether the filing to the cantonal court was an admissible appeal or had to be treated as an opposition to the SUVA decision.
Solution extraite
The filing was premature as an appeal because the opposition remedy was open; it had to be treated as an opposition and transmitted to SUVA.
Motifs extraits
Under Arts. 56 and 57 LPGA, only decisions on opposition or decisions without an available opposition remedy are appealable. The challenged SUVA decision was subject to opposition, and Art. 30 LPGA requires misdirected submissions to be accepted and forwarded to the competent body. The submission was timely under Art. 39(2) LPGA despite being sent to the wrong authority.