projets

Complaint struck out after withdrawal in enforcement proceedings

15.1996.119Autre juridiction23 sept. 1996Withdrawn

Ouvrir la source

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Ticino Chamber of Enforcement and Bankruptcy, acting as supervisory authority, dealt with a complaint of July 16, 1996 against an attachment order issued by the Lugano Enforcement Office. After suspensive effect had been granted, the enforcement office removed the complaint from its docket following withdrawal on July 22, 1996. Because that removal order was not challenged, the supervisory complaint had no remaining object and was struck out. The court ordered no costs and no indemnity.

Regeste Omnilex

Art. 67 cpv. 2 and 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF; a supervisory complaint becomes moot when the challenged measure or the complaint itself is withdrawn and the withdrawal/removal decision is not appealed. In such a situation the authority strikes the matter from the docket for lack of object. Where the proceedings end in this manner, no fees or indemnities need be allocated absent a contrary statutory basis or special circumstances.

Texte intégral

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 15.1996.119

Data decisione, Autorità: 23.09.1996, CEF

Incarto n. 15.96.00119

Lugano 23 settembre 1996 /B/fc/fb

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici:

Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretario:

Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul reclamo 16 luglio 1996 di

patr. dall'avv. __________

contro

l’operato dell’Ufficio esecuzione di Lugano e meglio contro l’atto di pignoramento 28 giugno 1996 emesso nell’esecuzione n. __________ promossa dalla reclamante contro

rilevato che con decreto presidenziale 18 luglio 1996 al reclamo è stato concesso effetto sospensivo;

preso atto che con provvedimento 22 luglio 1996 l’UE di Lugano ha stralciato dai ruoli il reclamo per intervenuto ritiro;

ritenuto che il suddetto provvedimento, munito dell’indicazione dei mezzi di ricorso,

non è stato impugnato;

considerato come il reclamo sia così divenuto privo d’oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 67 cpv. 2 e 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia

  1. Il reclamo 16 luglio 1996 della __________, è stralciato dai ruoli per intervenuto ritiro.

  2. Non si prelevano spese e non si assegnano indennità.

  3. Intimazione: - __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Mots-clés

debt enforcementattachmentsupervisory complaintwithdrawalmootnesscosts

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the supervisory complaint against the attachment should remain pending after withdrawal

Solution extraite

The complaint became moot and was struck from the docket because it had been withdrawn and the withdrawal decision was not challenged.

Motifs extraits

The enforcement office issued a withdrawal-based removal order on July 22, 1996, with appeal instructions; since that order was not appealed, the complaint lost its object.

Question juridique clé

Allocation of costs and compensation after the complaint was struck out

Solution extraite

No court costs were levied and no compensation was awarded.

Motifs extraits

Given the procedural termination after withdrawal, the court ordered no fees and no indemnity.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.