projets

Complaint struck out after withdrawal

15.1995.237Autre juridiction27 déc. 1995Withdrawn

Ouvrir la source

Extrait par Omnilex

Résumé Omnilex

The Ticino Court of Appeal’s Chamber of Enforcement and Bankruptcy, acting as supervisory authority, dealt with a complaint against the Leventina enforcement office concerning an auction of a parcel scheduled for 16 November 1995. After the complainants withdrew the complaint by letter of 7 December 1995, the court held that the matter had become moot and struck it from the docket. It further ordered that no costs be charged and no compensation be awarded.

Regeste Omnilex

Art. 67 cpv. 2 and Art. 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF; withdrawal of a supervisory complaint renders the proceedings devoid of object and leads to striking the matter from the roll. Where the complaint is withdrawn before adjudication, the supervisory authority does not decide the merits; it simply orders the case removed from the docket and, absent special circumstances, refrains from levying costs or awarding indemnities (consid. implicit).

Texte intégral

AIUTO RICERCA

Anteprima di stampa

Numero d'incarto: 15.1995.237

Data decisione, Autorità: 27.12.1995, CEF

Incarto n. 15.95.00237

Lugano 27 dicembre 1995/B/fc/fb

In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino

La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici:

Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretario:

Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul reclamo 24 novembre 1995 di

Contro

l’operato dell’ Ufficio esecuzione e fallimenti di Leventina nell’ambito della vendita

all’asta del mapp. ____________________ RFD di __________ prevista per il 16 novembre 1995;

preso atto che i reclamanti con scritto 7 dicembre 1995 hanno ritirato il gravame;

ritenuto come il reclamo sia così divenuto privo d’oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 67 cpv. 2 e 68 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia

  1. Il reclamo 24 novembre 1995 di __________, è stralciato dai ruoli per intervenuto ritiro.

  2. Non si prelevano spese e non si assegnano indennità.

  3. Intimazione: - __________ e __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria

Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026

  |  Informazioni legali  |  Requisiti minimi  |  Contatta il webmaster

Mots-clés

debt enforcementsupervisory complaintwithdrawalmootnessauctioncosts

Extrait par Omnilex

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Omnilex

Question juridique clé

Whether the supervisory complaint should be continued after the complainants withdrew it.

Solution extraite

The complaint became moot after withdrawal and was removed from the docket.

Motifs extraits

The court noted that the complainants filed a written withdrawal on 7 December 1995; the complaint therefore no longer had a subject matter.

Question juridique clé

Whether court costs or compensation should be awarded.

Solution extraite

No costs were charged and no compensation was awarded.

Motifs extraits

Following the withdrawal and striking out of the complaint, the court ordered no costs and no indemnity.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.