One-year domicile requirement for maintenance advance aid

ATA/95/1997Cour de justice / Chambre administrative4 févr. 1997Dismissed

Ouvrir la source

Résumé

The case concerns a request for maintenance advance aid under LARPA. The applicant had not been domiciled in the canton for the required one-year period. The court held that this domicile requirement is a mandatory condition of entitlement and therefore confirmed the refusal of the advance.

Regest

Art. 8 al. 1 LARPA; domicile requirement for maintenance advance aid: entitlement presupposes that the claimant has been domiciled in the canton for at least one year. Where this condition is not met, the request is inadmissible on the merits and must be rejected; no discretionary balancing can override the statutory threshold.

Texte intégral

Descripteurs

OBLIGATION D'ENTRETIEN; AVANCE(EN GENERAL); DOMICILE; CREANCIER; IP

Normes

LARPA.8 al.1

Résumé

Le bénéficiaire d'une avance ne peut requérir l'aide du scarpa s'il est domicilié dans le canton depuis moins d'un an.

Mots-clés

maintenance advancedomicile requirementeligibilitysocial assistancecantonclaim rejection