projets
ATA/697/1996 ΓÇó Remission denied for hardship caused by vacation chalet purchase
ATA/697/1996Cour de justice / Chambre administrative26 nov. 1996Dismissed
The appellant challenged the refusal to grant a remission of a housing-related surcharge/prestation. The court held that remission is intended for social hardship situations, not for difficulties arising from a voluntary investment in a vacation chalet purchased with CHF 100,000 in own funds. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
RLGL 9 al. 2; RLGL 11; remission of a housing-related surcharge/prestation. Remission is reserved for genuine social hardship. Financial distress that results from a voluntary capital investment in the purchase of a vacation chalet does not constitute a social case warranting remission; the applicant cannot rely on hardship that is self-created by such an investment.
Descripteurs
LOGEMENT; MODIFICATION(EN GENERAL); EXCES; REMISE DE LA PRESTATION; SURTAXE; LOGEMENT SOCIAL; HYPOTHEQUE; IEA
Normes
RLGL.9 al.2; RLGL.11
Résumé
Si la situation financière difficile du recourant est la conséquence d'un investissement dans l'achat d'un chalet de vacances (payé au moyen de fonds propres à hauteur de Frs 100'000,-), il ne saurait bénéficier d'une remise, celle-ci étant réservée à des cas sociaux.