Double affiliation in mandatory health insurance

ATA/526/1996Cour de justice / Chambre administrative24 sept. 1996

Ouvrir la source

Résumé

The case concerns mandatory social health insurance and the prohibition of double affiliation in a situation where an insured person moves from collective coverage to an individual policy. The available information only indicates the legal question; no details on the parties, procedural history, or operative part are provided.

Regest

LAMal Art. 11; prohibition of double affiliation in mandatory health insurance when changing from collective to individual coverage; the decisive point is whether the new individual affiliation can coexist with an existing collective affiliation or whether the earlier affiliation must be terminated before, or at the latest upon, the effective start of the new coverage. The determination turns on the continuity of compulsory coverage and the avoidance of overlapping memberships.

Texte intégral

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; AM; ASSURANCE OBLIGATOIRE; ASSU

Normes

LAMO.11

Résumé

Interdiction de la double affiliation; situation dans un cas de passage d'une assurance collective à une assurance individuelle.

Mots-clés

social insurancemandatory health insurancedouble affiliationcollective insuranceindividual insurance