Question juridique clé
Whether the appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements under Art. 42 LTF
Solution extraite
No. The filing did not engage with the cantonal court's reasoning and did not show, in a sufficiently specific way, why the decision violated federal law.
Motifs extraits
The appellant merely asserted errors in the psychiatric expert report and requested further evidence, but failed to discuss the decisive grounds of the cantonal judgment or explain which legal rules were allegedly breached.