Question juridique clé
Whether the criminal appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning and factual-review requirements
Solution extraite
The appeal did not satisfy the required reasoning and did not show that the facts were established manifestly incorrectly; the court therefore did not enter into the appeal.
Motifs extraits
The complaints about constitutional rights were inadequately reasoned under Art. 106(2) BGG, and the appellant merely challenged the facts without demonstrating manifest factual error under Art. 97(1) BGG. Non-entry was proper under Art. 108 BGG.