Question juridique clé
Whether the subsidiairy constitutional appeal met the motivation requirement of Art. 42(2) LTF.
Solution extraite
The filing contained only a general intention to appeal and unrelated assertions; it did not address the reasoning of the challenged judgment, so the appeal was manifestly inadmissible.
Motifs extraits
A valid appeal must explain, in relation to the contested reasoning, why the decision violates law; unsupported statements about a new lease, advice from a third person, or the appellant's health are insufficient.