rr-03-65.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

Part I

Section 411.-- Minimum Vesting Standards

Rev. Rul. 2003-65

ISSUE
If accruals under a qualified retirement plan are frozen, so that a partial
termination of the plan occurs, and accruals under the plan subsequently resume, must
all years of service for the plan sponsor following the establishment of the plan be taken
into account for purposes of vesting? Is the result different if, instead, a new plan is
established that is then merged into the frozen plan after the partial termination?

FACTS

Employer M maintains Plan A, a defined benefit plan qualified under § 401(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code, under which benefit accruals were frozen as of December
31, 1996. Under Plan A’s benefit formula prior to January 1, 1997, a participant
received a specified percentage of his or her highest average pay multiplied by the
participant's total years of service. Plan A provides that each participant becomes fully
vested in his or her accrued benefit after five years of service. The freezing of accruals
under Plan A caused a partial termination in 1997, so that all participants in Plan A
became fully vested in their accrued benefits following the freeze. Employer M
subsequently amends Plan A to provide that, as of January 1, 2003, participants in Plan
A will begin accruing benefits under a different formula. A participant’s accrued benefit
under Plan A, as amended, will be the sum of the accrued benefit under the old formula
and the accrued benefit under the new formula.

LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 411(a) describes minimum vesting standards that a retirement plan must
satisfy in order for the plan to be qualified under § 401(a). These standards include
§ 411(a)(2), which requires that qualified retirement plans provide that employees who
have completed a certain number of years of service have a nonforfeitable right to their
accrued benefit derived from employer contributions. Employees must become fully
vested in these benefits after no more than five years of service under a cliff vesting
schedule or seven years of service under a graded vesting schedule.

1
Section 411(a)(4) and § 1.411(a)-5(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provide
that, in computing the period of service under the plan for purposes of determining the
nonforfeitable percentage under § 411(a)(2), all of an employee’s years of service with
the employer or employers maintaining the plan are taken into account subject to

2
certain exceptions. These include an exception for years of service with an employer
during any period for which the employer did not maintain the plan or a predecessor
plan. In particular, § 1.411(a)-5(b)(3)(iii) provides that the period for which a plan is not
maintained by an employer includes the period after the plan is terminated. For
purposes of § 1.411(a)-5, a plan is terminated at the date there is a termination of the
plan within the meaning of § 411(d)(3)(A) and the regulations thereunder.

Section 411(d)(3)(A) requires that a defined benefit plan provide that, upon its
termination or partial termination, the rights of all affected employees to benefits
accrued to the date of such termination or partial termination, to the extent funded as of
such date, are nonforfeitable. Section 1.411(d)-2(c) provides rules for determining
when a plan has undergone a termination. Section 1.411(d)-2(b) provides rules for
determining when a plan has undergone a partial termination. A partial termination of a
plan is not a termination.

Under the facts presented, Plan A has not been terminated but has undergone a
partial termination. Employer M has continued to maintain Plan A after benefit accruals
were frozen. For vesting purposes, § 1.411(a)-5(b)(3)(iii) excludes service after a plan
has been terminated but does not exclude service after a partial termination.
Accordingly, service with Employer M after the establishment of Plan A and prior to
January 1, 2003, during which accruals under Plan A were frozen may not be
disregarded for vesting purposes with respect to the future accruals under Plan A.

HOLDING

The freezing of accruals under a qualified retirement plan, so that a partial
termination of the plan occurs, does not constitute a plan termination for purposes of
determining whether service for the plan sponsor after the plan was established may be
disregarded toward vesting if accruals resume under the plan. Accordingly, all years of
service for the plan sponsor following the establishment of the previously frozen plan
must be taken into account for purposes of vesting. If, instead, the accruals are earned
under a new plan maintained by the same employer and the new plan is merged with
the frozen plan, then this holding also applies, so that, after the merger, service after the
frozen plan was established must be taken into account for purposes of vesting in any
benefit accruals under the new plan.

DRAFTING INFORMATION

The principal author of this revenue ruling is Diane S. Bloom of Employee Plans,
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding this
revenue ruling, contact the Employee Plans taxpayer assistance telephone service
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, by
calling (877) 829-5500 (a toll-free number). Ms. Bloom may be reached at (202) 283-
9888 (not a toll-free number).