us-irs-revenue-procedures-irb-2003-48-pdf•Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-48 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Procedures
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-48 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Procedures
us-irs-revenue-procedures-irb-2003-48-pdfInternal Revenue Bulletin 2003-48 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue ProceduresGuidance
Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.
Bulletin No. 2003-48 December 1, 2003 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations. INCOME TAX Rev. Rul. 2003–120, page 1154. Life insurance companies; computation of required interest. This ruling provides that a life insurance company calculates „required interest‰ under section 812(b)(2)(A) of the Code using the mean of the amount of the reserve at the beginning of the taxableyearandtheamountofthereserveattheendofsuch year. Rev. Rul. 2003–121, page 1153. LIFO; price indexes; department stores. The September 2003 Bureau of Labor Statistics pric e indexes are accepted for use by department stores employ ing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory m ethods for valuing inventories for tax years ended on, or with refe rence to, September 30, 2003. REG–146692–03, page 1164. Section 103(a) of the Code provides that, generally, interest on bonds issued by state and local governments is excluded from gross income. „Qualified mortgage revenue bonds‰ may also be qualified bonds. A bond may only be a qualified mortgage revenuebondiftheeffectiverateofmortgageinterestonthe mortgages provided with the bond proceeds does not exceed the yield on the bonds by more that 1.125 percentage points. The proposed regulations provide rules for calculating the ef- fective rate of mortgage interest. Specifically, the proposed regulations provide that amounts paid for pool mortgage insur- ance are to be excluded from the calculation (which results in a lower effective rate of mortgage interest). A public hearing is scheduled for January 28, 2004. Rev. Proc. 2003–84, page 1159. Optional election to make monthly 706(a) computations. This procedure allows certain partnerships that invest in tax-exempt obligations to make an election that enables the partners to take into account monthly the inclusions required under sections 702 and 707(c) of the Code and provides rules for partnership income tax reporting under section 6031 for such partnerships. Rev. Proc. 2002–68 modified and superseded. EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS Announcement 2003–74, page 1171. This announcement is a public notice of the suspension of the federal tax exemption under sectio n 501(p) of the Code of cer- tain organizations that have been d esignated as supporting or engaging in terrorist activity or supporting terrorism. Contribu- tions made to these organizati ons during the period that the or- ganizationÊs tax-exempt sta tus is suspended are not deductible for federal tax purposes. Announcement 2003–76, page 1171. Zaire Unlimited of Calumet Park, IL, no longer qualifies as an organization to which contributions are deductible under sec- tion 170 of the Code. (Continued on the next page) Anno uncements of Disbarments and Suspensions begin on page 1168. Finding Lists begin on page ii. EMPLOYMENT TAX Notice 2003–66, page 1159. 2004 social security contribution and benefit base; domes- tic employee coverage threshold.The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration has announced (1) the OASDI contribution and benefit base for remuneration paid in 2004 and self-employment income earned in taxable years beginning in 2004, and (2) the domestic employee coverage threshold amount for 2004. ADMINISTRATIVE T.D. 9093, page 1156. Final regulations under section 7701 of the Code contain spe- cial rules regarding the entity classification of certain foreign business entities, including a special rule that terminates the grandfathered status of certain foreign business entities upon a 50-percent change of control, and a special rule that clarifies and further modifies the relevancy rules relating to certain for- eign eligible entities. Announcement 2003–78, page 1172. This announcement contains a withdrawal of proposed regula- tion section 301.7701-3(h), which provided a rule that would have operated to change the classification of a foreign disre- garded entity if a so-called "extraordinary transaction" occurred one day before or within one year after the election to treat the entity as disregarded. REG-110385-99 partially withdrawn. December 1, 20032003-48 I.R.B. The IRS Mission Provide AmericaÊs taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all. Introduction The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven- tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bul- letin contents are consolidated semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis. It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub- stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod- ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi- cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man- agement are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published. Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements. Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same. The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows: Part I.—1986 Code. This part includes rulings and decision s based on provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg- islation and Related Committee Reports. Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul- ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the TreasuryÊs Office of the Assistant Sec- retary (Enforcement). Part IV.—Items of Gener al Interest. This part includes noti ces of proposed rulemakings, disbar- ment and suspension l ists, and announcements. The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.* The content s of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. * Beginning with Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003–43, we are publishing the index at the end of the month, rather than at the beginning. 2003-48 I.R.B.December 1, 2003 Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 Section 171.—Amortizable Bond Premium May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 472.—Last-in, First-out Inventories 26 CFR 1.472–1: Last-in, first-out inventories. LIFO; price indexes; department stores.The September 2003 Bureau of Labor Statistics price indexes are accepted for use by department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for valuing inventories for tax years ended on, or with reference to, September 30, 2003. Rev. Rul. 2003–121 The following Department Store In- ventory Price Indexes for September 2003 were issued by the Bureau of La- bor Statistics. The indexes are accepted by the Internal Revenue Service, under § 1.472–1(k) of the Income Tax Regula- tions and Rev. Proc. 86–46, 1986–2 C.B. 739, for appropriate application to in- ventories of department stores employing the retail inventory and last-in, first-out inventory methods for tax years ended on, or with reference to, September 30, 2003. The Department Store Inventory Price Indexes are prepared on a national basis and include (a) 23 major groups of depart- ments, (b) three special combinations of the major groups — soft goods, durable goods, and miscellaneous goods, and (c) a store total, which covers all departments, including some not listed separately, ex- cept for the following: candy, food, liquor, tobacco, and contract departments. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DEPARTMENT STORE INVENTORY PRICE INDEXES BY DEPARTMENT GROUPS (January 1941 = 100, unless otherwise noted) GroupsSept. 2002Sept. 2003 Percent Change from Sept. 2002 to Sept. 2003 ¹ 1. PieceGoods .............................................484.6482.6-0.4 2. DomesticsandDraperies..................................574.2559.7-2.5 3. Women’sandChildren’sShoes ............................658.0651.9-0.9 4. Men’sShoes.............................................886.9847.3-4.5 5. Infants’Wear ............................................618.5611.8-1.1 6. Women’sUnderwear......................................548.2517.8-5.5 7. Women’sHosiery ........................................343.2355.53.6 8. Women’s and Girls’ Accessories...........................549.2584.66.4 9. Women’sOuterwearandGirls’Wear .......................385.7377.3-2.2 10. Men’sClothing ..........................................561.1542.3-3.4 11. Men’sFurnishings........................................593.8579.8-2.4 12. Boys’ClothingandFurnishings............................446.2448.20.4 13. Jewelry..................................................896.7875.9-2.3 14. Notions .................................................809.1788.2-2.6 15. ToiletArticlesandDrugs..................................971.4980.40.9 16. Furniture and Beddin g .................................... 625.9620.7-0.8 17. FloorCoverings..........................................601.1588.6-2.1 18. Housewares..............................................748.9717.2-4.2 19. MajorAppliances.........................................222.2210.3-5.4 20. RadioandTelevision......................................47.744.7-6.3 21. Recreation and Education 2 .................................85.481.9-4.1 22. Home Improve ments 2 ..................................... 124.9123.9-0.8 23. Automotive Accessories 2 ..................................112.0111.7-0.3 Groups1–15:SoftGoods........................................578.4568.8-1.7 Groups16–20:DurableGoods...................................407.9391.4-4.0 2003-48 I.R.B.1153December 1, 2003 BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DEPARTMENT STORE INVENTORY PRICE INDEXES BY DEPARTMENT GROUPS (January 1941 = 100, unless otherwise noted) GroupsSept. 2002Sept. 2003 Percent Change from Sept. 2002 to Sept. 2003 ¹ Groups 21–23: Misc. Goods 2 ....................................96.093.5-2.6 Store Total 3 ..............................................515.8504.3-2.2 1 Absence of a minus sign before the percentage change in this column signifies a price increase. 2 Indexes on a January 1986 = 100 base. 3 The store total index covers all departments, including some no t listed separately, except for the following: candy, food, liquor, tobacco and contract departments. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue rul- ing is Denise Carmichael of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). For further informa- tion regarding this revenue ruling, contact Ms. Carmichael at (202) 622–6888 (not a toll-free call). Section 702.—Income and Credits of Partner May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 704.—Partner’s Distributive Share May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 706.—Taxable Years of Partner and Partnership May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 708.—Continuation of Partnership May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 812.—Definition of Company’s Share and Policyholders’ Share Life insurance companies; computa- tion of required interest.This ruling pro- vides that a life insurance company cal- culates “required interest” under section 812(b)(2)(A) of the Code using the mean of the amount of the reserve at the begin- ning of the taxable year and the amount of the reserve at the end of such year. Rev. Rul. 2003–120 ISSUE What is the amount of reserves used to calculate “required interest” under sec- tion 812(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code? FACTS IC is a life insurance company subject to tax under Part I of subchapter L of the Internal Revenue Code (§§ 801–818). For purposes of determining its life insurance company taxable income, IC computes the amount of the section 807(c)(1) life insur- ance reserves under section 807(d)(2), us- ing the greater of the applicable Federal in- terest rate or the prevailing State assumed rate. For purposes of this revenue ruling, assume that the applicable Federal interest rate for the contracts is 6.0% and that the applicable Federal interest rate exceeds the prevailing State assumed rate for the con- tracts. On January 1, 200x, the opening balance of IC’s life insurance reserves (determined under section 807(d)(2)) equaled $1,000,000x. On December 31, 200x, the closing balance of IC’s life in- surance reserves for the contracts totaled $1,224,434x. LAW AND ANALYSIS To prevent a life insurance company from realizing a double benefit for tax-pre- ferred investment income (tax-exempt in- terest and dividends providing a dividends- received deduction) used to fund the com- pany’s liabilities to policyholders, sections 807 and 805 require the company to adjust certain income and deduction items for the policyholders’ share of such tax preferred income. To determine the increase or decrease in reserves for a taxable year, a life in- surance company reduces its end-of-year reserves by the “policyholders’ share” of tax-exempt interest. Section 807(a) and (b). The company’s deduction under sec- tion 805(a)(2) for a net increase in re- serves, therefore, is reduced by the pol- icyholders’ share of tax exempt interest. Conversely, if there is a net decrease in re- serves, the company’s gross income under section 803(a)(2) is increased by the pol- icyholders’ share of tax exempt interest. The adjustments effectively deny the com- pany any exclusion for the policyholders’ share of tax-exempt interest. December 1, 200311542003-48 I.R.B. Section 805(a)(4) prevents a double benefit with regard to dividends eligible for the dividends-received deduction by limiting a life insurance company’s de- duction for dividends (other than “100 percent dividends” as defined in section 805(a)(4)(C)) received by the company. The deduction is limited to the “com- pany’s share” of the dividends received. Seesection 805(a)(4)(A)(ii). No divi- dends-received deduction is allowed for the policyholders’ share of dividends re- ceived. Section 812 provides the mechanism to calculate the life insurance company’s and policyholders’ respective shares of net in- vestment income. For purposes of sec- tion 805(a)(4), the company’s share is the percentage obtained by dividing (1) the company’s share of the net investment in- come for the taxable year, by (2) the net investment income for the year. Section 812(a)(1). The policyholders’ share is the excess of 100 percent over the company’s percentage share. Section 812(a)(2). The first step in applying section 812 is to determine, under section 812(d), the amount of the life insurance company’s “gross investment income” for the taxable year. Next, “net investment income” for the taxable year is calculated under sec- tion 812(c). Except as otherwise provided insection812(c)(2)withregardtoincome attributable to assets held in a segregated asset account for variable contracts, the net investment income for a taxable year equals 90% of gross investment income for the year. Under section 812(b)(1), the life insurance company’s share of net in- vestment income is the excess (if any) of the net investment income for the taxable year over the sum of the “policy interest” for the taxable year and the “gross invest- ment income’s proportionate share of pol- icyholder dividends” for the taxable year. The policyholders’ share of net investment income, therefore, is the portion of net in- vestment income equal to the lesser of (1) the sum of policy interest and gross invest- ment income’s proportionate share of pol- icyholder dividends for the taxable year or (2) the total net investment income. Section 812(b)(2) provides that policy interest equals the sum of— (A) required interest (at the greater of the prevailing State assumed rate or the applicable Federal interest rate) on sec- tion 807(c) reserves (other than unearned premiums and unpaid losses under section 807(c)(2)); (B) the deductible portion of excess in- terest; (C) the deductible portion of any amount (whether or not a policyholder dividend) that is not taken into account under section 812(b)(2)(A) or (B) and that is credited either to (i) a policyholder’s fund under a pension plan contract for employees (other thanretired employees), or (ii) a deferred annuity contract before the annuity stating date; and (D) interest on amounts left on deposit with the company. If neither the prevailing State assumed in- terest rate nor the applicable Federal in- terest rate is used in determining the re- serve for a contract, required interest is cal- culated using another appropriate interest rate. Although required interest is a signifi- cant component of policy interest, section 812(b)(2) provides no guidance (other than the interest rates) regarding the method of calculating required interest. The leg- islative history that accompanied the en- actment of section 812 in 1984, however, states that “the formula used for purposes of determining the policyholders’ share is based generally on the proration formula used under prior law in computing gain or loss from operations (i.e., by reference to ‘required interest’).”SeeH. Rep. No. 432, Pt. 2, 98 th Cong., 2d Sess. 1430–31 (1984); S. Prt. 169, Vol. I, 98 th Cong. 2d Sess. 557–59 (1984). Under section 809(a)(2) of pre-1984 law, a life insurance company’s required interest for any taxable year equaled the sum of the products obtained by multiply- ing (i) each rate of interest required, or assumed by the taxpayer, in calculating the reserves described in section 810(c) of pre-1984 law [now section 807(c)], by (ii) the means of the amount of the reserves computed at that rate at the beginning and the end of the taxable year.See also section 1.809–2(d) of the Income Tax Reg- ulations. 1 As the formula in section 812 is based generally on the proration formula used under former section 809(a)(2), re- quired interest under section 812(b)(2)(A) is calculated using mean reserves. Ac- cordingly, required interest under section 812(b)(2)(A) equals the sum of products obtained by multiplying (i) the mean of the beginning-of-year and end-of-year re- serves under section 807(c)(1)–(6) (other than section 807(c)(2)) by (ii) the appli- cable interest rate (the prevailing State assumed interest rate, the applicable Fed- eral interest rate, or another appropriate interest rate). The opening balance of IC’s sec- tion 807(c)(1) life insurance reserves is $1,000,000x and the closing balance of the reserves is $1,224,434x. The mean of the reserves is $1,112,217x . Therefore, the required interest on the life insurance reserves is $66,733x [$1,112,217x 6% = $66,733x]. HOLDING Required interest under § 812(b)(2)(A) is calculated using the mean of the amount of the reserve at the beginning of the tax- able year and the amount of the reserve at the end of such year. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue rul- ing is Stephen Hooe of the Office of As- sociate Chief Counsel (Financial Institu- tions and Products). For further informa- tion regarding this revenue ruling, con- tact Mr. Hooe at (202) 622–7595 (not a toll-free call). Section 851.—Definition of Regulated Investment Company May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. 1 If provisions of pre-1984 law are incorporated into a current life insurance company tax provision, the regulations under the pre-1984 law may serve as an interpretative guide to the provision in the absence of any contrary guidance in the legislative history.SeeH. Rep. 432, at 1401; S. Prt. 169, at 524. 2003-48 I.R.B.1155December 1, 2003 Section 852.—Taxation of Regulated Investment Companies and Their Shareholders May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 1275.—Other Definitions and Special Rules May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 6001.—Notice or Regulations Requiring Records, Statements, and Special Returns 26 CFR 1.706–1: Taxable Years of partner and part- nership. May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 6031.—Return of Partnership Income 26 CFR 1.6031(a)–1T: Return of partnership income. May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 6229.—Period of Limitations for Making Assessments May a partner in a partnership that inv ests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly all ocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 6231.—Definitions and Special Rules May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 6233.—Extension to Entities Filing Partnership Returns, etc. May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 6698.—Failure to File Partnership Return May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 6722.—Failure to Furnish Correct Payee Statements May a partner in a partnership that invests in tax- exempt obligations make monthly allocations of part- nership items under section 706(a)? See Rev. Proc. 2003-84, page 1159. Section 7701.—Definitions 26 CFR 301.7701–3: Classification of certain busi- ness entities. T.D. 9093 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 Special Rules for Certain Foreign Business Entities AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Final regulations. SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations providing rules regarding the application of the general entity classifica- tion rules to certain foreign business enti- ties, in particular providing a rule that ter- minates the grandfathered status of certain foreign business entities upon a 50 percent change of ownership and a special rule that clarifies and further modifies the rules re- lating to whether the classification of cer- tain foreign eligible entities is relevant for Federal tax purposes. EFFECTIVE DATES: These regulations are effective as of October 22, 2003. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald M. Gootzeit, (202) 622–3860 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 18, 1996, Treasury and IRS published in theFederal Reg- ister(T.D. 8697, 1997–1 C.B. 215 [61 FR 66584]) final regulations relating to the classification of business enti- ties under section 7701 (check-the-box regulations). On November 29, 1999, Treasury and the IRS published in the Federal Registeranoticeofproposed rulemaking (REG–110385–99, 1999–2 C.B. 670 [64 FR 66591] proposing to amend §§301.7701–2 and 301.7701–3 of the current check-the-box regulations (proposed regulations). A public hearing on the proposed regulations was held on January 31, 2000. In addition, written comments were received. Most of the written and oral comments related to proposed §301.7701–3(h), which pro- vided a rule that would have operated to change the classification of a foreign disregarded entity if a so-called “extra- ordinary transaction” occurred one day before or within one year after the election to treat the entity as disregarded. On June 26, 2003, Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2003–46, 2003–28 I.R.B. 53, an- nouncing the intention to withdraw this extraordinary transaction rule of proposed §301.7701–3(h) and to finalize the remain- ing provisions of the proposed regulations. With the publication of a notice of withdrawal (REG-110385–99, published as Announcement 2003–78) elsewhere in this issue of the Bulletin, proposed §301.7701–3(h) is withdrawn. This Trea- sury decision adopts without substantive change the remaining provisions of the proposed regulations. The final regula- tions thus adopt the following provisions from the proposed regulations: (1) the rule that terminates the grandfathered status of certain foreign business entities when there has been a 50 percent change of ownership of such entity; (2) the provision clarifying that a foreign eligible entity withrespecttowhichanentityclassifi- cation election is made and which is not December 1, 200311562003-48 I.R.B. otherwise relevant for Federal tax pur- poses is deemed so relevant only on the effective date specified on a Form 8832, “Entity Classification Election”; and (3) the modifications to the classification rules for certain foreign eligible entities that have never been relevant or are no longer relevant for Federal tax purposes. Explanation of Provisions A.Grandfathered Foreign Per Se Entities The check-the-box regulations allow certain foreign business entities that were in existence and treated as partnerships prior to the date the check-the-box regula- tions were proposed (PS–43–95, 1996–1 C.B. 865 [61 FR 21989]) and that would otherwise be classified asper secor- porations under §301.7701–2(b)(8)(i) to remain classified as partnerships if the con- ditions enumerated in §301.7701–2(d)(1) are satisfied. These rules also provide that the occurrence of certain events results in a termination of this grandfathered sta- tus. See §301.7701–2(d)(3)(i). The final regulations adopt the rule in the proposed regulations at §301.7701–2(d)(3)(i) that provides an additional event resulting in the termination of an entity’s grandfa- thered status. Under this rule, an entity’s grandfathered status is terminated on the date when one or more persons who were not owners of the entity as of Novem- ber 29, 1999, own in the aggregate a 50 percent or greater interest in the entity. Consistent with the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide that this rule will apply as of the date the final regula- tions are published in the federal register; therefore, if persons that were not owners of a grandfathered entity on November 29, 1999, obtain a greater than 50 percent ownership interest between November 29, 1999, and October 22, 2003, the grandfa- thered entity will cease to have that status on October 22, 2003. Several commentators requested clari- fication as to whether this rule takes into account changes in direct ownership only or also changes in indirect ownership, and they suggested that the rule should take into account only changes in direct owner- ship. Treasury and the IRS believe that for purposes of grandfathered foreignper se entities a rule that took only direct changes of ownership into account could be eas- ily circumvented in inappropriate cases. Therefore, this rule has not been modi- fied in these final regulations. Some com- mentators requested that the rule be limited to significant changes in ownership within a specified period of time. For example, one commentator suggested that the rule be limited to situations where persons ob- tained a 50 percent or greater ownership interest within a 12-month period. The fi- nal regulations do not adopt this suggestion because Treasury and the IRS believe that an entity should retain grandfathered sta- tus only if there have been no significant changes in the ownership of that entity. B.Relevance of Classification The check-the-box regulations provide that if the classification of a foreign eligi- ble entity that was previously relevant for Federal tax purposes ceases to be relevant for 60 consecutive months and then sub- sequently becomes relevant again, the en- tity’s classification at the start of the sub- sequent period of relevance will be deter- mined under the default classification rules (60-month rule). These final regulations adopt the two rules in the proposed regulations that re- late to the application of the 60-month rule. First, these final regulations adopt the rule providing that the classification of a for- eign eligible entity that files an entity clas- sification election is deemed to be rele- vant for Federal tax purposes on the effec- tive date of the election for purposes of the 60-month rule. Second, these final regula- tions adopt the rule providing that the clas- sification of a foreign eligible entity whose classification has never been relevant for Federal tax purposes will initially be de- termined pursuant to the default classifi- cation provisions of §301.7701–3(b)(2) at the time the classification of the entity first becomes relevant. Commentators generally agreed with and supported the approach taken in the proposed regulations with respect to the relevance issues, and several commen- tators requested that these provisions be retroactive when finalized. These final regulations do not adopt the sug- gestion that these provisions be applied retroactively because Treasury and the IRS believe that it is not in the interest of sound tax administration. One commentator requested that the provisions be revised to clarify that it is the Federal tax classification of the foreign eligible entity, and not the entity itself, that is deemed to be relevant. Treasury and the IRS have adopted this clarifying change in these final regulations. One commentator requested that the regulations clarify why the classification of a foreign eligible entity, not otherwise relevant, that files Form 8832,“Entity Classification Election”, is deemed rele- vant only on the date the entity classifica- tion election is effective. The commenta- tor neither suggested what the period of deemed relevance should be if not limited to one day nor suggested a principle for when the deemed relevance should termi- nate such that the 60-month rule would be triggered. In the interest of certainty and administrability of the application of the 60-month rule, Treasury and the IRS have retained the limitation of deemed relevance to the day on which the entity’s classification is effective. One commentator requested further guidance on when and under what cir- cumstances the classification of a foreign eligible entity that was previously rel- evant ceases to be relevant under the 60-month rule. Treasury and the IRS be- lieve §301.7701–3(d)(1) and (3) provide sufficient guidance on when an entity’s classification becomes relevant and, ac- cordingly, when an entity’s classification ceases to be relevant. One commentator suggested that the regulations be revised to provide that an election by a non-relevant foreign entity to continue its current classification may be filed at any time within the 60-month period starting on the day after the date of the most recent election for that entity, and that such election will start a new 60-month period. Section 301.7701–3(c) provides that an eligible entity may elect to be classified other than as provided under the default classification rules of §301.7701–3(b), or to change its elec- tion. Allowing an eligible entity whose classification is not relevant to renew its election for purposes of the 60-month rule would frustrate the policies underlying that rule. Accordingly, the suggestion was not adopted. One commentator requested clarifica- tion and examples regarding the determi- nation of the classification of a foreign 2003-48 I.R.B.1157December 1, 2003 eligible entity whose classification was never relevant or whose classification has not been relevant for 60 months and therefore has lapsed under the 60-month rule. In either case (assuming in the latter case that no election is made following the lapse of the classification), the entity’s classification initially will be determined under the default classification rules of §301.7701–3(b)(2) when the classification of the entity becomes relevant. Under the general rules of §301.7701–3(c), an eligible entity may elect at such time to be classified other than as provided under the default classification rules, and may elect at some later time to change its clas- sification. Treasury and the IRS do not believe at this time that further guidance or examples are needed to illustrate these general rules. Special Analyses It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory as- sessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Ad- ministrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chap- ter 5) does not apply to these final regu- lations, and because these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analy- sis is not required. Drafting Information The principal authors of these regula- tions are Aaron A. Farmer and Ronald M. Gootzeit, Office of Associate Chief Coun- sel (International). However, other person- nel from the Treasury and the IRS partici- pated in their development. ***** Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is pro- posedtobeamendedasfollows: PART 301—PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION Par. 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in part as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * Par. 2. Section 301.7701–2 is amended by: 1. Removing the language “or” at the end of paragraph (d)(3)(i)(B). 2. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (d)(3)(i)(C) and adding “; or” in its place. 3. Adding paragraph (d)(3)(i)(D). 4. Adding a sentence at the end of para- graph (e). The additions read as follows: §301.7701–2 Business entities; definitions. ***** (d) * * * (3) * * * (i) * * * (D) The date any person or persons, who were not owners of the entity as of November 29, 1999, own in the aggregate a 50 percent or greater interest in the entity. ***** (e)Effective date. * * * However, para- graph (d)(3)(i)(D) of this section applies on or after October 22, 2003. Par. 3. Section 301.7701–3 is amended as follows: 1. The text of paragraph (d)(1) follow- ing the paragraph heading is redesignated as paragraph (d)(1)(i), and a paragraph heading is added for paragraph (d)(1)(i). 2. Paragraph (d)(1)(ii) is added. 3. Paragraph (d)(2) is revised. 4. Paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(4) are added. The revision and additions read as fol- lows: §301.7701–3 Classification of certain business entities. ***** (d)Special rules for foreign eligible entities—(1)Definition of relevance—(i) General rule.*** (ii)Deemed relevance—(A)General rule. For purposes of this section, except as provided in paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B) of this section, the classification for Federal tax purposes of a foreign eligible entity that files Form 8832,“Entity Classifi- cation Election”, shall be deemed to be relevant only on the date the entity classi- fication election is effective. (B)Exception. If the classification of a foreign eligible entity is relevant within the meaning of paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, then the rule in paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(A) of this section shall not apply. (2)Entities the classification of which has never been relevant. If the classifica- tion of a foreign eligible entity has never been relevant (as defined in paragraph (d)(1) of this section), then the entity’s classification will initially be determined pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section when the classifica- tion of the entity first becomes relevant (as defined in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section). (3)Special rule when classification is no longer relevant. If the classification of a foreign eligible entity is not relevant (as defined in paragraph (d)(1) of this section) for 60 consecutive months, then the en- tity’s classification will initially be deter- mined pursuant to the provisions of para- graph (b)(2) of this section when the clas- sification of the foreign eligible entity be- comes relevant (as defined in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section). The date that the classification of a foreign entity is not rele- vant is the date an event occurs that causes theclassificationtonolongerberelevant, or, if no event occurs in a taxable year that causes the classification to be relevant, then the date is the first day of that taxable year. (4)Effective date. Paragraphs (d)(1)(ii), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section apply on or after October 22, 2003. ***** Robert E. Wenzel, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Approved October 8, 2003. Pamela F. Olson, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on October 21, 2003, 8:45 a.m., a nd published in the issue of the Federal Register for October 22, 2003, 68 F.R. 60286) December 1, 200311582003-48 I.R.B. Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Social Security Contribution and Benefit Base for 2004 Notice 2003–66 Under authority contained in the So- cial Security Act (“the Act”), the Commis- sioner, Social Security Administration, has determined and announced (68 F.R. 60437, dated October 22, 2003) that the contri- bution and benefit base for remuneration paid in 2004, and self-employment income earned in taxable years beginning in 2004 is $87,900. “Old-Law” Contribution and Benefit Base General The “old-law” contribution and bene- fit base for 2004 is $65,100. This is the base that would have been effective under the Act without the enactment of the 1977 amendments. We compute the base under section 230(b) of the Act as it read prior to the 1977 amendments. The “old-law” contribution and benefit base is used by: (a) The Railroad Retirement program to determine certain tax liabilities and tier II benefits payable under that program to supplement the tier I payments which cor- respond to basic Social Security benefits, (b) The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to determine the maximum amount of pension guaranteed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (as stated in section 230(d) of the Social Security Act), (c) Social Security to determine a year of coverage in computing the special min- imum benefit, as described earlier, and (d) Social Security to determine a year of coverage (acquired whenever earnings equal or exceed 25 percent of the “old-law” base for this purpose only) in computing benefits for persons who are also eligible to receive pensions based on employment not covered under section 210 of the Act. Domestic Employee Coverage Threshold General The minimum amount a domestic worker must earn so that such earnings are covered under Social Security or Medicare is the domestic employee coverage thresh- old. For 2004, this threshold is $1,400. Section 3121(x) of the Internal Revenue Code provides the formula for increasing the threshold. Computation Under the formula, the domestic em- ployee coverage threshold amount for 2004 shall be equal to the 1995 amount of $1,000 multiplied by the ratio of the national average wage index for 2002 to that for 1993. If the resulting amount is not a multiple of $100, it shall be rounded to the next lower multiple of $100. Domestic Employee Coverage Threshold Amount Multiplying the 1995 domestic em- ployee coverage threshold amount ($1,000) by the ratio of the national average wage index for 2002 ($33,252.09) to that for 1993 ($23,132.67) produces the amount of $1,437.45. We then round this amount to $1,400. Accordingly, the domestic employee coverage threshold amount is $1,400 for 2004. (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on October 21, 2003, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for October 22, 2003, 68 F.R. 60437) 26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims for refund, credit or abatement; determination of correct tax liability. (Also: §§ 171, 702, 704, 706, 708, 851, 852, 1275, 6229, 6231, 6233, 6698, 6722; 1.706–1, 1.6001–1(a), 1.6031(a)–1T.) Rev. Proc. 2003–84 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This revenue procedure allows certain partnerships that invest in tax-exempt obli- gations to make an election that enables the partners to take into account monthly the inclusions required under §§ 702 and 707(c) of the Internal Revenue Code and provides rules for partnership income tax reporting under § 6031 for such partner- ships. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND A partnership may be used to create the economic equivalent of a variable-rate tax- exempt bond. To create this instrument, a sponsor purchases a tax-exempt obligation and transfers the tax-exempt obligation to an entity that qualifies as a partnership for federal tax purposes (tax-exempt-bond partnership). The tax-exempt-bond part- nership issues two classes of equity inter- ests: interests that are entitled to a pre- ferred variable return on its capital (vari- able-rate interests) and interests that are entitled to all of the remaining income of the partnership (inverse interest). The vari- able return on the variable-rate interests tracks current short-term exempt yields. Under § 702(b), tax-exempt interest in- come received by a partnership retains its character when the partnership allocates the income to a partner. Under § 706(a), a partner generally in- cludes in income for a taxable year the partner’s allocable share of items of part- nership income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit for the partnership’s taxable year ending within or with the partner’s taxable year. A partner must also include in in- come for a taxable year guaranteed pay- ments under § 707(c) that are taken into ac- count by the partnership under its method of accounting in the partnership’s taxable year ending within or with the partner’s taxable year. Moreover, for each taxable year in which a partnership has income, de- ductions, or credits, § 6031(a) and (b) re- quires the partnership to file a Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income,andto issue Schedules K–1 (Form 1065) to each partner. Annual inclusion of income under § 706(a) can be incompatible with the needs of money market funds and of medium- and long-term bond funds that invest in obligations that produce interest that is exempt from tax. For example, if a regulated investment company’s (RIC’s) taxable year does not correspond to the taxable year of a tax-exempt-bond partner- ship in which it holds an interest, the RIC 2003-48 I.R.B.1159December 1, 2003 may not be allocated sufficient tax-exempt interest income from the partnership to pay exempt-interest dividends quarterly. See§852. To resolve this problem, many tax-ex- empt-bond partnerships attempted to make an election under § 761(a) to be excluded from the provisions of subchapter K. A tax-exempt-bond partnership is not eligi- ble to elect to be wholly or partially ex- cluded from subchapter K, however, and an attempted election has no effect. Two of the requirements for eligibility to make an election under § 761(a) are that the part- ners must own the partnership property as co-owners and the partners must be able to compute their income without the ne- cessity of computing partnership taxable income.See§ 1.761–2(a)(1) and (2) of the Income Tax Regulations. If a business entity (classified as a partnership) owns a tax-exempt bond and issues member- ship interests that apportion the benefits and burdens of that bond to its members in a manner that differs significantly from direct investment in the bond, the hold- ers of those membership interests do not satisfy the requirement that they own the partnership property as co-owners.Cf. § 301.7701–4(c) of the Procedure and Ad- ministration Regulations. Moreover, if one class of partners has a right to partnership income that is superior to the right of an- other class of partners, then the net partner- ship income or loss allocated to the part- ners with inferior rights to partnership in- come can be determined only by comput- ing the net income or loss of the partner- ship and then by reducing that net income by income allocable to partners with supe- rior rights to partnership income. Such a partnership does not meet the requirement of § 1.761–2(a)(1) that the members of the organization be able to compute their in- comes without the necessity of computing partnership income. To assist tax-exempt-bond partner- ships to meet the needs of the market for tax-exempt obligations within the require- ments of the Internal Revenue Code, the Internal Revenue Service (Service) has issued two revenue procedures. Rev. Proc. 2002–16, 2002–1 C.B. 572, was issued to allow money market fund partners in tax-exempt-bond partnerships to take into account on a monthly basis their distribu- tive shares of partnership items (monthly closing) if the partnership made an effec- tive election under that revenue procedure (monthly closing election). Rev. Proc. 2002–68, 2002–2 C.B. 753, modified and superseded Rev. Proc. 2002–16 to extend the monthly closing election to all partners in tax-exempt-bond partnerships and established a transition rule. The transition rule provides that for any taxable year beginning before January 1, 2004, the Service will not challenge a partnership’s or a partner’s tax treatment that is consistent with an election to be ex- cluded from the provisions of subchapter K under § 761(a), provided that the partner- shipwouldbeaneligible partnership as de- fined in Rev. Proc. 2002–68 and the part- ners’ inclusion of income, gain, loss, de- duction and credits is consistent with that permitted under the revenue procedure. In Rev. Proc. 2002–68, the Service also requested comments on simplified in- come tax reporting procedures for some or all of the eligible tax-exempt-bond partner- ships. This revenue procedure is issued in response to comments received. SECTION 3. SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES This revenue procedure modifies and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2002–68 by ma k- ing the following changes: .01 Section 4 of this revenue proc edure expands the definition of tax-e xempt-bond partnerships that are eligibl etomakea monthly closing election and p rovides that all partners must consent to t he election. .02 Section 5.01 of this revenu e proce- dure provides that a monthly c losing elec- tion is made by including a binding provi- sion to that effect in the p artnership’s gov- erning documents. .03 Section 8 of this reven ue proce- dure provides that a part nership that has a monthly closing electio nineffectforthe partnership’s entire taxable year and that meets the other requi rements of section 8 of this revenue proc edure is not required to file a Form 1065 or to issue Schedules K–1 (Form 1065) to its p artners for the taxable year. .04 Section 9.02( 3) of this revenue pro- cedure provides g randfathering rules. SECTION 4. SCOPE This revenue procedure applies to el- igible partnerships (described in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure) that make a monthly closing election (described in sec- tion 5 of this revenue procedure). .01Eligible Partnership.Anentityisan eligible partnership for a calendar month if all of the following conditions are met: (1) As of the election test date and as of every operational test date that occurs on or before the end of such calendar month, the partnership satisfies both the income test and the expense test. The test dates are describedinsection4.05ofthisrevenue procedure, and the income test and the ex- pensetestaredescribedinsection4.02and section 4.03, respectively. (2) The entity is a partnership for fed- eral tax purposes; (3) All allocations of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit of the partnership are made in accordance with § 704(b); and (4) A written partnership agreement (or other governing document) provides that — (a) the entity is making the monthly closing election under this revenue proce- dure; and, (b) all partners consent to the election. .02Income test. At least 95 percent of the partnership’s gross income (computed without regard to items described in sec- tion 4.04 of this revenue procedure) is or is reasonably expected to be from: (1) interest on tax-exempt obliga- tions as defined in § 1275(a)(3) and § 1.1275–1(e); (2) exempt-interest dividends as de- fined in § 852(b)(5) that are paid by a RIC as defined in § 851(a); and (3) gain from the sale, redemption, or other disposition of assets generating the income described in section 4.02(1) and (2) of this revenue procedure and income from the temporary investment (for a pe- riod no greater than 7 months) of the pro- ceeds of the disposition, but only if the as- sets that are sold, redeemed, or disposed are original assets of the partnership. For this purpose, an asset is an original asset of the partnership if the asset is contributed to the partnership or is acquired with cap- italcontributedtothepartnership(andnot with the proceeds of the sale, redemption, or other disposition of a partnership asset). December 1, 200311602003-48 I.R.B. .03Expense test. Substantially all of the partnership’s expenses and deduc- tions (computed without regard to items describedinsection4.04ofthisrevenue procedure) are properly allocable to: (1) producing, collecting, managing, protecting, and conserving the income described in section 4.02(1), (2), or (3) of this revenue procedure or the assets generating the income; (2) acquiring, managing, conserving, maintaining, or disposing of property held for the production of the income described in section 4.02(1), (2), or (3) of this rev- enue procedure; and (3) servicing the equity in the partner- ship. .04Exclusion. For the purposes of sec- tions 4.02 and 4.03 of this revenue proce- dure, reasonable amounts charged to per- sons requesting information from the part- nership under section 8.03 of this revenue procedure and the costs of collecting, man- aging, computing, and supplying the infor- mation are not taken into account. .05Test Dates and Test Periods.Thein- cometestdescribedinsection4.02ofthis revenue procedure and the expense test de- scribedinsection4.03ofthisrevenuepro- cedure must be satisfied both as of the first day of the first month for which the part- nership’s monthly closing election is effec- tive (the election test date) and, beginning with the fourth month after the partner- ship’s monthly closing election becomes effective, on the last day of each month (the operational test date). The partnership de- termines whether the income test and the expense test are satisfied as of the elec- tion test date by reference to the election test period. The partnership determines whether the income test and expense test are satisfied as of each operational test date by reference to the operational test period. In applying the income and expense tests for a test period, a termination of the part- nership under § 708(b)(1)(B) during that period is ignored. (1)The Election Test Period. The elec- tion test period differs depending upon how long the partnership has been in exis- tence (determined from its start-up date). A partnership’s start-up date is the later of the date the entity had more than one owner and the date the entity had more than ade minimisamount of assets. (a) If, on the election test date, the part- nership has been in existence for at least 6 full calendar months, then the test period is the longer of the 6 full calendar months preceding the election test date and the portion of the partnership’s taxable year that precedes the election test date; and (b) If, on the election test date, the part- nership has not been in existence for at least 6 full calendar months, then the elec- tion test period is the first 6 full calendar months of the partnership’s existence. (2)The Operational Test Period.The operational test period is the 3-calendar- month period consisting of the calendar month within which the operational test date falls and the preceding 2 calendar months. SECTION 5. MAKING THE MONTHLY CLOSING ELECTION .01Manner of Making the Election.An eligible partnership makes a monthly clos- ing election by providing in the entity’s governing documents that— (a) the partnership is making a monthly closing election that is effective as pro- vided under section 5.02 of this revenue procedure, and (b) all partners consent to the election. .02Effective Date of the Election.The monthly closing election is effective on the later of: (a) the start-up date of the partnership (as defined in section 4.05(1) of this rev- enue procedure), or (b) the first day of the month in which theprovisiondescribedinsection5.01of this revenue procedure is first included in the entity’s governing documents. .03Terminations under § 708(b)(1)(B). A termination of the partnership under § 708(b)(1)(B) does not terminate the monthly closing election and does not cause the partnership to close its books under § 1.706–1(c) other than as described in section 6 of this revenue procedure. SECTION 6. MONTHLY CLO SING OF THE BOOKS If, at the end of any calendar month, an eligible partnership has a monthly clos- ing election in effect, then, with respect to each partner, the partnership must close its books as described in § 1.706–1(c)(2) as if each partner had sold its entire in- terest in the partnership on the last day of that month. Each partner must include in its taxable income for that month both the partner’s distributive share of items de- scribed in § 702(a) with respect to the part- ner that were earned by the partnership since either the last closing of the books or the first day of the partnership’s taxable year (whichever is later) and any guaran- teed payments under § 707(c) to the part- ner that are taken into account by the part- nership since the last closing of the books. If a partner is on a 52–53 week taxable year, then the provisions of § 1.441–2(e) apply as if the last day of the month were the last day of the partnership’s taxable year. SECTION 7. TERMINATION OF MONTHLY CLOSING ELECTION AND RE-ELECTION AFTER TERMINATION .01 A partnership’s monthly closing election terminates as of the first day of the month during which a partnership first fails to be an eligible partnership a s defined in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure. .02 If the partnership’s monthly closing election terminates, the partnershi pmay not make another monthly closing ele ction without the consent of the Commissi oner. .03 A partnership’s monthly closing election may be revoked only with th e consent of the Commissioner. SECTION 8. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .01Initial Filing Requirement.Apart- nership must file an abbreviated Form 1065,U.S. Return of Partnership Income, for the first taxable year during which the monthly closing election was in effect. The abbreviated Form 1065 must be filed by the date that the partnership’s income tax return for that taxable year would ordinarily be due and must be signed by a person with the authority to sign the part- nership’s Form 1065. The words “Filed in Accordance with Rev. Proc. 2003–84” must be typed or printed across the top of the form. The partnership is required to provide only the following information on the abbreviated Form 1065: (1) A statement that the partnership has made an election under this revenue proce- dure to which all present and future part- ners consent; 2003-48 I.R.B.1161December 1, 2003 (2) Identification of the partnership by name, address, and EIN; (3) The name, title, address, and phone number of the contact person from whom partners, beneficial owners, middlemen, and the Internal Revenue Service may re- quest information about the partnership; (4) The issue date of the partnership in- terests and the CUSIP (Committee on Uni- form Securities Identification Procedures) number or other identification of each class of partnership interest; (5) A statement that the entity’s govern- ing documents expressly provide that the entity is making a monthly closing elec- tion; and (6) The effective month of the election and the start-up date of the partnership. Seesection 4.05(1) of this revenue proce- dure for a definition of the start-up date. .02Annual Filing Requirements. (1)Elimination of Annual Filing Re- quirements. A partnership is not required tofileaForm1065,U.S. Return of Part- nership Income, or to issue Schedules K–1 (Form 1065) to its partners for any taxable year if the following requirements are sat- isfied: (a) The partnership’s monthly closing election is effective for the partnership’s entire taxable year; (b) The partnership makes the initial fil- ing described in section 8.01 of this rev- enue procedure; (c) A written partnership agreement (or other governing document) provides that — (i) the entity and its partners will com- ply with the reporting requirements of sec- tions 8.02 and 8.03, and 8.04 of this rev- enue procedure in lieu of complying with the requirements of § 6031(a) through (d), and, (ii) all partners consent to such report- ing; and (d) The partnership complies with the requirements of sections 8.03 and 8.04 of this revenue procedure. (2)Effect of Elimination of Annual Fil- ing Requirement. An entity that is not re- quired to file a partnership return under this revenue procedure is not required to file a partnership return under § 6031(a) and, as a result, is not a partnership as defined un- der § 6231(a)(1). Consequently, the entity and its members will not be subject to the provisions of subchapter C of chapter 63. An abbreviated Form 1065 used to make the initial filing described in section 8.01 of this revenue procedure is not considered to be a partnership return for purposes of § 6233. (3)Monthly Closing Election Effective for Portion of Taxable Year. A partnership that makes a monthly closing election that is effective after the first day of its taxable year must comply withthe partnership re- porting rules of § 6031(a) for that taxable year (but is still permitted to close its books on a monthly basis). If the partnership also makes the initial filing described in sec- tion 8.01 of this revenue procedure by the due date for its return for the first full tax- able year during which the monthly clos- ingelectionisineffect,thenthepartner- ship qualifies for elimination of annual fil- ing requirements under section 8.01 of this revenue procedure for subsequent taxable years. (4)Annual Reporting Required.Fail- ure to qualify for the elimination of annual filing requirements under section 8.02(1) of this revenue procedure does not ter- minate the partnership’s monthly closing election. However, a partnership that fails to satisfy all of the requirements of sec- tion 8.02(1) of this revenue procedure is re- quired to file a complete (not abbreviated) Form 1065 and to issue Schedules K–1 (Form 1065) to its partners as required by § 6031(a). A partnership that fails to file a Form 1065 or to issue Schedules K–1 as re- quired is subject to the applicable penalties under §§ 6698 and 6722 for failure to file a partnership return and to furnish payee statements, as well as any other applicable penalties. Moreover, if a partnership is re- quired to file a return under § 6031(a) but fails to do so, the period of limitations on assessment of tax attributable to items of that partnership remains open indefinitely under § 6229(a). .03Requests for Information.Within 45 days of a request by the Service or a partner (or a beneficial owner or a nomi- nee of a beneficial owner), the partnership must make available all the information necessary to compute a partner’s taxable income, tax-exempt income, gain, loss, de- duction, or credit, including sufficient in- formation for a partner to determine the portion of the tax-exempt interest that may be subject to the alternative minimum tax and information regarding each partner’s share of any bond premium amortization under § 171, any market or original issue discount, and capital gain or loss. .04Nominee and Beneficial Ownership Reporting. (1) If an eligible electing partnership complies with the requirements of sections 8.02 and 8.03 of this revenue procedure, the nominee reporting requirements of § 6031(c) and the regulations thereunder do not apply. In place of those require- ments, the partnership and the partners must comply with this section 8.04.See § 1.6001–1(a) and (e) for rules that apply to recordkeeping requirements. (2) Any person on whose behalf another person holds as a nominee an interest in an eligible partnership (a beneficial owner), other than a beneficial owner for which the relevant advisor or manager agrees to com- ply with section 8.04(3) of this revenue procedure, shall notify the partnership of its beneficial ownership status and provide the partnership with: (a) its name, address, and taxpayer identification number and the name, ad- dress, and taxpayer identification number of its nominee; and (b) the name of the partnership, its CUSIP number or other information suf- ficient to identify the partnership interest, and the amount of the partnership interest. (3)InthecaseofagroupofRICsthat is managed or advised by a common, or af- filiated, manager or advisor (the manager), the manager may elect to be responsible for collecting, retaining, and providing the Service upon demand the beneficial own- ership information. To make such an elec- tion, the manager must provide each eligi- ble partnership in which any of the RICs has an equity interest a statement indicat- ing that it is responsible for collecting, re- taining, and providing the Service upon demand the beneficial ownership informa- tion that otherwise would be required to be provided directly to the eligible partner- ships by the beneficial owners. In addition, the manager must provide the partnership with: (a) its name, address, and taxpayer identification number and contact infor- mation for the person from whom the Service can request beneficial ownership information; and (b) the name of the partnership, its CUSIP number or other information suffi- cient to identify the partnership interests, December 1, 200311622003-48 I.R.B. and the amount of the partnership inter- ests. SECTION 9 EFFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSITION RULES .01In General. This revenue procedure is effective on November 5, 2003. .02Grandfathering Rules. (1) If, prior to January 1, 2004, under the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002–16 or Rev. Proc. 2002–68, a partnership made an effective Monthly Closing election and a partner consented to the election, then the partnership and the partner may continue to comply with either Rev. Proc. 2002–16 or Rev. Proc. 2002–68, as applicable, ex- cept that monthly statements are not re- quired. (2) Except as provided in section 9.02(4) of this revenue procedure, if, prior to January 1, 2004, under the pro- visions of Rev. Proc. 2002–16 or Rev. Proc. 2002–68, a partnership made an effective Monthly Closing election and a partner consented to the election and if the partnership and partner consistently report the transaction in a manner that i s consistent with an election to be exclud ed from the provisions of subchapter K und er § 761(a), then the Service will not cha l- lenge that treatment. If section 9.02 (4) of this revenue procedure causes this p ara- graph (2) to cease to apply, the pa rtner and partnership remain eligible fo ranyrelief described in paragraph (1) abo ve that they are otherwise entitled to enjo y. (3) Except as provided in secti on 9.02(4) of this revenue proced ure, if a partnership’s start-up dat eisbefore January 1, 2004, the Servi ce will not challenge the partnershi p’s or its partners’ tax treatment that is con sistent with an electiontobeexcludedf rom the provi- sions of subchapter K un der § 761(a) for any taxable year durin g all of which the entityisaneligibl e partnership as defined in section 4.01 of th is revenue procedure (without regard to section 4.01(4) of this revenue procedure ).Seesection 4.05(1) of this revenue procedure for the definition of a partnership’s start-up date. (4) If, on or after January 1, 2005, a partnership acquires new assets, then, as of thefirstdayofthemonthinwhichthenew assets are acquired, the partnership is no longer eligible for the grandfathering rule provided in section 9.02(2) or (3) of this revenue procedure. For purposes of the preceding sentence, none of the following is treated as the acquisition of a new asset by the partnership: (a) The receipt of payment (including temporary investment of that payment) on, or in respect of, a sale, redemption, or other disposition of an asset of the partnership; (b) The receipt of a contribution in cash (including temporary investment of that cash) to fund expenses of the partnership described in section 4.03 of this revenue procedure or to fund distributions to part- ners in respect of accrued but unpaid tax- exempt interest (including accrued but un- paid tax-exempt original issue discount); or (c) The acquisition of an asset pursuant to a plan to keep the principal balance of the assets in the partnership stable by rein- vesting principal payments. (5) For purposes of section 9.02(4) of this revenue procedure)— (a) An investment is temporary if it is held for 7 months or less; and (b) If an asset was acquired with reason- able certainty it would be a temporary in- vestment but, due to unforeseeable circum- stances, it is held for more than 7 months, then, for purposes of section 9.02(4) of this revenue procedure, it is treated as acquired on the first day that it has been held for more than 7 months. SECTION 10 EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS Rev. Proc. 2002–68 is modif ied and superseded. SECTION 11 PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collection of information con- tained in this revenue procedure has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accor- dance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545–1768. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information un- less the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Thecollectionofinformationisinsec- tion 8 of this revenue procedure. The col- lection of information is required to ob- tain a benefit, and is required to inform the Service which partnerships are making the monthly closing election. The likely re- spondents are businesses. The estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden is 500 hours. The estimated annual burden per re- spondent/recordkeeper is 1/2 hour. The es- timated number of respondents and record- keepers is 1,000. The estimated annual frequency of re- sponses (used for reporting requiremen ts only) is once. Books or records relating to a collectio n of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any interna lrevenue law. Generally tax returns and ta xreturn information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this rev- enue procedure is David A. Shulman of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries). For further information regarding this revenue procedure, contact Mr. Shulman at (202) 622–3070 (not a toll-free call). 2003-48 I.R.B.1163December 1, 2003 Part IV. Items of General Interest Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Public Hearing Mortgage Revenue Bonds REG–146692–03 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing. SUMMARY: This document contains pro- posed regulations that provide guidance re- garding the limitation on the effective rate of mortgage interest for purposes of mort- gage revenue bonds issued by State and lo- cal governments. This document also con- tains a notice of public hearing on these proposed regulations. DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by January 7, 2004. Out- lines of topics to be discussed at the pub- lic hearing scheduled for January 28, 2004, at 10 a.m., must be received by January 7, 2004. ADDRESSES: Send submissions to CC:PA:LPD:PR(REG–146692–03), room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Wash- ington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–146692–03), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Wash- ington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit comments electronically to the IRS Internet site atwww.irs.gov/regs.The public hearing will be held in the Audi- torium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the regulations, Michael P. Brewer, (202) 622–3980; con- cerning submissions of comments, the hearing, and requests to be placed on the building access list to attend the meeting, Treena V. Garrett, (202) 622–3401 (not toll-free numbers). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Section 103(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code) provides that, gen- erally, interest on any State or local bond is not included in gross income. However, this exclusion does not apply to any private activity bond that is not a qualified bond. A.Mortgage Revenue Bonds Section 141(e)(1) provides that a qual- ified mortgage bond or a qualified veter- ans’ mortgage bond (together, mortgage revenue bonds) issued under section 143 maybeaqualifiedbond. Sections 143(a)(2)(A)(ii) and 143(b) provide, in part, that for an issue to be an issue of qualified mortgage bonds or qualified veterans’ mortgage bonds, respectively, the issue must satisfy the requirements of section 143(g). Section 143(g)(1) provides that an issue will meet the requirements of section 143(g) if the issue satisfies the requirements of section 143(g)(2) and, in the case of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to be used to provide residences for veterans, if the issue satisfies the re- quirements of section 143(g)(3). Section 143(g)(2)(A) provides that an issue will meet the requirements of section 143(g)(2) only if the excess of (1) the ef- fective interest rate on the mortgages pro- vided under the issue, over (2) the yield on the issue, is not greater than 1.125 percent- age points. Section 143(g)(2)(B)(i) provides that in determining the effective rate of interest on any mortgage for purposes of section 143(g)(2), all fees, charges, and other amounts borne by the mortgagor that are attributable to the mortgage or the bond issue are taken into account. Section 143(g)(2)(B)(ii) provides that, for purposes of determining the effective rate of mortgage interest, the following items (among others) shall be treated as borne by the mortgagor: (1) All points or similar charges paid by the seller of the property; and (2) the excess of the amounts received from any person other than the mortgagor by any person in connection with the acquisition of the mortgagor’s in- terest in the property over the usual and reasonable acquisition costs of a person ac- quiring like property when owner-financ- ing is not provided through the use of mort- gage revenue bonds. Section 143(g)(2)(B)(iii) provides that, for purposes of determining the effective rate of mortgage interest, the following items shall not be taken into account: (1) Any expected rebate of arbitrage profits; and (2) any application fee, survey fee, credit report fee, insurance charge, or simi- lar amount to the extent such amount does not exceed amounts charged in such area in cases when owner-financing is not pro- vided through the use of mortgage revenue bonds. The exclusion for application fees, survey fees, credit report fees, insurance charges, or similar amounts does not ap- ply to origination fees, points, or similar amounts. In the case of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to be used to provide residences for veter- ans, section 143(g)(3)provides that certain earnings on nonpurpose investments must either be paid or credited to mortgagors, or paid to the United States, in certain circum- stances. In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99–514 (the 1986 Act), Congress re- organized sections 103 and 103A of the In- ternal Revenue Code of 1954 (1954 Code) regarding tax-exempt bonds into sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. Congress intended that to the extent not amended by the 1986 Act, all principles of pre-1986 Act law would continue to ap- ply to the reorganized provisions. 2 H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 841, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. II–686 (1986), 1986–3 (Vol. 4) C.B. 686. Interpreting section 103A(i)(2)(B)(iii) of the 1954 Code, which is substantially identical to section 143(g)(2)(B)(iii) of the Code, §6a.103A–2(i)(2)(ii)(C) of the Tem- porary Income Tax Regulations provides the following: “For example, amounts paid for FHA, VA, or similar private mortgage insurance on an individual’s mortgage need not be taken into account so long as such amounts do not exceed the amounts charged in the area with respect to a similar mortgage that is not financed with qualified mortgage bonds. Premiums charged for pool mortgage insurance will be considered amounts in excess of the usual and reasonable amounts charged for December 1, 200311642003-48 I.R.B. insurance in cases where owner financing is not provided through the use of qual- ified mortgage bonds.” Pool mortgage insurance is not defined in the regulations. B.Qualified Guarantees Under §1.148–4(f), for purposes of computing yield on an issue, fees paid for a qualified guarantee for the issue are treated as additional interest on the issue. In general, a guarantee is a qualified guar- antee if: (1) As of the date the guarantee is obtained, the issuer reasonably expects that the present value of the fees for the guarantee will be less than the present value of the expected interest savings on the issue as a result of the guarantee; (2) the arrangement creates a guarantee in sub- stance; and (3) the fees for the guarantee do not exceed a reasonable, arm’s-length charge for the transfer of credit risk. The regulations provide that the guarantee of a loan of proceeds of an issue, as opposed to a guarantee of the issue, may constitute a qualified guarantee, but this rule does not apply to guarantees of mortgages financed with mortgage revenue bonds. Explanation of Provisions A.Pool Mortgage Insurance Recently, questions have arisen regard- ing whether an issuer should be required to treat the portion of the interest payments on a pool of mortgages used to pay fees for a guarantee of a pass-through secu- rity backed by the pool of mortgages as an amount borne by the mortgagors that must be taken into account in determining the effective rate of interest on the mort- gages for purposes of section 143(g). Tak- ing the guarantee fees into account results in a higher effective rate of interest on the mortgages than if the fees were not taken into account. The IRS and Treasury Department have determined that the guarantee fees should not be treated as amounts borne by the mortgagors that must be taken into account in determining the effective rate of inter- est on the mortgages for purposes of sec- tion 143(g). An issuer may achieve sub- stantially the same result as not taking the guarantee fees into account in computing the effective rate of interest on the mort- gages by substituting a qualified guarantee on the bonds for the guarantee of the pool of mortgages. If an issuer does not take the mortgage guarantee fees into account in computing the effective rate of interest on the mortgages, the difference between the bond yield and the effective rate on the mortgages is reduced because the effective rate on the mortgages is reduced. A qual- ified guarantee of the bonds accomplishes the same result by increasing bond yield, rather than reducing the effective rate of interest on the mortgages. Issuers should not be required to change the form of their transactions in these circumstances. Accordingly, to the extent the amounts charged for a guarantee of a pool of mort- gages do not exceed amounts charged in the area in cases when owner-financing is not provided through the use of mortgage revenue bonds, the proposed regulations provide that such amounts are not treated as borne by the mortgagors and are not taken into account in determining the ef- fective rate of interest on the mortgages for purposes of section 143(g). B.Proposed Regulations The proposed regulations create a new §1.143(g)–1. The proposed regulations providethatanissuesatisfiestherequire- ments of section 143(g) only if the issue meets the requirements of §1.143(g)–1(b) and, in the case of an issue 95 percent or more of the net proceeds of which are to be used to provide residences for veter- ans, the issue also meets the requirements of §1.143(g)–1(c). The requirements of section 143(g) and the proposed regula- tions are applicable in addition to the re- quirements of section 148 and §§1.148–0 through 1.148–11. The proposed regulations provide that an issue shall be treated as meeting the requirements of §1.143(g)–1(b) only if the excess of (1) the effective rate of interest on the mortgages financed by the issue, over (2) the yield on the issue, is not greater over the term of the issue than 1.125 percentage points. In determining the effective rate of in- terest on any mortgage, the proposed reg- ulations provide that all fees, charges, and other amounts borne by the mortgagor that are attributable to the mortgage or to the bond issue are taken into account. Such amounts include points, commitment fees, origination fees, servicing fees, and pre- payment penalties paid by the mortgagor. The proposed regulations provide that items that are treated as borne by the mort- gagor and are taken into account in cal- culating the effective rate of interest also include: (1) All points, commitment fees, origination fees, or similar charges borne by the seller of the property; and (2) the ex- cess of any amounts received from any per- son other than the mortgagor by any person in connection with the acquisition of the mortgagor’s interest in the property over the usual and reasonable acquisition costs of a person acquiring like property where owner-financing is not provided through the use of mortgage revenue bonds. The proposed regulations further pro- vide that the following items are not treated as borne by the mortgagor and are not taken into account in calculating the ef- fective rate of interest: (1) Any expected rebate of arbitrage profit; and (2) any ap- plication fee, survey fee, credit report fee, insurance charge or similar settlement or financing cost to the extent such amount does not exceed amounts charged in the area in cases where owner-financing is not provided through the use of mortgage rev- enue bonds. With respect to insurance charges, the proposed regulations provide that amounts paid for Federal Housing Ad- ministration, Veterans’ Administration, or similar private mortgage insurance on an individual’s mortgage, or amounts paid for pool mortgage insurance on a pool of mortgages, are not taken into account so long as such amounts do not exceed the amounts charged in the area with respect to a similar mortgage, or pool of mortgages, that is not financed with mortgage revenue bonds. Moreover, for this purpose, amounts paid for pool mort- gage insurance include amounts paid to an entity (for example, the Government Na- tional Mortgage Association, the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Fed- eral Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or other mortgage insurer) to directly guar- antee the pool of mortgages financed with the bonds, or to guarantee a pass-through security backed by the pool of mortgages financed with the bonds. The proposed regulations do not pro- vide guidance regarding all aspects of the application of section 143(g)(2). The proposed regulations provide that to the extent not inconsistent with the 1986 Act or subsequent law, the provisions of 2003-48 I.R.B.1165December 1, 2003 §6a.103A–2(i)(2) (other than paragraphs (i)(2)(i) and (i)(2)(ii)(A) through (C)) apply to provide additional rules relating to compliance with the requirement that the effective rate of mortgage interest not exceed the bond yield by more than 1.125 percentage points. The proposed regulations also do not provide guidance regarding the application of section 143(g)(3). The proposed reg- ulations provide that to the extent not in- consistent with the 1986 Act or subsequent law, the provisions of §6a.103A–2(i)(4) apply to provide guidance regarding the application of section 143(g)(3). Proposed Effective Dates The proposed regulations will apply to bonds sold on or after the date of publi- cation of final regulations in theFederal Register, that are subject to section 143. Issuers may also apply the proposed regu- lations in whole, but not in part, to bonds sold on or after November 5, 2003, and be- fore the date of publication of final regu- lations in theFederal Register,thatare subject to section 143. In addition, is- suers may apply the proposed regulations in whole, but not in part, to any bonds that are sold before November 5, 2003, and subject to section 143. Finally, subject to the applicable effective dates for the corre- sponding statutory provisions, issuers may apply the proposed regulations in whole, but not in part, to any bonds that are sub- ject to section 103A(i) of the 1954 Code. Special Analyses It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory as- sessment is not required. It has also been determined that section 553(b) of the Ad- ministrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chap- ter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because the regulations do not im- pose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for com- ment on its impact on small business. Comments and Public Hearing Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations, consideration will be given to any written comments that are submitted timely (preferably a signed original and eight copies) to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury Department request comments on all aspects of the proposed regulations. Comments are also requested on the clarity of the proposed regulations and how they may be made easier to un- derstand. All comments will be available for public inspection and copying. A public hearing has been scheduled for January 28, 2004, at 10 a.m. in the Au- ditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. Because of access restrictions, visi- tors will not be admitted beyond the lobby more than 30 minutes before the hear- ing starts. For information about having your name placed on the building access list to attend the hearing, see the “FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT” section of this preamble. The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) ap- ply to the hearing. Persons who wish to present oral com- ments at the hearing must submit written comments by January 7, 2004, and submit an outline of the topics to be discussed and the amount of time to be devoted to each topic by January 7, 2004. A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to each person for making comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will be prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the agenda will be available free of charge at the hearing. Drafting Information The principal authors of these regula- tions are Timothy L. Jones and Michael P. Brewer, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Tax-Exempt and Government Entities), IRS, and Bruce M. Serchuk, Office of Tax Policy, Treasury Department. However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their develop- ment. ***** Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 1—INCOME TAXES Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in part as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * Par. 2. Section 1.143(g)–1 is added to read as follows: §1.143(g)–1 Requirements related to arbitrage. (a)In general. Under section 143, for an issue to be an issue of qualified mort- gage bonds or qualified veterans’ mort- gage bonds (together, mortgage revenue bonds), the requirements of section 143(g) must be satisfied. An issue satisfies the re- quirements of section 143(g) only if such issue meets the requirements of paragraph (b)ofthissectionand,inthecaseofan issue 95 percent or more of the net pro- ceeds of which are to be used to provide residences for veterans, such issue also meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section. The requirements of section 143(g) and this section are applicable in addition to the requirements of section 148 and §§1.148–0 through 1.148–11. (b)Effectiverateofmortgageinterest not to exceed bond yield by more than 1.125 percentage points—(1)Maximum yield. An issue shall be treated as meeting the requirements of this paragraph (b) only if the excess of the effective rate of interest on the mortgages financed by the issue, over the yield on the issue, is not greater over the term of the issue than 1.125 percentage points. (2)Effective rate of interest.(i)Inde- termining the effective rate of interest on any mortgage for purposes of this para- graph (b), there shall be taken into account all fees, charges, and other amounts borne by the mortgagor that are attributable to the mortgage or to the bond issue. Such amounts include points, commitment fees, origination fees, servicing fees, and pre- payment penalties paid by the mortgagor. (ii) Items that shall be treated as borne by the mortgagor and shall be taken into account in calculating the effective rate of interest also include: December 1, 200311662003-48 I.R.B. (A) All points, commitment fees, origi- nation fees, or similar charges borne by the seller of the property; and (B) The excess of any amounts received from any person other than the mortgagor by any person in connection with the ac- quisition of the mortgagor’s interest in the property over the usual and reasonable ac- quisition costs of a person acquiring like property when owner-financing is not pro- vided through the use of mortgage revenue bonds. (iii) The following items shall not be treated as borne by the mortgagor and shall not be taken into account in calculating the effective rate of interest: (A) Any expected rebate of arbitrage profit under paragraph (c) of this section; and (B) Any application fee, survey fee, credit report fee, insurance charge or similar settlement or financing cost to the extent such amount does not exceed amounts charged in the area in cases when owner-financing is not provided through the use of mortgage revenue bonds. For ex- ample, amounts paid for Federal Housing Administration, Veterans’ Administration, or similar private mortgage insurance on an individual’s mortgage, or amounts paid for pool mortgage insurance on a pool of mortgages, are not taken into account so long as such amounts do not exceed the amounts charged in the area with respect to a similar mortgage, or pool of mortgages, that is not financed with mortgage revenue bonds. For this purpose, amounts paid for pool mortgage insurance include amounts paid to an entity (for example, the Gov- ernment National Mortgage Association, the Federal National Mortgage Associ- ation (FNMA), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or other mortgage insurer) to directly guarantee the pool of mortgages financed with the bonds, or to guarantee a pass-through security backed by the pool of mortgages financed with the bonds. (C) The following example illustrates the provisions of this paragraph (b)(2)(iii): Example. Housing Authority X issues bonds in- tended to be qualified mortgage bonds under sec- tion 143(a). At the time the bonds are issued, X enters into an agreement with a group of mortgage lending institutions (lenders) under which the lenders agree to originate and service mortgages that meet certain specified requirements. After originating a specified amount of mortgages, each lender issues a “pass-though security” (each, a PTS) backed by the mortgages and sells the PTS to X. Under the terms of the PTS, the lender pays X an amount equal to the reg- ular monthly payments on the mortgages (less certain fees), whether or not received by the lender (plus any prepayments and liquidation proceeds in the event of a foreclosure or other disposition of any mortgages). FNMA guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on each PTS. From the payments received from each mortgagor, the lender pays a fee to FNMA for its guarantee of the PTS. The amounts paid to FNMA do not exceed the amounts charged in the area with respect to a similar pool of mortgages that is not financed with mortgage revenue bonds. Under this paragraph (b)(2)(iii), the fees for the gua rantee pro- vided by FNMA are an insurance charge because the guarantee is pool mortgage insurance. Because the amounts charged for the guarantee do not e xceed the amounts charged in the area with respect to a similar pool of mortgages that is not financed with mortgage revenue bonds, the amounts charged for the guarantee are not taken into account in computing the effective rate of interest on the mortgages financed with X’s bonds. (3)Additional rules.Totheexten tnot inconsistent with the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Public Law 99–514 (the 198 6Act), or subsequent law, §6a.103A–2 (i)(2) (other than paragraphs (i)( 2)(i) and (i)(2)(ii)(A) through (C) )ofthischap- ter applies to provide add itional rules relating to compliance wi th the require- ment that the effective r ate of mortgage interest not exceed the bond yield by more than 1.125 percentage p oints. (c)Arbitrage and inve stment gains to be used to reduce cost s of owner-financ- ing.Asprovidedinse ction 143(g)(3), cer- tain earnings on non purpose investments must either be paid or credited to mort- gagors, or paid to t he United States, in cer- tain circumstan ces. To the extent not in- consistent wit h the 1986 Act or subsequent law, §6a.103A–2(i)(4) of this chapter ap- plies to provide guidance relating to com- pliance with this requirement. (d)Effective Dates—(1)In general.Ex- cept as otherwise provided in this section, §1.143(g)–1 applies to bonds sold on or after the date of publication of final reg- ulations in theFederal Register,thatare subject to section 143. Issuers may apply §1.143(g)–1, in whole, but not in part, to bonds sold on or after November 5, 2003, and before the date of publication of final regulations in theFederal Register,that are subject to section 143. (2)Permissive retroactive application in whole. Except as provided in paragraph (d)(4) of this section, an issuer may apply §1.143(g)–1, in whole, but not in part, to any bonds that are sold before November 5, 2003, and subject to section 143. (3)Bonds subject to the Internal Rev- enue Code of 1954. Except as provided in paragraph (d)(4) of this section, and sub- ject to the applicable effective dates for the corresponding statutory provisions, an is- suer may apply §1.143(g)–1, in whole, but not in part, to anybonds that are subject to section 103A(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. (4)Special rule for pre-July 1, 1993, bonds. To the extent that an issuer ap- plies this section to any bonds pursuant to paragraph (d)(2) or (d)(3) of this section, §6a.103A–2(i)(3) of this chapter also ap- plies to the bonds if the bonds were issued before July 1, 1993. Mark E. Matthews, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 4, 2003, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for November 5, 2003, 68 F.R. 62549) 2003-48 I.R.B.1167December 1, 2003 Announcement of Disciplinary Actions Involving Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents, and Enrolled Actuaries — Suspensions, Censures, Disbarments, and Resignations Announcement 2003-71 Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu- lations, Part 10, attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled actuaries may not accept assistance from, or assist, any person who is under disbar- ment or suspension from practice before the Internal Revenue Service if the assis- tance relates to a matter constituting prac- tice before the Internal Revenue Service and may not knowingly aid or abet another person to practice before the Internal Rev- enue Service during a period of suspen- sion, disbarment, or ineligibility of such other person. To enable attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled actuaries to identify persons to whom these restrictions apply, the Director, Of- fice of Professional Responsibility will announce in the Internal Revenue Bulletin their names, their city and state, their pro- fessional designation, the effective date of disciplinary action, and the period of suspension. This announcement will ap- pear in the weekly Bulletin at the earliest practicable date after such action and will continue to appear in the weekly Bulletins for five successive weeks. Disbarments From Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu- lations, Part 10, after notice and an oppor- tunity for a proceeding before an adminis- trative law judge, the following individuals have been disbarred from practice before the Internal Revenue Service: NameAddressDesignationEffective Date Loy, Michael F.Pittsburgh, KSCPAJuly 23, 2003 Consent Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu- lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub- lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled actuary, in order to avoid institution or con- clusion of a proceeding for his or her dis- barment or suspension from practice be- fore the Internal Revenue Service, may of- fer his or her consent to suspension from such practice. The Director, Office of Pro- fessional Responsibility, in his discretion, may suspend an attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent or enrolled ac- tuary in accordance with the consent of- fered. The following individuals have been placed under consent suspension from practice before the Internal Revenue Ser- vice: NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension Gillis, Robert F.Jacksonville,FLEnrolled AgentJuly 1, 2003 to January 31, 2004 Ziedins, AivarsCastle Rock, COEnrolled AgentIndefinite from July 1, 2003 December 1, 200311682003-48 I.R.B. NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension A. N. HebeshaVisalia, CAEnrolled AgentIndefinite from July 11, 2003 Stafford, Robert M.Allston, MACPAIndefinite from July 14, 2003 Carnahan, Larry K.Ashland, KYAttorneyIndefinite from July 18, 2003 McAlarney, Nancy A.Kissimmee,FLEnrolled AgentIndefinite from July 24, 2003 Rahman, ErnestMelville, NYEnrolled AgentIndefinite from July 31, 2003 Oleksy, Dennis L.Cary, ILEnrolled AgentIndefinite from August 12, 2003 Witti, Mary E.Boulder City, NVEnrolled AgentIndefinite from September 1, 2003 Lau, WillieHowell, NJEnrolled AgentIndefinite from September 1, 2003 Couch, Leslie L.Kihei, HIEnrolled AgentIndefinite from September 5, 2003 Khoudary, NicholasEast Brunswick, NJEnrolled AgentIndefinite from September 15, 2003 Solomon, DorothyLos Angeles, CAEnrolled AgentIndefinite from October 6, 2003 McMahon, AngelaToms River, NJEnrolled AgentIndefinite from October 20, 2003 Lee, Chun HyongLakewood, WACPAIndefinite from October 22, 2003 2003-48 I.R.B.1169December 1, 2003 Expedited Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal Revenue Service Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu- lations, Part 10, the Director, Office of Pro- fessional Responsibility, is authorized to immediately suspend from practice before the Internal Revenue Service any practi- tioner who, within five years from the date the expedited proceeding is instituted (1) has had a license to practice as an attorney, certified public accountant, or actuary sus- pended or revoked for cause or (2) has been convicted of certain crimes. The following individuals have been placed under suspension from practice before the Internal Revenue Service by virtue of the expedited proceeding provi- sions: NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension Daniels, MarioFlint, MICPAIndefinite from September 4, 2003 Hertz, KevinMcAllen, TXCPAIndefinite from October 1, 2003 Roselli, AntonioTopsfield, MACPAIndefinite from October 17, 2003 Moran, Maxine C.San Clemente, CACPAIndefinite from October 17, 2003 Muscio, Richard J.Solana Beach, CACPAIndefinite from October 17, 2003 Yates, James L.LaPlata, MDCPAIndefinite from October 21, 2003 Censure Issued by Consent Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg- ulations, Part 10, in lieu of a proceeding being instituted or continued, an attorney, certified public accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled actuary, may offer his or her consent to the issuance of a censure. Cen- sure is a public reprimand. The following individuals have con- sented to the issuance of a Censure: NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure Haynes, Gwenivar L.Ellenwood, GAEnrolled AgentAugust 1, 2003 Ritchie, DonaldMilton, MAEnrolled AgentSeptember 3, 2003 Bagley, HaywoodVista, CAEnrolled AgentSeptember 4, 2003 Book, Robert L.Plymouth, MNEnrolled AgentSeptember 15, 2003 December 1, 200311702003-48 I.R.B. Suspension of Tax-Exempt Status of Organizations Identified With Terrorism Announcement 2003–74 I. Purpose This announcement is a public notice of the suspension under section 501(p) of the Internal Revenue Code of the federal tax exemption of certain organizations that have been designated as supporting or en- gaging in terrorist activity or supporting terrorism. Contributions made to an organ- ization during the period that the organiza- tion’s tax-exempt status is suspended are not deductible for federal tax purposes. II. Background The federal government has designated a number of organizations as supporting or engaging in terrorist activity or supporting terrorism under the Immigration and Na- tionality Act, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the United Na- tions Participation Act of 1945. Federal law prohibits most contributions to orga- nizations that have been so designated. Section 501(p) of the Code was enacted as part of the Military Family Tax Relief Act of 2003 (P.L. 108–121), effective November 11, 2003. Section 501(p)(1) suspends the exemption from tax un- der section 501(a) of any organization describedinsection501(p)(2).Anorgan- ization is described in section 501(p)(2) if the organization is designated or oth- erwise individuallyidentified (1) under certain provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act as a terrorist organization or foreign terrorist organization; (2) in or pursuant to an Executive Order which is relatedtoterrorismandissuedunderthe authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act or section 5 of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 for the purpose of imposing on such or- ganization an economic or other sanction; or(3)inorpursuanttoanExecutiveOrder issued under the authority of any federal law, if the organization is designated or otherwise individually identified in or pur- suant to the Executive Order as supporting or engaging in terrorist activity (as defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act) or supporting terrorism (as defined in the Foreign Relations Authorization Act) and the Executive Order refers to section 501(p)(2). Under section 501(p)(3) of the Code, suspension of an organization’s tax ex- emption begins on the date of the first pub- lication of a designation or identification with respect to the organization, as de- scribed above, or the date on which sec- tion 501(p) was enacted, whichever is later. This suspension continues until all desig- nations and identifications of the organiza- tion are rescinded under the law or Execu- tive Order under which such designation or identification was made. Under section 501(p)(4) of the Code, no deduction is allowed under any pro- vision of the Internal Revenue Code for any contribution to an organization during any period in which the organization’s tax exemption is suspended under section 501(p). Thus, for example, no chari- table contribution deduction is allowed under section 170 (relating to the in- come tax), section 545(b)(2) (relating to undistributed personal holding company income), section 556(b)(2) (relating to undistributed foreign personal holding company income), section 642(c) (relating to charitable set asides), section 2055 (re- lating to the estate tax), section 2106(a)(2) (relating to the estate tax for nonresident aliens) and section 2522 (relating to the gift tax) for contributions made to the organization during the suspension period. Prior to the effective date of suspen- sion of exemption under section 501(p), the three organizations listed below were designated under Executive Order 13224, entitled "Blocking Property and Prohibit- ing Transactions With Persons Who Com- mit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Ter- rorism.” Contributions made to these orga- nizations in violation of the Executive Or- der prior to this suspension are not tax de- ductible under the Internal Revenue Code. III. Notice of Suspensions and Nondeductibility of Contributions Organizations whose tax exemption has been suspended under section 501(p) and the effective date of such suspension are listed below. Contributions made to these organizations during the period of suspen- sion are not deductible for federal tax pur- poses. Benevolence International Foundation, Inc. Palos Hills, Illinois Effective Date: November 11, 2003 Global Relief Foundation, Inc. Bridgeview, Illinois Effective Date: November 11, 2003 Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development Richardson, Texas Effective Date: November 11, 2003 IV. Federal Tax Filings An organization whose exempt status has been suspended under section 501(p) does not file Form 990 and is required to file the appropriate Federal income tax re- turns for the taxable periods beginning on the date of the suspension. The organi- zation must continue to file all other ap- propriate federal tax returns, including em- ployment tax returns, and may also have to file federal unemployment tax returns. V. Contact Information For additional information regarding the designation or identification of an or- ganization described insection 501(p)(2), contact the Compliance Division at the Of- fice of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Treasury Department at 202–622–2490. Additional information is also available for download from the Office’s Internet Home Page atwww.treas.gov/ofac. For additional information regarding the suspension of the federal tax ex- emption of an organization under section 501(p), contact Robert Fontenrose at (202) 283–9484 at the Internal Revenue Service. Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations Contributions to Which are Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code Announcement 2003–76 The name of an organization that no longer qualifies as an organization de- scribedinsection170(c)(2)oftheInternal Revenue Code of 1986 is listed below. Generally, the Service will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date 2003-48 I.R.B.1171December 1, 2003 of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the Service is not precluded from disallowing a deduction for any contributions made after an or- ganization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation. If on the other hand a suit for declara- tory judgment has been timely filed, con- tributions from individuals and organiza- tions described in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on October 28, 2002, and would end on the date the court first determines that the organization is not de- scribed in section 170(c)(2) as more partic- ularly set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum de- duction protected is $1,000, with a hus- band and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any indi- vidual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the organization that were the basis for revocation. Zaire Unlimited Calumet Park, IL Partial Withdrawal of Proposed Regulations Relating to Changes in Entity Classification Announcement 2003–78 AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. ACTION: Partial withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: This document withdraws a portion of a notice of proposed rulemak- ing (REG–110385–99, 1999–2 C.B. 670) published on November 29, 1999, address- ing certain transactions that occur within a specified period before or after a foreign entity changed its classification to disre- garded-entity status. EFFECTIVE DATES: The withdrawal of proposed §301.7701–3(h) is effective Oc- tober 22, 2003. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald M. Gootzeit, (202) 622–3860 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 18, 1996, Treasury and IRS published in theFederal Register final regulations (T.D. 8697, 1997–1 C.B. 215 [61 FR 66584]) relating to the classification of business entities under section 7701 (check-the-box regulations). On November 29, 1999, Treasury and the IRS published in theFederal Reg- istera notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–110385–99, 1999–2 C.B. 670 [64 FR 66591]) proposing to amend §§301.7701–2 and 301.7701–3 of the current check-the-box regulations (pro- posed regulations). A public hearing on the proposed regulations was held on January 31, 2000. In addition, written comments were received. Most of the written and oral comments related to pro- posed §301.7701–3(h), which provided a rule that would have operated to change the classification of a foreign disregarded entity if a so-called “extraordinary trans- action” occurred one day before or within one year after the election to treat the entity as disregarded. In general, commentators criticized the approach adopted in this rule as overly broad and expressed con- cern that it would mitigate the increased certainty promoted by the check-the-box regulations in 1996. After considering the comments re- ceived, Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2003–46, 2003–28 IRB 53, on June 26, 2003, announcing the intention to withdraw the extraordinary transaction rule in proposed §301.7701–3(h) and to finalize the remaining provisions of the proposed regulations addressing grand- fathered entities and the relevancy of classification status. With the publication of this document, proposed §301.7701–3(h) is withdrawn. Final regulations (T.D. 9093) adopting without substantive change the portions of the proposed regulations relating to grandfathered entities and the relevancy of classification status are being published on page 1156 of this issue of the Bulletin. These final regulations do not adopt the extraordinary transaction rule in proposed §301.7701–3(h). Drafting Information The principal author of this withdrawal notice is Ronald M. Gootzeit, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International). However, other personnel from Treasury and the IRS participated in its develop- ment. ***** Partial Withdrawal of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Accordingly, under the authority of 26 U.S.C. 7805, §301.7701–3(h) of the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Registeron November 29, 1999, (64 FR 66591) is withdrawn. Robert E. Wenzel, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on October 21, 2003, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register for October 22, 2003, 68 F.R. 60305) December 1, 200311722003-48 I.R.B. Definition of Terms Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the ef- fect: Amplifieddescribes a situation where no change is being made in a prior pub- lished position, but the prior position is be- ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle ap- plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi- fied,below). Clarifiedis used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is being made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed. Distinguisheddescribes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously pub- lished ruling and points out an essential difference between them. Modifiedis used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare withamplifiedandclarified,above). Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub- lished ruling that is not considered deter- minative with respect to future transac- tions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rul- ings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted. Revokeddescribes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is beingstatedinanewruling. Supersededdescribes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than re- state the substance and situation of a previ- ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same po- sition published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single rul- ing a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new rul- ing does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example,modifiedandsu- persededdescribes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously pub- lished ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded. Supplementedis used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original rul- ing has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the ad- ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series. Suspendedis used in rare situations to show that the previous published rul- ings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study. Abbreviations The following abbreviations in current use and formerly used will appear in material published in the Bulletin. A—Individual. Acq.—Acquiescence. B—Individual. BE—Beneficiary. BK—Bank. B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals. C—Individual. C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations. CI—City. COOP—Cooperative. Ct.D.—Court Decision. CY—County. D—Decedent. DC—Dummy Corporation. DE—Donee. Del. Order—Delegation Order. DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation. DR—Donor. E—Estate. EE—Employee. E.O.—Executive Order. ER—Employer. ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act. EX—Executor. F—Fiduciary. FC—Foreign Country. FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act. FISC—Foreign International Sales Company. FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company. F.R.—Federal Register. FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act. FX—Foreign corporation. G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum. GE—Grantee. GP—General Partner. GR—Grantor. IC—Insurance Company. I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin. LE—Lessee. LP—Limited Partner. LR—Lessor. M—Minor. Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence. O—Organization. P—Parent Corporation. PHC—Personal Holding Company. PO—Possession of the U.S. PR—Partner. PRS—Partnership. PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption. Pub. L.—Public Law. REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure. Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling. S—Subsidiary. S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules. Stat.—Statutes at Large. T—Target Corporation. T.C.—Tax Court. T.D.—Treasury Decision. TFE—Transferee. TFR—Transferor. T.I.R.—Technical Information Release. TP—Taxpayer. TR—Trust. TT—Trustee. U.S.C.—United States Code. X—Corporation. Y—Corporation. Z—Corporation. 2003-48 I.R.B.iDecember 1, 2003 Numerical Finding List 1 Bulletins 2003–27 through 2003–48 Announcements: 2003-45, 2003-28 I.R.B.73 2003-46, 2003-30 I.R.B.222 2003-47, 2003-29 I.R.B.124 2003-48, 2003-28 I.R.B.73 2003-49, 2003-32 I.R.B.339 2003-50, 2003-30 I.R.B.222 2003-51, 2003-37 I.R.B.555 2003-52, 2003-32 I.R.B.345 2003-53, 2003-32 I.R.B.345 2003-54, 2003-40 I.R.B.761 2003-55, 2003-38 I.R.B.597 2003-56, 2003-39 I.R.B.694 2003-57, 2003-37 I.R.B.555 2003-58, 2003-40 I.R.B.746 2003-59, 2003-40 I.R.B.746 2003-60, 2003-45 I.R.B.1049 2003-61, 2003-42 I.R.B.890 2003-62, 2003-41 I.R.B.821 2003-63, 2003-45 I.R.B.1015 2003-64, 2003-43 I.R.B.934 2003-65, 2003-43 I.R.B.935 2003-66, 2003-45 I.R.B.1049 2003-67, 2003-44 I.R.B.1005 2003-68, 2003-45 I.R.B.1050 2003-69, 2003-46 I.R.B.1086 2003-70, 2003-46 I.R.B.1090 2003-71, 2003-46 I.R.B.1090 2003-72, 2003-47 I.R.B.1146 2003-73, 2003-47 I.R.B.1149 2003-74, 2003-48 I.R.B.1171 2003-76, 2003-48 I.R.B.1171 2003-78, 2003-48 I.R.B.1172 Notices: 2003-38, 2003-27 I.R.B.9 2003-39, 2003-27 I.R.B.10 2003-40, 2003-27 I.R.B.10 2003-41, 2003-28 I.R.B.49 2003-42, 2003-28 I.R.B.49 2003-43, 2003-28 I.R.B.50 2003-44, 2003-28 I.R.B.52 2003-45, 2003-29 I.R.B.86 2003-46, 2003-28 I.R.B.53 2003-47, 2003-30 I.R.B.132 2003-48, 2003-30 I.R.B.133 2003-49, 2003-32 I.R.B.294 2003-50, 2003-32 I.R.B.295 2003-51, 2003-33 I.R.B.361 2003-52, 2003-32 I.R.B.296 2003-53, 2003-33 I.R.B.362 2003-54, 2003-33 I.R.B.363 Notices— Continued: 2003-55, 2003-34 I.R.B.395 2003-56, 2003-34 I.R.B.396 2003-57, 2003-34 I.R.B.397 2003-58, 2003-35 I.R.B.429 2003-59, 2003-35 I.R.B.429 2003-60, 2003-39 I.R.B.643 2003-61, 2003-42 I.R.B.851 2003-62, 2003-38 I.R.B.576 2003-63, 2003-38 I.R.B.577 2003-64, 2003-39 I.R.B.646 2003-65, 2003-40 I.R.B.747 2003-66, 2003-48 I.R.B.1159 2003-67, 2003-40 I.R.B.752 2003-68, 2003-41 I.R.B.824 2003-69, 2003-42 I.R.B.851 2003-70, 2003-43 I.R.B.916 2003-71, 2003-43 I.R.B.922 2003-72, 2003-44 I.R.B.964 2003-73, 2003-45 I.R.B.1017 2003-74, 2003-47 I.R.B.1097 Proposed Regulations: REG-209377-89, 2003-36 I.R.B.521 REG-208199-91, 2003-40 I.R.B.756 REG-106486-98, 2003-42 I.R.B.853 REG-108639-99, 2003-35 I.R.B.431 REG-106736-00, 2003-28 I.R.B.60 REG-108524-00, 2003-42 I.R.B.869 REG-115037-00, 2003-44 I.R.B.967 REG-140378-01, 2003-41 I.R.B.825 REG-107618-02, 2003-27 I.R.B.13 REG-122917-02, 2003-27 I.R.B.15 REG-128203-02, 2003-41 I.R.B.828 REG-131997-02, 2003-33 I.R.B.366 REG-133791-02, 2003-35 I.R.B.493 REG-138495-02, 2003-37 I.R.B.541 REG-138499-02, 2003-37 I.R.B.541 REG-140808-02, 2003-38 I.R.B.582 REG-140930-02, 2003-38 I.R.B.583 REG-141402-02, 2003-43 I.R.B.932 REG-141669-02, 2003-34 I.R.B.408 REG-142538-02, 2003-38 I.R.B.590 REG-143679-02, 2003-38 I.R.B.592 REG-144908-02, 2003-38 I.R.B.593 REG-146893-02, 2003-44 I.R.B.967 REG-157164-02, 2003-44 I.R.B.1004 REG-162625-02, 2003-35 I.R.B.500 REG-163974-02, 2003-38 I.R.B.595 REG-108676-03, 2003-36 I.R.B.523 REG-112039-03, 2003-35 I.R.B.504 REG-113112-03, 2003-40 I.R.B.760 REG-116914-03, 2003-32 I.R.B.338 REG-121122-03, 2003-37 I.R.B.550 REG-129709-03, 2003-35 I.R.B.506 Proposed Regulations— Continued: REG-130262-03, 2003-37 I.R.B.553 REG-132483-03, 2003-34 I.R.B.410 REG-132760-03, 2003-43 I.R.B.933 REG-146692-03, 2003-48 I.R.B.1164 Revenue Procedures: 2003-45, 2003-27 I.R.B.11 2003-46, 2003-28 I.R.B.54 2003-47, 2003-28 I.R.B.55 2003-48, 2003-29 I.R.B.86 2003-49, 2003-29 I.R.B.89 2003-50, 2003-29 I.R.B.119 2003-51, 2003-29 I.R.B.121 2003-52, 2003-30 I.R.B.134 2003-53, 2003-31 I.R.B.230 2003-54, 2003-31 I.R.B.236 2003-55, 2003-31 I.R.B.242 2003-56, 2003-31 I.R.B.249 2003-57, 2003-31 I.R.B.257 2003-58, 2003-31 I.R.B.262 2003-59, 2003-31 I.R.B.268 2003-60, 2003-31 I.R.B.274 2003-61, 2003-32 I.R.B.296 2003-62, 2003-32 I.R.B.299 2003-63, 2003-32 I.R.B.304 2003-64, 2003-32 I.R.B.306 2003-65, 2003-32 I.R.B.336 2003-66, 2003-33 I.R.B.364 2003-67, 2003-34 I.R.B.397 2003-68, 2003-34 I.R.B.398 2003-69, 2003-34 I.R.B.403 2003-70, 2003-34 I.R.B.406 2003-71, 2003-36 I.R.B.517 2003-72, 2003-38 I.R.B.578 2003-73, 2003-39 I.R.B.647 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B.923 2003-75, 2003-45 I.R.B.1018 2003-76, 2003-43 I.R.B.924 2003-77, 2003-44 I.R.B.964 2003-78, 2003-45 I.R.B.1029 2003-79, 2003-45 I.R.B.1036 2003-80, 2003-45 I.R.B.1037 2003-81, 2003-45 I.R.B.1046 2003-82, 2003-47 I.R.B.1097 2003-83, 2003-47 I.R.B.1099 2003-84, 2003-48 I.R.B.1159 Revenue Rulings: 2003-70, 2003-27 I.R.B.3 2003-71, 2003-27 I.R.B.1 2003-72, 2003-33 I.R.B.346 2003-73, 2003-28 I.R.B.44 2003-74, 2003-29 I.R.B.77 2003-75, 2003-29 I.R.B.79 1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2003-1 through 2003-26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-27, dated July 7, 2003. December 1, 2003ii2003-48 I.R.B. Revenue Rulings— Continued: 2003-76, 2003-33 I.R.B.355 2003-77, 2003-29 I.R.B.75 2003-78, 2003-29 I.R.B.76 2003-79, 2003-29 I.R.B.80 2003-80, 2003-29 I.R.B.83 2003-81, 2003-30 I.R.B.126 2003-82, 2003-30 I.R.B.125 2003-83, 2003-30 I.R.B.128 2003-84, 2003-32 I.R.B.289 2003-85, 2003-32 I.R.B.291 2003-86, 2003-32 I.R.B.290 2003-87, 2003-29 I.R.B.82 2003-88, 2003-32 I.R.B.292 2003-89, 2003-37 I.R.B.525 2003-90, 2003-33 I.R.B.353 2003-91, 2003-33 I.R.B.347 2003-92, 2003-33 I.R.B.350 2003-93, 2003-33 I.R.B.346 2003-94, 2003-33 I.R.B.357 2003-95, 2003-33 I.R.B.358 2003-96, 2003-34 I.R.B.386 2003-97, 2003-34 I.R.B.380 2003-98, 2003-34 I.R.B.378 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 2003-100, 2003-34 I.R.B.385 2003-101, 2003-36 I.R.B.513 2003-102, 2003-38 I.R.B.559 2003-103, 2003-38 I.R.B.568 2003-104, 2003-39 I.R.B.636 2003-105, 2003-40 I.R.B.696 2003-106, 2003-44 I.R.B.936 2003-107, 2003-41 I.R.B.815 2003-108, 2003-44 I.R.B.963 2003-109, 2003-42 I.R.B.839 2003-110, 2003-46 I.R.B.1083 2003-111, 2003-45 I.R.B.1009 2003-112, 2003-45 I.R.B.1007 2003-113, 2003-44 I.R.B.962 2003-114, 2003-45 I.R.B.1012 2003-115, 2003-46 I.R.B.1052 2003-116, 2003-46 I.R.B.1083 2003-117, 2003-46 I.R.B.1051 2003-118, 2003-47 I.R.B.1095 2003-119, 2003-47 I.R.B.1094 2003-120, 2003-48 I.R.B.1154 2003-121, 2003-48 I.R.B.1153 Social Security Contribution and Benefit Base; Domestic Employee Coverage Threshhold: 2003-66, 2003-48 I.R.B.1159 Tax Conventions: 2003-58, 2003-40 I.R.B.746 2003-59, 2003-40 I.R.B.746 2003-62, 2003-41 I.R.B.821 2003-63, 2003-45 I.R.B.1015 Treasury Decisions: 9061, 2003-27 I.R.B.5 9062, 2003-28 I.R.B.46 9063, 2003-36 I.R.B.510 9064, 2003-36 I.R.B.508 9065, 2003-36 I.R.B.515 9066, 2003-36 I.R.B.509 9067, 2003-32 I.R.B.287 9068, 2003-37 I.R.B.538 9069, 2003-37 I.R.B.525 9070, 2003-38 I.R.B.574 9071, 2003-38 I.R.B.560 9072, 2003-37 I.R.B.527 9073, 2003-38 I.R.B.570 9074, 2003-39 I.R.B.601 9075, 2003-39 I.R.B.608 9076, 2003-38 I.R.B.562 9077, 2003-39 I.R.B.634 9078, 2003-39 I.R.B.630 9079, 2003-40 I.R.B.729 9080, 2003-40 I.R.B.696 9081, 2003-35 I.R.B.420 9082, 2003-41 I.R.B.807 9083, 2003-40 I.R.B.700 9084, 2003-40 I.R.B.742 9085, 2003-41 I.R.B.775 9086, 2003-41 I.R.B.817 9087, 2003-41 I.R.B.781 9088, 2003-42 I.R.B.841 9089, 2003-43 I.R.B.906 9090, 2003-43 I.R.B.891 9091, 2003-44 I.R.B.939 9092, 2003-46 I.R.B.1055 9093, 2003-48 I.R.B.1156 2003-48 I.R.B.iiiDecember 1, 2003 Findings List of Current Actions on Previously Published Items 1 Bulletins 2003-27 through 2003-48 Notices: 87-5 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 87-66 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 87-79 Modified by Notice 2003-65, 2003-40 I.R.B.747 89-79 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-47, 2003-28 I.R.B.55 89-94 Modified by Notice 2003-50, 2003-32 I.R.B.295 94-46 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 95-18 Modified by Notice 2003-70, 2003-43 I.R.B.916 95-50 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 95-53 Modified and superseded by Notice 2003-55, 2003-34 I.R.B.395 2001-4 Section III.C. superseded for 2004 and subsequent calendar years by Rev. Proc. 2003-64, 2003-32 I.R.B.306 2001-70 Amplified by Notice 2003-45, 2003-29 I.R.B.86 2001-74 Amplified by Notice 2003-45, 2003-29 I.R.B.86 2002-1 Amplified by Notice 2003-49, 2003-32 I.R.B.294 2003-12 Obsoleted by T.D. 9090, 2003-43 I.R.B.891 REG-141402-02, 2003-43 I.R.B.932 Notices— Continued: 2003-36 Modified by Notice 2003-59, 2003-35 I.R.B.429 Proposed Regulations: REG-EE-86-88 (LR-279-81) Withdrawn by REG-122917-02, 2003-27 I.R.B.15 REG-105606-99 Withdrawn by REG-133791-02, 2003-35 I.R.B.493 REG-110385-99 Partially withdrawn by Ann. 2003-78, 2003-48 I.R.B.1172 Revenue Procedures: 66-3 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B.923 66-50 Modified, amplified, and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-62, 2003-32 I.R.B.299 68-23 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-41 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-6 Modified and superseded, in part by Notice 2003-70, 2003-43 I.R.B.916 77-12 Amplified, modified, and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-51, 2003-29 I.R.B.121 80-4 Modified and amplified by Notice 2003-70, 2003-43 I.R.B.916 81-40 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-62, 2003-32 I.R.B.299 84-71 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B.923 85–56 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B.923 87–21 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B.923 Revenue Procedures— Continued: 89-12 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 89-21 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-53, 2003-31 I.R.B.230 89-31 Obsoleted by REG-108524-00, 2003-42 I.R.B.869 90-19 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 90-32 Section4supersededby Rev. Proc. 2003-55, 2003-31 I.R.B.242 Section5supersededby Rev. Proc. 2003-56, 2003-31 I.R.B.249 Section6supersededby Rev. Proc. 2003-57, 2003-31 I.R.B.257 Section7supersededby Rev. Proc. 2003-59, 2003-31 I.R.B.268 Section8supersededby Rev. Proc. 2003-60, 2003-31 I.R.B.274 91-11 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 91-13 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 91-39 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 92-33 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 92-35 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 92–39 Superseded in part by Rev. Proc. 2003-78, 2003-43 I.R.B.1029 92-66 Obsoleted by REG-108524-00, 2003-42 I.R.B.869 92-88 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 1 A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2003-1 through 2003-26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2003-27, dated July 7, 2003. December 1, 2003iv2003-48 I.R.B. Revenue Procedures— Continued: 93-17 Obsoleted by REG-132483-03, 2003-34 I.R.B.410 94-46 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 94-52 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B.923 95-10 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 95-11 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 95-39 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 96-17 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-69, 2003-34 I.R.B.403 96-30 Modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2003-48, 2003-29 I.R.B.86 96-38 Obsoleted by Rev. Proc. 2003-71, 2003-36 I.R.B.517 97-11 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-74, 2003-43 I.R.B.923 2000-12 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-64, 2003-32 I.R.B.306 2000-15 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003-32 I.R.B.296 2000-20 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-72, 2003-38 I.R.B.578 2001-19 Amplified by Rev. Proc. 2003-75, 2003-45 I.R.B.1018 2001-40 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-83, 2003-47 I.R.B.1099 2002-9 Modified by T.D. 9090, 2003-43 I.R.B.891 REG-141402-02, 2003-43 I.R.B.932 Revenue Procedures— Continued: Rev. Proc. 2003-45, 2003-27 I.R.B.11 Amplified and modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-50, 2003-29 I.R.B.119 Modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2003-63, 2003-32 I.R.B.304 Rev. Rul. 2003-81, 2003-30 I.R.B.126 2002-13 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-68, 2003-34 I.R.B.398 2002-14 Amplified by Rev. Proc. 2003-75, 2003-45 I.R.B.1018 2002-29 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-72, 2003-38 I.R.B.578 2002-33 Amplified and modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-50, 2003-29 I.R.B.119 2002-34 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-52, 2003-30 I.R.B.134 2002-38 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-79, 2003-45 I.R.B.1036 2002-39 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-79, 2003-45 I.R.B.1036 2002-45 Revoked by Rev. Proc. 2003-68, 2003-34 I.R.B.398 2002-60 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-73, 2003-39 I.R.B.647 2002-61 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-76, 2003-43 I.R.B.924 2002-63 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-80, 2003-45 I.R.B.1037 2002-68 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-84, 2003-48 I.R.B.1159 2003-3 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-48, 2003-29 I.R.B.86 2003-15 Modified and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2003-49, 2003-29 I.R.B.89 2003-28 Modified by Ann. 2003-35, 2003-38 I.R.B.597 Revenue Procedures— Continued: 2003-44 Modified by Rev. Proc. 2003-72, 2003-38 I.R.B.578 2003-49 Supplemented by Rev. Proc. 2003-81, 2003-45 I.R.B.1046 Revenue Rulings: 53-56 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 54-139 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 54-396 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 55-105 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 55-372 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-128 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-160 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-212 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-220 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-271 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-344 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-448 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-451 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-586 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 2003-48 I.R.B.vDecember 1, 2003 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 56-680 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 56-681 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 57-116 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 57-296 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 57-542 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 58-92 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 58-618 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-108 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-120 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-122 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-233 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-326 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-356 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-400 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 59-412 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 60-49 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 60-246 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 60-262 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 60-307 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 61-96 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 63-157 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 63-224 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 63-248 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 64-147 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 64-177 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 64-285 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 65-110 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 65-260 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 65-273 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 66-4 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 66-23 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 66-610 Partially obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-105, 2003-40 I.R.B.696 66-290 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 67-186 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 67-189 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 67-326 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-309 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-388 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-434 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-477 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-522 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-608 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-640 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 68-641 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 69-18 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 69-20 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 69-241 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 69-361 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 69-426 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 69-485 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 69-517 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 December 1, 2003vi2003-48 I.R.B. Revenue Rulings— Continued: 70-6 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-111 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-229 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-230 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-264 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-286 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-378 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-409 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 70-496 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-13 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-384 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-440 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-453 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-454 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-495 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-518 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 71-565 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 71-582 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-61 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-116 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-212 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-357 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-472 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-526 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-599 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 72-603 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-46 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-119 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-182 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-257 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-277 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-473 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-490 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 73-498 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 74-6 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-59 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-73 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-83 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-87 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-211 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-376 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-476 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-521 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 74-610 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-53 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-54 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-105 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-106 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-107 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-111 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-134 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 2003-48 I.R.B.viiDecember 1, 2003 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 75-160 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-174 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-179 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-212 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-248 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-298 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-341 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-426 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-468 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-515 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 75-561 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 76-44 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 76-67 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 76-90 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 76-225 Revoked by T.D. 9068, 2003–37 I.R.B.538 76-239 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 76-329 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 76-347 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 76-535 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-41 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-81 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-150 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-256 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-284 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-321 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-343 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-405 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-456 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-482 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 77-483 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 78-89 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 78-287 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 78-420 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-105, 2003-40 I.R.B.696 78-441 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 79-29 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 79-50 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-105, 2003-40 I.R.B.696 79-71 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 79-82 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 79-104 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 79-116 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 79-314 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 79-410 Amplified by Rev. Rul. 2003-90, 2003-33 I.R.B.353 79-424 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 80-78 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 80-79 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 80-101 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 80-167 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 80-170 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 80-358 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 81-190 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 81-225 Clarified and amplified by Rev. Rul. 2003-92, 2003-33 I.R.B.350 December 1, 2003viii2003-48 I.R.B. Revenue Rulings— Continued: 81-247 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 82-164 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 82-226 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 83-101 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 83-119 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 84-28 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 84-30 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 85-55 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 85-136 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 86-52 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 87-1 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 87-95 Superseded by Rev. Rul. 2003-109, 2003-42 I.R.B.839 88-7 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 89-72 Obsoleted by Rev. Rul. 2003-99, 2003-34 I.R.B.388 94-56 Superseded by Rev. Rul. 2003-109, 2003-42 I.R.B.839 2002-78 Supplemented and superseded by Rev. Rul. 2003-118, 2003-47 I.R.B.1095 2002-79 Supplemented and superseded by Rev. Rul. 2003-119, 2003-47 I.R.B.1094 Revenue Rulings— Continued: 2003-58 Distinguished by Rev. Rul. 2003-102, 2003-38 I.R.B.559 Treasury Decisions: 9033 Removed by T.D. 9065, 2003-36 I.R.B.515 9083 Corrected by Ann. 2003-60, 2003-45 I.R.B.1049 2003-48 I.R.B.ixDecember 1, 2003 *U.S. Government Printing Office: 2003—304–774/60111
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.