Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-50 (PDF rendition): IRS Notices

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
6-50
December 11, 200
6
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
Announcement 2006–95, page 1105.
This announcement provides a two-part settlement initiative of-
fered by the IRS under which current and former employees of
foreign embassies, foreign consular offices, or international or-
ganizations in the United States can (1) resolve income tax mat-
ters related to their employment at a foreign embassy, foreign
consular office, or international organization and (2) unwind
their participation in SEP/IRA plans, which they erroneously es-
tablished. In addition, the announcement sets forth the eligibil-
ity for and terms of the settlement, including procedures to be
followed by eligible participants.
INCOME TAX
T.D. 9296, page 1078.
Final regulations under section 41 of the Code provide rules
for the computation and allocation of the credit for increasing
research activities in the case of a controlled group of cor-
porations or a group of trades or businesses under common
control. The regulations also provide rules for making and re-
voking an election to compute the research credit using the
alternative incremental research credit rules.
T.D. 9297, page 1089.
Final regulations under section 937(a) of the Code provide
a new alternative under the presence test for determining
whether an individual is abona fideresident of American
Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, or
the U.S. Virgin Islands, referred to as U.S. possessions or
territories. Generally, an individual is abona fideresident of a
territory if the individual satisfies a presence test, a tax home
test and a closer connection test. Under this new alternative,
an individual would satisfy the presence test if the individual
meets an averaging test for the minimum number of days
spent in the relevant territory.
Announcement 2006–97, page 1108.
This announcement contains a correction to a phone number in
Announcement 2006–61, 2006–36 I.R.B. 390, which provides
an opportunity for small business/self-employed taxpayers to
use Fast Track Settlement (FTS) to expedite case resolution
within the IRS’s Small Business Self-Employed (SB/SE) organi-
zation.
EMPLOYEE PLANS
Notice 2006–105, page 1093.
Minimum funding standards; alternative deficit reduc-
tion contribution.This notice describes how a commercial
passenger airline may make an election of an alternative deficit
reduction contribution pursuant to section 402(i) of the Pen-
sion Protection Act of 2006 and contains background for that
election. Announcement 2004–38 modified. Announcement
2004–43 amplified and modified. Notice 2004–59 amplified.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Announcement 2006–96, page 1108.
Per diemallowances.This announcement corrects the pe-
riod for which Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, is a high-cost
locality under the high-low substantiation method of Rev. Proc.
2006–41, 2006–43 I.R.B. 777.
(Continued on the next page)
Announcements of Disbarments and Suspensions begin on page 1095.
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

Announcement 2006–97, page 1108.
This announcement contains a correction to a phone number in
Announcement 2006–61, 2006–36 I.R.B. 390, which provides
an opportunity for small business/self-employed taxpayers to
use Fast Track Settlement (FTS) to expedite case resolution
within the IRS’s Small Business Self-Employed (SB/SE) organi-
zation.
December 11, 20062006–50 I.R.B.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
2006–50 I.R.B.December 11, 2006

Place missing child here.
December 11, 20062006–50 I.R.B.

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 41.—Credit for
Increasing Research
Activities
26 CFR 1.41–6: Aggregation of expenditures.
T.D. 9296
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
Credit for Increasing Research
Activities
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal
of temporary regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains fi-
nal regulations relating to the computation
and allocation of the credit for increasing
research activities for members of a con-
trolled group of corporations or a group
of trades or businesses under common
control. These final regulations reflect
changesmadetosection41bytheRev-
enue Reconciliation Act of 1989, which in-
troduced the current computational regime
for the credit, and the Small Business Job
Protection Act of 1996, which introduced
the alternative incremental research credit.
DATES:Effective Date:These regulations
are effective November 9, 2006.
Applicability Dates:For dates of appli-
cability, see §§1.41–6(j) and 1.41–8(b)(5).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Nicole R. Cimino (202)
622–3120 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document amends 26 CFR part 1
to provide revised rules for the research
credit under section 41, specifically sec-
tion 41(f). On May 24, 2005, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published in the
Federal Register(70 FR 29662) proposed
amendments to the regulations under sec-
tion 41(f) by cross-reference to temporary
regulations (REG–134030–04, 2005–1
C.B. 1339) and temporary regulations (70
FR 29596) (T.D. 9205, 2005–1 C.B. 1267)
(collectively, the 2005 regulations) relat-
ing to the computation and allocation of
the credit for increasing research activi-
ties (research credit) under section 41 for
members of a controlled group of corpora-
tions or a group of trades or businesses un-
der common control (controlled groups).
The 2005 notice of proposed rulemaking
withdrew the proposed regulations pub-
lished in theFederal Registeron July 29,
2003 (68 FR 44499) (REG–133791–02,
2003–2 C.B. 493) (the 2003 proposed
regulations). A public hearing was held
on October 19, 2005. After considering
the comments received and the statements
made at the public hearing regarding the
2005 regulations, the 2005 regulations are
adopted as revised by this Treasury de-
cision. These final regulations generally
retain the provisions of the 2005 regu-
lations with the modifications discussed
below.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Provisions
Allocation of the Group Credit
The 2005 regulations required that the
group credit that did not exceed the sum
of the stand-alone entity credits of all the
members of the group be allocated among
the members of a controlled group in pro-
portion to the relative amounts of each
individual member’s stand-alone entity
credit, computed for each member using
the method that would have yielded the
largest stand-alone entity credit for that
member. Any excess of the group credit
over the sum of the stand-alone entity cred-
its of all the members of the group was
allocated among all the members of the
group based on the ratio of an individual
member’s qualified research expenditures
(QREs) to the sum of all the members’
QREs.
Although commentators generally
agreed that the 2005 regulations fixed
the anomalous results (for example, none
of the group credit would be allocated to
the members of the controlled group if no
member had stand-alone entity credits)
created by the method in the 2003 pro-
posed regulations, some commentators
continued to disagree with the stand-alone
entity credit method. Commentators again
suggested that the members of a con-
trolled group should be permitted to use
any reasonable method to allocate the
group credit as long as the group’s mem-
bers collectively do not claim more than
100 percent of the group credit, or that if
one method must be prescribed for all sit-
uations, a method that allocates the group
credit based on the relative amounts of
each member’s total QREs (gross QREs
method) is more appropriate than any
other method.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
continue to believe that the allocation
method under section 41(f) should be
based on a group member’s QREs in
excess of a base amount, and that the
stand-alone entity credit method reflects
the incremental nature of the credit. The
Treasury Department and the IRS believe
that the stand-alone entity credit method
of the 2005 regulations is consistent with
the purpose of section 41(f) and its under-
lying legislative history. Further, a single,
prescribed method is necessary to ensure
the group’s members collectively do not
claim more than 100 percent of the group
credit. For the reasons stated above and in
the preamble to the 2005 regulations, the
final regulations do not adopt the changes
suggested by the commentators, and retain
the allocation method contained in the
2005 regulations.
Special Allocation Rule for Consolidated
Groups
The 2005 regulations provide that, for
purposes of allocating the group credit
among the members of a controlled group
(first-tier allocation), a consolidated group
(whose members are members of the
controlled group) is treated as a single
member of the controlled group, and a
single stand-alone entity credit is com-
puted for the consolidated group. If the
consolidated group is the only member of
2006–50 I.R.B.1078December 11, 2006

the controlled group, the stand-alone en-
tity credit computedfor the consolidated
group is equal to the group credit. The
portion of the group credit allocated to
a consolidated group must be allocated
among the members of the consolidated
group (second-tier allocation) in propor-
tion to the stand-alone entity credits of the
members of the consolidated group. Un-
der the 2005 regulations, this rule applied
only to taxable years ending on or after
May 24, 2005.
One commentator argued that the treat-
ment of a consolidated group as a single
member of a controlled group is con-
trary to the statutory language of sec-
tions 41(f)(5) and 1563. The Secretary
is granted broad authority under section
1502 to provide rules regarding the deter-
mination of the tax liability of an affiliated
group of corporations filing a consolidated
return. The Treasury Department and the
IRS believe that the treatment of a con-
solidated group as a single member of a
controlled group of corporations for pur-
poses of section 41(f) is within the broad
authority of section 1502. Moreover, this
treatment is consistent with the single
entity treatment of a consolidated group
under certain other provisions of the Code.
One commentator argued that treating
a consolidated group as a single mem-
ber of the controlled group adds unnec-
essary complexity and is administratively
burdensome because it requires additional
rounds of allocationsof each consolidated
group’s credit among its members and ad-
ditional computations of each consolidated
group member’s stand-alone entity credit.
One commentator urged that, if the consol-
idated group rule is retained, then the fi-
nal regulations should not provide specific
rules for how the second-tier allocation is
to be made.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
continue to believe that computing a stand-
alone entity credit for each member of
a consolidated group does not impose a
greater burden than computing a stand-
alone entity credit for a corporation that is
not a member of a consolidated group. The
Treasury Department and the IRS also be-
lieve that specific allocation rules are nec-
essary with respect to the second-tier allo-
cation in order to prevent distortions and
provide certainty concerning each consol-
idated group member’s share of the credit,
for example, if a member ceases to be a
member of the consolidated group or if a
member’s share of credits becomes sub-
ject to section 383. Accordingly, the fi-
nal regulations retain the rules contained
in the 2005 regulations. The final regu-
lations make clear, however, that the spe-
cial allocation rule for consolidated groups
applies prospectively only. Accordingly,
the consolidated group rule contained in
these final regulations applies only to tax-
able years ending on or after the date these
final regulations are published in theFed-
eral Register. For taxable years ending
on or after May 24, 2005, and before the
date these final regulations are published
in theFederal Register, taxpayers must
use the special allocation rule for consoli-
dated groups contained in the 2005 regula-
tions. However, taxpayers may choose to
apply the rule retroactively to taxable years
ending before May 24, 2005, provided that
all the members of the controlled group
treat the consolidated group as a single
member of the controlled group.
One commentator stated that the 2005
regulations are unclear whether, for pur-
poses of the second-tier allocation, each
consolidated group member’s stand-alone
entity credit is to be computed in the same
manner as a controlled group member’s
stand-alone entity credit is computed for
purposes of a first-tier allocation (that is,
using the method that would have yielded
the largest stand-alone entity credit for that
consolidated group member). The Trea-
sury Department and the IRS believe that
the final regulations are clear that this is
the rule, as they provide that “the princi-
ples of paragraph (c)” (which contains the
rule) apply for purposes of the second-tier
allocation. In addition, this rule is illus-
trated inExample 3of §1.41–6(e).
Start-up Companies
For purposes of computing the group
credit, §1.41–6T(b)(2) of the 2005 reg-
ulations treated a controlled group as a
start-up company if the first taxable year
in which at least one member of the group
had gross receipts and at least one mem-
ber of the group had QREs begins after De-
cember 31, 1983; or there were fewer than
3 taxable years beginning after December
31, 1983, and before January 1, 1989, in
which at least one member of the group
had gross receipts and at least one mem-
ber of the group had QREs. One commen-
tator suggested that the rule was not clear
in a situation in which one member of the
group has both gross receipts and QREs in
a taxable year beginning before January 1,
1984. Although the Treasury Department
and IRS believe that the temporary regula-
tions are clear that the start-up rules do not
apply if the group had QREs and gross re-
ceipts in a year beginning before January
1, 1984, no matter which member(s) of the
group had the QREs and gross receipts, the
final regulations clarify the start-up com-
pany rule of §1.41–6(b)(2) to make it ex-
plicit.
Alternative Incremental Research Credit
Section 41(c)(4) provides an election
to determine the research credit using the
alternative incremental research credit
(AIRC) computation. Section 41(c)(4)(B)
provides that the election to use the AIRC
method applies to all succeeding taxable
years unless revoked with the consent of
the Secretary. The 2005 regulations gener-
ally provide that elections (or revocations)
of the AIRC method are made by complet-
ing the portion of Form 6765, “Credit for
Increasing Research Activities,” relating
to the AIRC method (in the case of an
election of the AIRC method) or to the
regular method (in the case of a revocation
of the AIRC method), and attaching the
completed form to the taxpayer’s timely
filed original Federal income tax return
for the year to which the election (or re-
vocation) applies.Once an election (or
revocation) is made for a taxable year, the
taxpayer may not change the election (or
revocation) on an amended return. The
2005 regulations provide that the pro-
visions relating to AIRC elections and
revocations apply to taxable years ending
on or after May 24, 2005.
The 2005 regulations provide special
rules for making (or revoking) an elec-
tion for controlled groups under section
41(f)(1) (in which one or more of the mem-
bers do not join in filing a consolidated
return). In such cases, the designated
member must make (or revoke) the AIRC
election on behalf of the group’s mem-
bers. The election (or revocation) by the
designated member is binding on all the
members of the group for the taxable year
to which the election (or revocation) re-
lates. The 2005 regulations provide that
the designated member is that member
December 11, 200610792006–50 I.R.B.

of the group that is allocated the greatest
amount of the group credit. In the event
the members of a group compute the group
credit using different methods (either the
regular method or the AIRC method) and
at least two members of the group qualify
as the designated member, the designated
member is the member that computes the
group credit using the method that yields
the greater group credit. If all the members
of a controlled group are members of a sin-
gle consolidated group, the AIRC election
(or revocation) is made by the agent of the
consolidated group, determined pursuant
to the rules of §1.1502–77.
One commentator suggested that the
language contained in §1.41–8T(b)(4)(i)
of the 2005 regulations be clarified to
avoid any implication that additional re-
quirements (other than completing the
appropriate portion of Form 6765 and
attaching the form to a timely filed orig-
inal Federal income tax return) apply to
a designated member seeking to elect (or
revoke) the AIRC method. The final reg-
ulations clarify that a designated member
must follow the same procedures for mak-
ing (or revoking) an AIRC election that
apply to other taxpayers.
A commentator also noted that the reg-
ulations do not address whether and how
changes to a member’s research credit
information after the original Federal
income tax return is timely filed may af-
fect its status as the designated member.
The commentator suggested that the final
regulations clarify what happens if the
designated member at the time of filing
subsequently is determined not to be the
designated member. The Treasury Depart-
ment and the IRS agree that clarification
regarding this issue is needed. Accord-
ingly, the final regulations are clarified to
provide that the termdesignated member
means the member of the group that is
allocated the greatest amount of the group
credit under paragraph (c) of §1.41–6
based on the amount of credit reported on
the original timely filed Federal income
tax return.
A commentator questioned what hap-
pens if the designated member fails to
timely file an original Federal income
tax return. The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that the designated mem-
ber must timely file a return in order for
the group to elect (or revoke) the AIRC
method. Accordingly, if the designated
member fails to timely file for the current
credit year (and thus, fails to elect (or
revoke) the AIRC method for that year),
then the method used by the group in the
immediately preceding credit year remains
the method in effect for the current credit
year. The final regulations are amended to
clarify this rule.
The commentator also suggested that
the final regulations allow the members of
a controlled group to decide which mem-
ber of the group will be the designated
member. The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that it is necessary to have
a bright-line test, applicable to all con-
trolled groups, to provide certainty as to
the identity of the designated member, and
that to allow the members of a controlled
group to decide which member’s election
(or revocation) willbind all the members
of the group would not provide certainty in
all situations. Accordingly, this comment
has not been adopted.
Another commentator urged the Trea-
sury Department and the IRS to allow
taxpayers to elect the AIRC method on an
amended return. Alternatively, the com-
mentator argued that if taxpayers cannot
elect the AIRC method on an amended re-
turn, the final regulations should provide
a special rule under which a taxpayer’s
research credit, computed by the tax-
payer under the regular method, may not
be adjusted on audit below the amount
that would have been allowable under
the AIRC method. The Treasury Depart-
ment and the IRS believe that requiring
an election to be made only on a timely
filed original Federal income tax return is
consistent with the statute and the doctrine
of elections, and that the commentator’s
suggestion would inappropriately limit
the authority of the IRS to conduct ex-
aminations. Thus, these final regulations
retain the rules as contained in the 2005
regulations.
Finally, a commentator suggested that,
with respect to the AIRC provisions, the
effective date for the 2005 regulations
should not be limited to taxable years end-
ing on or after May 24, 2005, but should
apply as well to any taxable year ending
before that date, provided that the original
Federal income tax return for that year
has not yet been filed. The Treasury De-
partment and the IRS believe that making
this option available retroactively to tax-
payers that have not yet filed their returns
would treat similarly situated taxpayers
differently. For example, taxpayers that
already had filed their returns would have
been required to request permission for a
revocation, while taxpayers that had not
filed their returns would be eligible for the
automatic revocation procedures set forth
in the 2005 regulations. Thus, the Trea-
sury Department and the IRS believe that
it is appropriate to limit the application
of this rule to prospective use only. The
final regulations are effective for taxable
years ending on or after the date these final
regulations are published in theFederal
Register. For taxable years ending on or
after May 24, 2005, and before the date
these final regulations are published in the
Federal Register, taxpayers must use the
rules contained in the 2005 regulations.
Other
Several commentators mentioned that
the definition of trade or business in the
2005 regulations was changed from the
prior regulations. The change in the 2005
regulations was inadvertent, and the def-
inition has been returned to the language
from the regulations existing prior to the
issuance of the 2005 regulations. For tax-
able years prior to the effective date of
these final regulations, taxpayers may rely
upon the definition of trade or business in
these final regulations.
Another commentator requested that
the regulations provide guidance as to
whether the section 280C(c) election is
made member by member or by the entire
controlled group. This issue is beyond
the scope of these final regulations, as
guidance would have to be provided under
the authority of section 280C rather than
section 41. The Treasury Department and
the IRS may consider addressing this issue
in separate guidance.
Effective Date
The preamble to the 2005 regulations
states that because the Treasury Depart-
ment and the IRS decided to retain the gen-
eral rules for the computation and alloca-
tion of the group credit contained in the
2003 proposed regulations, with certain
modifications, the 2005 regulations were
effective for taxable years ending on or af-
ter May 24, 2005. For taxable years prior
to those covered by the 2005 regulations, a
taxpayer generally may use any reasonable
2006–50 I.R.B.1080December 11, 2006

method of computing and allocating the
group credit. As explained in the preamble
to the 2005 regulations, paragraph (b) of
the 2005 regulations, relating to the com-
putation of the group credit, and paragraph
(c) of the 2005 regulations, relating to the
allocation of the group credit, apply to tax-
able years ending on or after December 29,
1999, if the members of a controlled group,
as a whole, claimed more than 100 per-
cent of the amount that would be allow-
able under paragraph (b). In the case of
a controlled group whose members have
different taxable years and whose mem-
bers use inconsistent methods of alloca-
tion, the members of the controlled group
are deemed to have, as a whole, claimed
more than 100 percent of the amount that
would be allowable under paragraph (b).
One commentator argued that the 2005
regulations should not be effective until fi-
nal regulations are published in theFed-
eral Register. The Treasury Department
and the IRS continue to believe that the
general May 24, 2005, effective date is ap-
propriate, because these final regulations
are substantially similar to the 2003 pro-
posed regulations.
Another commentator objected to the
use of the December 29, 1999, effective
date for the portions of the 2005 regula-
tions that are retroactive, because that is
the date that the previous proposed regu-
lations (2000 proposed regulations) were
sent to theFederal Register, and not the
date (January 4, 2000) on which they were
published. The Treasury Department and
the IRS continue to believe that the De-
cember 29, 1999, effective date is the ap-
propriate date, because this is the date the
2000 proposed regulations were filed with
theFederal Registerand, thus, were made
available to the public. Additionally, sec-
tion 7805(b)(3) allows any regulation to
take effect or apply retroactively to prevent
abuse.
Another commentator criticized the
retroactive application of the rule requiring
that a member’s stand-alone entity credit
be computed using whichever method
results in the greater stand-alone entity
credit for that member, without regard
to the method used to compute the group
credit. The commentator stated that the in-
centive effect sought can only be achieved
prospectively, and that to allow use of
the rule retroactively may cause abusive
inconsistencies where some members of
the group rely on the 2003 proposed reg-
ulations, while other members amend to
follow the new rule. While the Treasury
Department and the IRS do not want to
encourage potentially abusive inconsis-
tencies in years that taxpayers believe are
settled, the Treasury Department and the
IRS believe that one bright line is appro-
priate and do not want to treat similarly
situated taxpayers differently.
Another commentator suggested that
the final regulations make clear that the
special rule for consolidated groups is to
be applied prospectively only. The 2005
regulations required paragraph (b) of those
regulations, relating to the computation of
the group credit, and paragraph (c) of
those regulations, relating to the allocation
of the group credit, to be applied retroac-
tively in certain instances of abuse. The
2005 regulations did not require paragraph
(d), relating to the special rule for consol-
idated groups, to be applied retroactively.
Thus, the Treasury Department and IRS
did not intend that taxpayers be required to
apply retroactively the special rule for con-
solidated groups. Accordingly, the final
regulations clarify that the special rule for
consolidated groups applies only to tax-
able years ending on or after the date these
final regulations are published in theFed-
eral Register. The 2005 regulations apply
for taxable years ending on or after May
24, 2005, and before the date these final
regulations are published in theFederal
Register. However, a controlled group
may choose to apply the rule in paragraph
(d) retroactively if all the members of the
group do so, so that the controlled group,
as a whole, does not claim more than 100
percent of the group credit.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Trea-
sury decision is not a significant regula-
tory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment
is not required. It also has been deter-
mined that section 553(b) of the Admin-
istrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
5) does not apply to these regulations and,
because these regulations do not impose
on small entities a collection of informa-
tion requirement, the Regulatory Flexibil-
ity Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Anal-
ysis is not required. Pursuant to section
7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed
rulemaking preceding these final regula-
tions were submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Ad-
ministration for comment on their impact
on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regula-
tions is Nicole R. Cimino, Office of As-
sociate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries). However, personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended
as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 is amended by removing the entry
for §1.41–6T and adding an entry in nu-
merical order to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section1.41–6alsoissuedunder26
U.S.C. 1502. * * *
Par. 2. In §1.41–0, the table of con-
tents is amended by removing the entries
for §1.41–6T and §1.41–8T and adding en-
tries for §1.41–6 and §1.41–8 to read as
follows:
§1.41–0 Table of contents.
*****
§1.41–6 Aggregation of expenditures.
(a) Controlled groups of corporations;
trades or businesses under common con-
trol.
(1) In general.
(2) Consolidated groups.
(3) Definitions.
(b) Computation of the group credit.
(1) In general.
(2) Start-up companies.
(c) Allocation of the group credit.
(1) In general.
(2) Stand-alone entity credit.
(d) Special rules for consolidated
groups.
(1) In general.
(2) Start-up company status.
December 11, 200610812006–50 I.R.B.

(3) Special rule for allocation of group
credit among consolidated group mem-
bers.
(e) Examples.
(f) For taxable years beginning before
January 1, 1990.
(g) Tax accounting periods used.
(1) In general.
(2) Special rule when timing of research
is manipulated.
(h) Membership during taxable year in
more than one group.
(i) Intra-group transactions.
(1) In general.
(2) In-house research expenses.
(3) Contract research expenses.
(4) Lease payments.
(5) Payment for supplies.
(j) Effective date.
*****
§1.41–8 Special rules for taxable years
ending on or after May 24, 2005.
(a) Alternative incremental credit.
(b) Election.
(1) In general.
(2) Time and manner of election.
(3) Revocation.
(4) Special rules for controlled groups.
(5) Effective date.
Par. 3. Section 1.41–6 is added to read
as follows.
§1.41–6 Aggregation of expenditures.
(a)Controlled group of corporations;
trades or businesses under common con-
trol—(1)In general. To determine the
amount of research credit (if any) allow-
able to a trade or business that at the end
of its taxable year is a member of a con-
trolled group, a taxpayer must—
(i) Compute the group credit in the man-
ner described in paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion; and
(ii) Allocate the group credit among the
members of the group in the manner de-
scribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
(2)Consolidated groups. For special
rules relating to consolidated groups, see
paragraph (d) of this section.
(3)Definitions. For purposes of this
section—
(i)Consolidated grouphas the meaning
set forth in §1.1502–1(h).
(ii)Controlled groupandgroupmean
a controlled group of corporations, as de-
fined in section 41(f)(5), or a group of
trades or businesses under common con-
trol. For rules for determining whether
trades or businesses are under common
control, see §1.52–1 (b) through (g).
(iii)Credit yearmeans the taxable year
for which the member is computing the
credit.
(iv)Group creditmeans the research
credit (if any) allowable to a controlled
group.
(v)Trade or businessmeans a sole pro-
prietorship, a partnership, a trust, an estate,
or a corporation that is carrying on a trade
or business (within the meaning of section
162). Any corporation that is a member
of a commonly controlled group shall be
deemed to be carrying on a trade or busi-
ness if any other member of that group is
carrying on any trade or business.
(b)Computation of the group
credit—(1)In general.Allmembers
of a controlled group are treated as a sin-
gle taxpayer for purposes of computing
the research credit. The group credit is
computed by applying all of the section 41
computational rules on an aggregate basis.
All members of a controlled group must
use the same method of computation, ei-
ther the method described in section 41(a)
or the alternative incremental research
credit (AIRC) method described in section
41(c)(4), in computing the group credit for
a credit year.
(2)Start-up companies—(i)In gen-
eral. For purposes of computing the group
credit, a controlled group is treated as a
start-up company for purposes of section
41(c)(3)(B)(i) if—
(A) There was no taxable year begin-
ning before January 1, 1984, in which a
member of the group had gross receipts
and either the same member or another
member also had qualified research expen-
ditures (QREs); or
(B) There were fewer than three tax-
able years beginning after December 31,
1983, and before January 1, 1989, in which
a member of the group had gross receipts
and either the same member or another
member also had QREs.
(ii)Example. The following exam-
ple illustrates the principles of paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section:
Example. A, B, and C, all of which are calendar
year taxpayers, are members of a controlled group.
During the 1983 taxable year, A had QREs, but no
gross receipts; B had gross receipts, but no QREs;
and C had no QREs or gross receipts. The 1984 tax-
able year was the first taxable year for which each
of A, B, and C had both QREs and gross receipts.
A, B, and C had both QREs and gross receipts in
1985, 1986, 1987, and 1988. Because the first taxable
year for which each of A, B, and C had both QREs
and gross receipts beganafter December 31, 1983,
each of A, B, and C is a start-up company under sec-
tion 41(c)(3)(B)(i) and each is a start-up company for
purposes of computing the stand-alone entity credit.
During the 1983 taxable year, at least one member of
the group, A, had QREs and at least one member of
the group, B, had gross receipts, thus, the group had
both QREs and gross receipts in 1983. Therefore, the
controlled group is not astart-up company because
the first taxable year for which the group had both
QREs and gross receipts did not begin after Decem-
ber 31, 1983, and there were not fewer than three tax-
able years beginning after December 31, 1983, and
before January 1, 1989, in which a member of the
group had gross receipts and QREs.
(iii)First taxable year after December
31, 1993, for which the controlled group
had QREs. In the case of a controlled
group that is treated as a start-up company
under section 41(c)(3)(B)(i) and paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section, for purposes of de-
termining the group’s fixed-base percent-
age under section 41(c)(3)(B)(ii), the first
taxable year after December 31, 1993, for
which the group has QREs is the first tax-
able year in which at least one member of
the group has QREs.
(iv)Example. The following exam-
ple illustrates the principles of paragraph
(b)(2)(iii) of this section:
Example. D, E, and F, all of which are calendar
year taxpayers, are members of a controlled group.
The group is treated as a start-up company under sec-
tion 41(c)(3)(B)(i) and paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this sec-
tion. The first taxable year after December 31, 1993,
for which D had QREs was 1994. The first taxable
year after December 31, 1993, for which E had QREs
was 1995. The first taxable year after December 31,
1993, for which F had QREs was 1996. Because the
1994 taxable year was the first taxable year after De-
cember 31, 1993, for which at least one member of
the group, D, had QREs, for purposes of determin-
ing the group’s fixed-based percentage under section
41(c)(3)(B)(ii), the 1994 taxable year was the first
taxable year after December 31, 1993, for which the
group had QREs.
(c)Allocation of the group credit—(1)
In general. (i) To the extent the group
credit (if any) computed under paragraph
(b) of this section does not exceed the sum
of the stand-alone entity credits of all of the
members of a controlled group, computed
under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, such
group credit shall be allocated among the
members of the controlled group in pro-
portion to the stand-alone entity credits of
the members of the controlled group, com-
puted under paragraph (c)(2) of this sec-
tion:
2006–50 I.R.B.1082December 11, 2006

member’s stand-alone entity credit
group credit that does not exceed sum of all the members’
stand-alone entity credits
×
sum of all the members’ stand-alone entity credits.
(ii) To the extent that the group credit (if
any) computed under paragraph (b) of this
section exceeds the sum of the stand-alone
entity credits of all of the members of the
controlled group, computed under para-
graph (c)(2) of this section, such excess
shall be allocated among the members of a
controlledgroupinproportiontotheQREs
of the members of the controlled group:
member’s QREs
(group creditsum of all the members’ stand-alone entity
credits)
×
sumofallthemembers’QREs.
(2)Stand-alone entity credit.The
termstand-alone entity creditmeans the
research credit (if any) that would be
allowable to a member of a controlled
group if the credit were computed as if
section 41(f)(1) did not apply, except that
the member must apply the rules pro-
vided in paragraphs (d)(1) (relating to
consolidated groups)and (i) (relating to
intra-group transactions) of this section.
Each member’s stand-alone entity credit
for any credit year must be computed
under whichever method (the method de-
scribed in section 41(a) or the method
described in section 41(c)(4)) results in
the greater stand-alone entity credit for
that member, without regard to the method
used to compute the group credit.
(d)Special rules for consolidated
groups—(1)In general. For purposes
of applying paragraph (c) of this section,
a consolidated group whose members are
members of a controlled group is treated
as a single member of the controlled group
and a single stand-alone entity credit is
computed for the consolidated group.
(2)Start-up company status.Aconsoli-
datedgroup’sstatusasastart-upcompany
and the first taxable year after December
31, 1993, for which a consolidated group
has QREs are determined in accordance
with the principles of paragraph (b)(2) of
this section.
(3)Special rule for allocation of group
credit among consolidated group mem-
bers. The portion of the group credit
that is allocated to a consolidated group
is allocated to the members of the con-
solidated group in accordance with the
principles of paragraph (c) of this section.
However, for this purpose, the stand-alone
entity credit of a member of a consolidated
group is computed without regard to sec-
tion 41(f)(1), but with regard to paragraph
(i) of this section.
(e)Examples. The following exam-
ples illustrate the provisions of this section.
Unless otherwise stated, no members of a
controlled group are members of a consoli-
dated group, no member of the group made
any basic research payments or paid or in-
curred any amounts to an energy research
consortium, and except as provided inEx-
ample 6, the group has not made an AIRC
election:
Example 1.Group credit is less than sum of mem-
bers’ stand-alone entity credits—(i)Facts.A,B,and
C, all of which are calendar-year taxpayers, are mem-
bers of a controlled group. For purposes of comput-
ing the group credit for the 2004 taxable year (the
credit year), A, B, and C had the following:
ABCGroup
Aggregate
Credit Year QREs
$200x$20x$110x$330x
1984–1988 QREs
$40x$10x$100x$150x
1984–1988 Gross Receipts
$1,000x$350x$150x$1,500x
Average Annual Gross Receipts for 4 Years Preceding the
Credit Year
$1,200x$200x$300x$1,700x
(
ii)Computation of the group credit—(A)In gen-
eral. The research credit allowable to the group is
computed as if A, B, and C were one taxpayer. The
group credit is equal to 20 percent of the excess of
the group’s aggregate credit year QREs ($330x) over
the group’s base amount ($170x). The group credit is
0.20 × ($330x
$170x), which equals $32x.
(B)Group’s base amount—(1)Computation.
The group’s base amount equals the greater of: the
group’s fixed-base percentage (10 percent) mul-
tiplied by the group’s aggregate average annual
gross receipts for the 4 taxable years preceding
the credit year ($1,700x), or the group’s minimum
base amount ($165x). The group’s base amount,
therefore, is $170x, whichis the greater of: 0.10 ×
$1,700x, which equals $170x, or $165x.
(
2)Group’s minimum base amount. The group’s
minimum base amount is 50 percent of the group’s
aggregate credit year QREs. The group’s minimum
base amount is 0.50 × $330x, which equals $165x.
(3)Group’s fixed-base percentage. The group’s
fixed-base percentage is the lesser of: the ratio that
the group’s aggregate QREs for the taxable years be-
ginning after December 31,1983, and before January
1, 1989, bear to the group’s aggregate gross receipts
for the same period, or 16 percent (the statutory maxi-
mum). The group’s fixed-base percentage, therefore,
is 10 percent, which is the lesser of: $150x/$1,500x,
which equals 10 percent, or 16 percent.
(iii)Allocation of the group credit. Under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, each member’s
stand-alone entity credit must be computed using the
method that results in the greater stand-alone entity
c
redit for that member. The stand-alone entity credit
foreachofA,B,andCisgreaterusingthemethod
described in section 41(a). Therefore, the stand-alone
entity credit for each of A, B, and C must be com-
puted using the method described in section 41(a).
A’s stand-alone entity credit is $20x. B’s stand-alone
entity credit is $2x. C’s stand-alone entity credit is
$11x. The sum of the members’ stand-alone entity
credits is $33x. Because the group credit of $32x
is less than the sum of the stand-alone entity credits
of all the members of the group ($33x), the group
credit is allocated among the members of the group
based on the ratio that each member’s stand-alone
entity credit bears to the sum of the stand-alone entity
credits of all the members of the group. The $32x
group credit is allocated as follows:
December 11, 200610832006–50 I.R.B.

ABCTotal
Stand-Alone Entity Credit
$20x$2x$11x$33x
Allocation Ratio (Stand-Alone Entity Credit/Sum of
Stand-Alone Entity Credits)
20/332/3311/33
Multiplied by: Group Credit
$32x$32x$32x
Equals: Credit Allocated to Member
$19.39x$1.94x$10.67x$32x
Example 2.Group credit exceeds sum of mem-
bers’ stand-alone entity credits—(i)Facts.D,E,F,
and G, all of which are calendar-year taxpayers, are
members of a controlled group. For purposes of com-
puting the group credit for the 2004 taxable year (the
credit year), D, E, F, and G had the following:
DEFGGroup
Aggregate
Credit Year QREs
$580x$10x$70x$15x$675x
1984–1988 QREs
$500x$25x$100x$25x$650x
1984–1988 Gross Receipts
$4,000x$5,000x$2000x$10,000x$21,000x
Average Annual Gross Receipts for 4 Years Preceding the
Credit Year
$5,000x$5,000x$2,000x$5,000x$17,000x
(ii)C
omputation of the group credit—(A)In gen-
eral. The research credit allowable to the group is
computed as if D, E, F, and G were one taxpayer. The
grou
p credit is equal to 20 percent of the excess of
the group’s aggregate credit year QREs ($675x) over
the group’s base amount ($527x). The group credit is
0.20
× ($675x
$527x), which equals $29.76x.
(B)Group’s base amount—(1)Computation.
The group’s base amount equals the greater of:
the g
roup’s fixed-base percentage (3.10 percent)
multiplied by the group’s aggregate average annual
gross receipts for the 4 taxable years preceding the
cre
dit year ($17,000x), or the group’s minimum
base amount ($337.50x). The group’s base amount,
therefore, is $527x, which is the greater of: 0.031 ×
$17
,000x, which equals $527x, or $337.50x.
(2)Group’s minimum base amount. The group’s
minimum base amount is 50 percent of the group’s
aggre
gate credit year QREs. The group’s minimum
base amount is 0.50 × $675x, which equals $337.50x.
(3)Group’s fixed-base percentage. The group’s
fixed
-base percentage is the lesser of: the ratio that
the group’s aggregate QREs for the taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1983, and before Jan-
uary
1, 1989, bear to the group’s aggregate gross
receipts for the same period,or 16 percent (the statu-
tory maximum). The group’s fixed-base percentage,
ther
efore, is 3.10 percent, which is the lesser of:
$650x/$21,000x, which equals 3.10 percent, or 16
percent.
(iii
)Allocation of the group credit. Under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, each member’s
stand-alone entity credit must be computed using
the
method that results in the greater stand-alone
entity credit for that member. The stand-alone entity
credits for D ($19.46x) and F ($1.71x) are greater
usi
ng the AIRC method. Therefore, the stand-alone
entit
y credits for D and F must be computed using
the AIRC method. The stand-alone entity credit for
G ($0.50x) is greater using the method described
in se
ction 41(a). Therefore, the stand-alone entity
credit for G must be computed using the method de-
scribed in section 41(a). E’s stand-alone entity credit
comp
uted under either method is zero. The sum of
the members’ stand-alone entity credits is $21.67x.
Because the group credit of $29.76x is greater than
the
sum of the stand-alone entity credits of all the
members of the group ($21.67x), each member of
the group is allocated an amount of the group credit
equ
al to that member’s stand-alone entity credit. The
excess of the group credit over the sum of the mem-
bers’ stand-alone entity credits ($8.09x) is allocated
amo
ng the members of the group based on the ratio
that each member’s QREs bear to the sum of the
QREs of all the members of the group. The $29.76x
gr
oup credit is allocated as follows:
DEF GTotal
Group Credit
$29.76x
Minus: Sum of Stand-Alone Entity Credits
$19.46x$0.00x$1.71x$0.50x$21.67x
Equals: Excess Group Credit
$8.09x
Excess Group Credit
$8.09x$8.09x$8.09x$8.09x
Multiplied By Allocation Ratio: QREs/Sum of QREs
580/67510/67570/67515/675
Excess Group Credit Allocated
$6.95x$0.12x$0.84x$0.18x
Plus: Stand-Alone Entity Credit
$19.46x$0.00x$1.71x$0.50x
Equals: Credit Allocated to Member
$26.41x$0.12x$2.55x$0.68x$29.76x
Example 3.Consolidated group within a con-
trolled group—(i)Facts. The facts are the same as
inExample 2, except that D and E file a consolidated
return.
(ii)Allocation of the group credit—(A)In gen-
eral. For purposes of allocating the controlled
group’s research credit of $29.76x among the mem-
bers of the controlled group, D and E are treated as a
single member of the controlled group.
(B)Computation of stand-alone entity credits.
The stand-alone entity credit for the consolidated
group is computed by treating D and E as a single
entity. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the
stand-alone entity credit for each member must be
computed using the method that results in the greater
stand-alone entity credit for that member. The
stand-alone entity creditfor each of the DE consoli-
dated group ($17.55x) and F ($1.71x) is greater using
2006–50 I.R.B.1084December 11, 2006

the AIRC method. Therefore, the stand-alone entity
credit for each of the DE consolidated group and
F must be computed using the AIRC method. The
stand-alone entity credit for G ($0.50x) is greater us-
ing the method described in section 41(a). Therefore,
the stand-alone entity credit for G must be computed
using the method described in section 41(a). The
sum of the members’ stand-alone entity credits is
$19.76x.
(C)Allocation of controlled group credit.Be-
cause the group credit of $29.76x is greater than
the sum of the stand-alone entity credits of all the
members of the group ($19.76x), each member of
the group is allocated an amount of the group credit
equal to that member’s stand-alone entity credit.
The excess of the group credit over the sum of the
members’ stand-alone entity credits ($10.00x) is
allocated among the members of the group based on
the ratio that each member’s QREs bear to the sum
of the QREs of all the members of the group. The
group credit of $29.76x is allocated as follows:
DEFGTotal
Group Credit
$29.76x
Minus: Sum of Stand-Alone Entity Credits
$17.55x$1.71x$0.50x$19.76x
Equals: Excess Group Credit
$10.00x
Excess Group Credit
$10.00x$10.00x$10.00x
Multiplied By Allocation Ratio: QREs/Sum of QREs
590/67570/67515/675
Excess Group Credit Allocated
$8.74x$1.04x$0.22x
Plus: Stand-Alone Entity Credit
$17.55x$1.71x$0.50x
Equals: Credit Allocated to Member
$26.29x$2.75x$0.72x$29.76x
(iii)Allocation of the group credit allocated to
consolidated group—(A)In general. The group
credit that is allocated to a consolidated group is
allocated among the members of the consolidated
group in accordance with the principles of paragraph
(c)ofthissection.
(B)Computation of stand-alone entity cred-
its. Under paragraph (c)(2)ofthissection,the
stand-alone entity credit for each member of the
consolidated group must be computed using the
method that results in the greater stand-alone entity
credit for that member. The stand-alone entity credit
for D ($19.46x) is greater using the AIRC method.
Therefore, the stand-alone entity credit for D must be
computed using the AIRC method. The stand-alone
entity credit for E is zero under either method. The
sum of the stand-alone entity credits of the members
of the consolidated group is $19.46x.
(C)Allocation among members of consolidated
group. Because the amount of the group credit allo-
cated to the consolidated group ($26.29x) is greater
than $19.46x, the sum of the stand-alone entity cred-
its of all the members of the consolidated group,
each member of the consolidated group is allocated
an amount of the group credit allocated to the con-
solidated group equal to that member’s stand-alone
entity credit. The excess of the group credit allo-
cated to the consolidated group over the sum of
the consolidated group members’ stand-alone entity
credits ($6.83x) is allocated among the members of
the consolidated group based on the ratio that each
member’s QREs bear to the sum of the QREs of all
the members of the consolidated group. The group
credit of $26.29x allocated to the DE consolidated
group is allocated between D and E as follows:
DETotal
Group Credit
$26.29x
Minus: Sum of Stand-Alone Entity Credits
$19.46x$0.00x$19.46x
Excess Group Credit
$6.83x
Excess Group Credit
$6.83x$6.83x
Multiplied By Allocation Ratio: QREs/Sum of QREs
580/59010/590
Excess Group Credit Allocated
$6.71x$0.12x
Plus: Stand-Alone Entity Credit
$19.46x$0.00x
Equals: Credit Allocated to Member
$26.17x$0.12x$26.29x
Example 4.Member is a start-up company—(i)
Facts. H, I, and J, all of which are calendar-year tax-
payers, are members of a controlled group. The first
taxable year for which J has both QREs and gross re-
ceipts begins after December 31, 1983, therefore, J is
a start-up company under section 41(c)(3)(B)(i). The
first taxable year for which H and I had both QREs
and gross receipts began before December 31, 1983,
therefore, H and I are not start-up companies under
section 41(c)(3)(B)(i). For purposes of computing
the group credit for the 2004 taxable year (the credit
year), H, I, and J had the following:
December 11, 200610852006–50 I.R.B.

HI J
Group
Aggregate
Credit Year QREs
$200x$20x$50x$270x
1984–1988 QREs
$55x$15x$0x$70x
1984–1988 Gross Receipts
$1,000x$400x$0x$1,400x
Average Annual Gross Receipts for 4 Years Preceding the
Credit Year
$1,200x$200x$0x$1,400x
(ii)Computation of the group credit—(A)In gen-
eral. The research credit allowable to the group is
computed as
if H, I, and J were one taxpayer. The
group credit is equal to 20 percent of the excess of
the group’s aggregate credit year QREs ($270x) over
the group’s
base amount ($135x). The group credit is
0.20 × ($270x
$135x), which equals $27x.
(B)Group’s base amount—(1)Computation.
The group’s
base amount equals the greater of:
the group’s fixed-base percentage (5 percent) mul-
tiplied by the group’s aggregate average annual
gross rece
ipts for the 4 taxable years preceding
the credit year ($1,400x), or the group’s minimum
base amount ($135x). The group’s base amount,
therefor
e, is $135x, which is the greater of: 0.05 ×
$1,400x, which equals $70x, or $135x.
(2)Group’s minimum base amount. The group’s
minimum b
ase amount is 50 percent of the group’s
aggregate credit year QREs. The group’s minimum
base amount is 0.50 × $270x, which equals $135x.
(3)Group’s f
ixed-base percentage. Because the
first taxable year in which at least one member of the
group has QREs and at least one member of the group
has gross re
ceipts does not begin after December 31,
1983, the group is not a start-up company. There-
fore, the group’s fixed-base percentage is the lesser
of: the rati
o that the group’s aggregate QREs for the
taxable years beginning after December 31, 1983, and
before January 1, 1989, bear to the group’s aggregate
gross rece
ipts for the same period, or 16 percent (the
statutory maximum). The group’s fixed-base per-
centage, therefore, is 5 percent, which is the lesser
of: $70x/
$1,400x, which equals 5 percent, or 16 per-
cent.
(iii)Allocation of the group credit. Under para-
graph (c)
(2) of this section, the stand-alone entity
credit for each member ofthe group must be com-
puted using the method that results in the greater
stand-alon
e entity credit for that member. The
stand-alone entity credits for H ($20x), I ($2x), and
J ($5x) are greater using the method described in
section 41(
a). Therefore, the stand-alone entity cred-
itsforeachofH,I,andJmustbecomputedusing
the method described in section 41(a). The sum of
the stand-
alone entity credits of the members of the
group is $27x. Because the group credit of $27x
is equal to the sum of the stand-alone entity credits
of all the m
embers of the group ($27x), the group
credit is allocated among the members of the group
based on the ratio that each member’s stand-alone
entity cr
edit bears to the sum of the stand-alone entity
credits of all the members of the group. The group
credit of $27x is allocated as follows:
HI J Total
Stand-Alone Entity Credit
$20x$2x$5x$27x
Allocation Ratio (Stand-Alone Entity Credit/Sum of
Stand-Alone Entity Credits)
20/272/27
5/27
Multiplied by: Group Credit
$27x$27x$27x
Equals: Credit Allocated to Member
$20x$2x$5x$27x
Example 5.Group is a start-up company—(i)
Facts. K, L, and M, all of which are calendar-year
taxp
ayers, are members of a controlled group. The
taxable year ending on December 31, 1999, is the
first taxable year in which a member of the group had
QREs and either the same member or another mem-
ber also had gross receipts. In that year, each of K, L,
and M
had both QREs and gross receipts. The 2004
taxable year is the fifth taxable year beginning after
December 31, 1993, for which at least one member
of the group had QREs. For purposes of computing
the group credit for the 2004 taxable year (the credit
year
), K, L, and M had the following:
KLMGroup
Aggregate
Credit Year QREs
$255x$25x$100x$380x
1984–1988 QREs
$0x$0x$0x$0x
1984–1988 Gross Receipts
$0x$0x$0x$0x
Average Annual Gross Receipts for 4 Years Preceding the
Credit Year
$1,600x$340x$300x$2,240x
(ii)Computation of the group credit—(A)In gen-
eral. The research credit allowable to the group is
computed as if K, L, and M were one taxpayer. The
group credit is equal to 20 percent of the excess of
the group’s aggregate credit year QREs ($380x) over
the group’s base amount ($190x). The group credit is
0.20 × ($380x
$190x), which equals $38x.
(B)Group’s base amount—(1)Computation.
The group’s base amount equals the greater of:
the group’s fixed-base percentage (3 percent) mul-
tiplied by the group’s aggregate average annual
gross receipts for the 4 taxable years preceding
the credit year ($2,240x), or the group’s minimum
base amount ($190x). The group’s base amount,
therefore, is $190x, which is the greater of: 0.03 ×
$2,240x, which equals $67.20x, or $190x.
(2)Group’s minimum base amount. The group’s
minimum base amount is 50 percent of the group’s
aggregate credit year QREs. The group’s minimum
base amount is 0.50 × $380x, which equals $190x.
(3)Group’s fixed-base percentage. Because the
first taxable year in which at least one member of
the group has QREs and at least one member of the
group has gross receipts begins after December 31,
1983, the group is treated as a start-up company
under section 41(c)(3)(B)(i) and paragraph (b)(2)(i)
of this section. Becausethe 2004 taxable year is
the fifth taxable year beginning after December 31,
1993, for which at least one member of the group had
2006–50 I.R.B.1086December 11, 2006

QREs, under section 41(c)(3)(B)(ii)(I), the group’s
fixed-base percentage is 3 percent.
(iii)Allocation of the group credit. Under para-
graph (c)(2) of this section, the stand-alone entity
credit for each member of the group must be com-
puted using the method that results in the greater
stand-alone entity credit for that member. The
stand-alone entity credit for each of K ($25.5x), L
($2.5x), and M ($10x) is greater using the method
described in section 41(a). Therefore, the stand-alone
entity credits for each of K, L, and M must be com-
puted using the method described in section 41(a).
The sum of the stand-alone entity credits of all the
members of the group is $38x. Because the group
credit of $38x is equal to sum of the stand-alone
entity credits of all the members of the group ($38x),
the group credit is allocated among the members
of the group based on the ratio that each member’s
stand-alone entity credit bears to the sum of the
stand-alone entity credits of all the members of the
group. The $38x group credit is allocated as follows:
KLMTotal
Stand-Alone Entity Credit
$25.5x$2.5x$10x$38x
Allocation Ratio (Stand-Alone Entity Credit/Sum of
Stand-Alone Entity Credits)
25.5/382.5/38
10/38
Multiplied by: Group Credit
$38x$38x$38x
Equals: Credit Allocated to Member
$25.5x$2.5x$10x$38x
Example 6.Group alternative incremental re-
search credit—(i)Facts. N, O, and P, all of which are
calendar-year taxpayers, are members of a controlled
group. The research creditunder section 41(a) is not
allowable to the group for the 2004 taxable year be-
cause the group’s aggregate QREs for the 2004 tax-
able year are less than the group’s base amount. The
group credit is computed using the AIRC rules of sec-
tion 41(c)(4). For purposes of computing the group
credit for the 2004 taxableyear (the credit year), N,
O, and P had the following:
NOP Group
Aggregate
Credit Year QREs
$0x$20x$110x$130x
Average Annual Gross Receipts for 4 Years Preceding the
Credit Year
$1,200x$200x$300x$1,700x
(ii)Computation of the group credit. The research
credit allowable to the group is computed as if N, O,
and P were one taxpayer. The group credit is equal
to the sum of: 2.65 percent of so much of the group’s
aggregate QREs for the taxable year as exceeds 1 per-
cent of the group’s aggregate average annual gross re-
ceipts for the 4 taxable years preceding the credit year,
but does not exceed 1.5 percent of such average; 3.2
percent of so much of the group’s aggregate QREs as
exceeds 1.5 percent of such average but does not ex-
ceed 2 percent of such average; and 3.75 percent of
so much of such QREs as exceeds 2 percent of such
average. The group creditis [0.0265 × [($1,700x ×
0.015)
($1,700x × 0.01)]] + [0.032 × [($1,700x ×
0.02)
($1,700x × 0.015)]] + [0.0375 × [$130x
($1,700x × 0.02)]], which equals $4.10x.
(iii)Allocation of the group credit. Under para-
graph (c)(2) of this section, the stand-alone entity
credit for each member of the group must be com-
puted using the method that results in the greater
stand-alone entity credit for that member. The
stand-alone entity credit for N is zero under either
method. The stand-alone entity credit for each of O
($0.66x) and P ($3.99x) is greater using the AIRC
method. Therefore, the stand-alone entity credits for
each of O and P must be computed using the AIRC
method. The sum of the stand-alone entity credits
of the members of the group is $4.65x. Because the
group credit of $4.10x is less than the sum of the
stand-alone entity credits of all the members of the
group ($4.65x), the group credit is allocated among
the members of the group based on the ratio that each
member’s stand-alone entity credit bears to the sum
of the stand-alone entity credits of all the members
of the group. The $4.10x group credit is allocated as
follows:
NOP Total
Stand-Alone Entity Credit
$0.00x$0.66x$3.99x$4.65x
Allocation Ratio (Stand-Alone Entity Credit/Sum of
Stand-Alone Entity Credits)
0/4.650.66/4.653.99/4.65
Multiplied by: Group Credit
$4.10x$4.10x$4.10x
Equals: Credit Allocated to Member
$0.00x$0.58x$3.52x$4.10x
(f)For taxable years beginning before
January 1, 1990. For taxable years begin-
ning before January 1, 1990, see §1.41–6
as contained in 26 CFR part 1, revised
April 1, 2005.
(g)Tax accounting periods used—(1)
In general. The credit allowable to a mem-
ber of a controlled group is that member’s
share of the group credit computed as of
the end of that member’s taxable year. In
computing the group credit for a group
whose members have different taxable
years, a member generally should treat the
taxable year of another member that ends
with or within the credit year of the com-
puting member as the credit year of that
other member. For example, Q, R, and
S are members of a controlled group of
corporations. Both Q and R are calendar
year taxpayers. S files a return using a
fiscal year ending June 30. For purposes
of computing the group credit at the end
of Q’s and R’s taxable year on December
31, S’s fiscal year ending June 30, which
ends within Q’s and R’s taxable year, is
treated as S’s credit year.
(2)Special rule when timing of research
is manipulated. If the timing of research
by members using different tax accounting
periods is manipulated to generate a credit
December 11, 200610872006–50 I.R.B.

in excess of the amount that would be al-
lowable if all members of the group used
the same tax accounting period, then the
appropriate Internal Revenue Service offi-
cial in the operating division that has ex-
amination jurisdiction of the return may re-
quire each member of the group to calcu-
late the credit in thecurrent taxable year
and all future years as if all members of the
group had the same taxable year and base
period as the computing member.
(h)Membership during taxable year in
more than one group. A trade or business
may be a member of only one group for a
taxable year. If, without application of this
paragraph, a business would be a member
of more than one group at the end of its
taxable year, the business shall be treated
as a member of the group in which it was
included for its preceding taxable year. If
the business was not included for its pre-
ceding taxable year in any group in which
it could be included as of the end of its tax-
able year, the business shall designate in its
timely filed (including extensions) return
the group in which it is being included. If
the return for a taxable year is due before
July 1, 1983, the business may designate
its group membership through an amended
return for that year filed on or before June
30, 1983. If the business does not so desig-
nate, then the appropriate Internal Revenue
Service official in the operating division
that has examination jurisdiction of the re-
turn will determine the group in which the
business is to be included.
(i)Intra-group transactions—(1)In
general. Because all members of a group
under common control are treated as a
single taxpayer for purposes of determin-
ing the research credit, transfers between
members of the group are generally disre-
garded.
(2)In-house research expenses. If one
member of a group performs qualified re-
search on behalf of another member, the
member performing the research shall in-
clude in its QREs any in-house research
expenses for that work and shall not treat
any amount received or accrued as fund-
ing the research. Conversely, the mem-
ber for whom the research is performed
shall not treat any part of any amount paid
or incurred as a contract research expense.
For purposes of determining whether the
in-house research for that work is quali-
fied research, the member performing the
research shall be treated as carrying on any
trade or business carried on by the member
on whose behalf the research is performed.
(3)Contract research expenses.Ifa
member of a group pays or incurs contract
research expenses to a person outside the
group in carrying on the member’s trade or
business, that member shall include those
expenses as QREs. However, if the ex-
penses are not paid or incurred in carry-
ing on any trade or business of that mem-
ber, those expenses may be taken into ac-
count as contract research expenses by an-
other member of the group provided that
the other member—
(i) Reimburses the member paying or
incurring the expenses; and
(ii) Carries on a trade or business to
which the research relates.
(4)Lease Payments. The amount paid
or incurred to another member of the group
for the lease of personal property owned by
a member of the group is not taken into ac-
count for purposes of section 41. Amounts
paid or incurred to another member of the
group for the lease of personal property
owned by a person outside the group shall
be taken into account as in-house research
expenses for purposes of section 41 only to
the extent of the lesser of—
(i) The amount paid or incurred to the
other member; or
(ii) The amount of the lease expenses
paid to the person outside the group.
(5)Payment for supplies.Amountspaid
or incurred to another member of the group
for supplies shall be taken into account as
in-house research expenses for purposes of
section41onlytotheextentofthelesser
of—
(i) The amount paid or incurred to the
other member; or
(ii) The amount of the other member’s
basis in the supplies.
(j)Effective date—(1)In general.Ex-
cept for paragraph (d) of this section, these
regulations are applicable for taxable years
ending on or after May 24, 2005. Gen-
erally, a taxpayer may use any reasonable
method of computing and allocating the
credit (including use of the consolidated
group rule contained in paragraph (d) of
this section) for taxable years ending be-
fore May 24, 2005. However, paragraph
(b) of this section, relating to the compu-
tation of the group credit, and paragraph
(c) of this section, relating to the alloca-
tion of the group credit, (applied without
regard to paragraph (d) of this section) will
apply to taxable years ending on or af-
ter December 29, 1999, if the members of
a controlled group, as a whole, claimed
more than 100 percent of the amount that
would be allowable under paragraph (b) of
this section. In the case of a controlled
group whose members have different tax-
able years and whose members use incon-
sistent methods of allocation, the members
of the controlled group shall be deemed to
have, as a whole, claimed more than 100
percent of the amount that would be allow-
able under paragraph (b) of this section.
(2)Consolidated group rule. Paragraph
(d) of this section is applicable for tax-
able years ending on or after November 9,
2006. For taxable years ending on or af-
ter May 24, 2005, and before November 9,
2006, see §1.41–6T(d) as contained in 26
CFR part 1, revised April 1, 2006.
§1.41–6T [Removed]
Par. 4. Section 1.41–6T is removed.
Par. 5. Section 1.41–8 is added to read
as follows.
§1.41–8 Special rules for taxable years
ending on or after November 9, 2006.
(a)Alternative incremental credit.At
the election of the taxpayer, the credit de-
termined under section 41(a)(1) equals the
amount determined under section 41(c)(4).
(b)Election—(1)In general.Atax-
payer may elect to apply the provisions of
the alternative incremental research credit
(AIRC) in section 41(c)(4) for any taxable
year of the taxpayer beginning after June
30, 1996. If a taxpayer makes an election
under section 41(c)(4),the election applies
to the taxable year for which made and all
subsequent taxable years unless revoked in
the manner prescribed in paragraph (b)(3)
of this section.
(2)Time and manner of election.An
election under section 41(c)(4) is made
by completing the portion of Form 6765,
“Credit for Increasing Research Activi-
ties,” relating to the election of the AIRC,
and attaching the completed form to the
taxpayer’s timely filed (including exten-
sions) original return for the taxable year
to which the election applies. An election
under section 41(c)(4) may not be made
on an amended return.
(3)Revocation. An election under this
section may not be revoked except with
2006–50 I.R.B.1088December 11, 2006

the consent of the Commissioner. A tax-
payer is deemed to have requested, and to
have been granted, the consent of the Com-
missioner to revoke an election under sec-
tion 41(c)(4) if the taxpayer completes the
portion of Form 6765 relating to the regu-
lar credit and attaches the completed form
to the taxpayer’s timely filed (including
extensions) original return for the year to
which the revocation applies. An election
under section 41(c)(4) may not be revoked
on an amended return.
(4)Special rules for controlled
groups—(i)In general. In the case of
a controlled group of corporations, all
the members of which are not included
on a single consolidated return, an elec-
tion (or revocation) must be made by the
designated member by satisfying the re-
quirements of paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3)
of this section (whichever applies), and
such election (or revocation) by the des-
ignated member shall be binding on all
the members of the group for the credit
year to which the election (or revocation)
relates. If the designated member fails
to timely make (or revoke) an election,
each member of the group must compute
the group credit using the method used to
compute the group credit for the immedi-
ately preceding credit year.
(ii)Designated member. For purposes
of this paragraph (b)(4) of this section,
for any credit year, the termdesignated
membermeans that member of the group
that is allocated the greatest amount of the
group credit under paragraph (c) of this
section based on the amount of credit re-
ported on the original timely filed Federal
income tax return (even if that member
subsequently is determined not to be the
designated member). If the members
of a group compute the group credit us-
ing different methods (either the method
described in section 41(a) or the AIRC
method of section 41(c)(4)) and at least
two members of the group qualify as
the designated member, then the term
designated membermeans that member
that computes the group credit using the
method that yields the greater group credit.
Forexample,A,B,C,andDaremembers
of a controlled group but are not members
of a consolidated group. For the 2005
taxable year, the group credit using the
method described in section 41(a) is $10x.
Under this method, A would be allocated
$5x of the group credit, which would be
the largest share of the group credit under
this method. For the 2005 taxable year,
the group credit using the AIRC method is
$15x. Under the AIRC method, C would
be allocated $5x of the group credit, which
is the largest share of the group credit com-
puted using the AIRC method. Because
the group credit is greater using the AIRC
method and C is allocated the greatest
amount of credit under that method, C is
the designated member. Therefore, C’s
section 41(c)(4) election is binding on all
the members of the group for the 2005
taxable year.
(5)Effective date. These regulations
are applicable for taxable years ending
on or after November 9, 2006. For tax-
able years ending on or after May 24,
2005, and before November 9, 2006, see
§1.41–8T(b)(5) as contained in 26 CFR
part 1, revised April 1, 2006.
§1.41–8T [Removed]
Par. 6. Section 1.41–8T is removed.
Steven T. Miller,
Acting Deputy Commissioner
for Services and Enforcement.
Approved October 18, 2006.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 8,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for November 9, 2006, 71 F.R. 65722)
Section 937.—Residence
and Source Rules Involving
Possessions
26 CFR 1.937–1: Bona fide residency in a posses-
sion.
T.D. 9297
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
Residence Rules Involving
U.S. Possessions
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations that provide rules for determin-
ingbona fideresidency in the following
U.S. territories: American Samoa, Guam,
the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico,
and the United States Virgin Islands un-
dersection937(a)oftheInternalRevenue
Code.
DATES:Effective Date:These regulations
are effective November 14, 2006.
Applicability Dates:For dates of appli-
cability, see §1.937–1(i).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: J. David Varley, (202)
435–5262 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 11, 2005, the IRS and Trea-
sury Department published in theFederal
Registertemporary regulations (T.D.
9194, 2005–1 C.B. 1016 [70 FR 18920],
as corrected at 70 FR 32589–01), which
provided rules to implement section 937
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) deal-
ing with U.S. possessions or territories
specified in that section (territories) and
to conform existing regulations to other
legislative changes with respect to the ter-
ritories. A notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–159243–03, 2005–1 C.B. 1075 [70
FR 18949]) cross-referencing the tem-
porary regulations was published in the
Federal Registeron the same day. Writ-
ten comments were received in response
to the notice of proposed rulemaking and a
public hearing on the proposed regulations
was held on July 21, 2005. After con-
sideration of the comments, the IRS and
Treasury Department on January 31, 2006
published in the Federal Register final reg-
ulations (T.D. 9248, 2006–9 I.R.B. 524 [71
FR 4996], as corrected at 71 FR 14099)
under section 937(a) concerning the de-
termination of residency in a territory and
adopting with amendments the proposed
regulations (specifically, §§1.937–1 and
1.881–5(f)(4)).
Section 937(a) provides that an individ-
ual is abona fideresident of a territory if
the individual meets a presence test, a tax
home test and a closer connection test. In
December 11, 200610892006–50 I.R.B.

order to satisfy the presence test, a per-
son must be present in the territory for at
least 183 days during the taxable year (the
183-day rule), unless otherwise provided
in regulations. The final section 937(a)
regulations provide several alternatives to
the 183-day rule in the statute.
Treasury Reg. §1.937–1 provides that
an individual who does not satisfy the 183-
day rule nevertheless meets the presence
test if the individual satisfies one of three
alternative tests: (1) the individual spends
no more than 90 days in the United States
during the taxable year; (2) the individ-
ual has no more than $3,000 of earned
income from U.S. sources and is present
for more days in the territory than in the
United States during the taxable year; or
(3) the individual has no significant con-
nection to the United States during the tax
year. The term “significant connection”
is generally defined as a permanent home,
voter registration, spouse, or minor child
in the United States. The final regulations
also provide that certain days count as days
of presence in the relevant territory for pur-
poses of the presence test, even if the per-
son was not physically present in the ter-
ritory. Similarly, certain days that an indi-
vidual spends in the United States do not
count as days of presence in the United
States for purposes of the presence test.
Before finalizing the regulations, the
IRS and Treasury Department received
comments suggesting that days spent out-
side of a territory for nonmedical family
emergencies, charitable pursuits or busi-
ness travel should count as days spent
in the territory and outside the United
States. The IRS and Treasury Department
were sympathetic to the concern that the
realities of life in the territories might re-
quire periodic temporary absences from
the territories, butfound that the partic-
ular suggestions would have been very
difficult to implement and monitor admin-
istratively. Further, the IRS and Treasury
Department declined to adopt the com-
mentators’ suggestion to import a simple
mirroring of the substantial presence test
of section 7701(b) to determinebona fide
residency in a territory on the ground
that Congress had considered but rejected
this approach for determining residency
in a territory. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No.
108–755, at 791–795 (2004). Nonethe-
less, the IRS and Treasury Department
believed that final regulations provided
meaningful advantages to taxpayers over
the proposed and temporary regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
Following publication of the final reg-
ulations, additional comments were made
requesting that the IRS and Treasury De-
partment revisit the presence test. For ex-
ample, one commentator requested that up
to 30 days of business or personal travel
outside the United States and the territory
be treated as days of presence in a terri-
tory. The IRS and Treasury Department
continue to be sympathetic to the concern
that the realities of life in the territories
might require periodic temporary absences
from the territories for business pursuits
but have concluded that such a rule would
be administratively difficult to implement
and monitor. In addition, commentators
have not been able to offer meaningful sug-
gestions to alleviate this concern. The IRS
and Treasury Department believe that in
these situations, the 183-day rule in com-
bination with the alternatives to that rule,
as liberalized in these final regulations,
provide sufficient flexibility to accommo-
date absences from the territory to pursue
a range of activities.
In addition, a commentator argued that
the treatment of major disasters should be
liberalized to allow individuals to spend
time away from the territories in the event
of a natural disaster. This commentator
said the final regulations only provide
rules for evacuationsof territories, which
suggests the IRS and Treasury Department
do not realize that the territories are typi-
cally not evacuated in the event of natural
disasters such as a hurricane. This com-
mentator appears to have misunderstood
the final regulations. The final regula-
tions already address the commentator’s
concerns and providethat if an individual
leaves, or is unable to return to, a relevant
territory during a two-week period within
which an officially declared major disaster
in the relevant territory occurs, then the
individual will not count any day during
either period as a day of presence in the
United States, even if the individual is
physically present in the United States,
and will treat such days as days of pres-
ence in the relevant territory. In addition,
the regulations provide for similar relief
in case there ever is a natural disaster that
would warrant the evacuation of a terri-
tory. The IRS and Treasury Department
recognize that it is currently not the cus-
tom to evacuate the territories in the event
of natural disasters such as a hurricane.
However, the IRS and Treasury Depart-
ment continue to think it best to retain
the rules regarding evacuations so that the
regulations are flexible enough to allow
for such an event should it ever occur.
Individuals who remain in the territories
during the natural disaster obviously can
count those days for the presence test.
Commentators also requested that out-
patient care be added to the permitted types
of qualifying medical treatment. Under
the final regulations, a temporary stay in
the United States for certain documented
medical treatment of the individual, or a
parent, spouse or child whom the individ-
ual accompanies to the treatment, will not
count as days spent in the United States
for purposes of the alternatives to the 183-
day rule, irrespective of where the medi-
cal condition arose. The final regulations
focus on inpatient treatment in a hospital,
hospice or residential medical care facil-
ity and the formal credentials of the health
care provider as an objective proxy for a
determination that a medical condition is
serious enough to entail periods of treat-
ment that may not be readily covered by
other alternatives to the 183-day rule. The
IRS and Treasury Department continue to
believe that in medical situations not other-
wise provided for in the final regulations,
the 183-day rule in combination with the
alternatives to that rule, as liberalized in
these final regulations, provide sufficient
flexibility to accommodate absences from
the territories.
Finally, these post-publication com-
ments suggested a new alternative to the
presence test whereby U.S. citizens and
residents should be permitted to satisfy
the 183-day rule of section 937(a)(1) by
meeting some type of averaging test that
would better accommodate the reality that
business cycles and life in the territories
may require more time away from the ter-
ritories in some years than in others. The
IRS and Treasury Department believe that
this final new suggestion is administrable
and achieves the additional flexibility the
commentators sought for the host of activ-
ities commentators discussed above and
for which the commentators suggested
additional exceptions to the 183-day rule.
2006–50 I.R.B.1090December 11, 2006

As amended by this Treasury decision,
the final regulations now incorporate a
new alternative to the presence test that
requires the individual to be present in
the relevant territory for a simple non-
weighted three-year average of 183 days
per year, provided that a minimum of 60
days of presence is met in each of those
three years. Thus, under this alternative,
an individual will satisfy the presence
test for a taxable year if the individual is
present in the relevant territory a mini-
mum of 549 days during the three-year
period that includes the current taxable
year and the two preceding taxable years,
so long as the individual is also present in
the relevant territory for a minimum of 60
days in each year during that three-year
period. This test is in addition to the exist-
ing regulatory alternatives to the statutory
test and incorporates the existing rules for
counting days.
In light of the additional flexibility
achieved by the new three-year averag-
ing alternative adopted in this Treasury
decision, the IRS and Treasury Depart-
ment have determined not to adopt the
other amendments suggested by commen-
tators. These suggestions were each felt
to be either not appropriate or difficult to
administer. The new three-year averag-
ing alternative, together with the existing
available alternatives, provides individu-
als with sufficient flexibility in applying
the presence test. It is not expected that
any further amendments will be made to
thebona fideresidence rules of §1.937–1.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Trea-
sury decision is not a significant regula-
tory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment
is not required. It also has been deter-
mined that section 553(b) of the Admin-
istrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
5) does not apply to these regulations. Be-
cause the regulations do not impose a col-
lection of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chap-
ter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to sec-
tion 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of pro-
posed rulemaking preceding these regula-
tions was submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Ad-
ministration for comment on its impact on
small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regula-
tionsisJ.DavidVarley,OfficeoftheAs-
sociate Chief Counsel (International), IRS.
However, other personnel from the IRS
and Treasury Department participated in
their development.
*****
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended
as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part1isamendedbyaddingentriesinnu-
merical order to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.937–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 937(a). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.937–1 is amended as
follows:
1. Revise paragraph (c)(1) and (c)(5)
introductory text.
2. Revise paragraph (g) by redesignat-
ingExamples 1through9asExamples 2
through10respectively, adding newEx-
ample 1, and revising newly designated
Example 2, the last sentence;Example 3,
the ninth sentence; andExample 6,the
sixth sentence.
The revisions and addition read as fol-
lows:
§1.937–1 Bona fide residency in a
possession.
*****
(c)Presence test—(1)In general.
A United States citizen or resident
alien individual (as defined in section
7701(b)(1)(A)) satisfies the requirements
of this paragraph (c) for a taxable year if
that individual—
(i) Was present in the relevant posses-
sion for at least 183 days during the taxable
year;
(ii) Was present in the relevant pos-
session for at least 549 days during the
three-year period consisting of the taxable
year and the two immediately preceding
taxable years, provided that the individual
was also present in the relevant possession
for at least 60 days during each taxable
year of the period;
(iii) Was present in the United States for
no more than 90 days during the taxable
year;
(iv) During the taxable year had earned
income (as defined in §1.911–3(b)) in the
United States, if any, not exceeding in
the aggregate the amount specified in sec-
tion 861(a)(3)(B) and was present for more
days in the relevant possession than in the
United States; or
(v) Had no significant connection to the
United States during the taxable year. See
paragraph (c)(5) of this section.
*****
(5)Significant connection.Forpur-
poses of paragraph (c)(1)(v) of this sec-
tion—
*****
(g)Examples.***
Example 1.Presence test. H, a U.S. citizen, is en-
gaged in a profession that requires frequent travel. H
spends 195 days of each of the years 2005 and 2006
in Possession N. In 2007, H spends 160 days in Pos-
session N. Under paragraph (c)(1)(ii), H satisfies the
presence test of paragraph (c) of this section with re-
spect to Possession N for taxable year 2007. Assum-
ing that in 2007 H does not have a tax home outside of
Possession N and does not have a closer connection
to the United States or a foreign country under para-
graphs (d) and (e) of this section respectively, then
regardless of whether H was abona fideresident of
Possession N in 2005 and 2006, H is abona fideres-
ident of Possession N for taxable year 2007.
Example 2.Presence test.***However,under
paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this section, W still satisfies
the presence test of paragraph (c) of this section with
respect to Possession P because she has no earned
income in the United States and is present for more
days in Possession P than in the United States.
Example 3.Presence test.***Assumingthatno
other accommodations in the United States constitute
a permanent home with respect to T, then under para-
graphs (c)(1)(v) and (c)(5) of this section, T has no
significant connection to the United States. * * *
*****
Example 6.Seasonal workers— Tax home and
closer connection. * * * P satisfies the presence test
of paragraph (c) of this section with respect to both
Possession Q and Possession I, because, among other
reasons, under paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section she
does not spend more than 90 days in the United States
during the taxable year. * * *
*****
December 11, 200610912006–50 I.R.B.

Linda M. Kroening,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved November 3, 2006.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
oftheTreasury(TaxPolicy).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 13,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for November 14, 2006, 71 F.R. 66232)
2006–50 I.R.B.1092December 11, 2006

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Extension of Election of
Alternative Deficit Reduction
Contribution
Notice 2006–105
This notice sets forth the procedures
for electing an alternative deficit reduction
contribution under § 412(l)(12) of the In-
ternal Revenue Code (the Code) (which
was added by section 102 of the Pension
Funding Equity Act of 2004 (PFEA), Pub.
L. No. 108–218), as modified by section
402(i) of the Pension Protection Act of
2006 (PPA), Pub. L. No. 109–280. Ex-
cept as outlined below, all references to
the Code and the Employee Retirement In-
come Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) are to
the Code and ERISA as in effect on August
16, 2006.
I. Background
Section 412(l)(12) of the Code per-
mits certain employers who are required
to make additional contributions under
§ 412(l) to elect a reduced amount of those
contributions (“alternative deficit reduc-
tion contributions”) for plan years begin-
ning after December 27, 2003, and before
December 28, 2005. Section 412(l)(12) is
generally limited to a plan maintained by
either (1) a commercial passenger airline
or (2) an employer primarily engaged in
the production or manufacture of a steel
mill product or the processing of iron ore
pellets.
1
Section 302(d)(12) of ERISA
permits an identicalelection and provides
identical requirements with respect to the
minimum funding standard of section 302.
Announcement 2004–38, 2004–1 C.B.
878, provides procedures for electing an
alternative deficit reduction contribution
including a model election form. An-
nouncement 2004–43, 2004–1 C.B. 955,
provides guidance on the types of notices
thatmustbegivenbyanemployertoplan
participants and their beneficiaries and to
the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corpora-
tion (the PBGC) if that employer elects
to make an alternative deficit reduction
contribution described in Announcement
2004–38. In addition, Announcement
2004–43, as corrected by Announcement
2004–51, 2004–1 C.B. 1041, sets forth
timing requirements for the election. No-
tice 2004–59, 2004–2 C.B. 447, provides
guidance on the restrictions that are placed
on plan amendments following an em-
ployer’s election of an alternative deficit
reduction contribution under § 412(l)(12)
of the Code and section 302(d)(12) of
ERISA.
Section 402(i) of PPA extended the al-
ternative deficit reduction election for cer-
tain employers. The extension under the
PPA is limited to an eligible employer that
is a commercial passenger airline, can be
made for any plan year beginning after
December 27, 2003, and before Decem-
ber 28, 2007, and applies without regard
to the two plan year limit contained in
§ 412(l)(12)(D)(ii) of the Code.
Other than as necessary to reflect the
statutory narrowing of the class of eligible
employers, the elimination of the two-year
rule and the extension of time described in
the preceding paragraph, all of the guid-
ance described above with respect to the
election under PFEA remains applicable
to the election under section 402(i) of
the PPA with the following exceptions.
Notwithstanding the requirement under
Announcement 2004–43 that any alterna-
tive deficit reduction contribution election
be made by the end of the first quarter of
the plan year, if, on or before December
21, 2006, an employer makes an alterna-
tive deficit reduction contribution election
for the first plan year beginning on or after
December 28, 2005, that election will be
deemed timely. In addition, if an employer
issuesaPBGCnoticeforaplanforsucha
plan year on or before December 21, 2006,
thePBGCwilltreatthePBGCnoticeas
timely issued. The content of the PBGC
notice should reflect a reasonable effort to
make any appropriate modifications to the
projections in order to take into account
the enactment of the PPA.
Section III of this notice sets forth the
information that must be contained in the
election and the address to which the elec-
tion must be sent. If an employer elects
an alternative deficit reduction contribu-
tion for any plan year, the employer must
provide written notice of the election to the
plan’s participants and beneficiaries and
(except to the extent that an earlier notice
is required by the preceding paragraph) to
the PBGC within 30 days of filing the elec-
tion.
II. Effect on Other Documents
Announcement 2004–38 is modified,
Announcement 2004–43 is amplified and
modified, and Notice 2004–59 is ampli-
fied.
1
An eligible employer under PFEA (but not PPA) also included an organization described in § 501(c)(5) of the Code that established a plan on June 30, 1955, to which § 412 now applies.
December 11, 200610932006–50 I.R.B.

III. Election of Alternative Deficit Reduction Contribution for Commercial Passenger Airlines
A. As an officer of the employer maintaining the plan, I hereby elect an alternative deficit reduction contribution under
§ 412(l)(12) of the Code and section 302(d)(12) ofERISA and include the following information:
1. The name and EIN of the employer:
2. The name and plan number of the plan:
3. The plan year to which the election relates:
4. Specify the plan year beginning in 2000 for which the additional contributions under § 412(l) did not
apply:
5.Ifanyoftheinformationinitems1or2wasdifferentforthe 2000 plan year than in the plan year for which the election
is being made, enter the plan name, plan number, and name and EIN of the employer for the 2000 plan year:
6. Signature of employerDate
Theelectionmustbesignedbyanofficeroftheemployermaintaining the plan. An authorized representative of the
employer, plan administrator, or enrolled actuarymay not sign this election on behalf of the employer.
B. This election must be filed at the following address:
Internal Revenue Service
Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division
Attention: SE:T:EP:RA:T
Alternative DRC Election
P.O. Box 27063
McPherson Station
Washington, D.C. 20038
Drafting Information
The principal author of this notice is
Michael Rubin of the Employee Plans,
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Di-
vision. For further information regarding
this notice, please contact the Employee
Plans taxpayer assistance telephone ser-
vice at (877) 829–5500 (a toll-free num-
ber) between the hours of 8:30 am and
4:30 pm Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday. Mr. Rubin may be reached at
(202) 283–9888 (not a toll-free number).
2006–50 I.R.B.1094December 11, 2006

Part IV. Items of General Interest
Announcement of Disciplinary Actions Involving
Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents,
and Enrolled Actuaries — Suspensions, Censures,
Disbarments, and Resignations
Announcement 2006-94
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries may not accept assistance from,
or assist, any person who is under disbar-
ment or suspension from practice before
the Internal Revenue Service if the assis-
tance relates to a matter constituting prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service
and may not knowingly aid or abet another
person to practice before the Internal Rev-
enue Service during a period of suspen-
sion, disbarment, or ineligibility of such
other person.
To enable attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries to identify persons to whom
these restrictions apply, the Director, Of-
fice of Professional Responsibility, will
announce in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
their names, their city and state, their pro-
fessional designation, the effective date
of disciplinary action, and the period of
suspension. This announcement will ap-
pear in the weekly Bulletin at the earliest
practicable date after such action and will
continue to appear in the weekly Bulletins
for five successive weeks.
Consent Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid the institution
or conclusion of a proceeding for his or
her disbarment or suspension from prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service,
may offer his or her consent to suspension
from such practice. The Director, Office
of Professional Responsibility, in his dis-
cretion, may suspend an attorney, certified
public accountant, enrolled agent, or en-
rolled actuary in accordance with the con-
sent offered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent suspension from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Tomasulo, Maria V.Wantagh, NYCPAIndefinite
from
August 7, 2006
Maloy, Jr., Robert J.Galion, OHCPAIndefinite
from
August 15, 2006
Pate, Janet M.Broadview, NMCPAIndefinite
from
August 15, 2006
Scott, HowardMiami, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 15, 2006
Adamic, Jonathan E.San Lorenzo, CACPAIndefinite
from
August 18, 2006
December 11, 200610952006–50 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Becker, Ira S.Wilmette, ILCPAAugust 22, 2006
to
August 21, 2008
Snigur, Virginia IaquintaWarwick, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
Galpern, Joel G.North Miami, FLCPAIndefinite
from
September 1, 2006
DiSiena, Frank E.Katonah, NYCPAIndefinite
from
September 4, 2006
Carusona, Thomas M.Huntington, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 15, 2006
Shaikh, Firoz A.Melville, NYCPAIndefinite
from
September 15, 2006
Wickline, Ella L.Ronceverte, WVEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
September 15, 2006
Smith, Daniel B.Garden City, NYCPAIndefinite
from
September 18, 2006
Carlin, Charles R.South Bend, INCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Devine, Daniel M.Boca Raton, FLCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Dupont, Hewitt, J.Daytona Beach, FLCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Farrell, Raymond J.Matawan, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Kelligrew, John R.White Plains, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Klein, Robert B.Bardonia, NYEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Long, Gregory S.Hutchinson, KSAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
2006–50 I.R.B.1096December 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Moore, Ronald L.Cayce, SCCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Schaffer, Robert J.Calverton, NYCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Berlin, StanleyErie, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Briscoe, JackDrexel Hill, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Buzzeo, Michael V.New Canaan, CTCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Sacco, John M.Pound Ridge, NYCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Sheiman, Alan P.Sherman Oaks,CAEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Tourin, MarkMiami, FLCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Burns, William J.Randolph, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 16, 2006
Webb, Norman R.Daphne, ALCPAIndefinite
from
October 16, 2006
Brown, Guia EPHobe Sound, FLEnrolled AgentOctober 20, 2006
to
April 19, 2008
Gram, John A.Gainesville, GAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Herzog, Samuel A.Jericho, NYCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Kellicker, John F.Cleveland, OHCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Krieger, Robert M.Hampton, NHCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Minsky, Neil J.Randolph, NJCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
December 11, 200610972006–50 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
O’Brien, TimothyNewton Center, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Sukenik, MartinKew Gardens, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Savoy, CassandraEast Orange, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 7, 2006
Bonner, Charles B.Athens, GACPAIndefinite
from
November 15, 2006
Levine, Barton P.New York, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 15, 2006
Taves, Joseph G.Provincetown, MACPAIndefinite
from
November 15, 2006
Young, RonaldFairfield, CTCPAIndefinite
from
November 16, 2006
Brush, Charles, H.Southbury, CTCPAIndefinite
from
December 1, 2006
Jacob, Robert T.Tucson, AZCPAIndefinite
from
December 15, 2006
Expedited Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, the Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, is authorized to
immediately suspend from practice before
the Internal RevenueService any practi-
tioner who, within five years from the date
the expedited proceeding is instituted (1)
has had a license to practice as an attor-
ney, certified public accountant, or actuary
suspended or revoked for cause or (2) has
been convicted of certain crimes.
The following individuals have been
placed under suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service by virtue
of the expedited proceeding provisions:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Williams, Donna M.York, PACPAIndefinite
from
July 25, 2006
Foushee, Wayne H.Winston-Salem, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
2006–50 I.R.B.1098December 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Kronegold, Sheldon H.Englewood, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
Norman, ClarenceBrooklyn, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
Chin, ArnoldSan Francisco, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
McCann, ThomasDes Moines, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
Whaley, Daniel P.Hood, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
Chukumba, Stephen C.Montclair, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 12, 2006
Katz, Edward C.New York, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 12, 2006
Kadunce, Darrell L.Butler,PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 18, 2006
Allen, Robert W.Torrance, CACPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Brown, Davin W.Raleigh, NCCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Cunningham, R. ScottDalton, GAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Eilers, Tom D.Raleigh, NCCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Gerdes, Roger A.Carpinteria, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Kurth, Richard FrederickDanville, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Mitchell, McArthur D.Charlotte, NCCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
December 11, 200610992006–50 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Ragusa, Patricia A.Spring, TXCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Wulfsberg, David E.Murrieta, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Cox, Brian J.Plymouth, MICPAIndefinite
from
September 25, 2006
Mandelman, Michael D.Mequon, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 25, 2006
Miller, Steven L.Canal Winchester, OHAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 25, 2006
Felli, Jay A.Mequon, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 2, 2006
Schoch V, Arch K.High Point, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 2, 2006
Andre, Patrick F.Manchester, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Brill, Kevin MichaelDowners Grove, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Day, Richard G.Largo, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Dull, Kay E.Miami Shores, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Frank, Arthur J.Chicago, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Gackle, Thomas E.Plymouth, MIAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Hamilton, Howard D.Fort Dodge, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Hodge, Robert M.Lafayette, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Lesyshen, Donna P.Waterloo, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
2006–50 I.R.B.1100December 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Peiss, John H.Downers Grove, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Petty, James E.Austin, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Ruffin-Hudson, Linda C.Saint Louis, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Schaefer, James E.St. LouisPark, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Schmitt, Martha G.Minneapolis, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Shannon, Terrance J.Mission Viejo, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Smith, Matthew S.Denver, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Swanson, RichardWest Chicago, ILCPAIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Thomas, Kenneth A.Farmers Branch, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Tomasa, Ryan H.Honolulu, HIAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Williams, Jr., Harry D.San Antonio, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Wilson, Jr., Robert N.Ayer, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Yum, Chris ChulhoWoodbridge, VAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Dunham, Richard G.Irvine, CAEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Housman, DavidAlbuquerque, NMAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Malitz, Charles P.Beachwood, OHCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
December 11, 200611012006–50 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Emig, Robert W.Houston, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 24, 2006
Freese, Scott D.Norfolk, NEAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 24, 2006
Rambo, Byron L.Sanford, FLEAIndefinite
from
October 24, 2006
Ask, Ronald W.Riverside, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Berry, Richard S.Tempe, AZAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Burkhardt, William R.Canyon Lake, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Callaway, Jr., Paul F.Greensboro, NCCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Doyle, David W.Arvada,COAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Elmore, III, VirgilBirmingham, ALAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Grandt, Lawrence E.Gurnee, ILCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Hanson, Steven G.Lodi, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Omodele, BoluwajiHouston, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Rahden, Horst R.Fort Wayne, INCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Censoprano, SalvatoreFoster City, CACPAIndefinite
from
October 31, 2006
Powell, James S.Lakewood, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 31, 2006
Allen, Leonard G.Mesa, AZCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
2006–50 I.R.B.1102December 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Parker, Donald A.Benson, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 6, 2006
Rogers, James M.Tulsa, OKAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 6, 2006
Coopet, Michael W.Saint Paul, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Day, Jr., John TaylorHingham, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Grella, Paul J.Canton, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Meggers, Theodore M.Des Moines, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Tolbert, James L.Los Angeles, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, after notice and an op-
portunity for a proceeding before an ad-
ministrative law judge, the following indi-
viduals have been placed under suspension
from practice before the Internal Revenue
Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Lazaro, CharlesVisalia, CAAttorneyJuly 20, 2006
to
January 19, 2010
Wasilowski, RonaldNatrona Heights, PACPAJuly 21, 2006
to
July 20, 2011
Wellbery, William J.Deerfield Beach, FLCPAOctober 12, 2006
to
October 11, 2008
Clapper, Gary L.La Mesa, CAEnrolled AgentNovember 2, 2006
to
November 1, 2008
December 11, 200611032006–50 I.R.B.

Consent Disbarments From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid institution or con-
clusion of a proceeding for his or her dis-
barment or suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service, may of-
fer his or her consent to disbarment from
such practice. The Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, in his discretion,
may disbar an attorney, certified public ac-
countant, enrolled agent, or enrolled actu-
ary in accordance with the consent offered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent disbarment from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Disbarment
Grossman, Robert S.Ardmore, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 4, 2006
Disbarments From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, after notice and an oppor-
tunity for a proceeding before an adminis-
trative law judge, the following individu-
als have been disbarred from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Hubbard, MurphySpringfield, MOCPASeptember 20, 2006
Kardos, Sandra E.Van Nuys, CACPAOctober 2, 2006
Jewett,
Jerry A.
Fremont
,OH
Enrolle
dAgent
Novembe
r 2, 2006
Censure Issued by Consent
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, in lieu of a proceeding
being instituted or continued, an attorney,
certified public accountant, enrolled agent,
or enrolled actuary, may offer his or her
consent to the issuance of a censure. Cen-
sure is a public reprimand.
The following individuals have con-
sented to the issuance of a Censure:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure
Applegate, William F.Madison, NJCPASeptember 12, 2006
Vigliotti, Anthony J.East Haven, CTEnrolled AgentSeptember 12, 2006
Bolgiani, Janette A.Brooklyn, NYEnrolled AgentSeptember 14, 2006
Cheney, James E.Phelps, NYCPASeptember 18, 2006
Dollinger, DouglasMiddletown, NYAttorneyOctober 2, 2006
Reeves, Zak E.Denver, COEnrolled AgentOctober 2, 2006
2006–50 I.R.B.1104December 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure
Castiglione, JohnPittsfield, MAAttorneyOctober 4, 2006
Shannon, James P.Rochester, NHAttorneyOctober 4, 2006
Kuller, Mark A.Bethesda, MDAttorneyOctober 6, 2006
Resignations of Enrolled Agents
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an enrolled agent, in or-
der to avoid the institution or conclusion
of a proceeding for his or her disbarment
or suspension from practice before the In-
ternal Revenue Service, may offer his or
her resignation as an enrolled agent. The
Director, Office of Professional Responsi-
bility, in his discretion, may accept the of-
fered resignation.
The Director, Office of Professional
Responsibility, has accepted offers of res-
ignation as an enrolled agent from the
following individuals:
NameAddressDate of Resignation
Schwartz, JudyLas Vegas, NVOctober 13, 2006
Settlement Initiative for
Employees of Foreign
Embassies, Foreign Consular
Offices and International
Organizations in the United
States
Announcement 2006–95
Section 1. Overview and Purpose of the
Settlement Initiative
This announcement provides a two-part
settlement initiative offered by the Inter-
nal Revenue Service (IRS) under which
current and former employees of foreign
embassies, foreign consular offices or in-
ternational organizations (as defined in
I.R.C. § 7701(a)(18)) in the United States
(U.S.) can: (1) resolve income tax matters
related to their employment at a foreign
embassy, foreign consular office or in-
ternational organization; and (2) unwind
their participation in Simplified Employee
Pension/Individual Retirement Account
(SEP/IRA) plans, which they erroneously
established. Section 2 describes eligi-
bility requirements to participate in this
settlement initiative. Section 3 describes
the settlement terms. Section 4 sets out
the settlement procedures and Section 5
states how ineligible and non-participat-
ing taxpayers will be treated. Taxpayers
have until February 20, 2007, to notify the
Service of their intent to participate in this
settlement initiative.
The IRS has determined that a signif-
icant number of U.S. citizens and lawful
permanent residents (“LPRs” also referred
to as “green cardholders”) employed at
foreign embassies, foreign consular of-
fices and international organizations in the
U.S. have failed to fulfill their U.S. income
tax responsibilities. Some have failed to
timely file U.S. tax returns. Others have
failed to accurately report the tax due by
underreporting income, claiming deduc-
tions for unallowable expenses, and/or
failing to pay self-employment taxes. See
Section 3(a) of this announcement for the
settlement terms of the income tax part of
the settlement initiative.
U.S. citizens and LPRs who perform
services in the United States as common
law employees of foreign governments are
not considered to be self-employed for pur-
poses of I.R.C. §§ 401 and 408. These in-
dividuals are common law employees and,
thus, may not contribute to SEP/IRA plans
based on their employment with foreign
embassies, foreign consular offices and in-
ternational organizations. Many U.S. citi-
zens and LPRs employed by foreign em-
bassies, foreign consular offices and in-
ternational organizations have erroneously
established SEP/IRA plans, claimed de-
ductions for contributions to the plans and
used the plans as part of their retirement
planning. See Section 3(b) of this an-
nouncement for the terms of the settlement
of the SEP/IRA part of the settlement ini-
tiative.
Section 2. Eligibility Requirements
(1) This settlement initiative is limited
to employees and former employees of for-
eign embassies, foreign consular offices
or international organizations who are ei-
ther currently employed or were employed
as such in the United States. The initia-
tive is limited to taxation issues relating
to their employment at a foreign embassy,
foreign consular office or international or-
ganization for taxable years 2003, 2004,
and 2005.
(2) To be eligible to participate, tax-
payers who contributed to SEP/IRA plans
based on their employment with foreign
embassies, foreign consular offices and
international organizations, must comply,
where applicable, withall requirements
of both parts of the settlement initiative
(Sections 3(a) and 3(b)).
December 11, 200611052006–50 I.R.B.

(3) To be eligible to participate, tax-
payers who are LPRs must represent that
they have signed and filed a U.S. Citizen-
ship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Form I–508 (Waiver of Rights, Privileges,
Exemptions and Immunities under Section
274(b) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act).
(4) Persons under criminal investiga-
tion. A person under tax-related criminal
investigation by the IRS or the Department
of Justice, or a person that has been noti-
fied, before the date on which a Notice of
Election is filed pursuant to Section 4 of
this announcement, that the IRS or the De-
partment of Justice intends to commence
a tax-related criminal investigation of that
person is ineligible to participate in this
settlement initiative.
(5) Taxpayers agree to cooperate and
provide information to the IRS as required
in this settlement initiative.
Section 3. Settlement Terms
(a)Income Tax Part
(1) Taxpayers will submit correct origi-
nal returns or amend their previously filed
tax returns for 2003, 2004, and 2005 to cor-
rectly report their tax liability.
(2) Taxpayers will pay all taxes and ap-
plicable statutory interest with respect to
their correct tax liabilities for taxable years
2003, 2004, and 2005. Taxpayers will
pay penalties and/or additions to tax as de-
scribed in subsection (7) below. Taxpay-
ers will not claim refunds of any amounts
paid under this initiative. Taxpayers will
not file claims for interest abatement with
respect to taxable years 2003, 2004, and
2005.
(3) Taxpayers will provide an official
statement from their employer to verify the
correct amount of gross income received
for taxable years 2003, 2004, and 2005.
Gross income includes, but is not limited
to, wages, taxable benefits, contributions
to qualified retirement plans made on an
after tax basis, pension distributions, and
taxes paid by employers.
(4) Taxpayers will provide verification
of payment and entitlement for all deduc-
tions and foreign tax credits claimed on
their original and amended tax returns for
taxable years 2003, 2004, and 2005, which
are related to their employment at a foreign
embassy, foreign consular office or inter-
national organization.
(5) Taxpayers must agree to report all
income they receive after 2005 related to
their employment at a foreign embassy,
foreign consular office or international or-
ganization. No penalties and/or additions
to tax will be waived with respect to any
taxable years after 2005 as part of this ini-
tiative.
(6) Taxpayers will agree not to claim tax
benefits in taxable years after 2005 that are
inconsistent with positions taken with re-
spect to prior taxable years. For example,
a taxpayer failing to report after tax con-
tributions to a qualified retirement plan as
described in I.R.C. § 401(a) for any year
cannot treat those contributions as consti-
tuting basis in those payments in a subse-
quent year.
(7) The IRS will assess an applicable
accuracy penalty on underpayments under
I.R.C. § 6662 and/or applicable additions
to tax under I.R.C. § 6651 for failure to
file and/or failure to payfor only oneof
the taxable years 2003, 2004, or 2005, the
year to be determined by the IRS based
on the year with the highest tax deficiency.
No other penalties will be assessed for ad-
justments relating to foreign embassy, for-
eign consular office or international organ-
ization income for the taxable years 2003,
2004, and 2005.
(8) The IRS will assess the taxes, penal-
ties, additions to tax, and statutory interest
determined under this initiative for taxable
years 2003, 2004, and 2005.
(b)SEP/IRA Part
(1) Taxpayers agree to the disallowance
of deductions claimed on their 2003, 2004,
and 2005 income tax returns for contribu-
tionstoerroneouslyestablishedSEP/IRA
accounts relating to their employment at
a foreign embassy, foreign consular office
or international organization and will not
claim deductions for such contributions af-
ter 2005.
(2) Taxpayers will pay all taxes and ap-
plicable statutory interest resulting from
the disallowance of erroneous SEP/IRA
contribution deductions for taxable years
2003, 2004, and 2005. Taxpayers will
not claim refunds of any amounts paid un-
der this initiative. Taxpayers will not file
claims for interest abatement with respect
to taxable years 2003, 2004, and 2005.
(3) The IRS will allow taxpayers to
move funds from their erroneously es-
tablished SEP/IRA accounts to other
tax-favored retirement plans (i.e., I.R.C.
§ 401(a) plans and IRAs) that would have
been available to them for the years in
which improper SEP/IRA contributions
were made. The amount that may be
moved will be limited to the amount of the
contributions that could have been made to
an allowable tax-favored retirement plan
plus the earnings, as determined by the
IRS, on the allowable contributions. To
the extent the taxpayer would have been
able to make pre-tax contributions to an
I.R.C. § 401(k) plan or an I.R.C. § 408(a)
IRA for the years in which the improper
SEP/IRA contributions were made, the
amount that is moved, plus the deemed
earnings thereon, will not be treated as
a taxable distribution from the SEP/IRA.
To the extent the amount moved is not
described in the preceding sentence, the
amount moved will be treated as a taxable
distribution from the SEP/IRA in the year
the amount is moved and will be treated
as investment in the contract for purposes
of I.R.C. § 72.
(4) Taxpayers will arrange for distribu-
tion of all amounts in their erroneously es-
tablished SEP/IRA accounts in excess of
those allowed to be moved as provided in
the preceding paragraph. In accordance
with I.R.C. § 408(d)(1), taxpayers will re-
port the amount of the distribution as ordi-
nary income in the year the distribution is
received, irrespective of the years in which
the amounts were contributed.
(5) The taxpayers will advise the finan-
cial institution where the SEP/IRA account
is established to withhold 20% of the tax-
able distribution from the erroneously es-
tablished SEP/IRA account.
(6) The IRS will not assess the annual
6% excise tax under I.R.C. § 4973(a) on
the excess contributions in the erroneously
established SEP/IRA account.
(7) The IRS will not assess the 10%
excise tax under I.R.C. § 72(t)(l) on the
early distribution from the erroneously es-
tablished SEP/IRA account.
(8) The IRS will not assess the ac-
curacy penalty under I.R.C. § 6662 on
underpayments relating to deductions to
the erroneously established SEP/IRA ac-
count. Notwithstanding, the IRS will
assess penalties and/or additions to tax re-
lated to income tax as provided in Section
3(a)(7) above.
(9) No penalties and/or additions to
tax will be waived with respect to taxable
years after 2005 as part of this initiative.
2006–50 I.R.B.1106December 11, 2006

(10) The IRS will assess the taxes,
penalties, additions to tax, and statutory
interest determined under this initiative
for taxable years 2003, 2004, and 2005.
Section 4. Required Procedures for
Electing Participants
(a)Notice of Election
Taxpayers electing to participate in this
initiative must notify the IRS of their elec-
tion by sending a Notice of Election, as
set out below, on or before Tuesday,Feb-
ruary 20, 2007. The Notice of Election
must be sent by certified mail or desig-
nated delivery service (within the meaning
of I.R.C. § 7502(f)) to:
Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Ave., NW
LE 4423
Washington, DC 20024
Attn: SE:LM:IN:C:FR:ELECTION
The Notice of Election must be signed
and must:
(1) State that the taxpayer elects to par-
ticipate in the Foreign Embassy/Foreign
Consular Office/International Organiza-
tion Employee Settlement Initiative;
(2) Include the taxpayer’s name, tax-
payer’s legal status (U.S. citizen or LPR),
taxpayer identification number (TIN), cur-
rent address, and daytime telephone num-
ber. If the taxpayer is under examination,
in Appeals, or has filed a petition in Tax
Court, the taxpayer must include the name,
address, and daytime telephone number of
the IRS examiner, IRS Appeals Officer or
IRS Attorney. If a tax practitioner repre-
sents the taxpayer, the practitioner must
provide a completed Form 2848 or other
valid power of attorney specifying each
taxable year and type of tax covered;
(3) Include copies of all tax returns pre-
viously filed with the IRS (with the nota-
tion “Copy” written across the top of each
return) for the taxable years 2003, 2004,
and 2005;
(4) Include an official statement from
the foreign embassy, foreign consular of-
fice or international organization showing
total gross income paid in taxable years
2003, 2004, and 2005; and
(5) Include original delinquent or
amended tax returns for taxable years
2003, 2004, and 2005 reporting the cor-
rect income and claiming only the proper
amount of deductions and foreign tax cred-
its, which are related to their employment
at a foreign embassy, foreign consular
office or international organization.
A taxpayer who is under examination,
in Appeals, or has filed a petition in Tax
Court must send a copy of the Notice of
Election to the IRS examiner, IRS Appeals
Officer, or IRS Attorney assigned to the
matter.
(b)Additional Information and Docu-
mentation
Upon receipt of an election to partici-
pate, the IRS may send a request for ad-
ditional information and documentation.
Taxpayer must submit all requested infor-
mation under penalties of perjury to the
IRS within 30 days of the date of mailing
oftherequestbytheIRS.TheIRSmay
grant an extension for good cause to a tax-
payer who requests additional time within
the 30-day period. The IRS will treat a tax-
payer who fails to provide the requested
information within the applicable time as
having withdrawn from the initiative.
(c)Closing Agreement and Payment
After receiving the requested informa-
tion, the IRS will prepare a closing agree-
ment under I.R.C. § 7121 reflecting the
terms of the settlement. The closing agree-
ment will provide that: (1) all information
provided by the taxpayer as required by
the settlement is considered material and
providing inaccurateinformation is a mis-
representation of a material fact within the
meaning of I.R.C. § 7121(b); and (2) tax-
payer waives all defenses to the assess-
ment and collection of the tax, penalties,
additions to tax, and statutory interest de-
termined under this initiative.
The IRS will mail the closing agree-
ment to taxpayer who must sign and return
it to the IRS within30days of the date of
mailing by the IRS. The IRS may grant an
extension for good cause to a taxpayer who
requests additional time within the30-day
period.
A taxpayer participating in this initia-
tive must fully pay all taxes, additions to
tax, penalties, and statutory interest due
when the signed closing agreement is re-
turned to the IRS. Any taxpayer unable to
make full payment at that time must submit
complete financial statements and agree to
financial arrangements acceptable to the
IRS before the IRS will execute the clos-
ing agreement. The IRS will not execute
a closing agreement under this initiative
with a taxpayer who is unable to reach ac-
ceptable financial arrangements.
Section 5. Ineligible and
Non-participating Taxpayers
For taxpayers ineligible or not partici-
pating in this initiative, the IRS may: (a)
conduct examinations; (b) determine the
correct taxes, penalties, additions to tax;
and, (c) issue a Notice of Deficiency.
Section 6. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information con-
tained in this announcement has been
reviewed and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3507(c)) under control number
1545–2045.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a valid
OMB number.
The collection of information in this
announcement is in Section 4 of this an-
nouncement, Required Procedures for
Electing Participants. The information is
required to apply the terms of the settle-
ment and determine the amount of taxes,
applicable statutory interest and penal-
ties. Collecting information is required
to obtain the benefit described in this an-
nouncement. The likely respondents are
individuals.
The estimated total annual reporting
burden is 11,000 hours. The estimated
annual burden per respondent varies from
1 to 3 hours, depending on individual cir-
cumstances, with an estimated average of
2 hours. The estimated number of respon-
dents is 5,500. The estimated frequency
of responses is one time per respondent.
Books or records about a collection of
information must be retained as long as
their content may become material in ad-
ministering any internal revenue law. Gen-
erally tax returns and tax return informa-
tion are confidential, as required by 26
U.S.C. § 6103.
Section 7. Contact Information
Various personnel from the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (International)
and Office of Division Counsel (Small
Business/Self-Employed) participated in
December 11, 200611072006–50 I.R.B.

drafting this announcement. For further
information regarding this announcement,
contact Brant Meadows with the Office
of Deputy Commissioner, International,
at (202) 874–1789 (not a toll-free call) or
send an e-mail toembassy@irs.gov.
Correction to High-Low
Substantiation Method for Per
Diem Allowances in Rev. Proc.
2006–41
Announcement 2006–96
This announcement makes a correction
to Rev. Proc. 2006–41, 2006–43 I.R.B.
777 (October 23, 2006), released Septem-
ber 29, 2006, which provides rules under
which the amount of ordinary and neces-
sary business expenses of an employee for
lodging, meal, and incidental expenses in-
curred while traveling away from home are
deemed substantiated under § 1.274–5 of
the Income Tax Regulations.
Section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2006–41 pro-
vides rules for the high-low substantia-
tion method, which may be used in lieu of
theper diemsubstantiation method of sec-
tion 4.01 of Rev. Proc. 2006–41 when a
payor (the employer, its agent, or a third
party) provides aper diemallowance for
lodging, meals, and incidental expenses
under a reimbursement or other expense
allowance arrangement. Section 5.03 of
Rev. Proc. 2006–41 identifies localities
that are high-cost localities (for all of the
calendar year or for a portion of the cal-
endar year) for purposes of the high-low
substantiation method. Section 5.03 con-
tains an error in identifying the period for
which Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts,
is a high-cost locality. The correct period
is June 1, 2007, through August 31, 2007.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this announce-
ment is Jeffrey T. Rodrick of the Office
of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income
Tax and Accounting). For further infor-
mation regarding this announcement, con-
tact Mr. Rodrick at (202) 622–4930 (not a
toll-free call).
Correction of Announcement
2006–61 Fast Track
Settlement For SB/SE
Taxpayers
Announcement 2006–97
CORRECTION OF CONTACT
INFORMATION
This announcement provides the
correct contact information for further
information regarding Announcement
2006–61, 2006–36 I.R.B. 390, Fast Track
Settlement for SB/SE Taxpayers. In that
announcement, interested persons were
instructed to contact either Thomas S.
Ryan, SB/SE Program Analyst or Nancy
J. Talajkowski, Appeals Program Analyst,
Tax Policy & Procedure (Alternative Dis-
pute Resolution). The telephone number
published for Thomas S. Ryan was in-
correct. The correct telephone number is
(757) 213–3810 (not a toll-free number).
The remainder of the contact information
is correct as originally published.
2006–50 I.R.B.1108December 11, 2006

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
December 11, 2006i2006–50 I.R.B.

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–50
Announcements:
2006-42, 2006-27 I.R.B.48
2006-43, 2006-27 I.R.B.48
2006-44, 2006-27 I.R.B.49
2006-45, 2006-31 I.R.B.121
2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
2006-47, 2006-28 I.R.B.78
2006-48, 2006-31 I.R.B.135
2006-49, 2006-29 I.R.B.89
2006-50, 2006-34 I.R.B.321
2006-51, 2006-32 I.R.B.222
2006-52, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-53, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-54, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-55, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
2006-56, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
2006-57, 2006-35 I.R.B.343
2006-58, 2006-36 I.R.B.388
2006-59, 2006-36 I.R.B.388
2006-60, 2006-36 I.R.B.389
2006-61, 2006-36 I.R.B.390
2006-62, 2006-37 I.R.B.444
2006-63, 2006-37 I.R.B.445
2006-64, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
2006-65, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
2006-66, 2006-37 I.R.B.448
2006-67, 2006-38 I.R.B.509
2006-68, 2006-38 I.R.B.510
2006-69, 2006-37 I.R.B.449
2006-70, 2006-40 I.R.B.629
2006-71, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
2006-72, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
2006-73, 2006-42 I.R.B.745
2006-74, 2006-42 I.R.B.746
2006-75, 2006-42 I.R.B.746
2006-76, 2006-42 I.R.B.746
2006-77, 2006-42 I.R.B.748
2006-78, 2006-42 I.R.B.748
2006-79, 2006-43 I.R.B.792
2006-80, 2006-45 I.R.B.840
2006-81, 2006-44 I.R.B.821
2006-82, 2006-44 I.R.B.821
2006-83, 2006-44 I.R.B.822
2006-84, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
2006-85, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
2006-86, 2006-45 I.R.B.842
2006-87, 2006-44 I.R.B.822
2006-88, 2006-46 I.R.B.910
2006-89, 2006-44 I.R.B.826
2006-90, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
2006-91, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
2006-92, 2006-48 I.R.B.
1014
2006-93, 2006-48 I.R.B.1017
Announcements— Continued:
2006-94, 2006-48 I.R.B.1017
2006-95, 2006-50 I.R.B.1105
2006-96, 2006-50 I.R.B.1108
2006-97, 2006-50 I.R.B.1108
Notices:
2006-56, 2006-28 I.R.B.58
2006-57, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2006-58, 2006-28 I.R.B.59
2006-59, 2006-28 I.R.B.60
2006-60, 2006-29 I.R.B.82
2006-61, 2006-29 I.R.B.85
2006-62, 2006-29 I.R.B.86
2006-63, 2006-29 I.R.B.87
2006-64, 2006-29 I.R.B.88
2006-65, 2006-31 I.R.B.102
2006-66, 2006-30 I.R.B.99
2006-67, 2006-33 I.R.B.248
2006-68, 2006-31 I.R.B.105
2006-69, 2006-31 I.R.B.107
2006-70, 2006-33 I.R.B.252
2006-71, 2006-34 I.R.B.316
2006-72, 2006-36 I.R.B.363
2006-73, 2006-35 I.R.B.339
2006-74, 2006-35 I.R.B.339
2006-75, 2006-36 I.R.B.366
2006-76, 2006-38 I.R.B.459
2006-77, 2006-40 I.R.B.590
2006-78, 2006-41 I.R.B.675
2006-79, 2006-43 I.R.B.763
2006-80, 2006-40 I.R.B.594
2006-81, 2006-40 I.R.B.595
2006-82, 2006-39 I.R.B.529
2006-83, 2006-40 I.R.B.596
2006-84, 2006-41 I.R.B.677
2006-85, 2006-41 I.R.B.677
2006-86, 2006-41 I.R.B.680
2006-87, 2006-43 I.R.B.766
2006-88, 2006-42 I.R.B.686
2006-89, 2006-43 I.R.B.772
2006-90, 2006-42 I.R.B.688
2006-91, 2006-42 I.R.B.688
2006-92, 2006-43 I.R.B.774
2006-93, 2006-44 I.R.B.798
2006-94, 2006-43 I.R.B.777
2006-95, 2006-45 I.R.B.848
2006-96, 2006-46 I.R.B.902
2006-97, 2006-46 I.R.B.904
2006-98, 2006-46 I.R.B.906
2006-99, 2006-46 I.R.B.907
2006-101, 2006-47 I.R.B.930
2006-102, 2006-46 I.R.B.909
2006-103, 2006-47 I.R.B.931
2006-104, 2006-48 I.R.B.995
2006-105, 2006-50 I.R.B.1093
Notices— Continued:
2006-106, 2006-49 I.R.B.1033
Proposed Regulations:
REG-208270-86, 2006-42 I.R.B.698
REG-121509-00, 2006-40 I.R.B.602
REG-135866-02, 2006-27 I.R.B.34
REG-140379-02, 2006-44 I.R.B.808
REG-142599-02, 2006-44 I.R.B.808
REG-146893-02, 2006-34 I.R.B.317
REG-159929-02, 2006-35 I.R.B.341
REG-148864-03, 2006-34 I.R.B.320
REG-168745-03, 2006-39 I.R.B.532
REG-105248-04, 2006-43 I.R.B.787
REG-103038-05, 2006-49 I.R.B.1049
REG-103039-05, 2006-49 I.R.B.1057
REG-103043-05, 2006-49 I.R.B.1063
REG-109512-05, 2006-30 I.R.B.100
REG-110405-05, 2006-48 I.R.B.1004
REG-141901-05, 2006-47 I.R.B.947
REG-142270-05, 2006-43 I.R.B.791
REG-145154-05, 2006-39 I.R.B.567
REG-148576-05, 2006-40 I.R.B.627
REG-109367-06, 2006-41 I.R.B.683
REG-112994-06, 2006-27 I.R.B.47
REG-118775-06, 2006-28 I.R.B.73
REG-118897-06, 2006-31 I.R.B.120
REG-120509-06, 2006-39 I.R.B.570
REG-124152-06, 2006-36 I.R.B.368
REG-125071-06, 2006-36 I.R.B.375
REG-127819-06, 2006-48 I.R.B.1013
REG-136806-06, 2006-47 I.R.B.950
Revenue Procedures:
2006-29, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2006-30, 2006-31 I.R.B.110
2006-31, 2006-27 I.R.B.32
2006-32, 2006-28 I.R.B.61
2006-33, 2006-32 I.R.B.140
2006-34, 2006-38 I.R.B.460
2006-35, 2006-37 I.R.B.434
2006-36, 2006-38 I.R.B.498
2006-37, 2006-38 I.R.B.499
2006-38, 2006-39 I.R.B.530
2006-39, 2006-40 I.R.B.600
2006-40, 2006-42 I.R.B.694
2006-41, 2006-43 I.R.B.777
2006-42, 2006-47 I.R.B.931
2006-43, 2006-45 I.R.B.849
2006-44, 2006-44 I.R.B.800
2006-45, 2006-45 I.R.B.851
2006-46, 2006-45 I.R.B.859
2006-47, 2006-45 I.R.B.869
2006-48, 2006-47 I.R.B.934
2006-49, 2006-47 I.R.B.936
2006-50, 2006-47 I.R.B.944
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–1 through 2006–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2006–26, dated June 26, 2006.
2006–50 I.R.B.iiDecember 11, 2006

Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2006-51, 2006-47 I.R.B.945
2006-52, 2006-48 I.R.B.995
2006-53, 2006-48 I.R.B.996
2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
Revenue Rulings:
2006-35, 2006-28 I.R.B.50
2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2006-37, 2006-30 I.R.B.91
2006-38, 2006-29 I.R.B.80
2006-39, 2006-32 I.R.B.137
2006-40, 2006-32 I.R.B.136
2006-41, 2006-35 I.R.B.331
2006-42, 2006-35 I.R.B.337
2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
2006-44, 2006-36 I.R.B.361
2006-45, 2006-37 I.R.B.423
2006-46, 2006-39 I.R.B.511
2006-47, 2006-39 I.R.B.511
2006-48, 2006-39 I.R.B.516
2006-49, 2006-40 I.R.B.584
2006-50, 2006-41 I.R.B.672
2006-51, 2006-41 I.R.B.632
2006-52, 2006-43 I.R.B.761
2006-53, 2006-44 I.R.B.796
2006-54, 2006-45 I.R.B.834
2006-55, 2006-45 I.R.B.837
2006-56, 2006-46 I.R.B.874
2006-57, 2006-47 I.R.B.911
2006-58, 2006-46 I.R.B.876
2006-59, 2006-48 I.R.B.992
2006-60, 2006-48 I.R.B.977
2006-61, 2006-49 I.R.B.1028
Social Security Contribution and Benefit
Base; Domestic Employee Coverage
Threshold:
2006-102, 2006-46 I.R.B.909
Tax Conventions:
2006-80, 2006-45 I.R.B.840
2006-86, 2006-45 I.R.B.842
Treasury Decisions:
9265, 2006-27 I.R.B.1
9266, 2006-28 I.R.B.52
9267, 2006-34 I.R.B.313
9268, 2006-30 I.R.B.94
9269, 2006-30 I.R.B.92
9270, 2006-33 I.R.B.237
9271, 2006-33 I.R.B.224
9272, 2006-35 I.R.B.332
9273, 2006-37 I.R.B.394
9274, 2006-33 I.R.B.244
9275, 2006-35 I.R.B.327
9276, 2006-37 I.R.B.424
9277, 2006-33 I.R.B.226
9278, 2006-34 I.R.B.256
Treasury Decisions— Continued:
9279, 2006-36 I.R.B.355
9280, 2006-38 I.R.B.450
9281, 2006-39 I.R.B.517
9282, 2006-39 I.R.B.512
9283, 2006-41 I.R.B.633
9284, 2006-40 I.R.B.582
9285, 2006-41 I.R.B.656
9286, 2006-43 I.R.B.750
9287, 2006-46 I.R.B.896
9288, 2006-44 I.R.B.794
9289, 2006-45 I.R.B.827
9290, 2006-46 I.R.B.879
9291, 2006-46 I.R.B.887
9292, 2006-47 I.R.B.914
9293, 2006-48 I.R.B.957
9294, 2006-48 I.R.B.979
9295, 2006-49 I.R.B.1030
9296, 2006-50 I.R.B.1078
9297, 2006-50 I.R.B.1089
December 11, 2006iii2006–50 I.R.B.

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–50
Announcements:
2004-38
Modified by
Notice 2006-105, 2006-50 I.R.B.1093
2004-43
Amplified and modified by
Notice 2006-105, 2006-50 I.R.B.1093
2005-59
Updated and superseded by
Ann. 2006-45, 2006-31 I.R.B.121
2006-61
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-97, 2006-50 I.R.B.1108
Notices:
88-128
Supplemented by
Notice 2006-95, 2006-45 I.R.B.848
2002-45
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2003-69
Amplified and superseded by
Notice 2006-101, 2006-47 I.R.B.930
2004-59
Amplified by
Notice 2006-105, 2006-50 I.R.B.1093
2004-61
Modified and superseded by
Notice 2006-95, 2006-45 I.R.B.848
2006-20
Supplemented and modified by
Notice 2006-56, 2006-28 I.R.B.58
2006-27
Modified by
Ann. 2006-88, 2006-46 I.R.B.910
2006-28
Modified by
Ann. 2006-88, 2006-46 I.R.B.910
2006-53
Modified by
Notice 2006-71, 2006-34 I.R.B.316
2006-67
Modified and superseded by
Notice 2006-77, 2006-40 I.R.B.590
Proposed Regulations:
REG-135866-02
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-64, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
Ann. 2006-65, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
REG-134317-05
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-47, 2006-28 I.R.B.78
REG-112994-06
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-79, 2006-43 I.R.B.792
REG-118775-06
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-71, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
REG-124152-06
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-90, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
Revenue Procedures:
99-35
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-40, 2006-42 I.R.B.694
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Notice 2006-67, 2006-33 I.R.B.248
Notice 2006-77, 2006-40 I.R.B.590
Rev. Proc. 2006-43, 2006-45 I.R.B.849
2002-37
Clarified, modified, amplified, and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-45, 2006-45 I.R.B.851
2002-38
Clarified, modified, amplified, and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-46, 2006-45 I.R.B.859
2002-41
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-53, 2006-48 I.R.B.996
2002-52
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
2004-63
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-34, 2006-38 I.R.B.460
2005-41
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-29, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2005-49
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-33, 2006-32 I.R.B.140
2005-67
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-41, 2006-43 I.R.B.777
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2005-70
Amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-51, 2006-47 I.R.B.945
2005-78
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-49, 2006-47 I.R.B.936
2006-9
Amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
2006-12
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-37, 2006-38 I.R.B.499
2006-26
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
2006-33
Updated and clarified by
Ann. 2006-73, 2006-42 I.R.B.745
2006-35
Modified by
Notice 2006-90, 2006-42 I.R.B.688
2006-41
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-96, 2006-50 I.R.B.1108
Revenue Rulings:
72-238
Obsoleted by
REG-109367-06, 2006-41 I.R.B.683
73-558
Obsoleted by
REG-109367-06, 2006-41 I.R.B.683
75-296
Distinguished by
Rev. Rul. 2006-52, 2006-43 I.R.B.761
80-31
Distinguished by
Rev. Rul. 2006-52, 2006-43 I.R.B.761
81-35
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
81-36
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
87-10
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
92-75
Clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–1 through 2006–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006–26, dated June 26, 2006.
2006–50 I.R.B.ivDecember 11, 2006

Revenue Rulings— Continued:
2002-41
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2003-43
Amplified by
Notice 2006-69, 2006-31 I.R.B.107
2005-24
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
Treasury Decisions:
9244
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-91, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
9254
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-44, 2006-27 I.R.B.49
Ann. 2006-66, 2006-37 I.R.B.448
9258
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
9260
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-67, 2006-38 I.R.B.509
9262
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-56, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
9264
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
9272
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-68, 2006-38 I.R.B.510
9274
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-89, 2006-44 I.R.B.826
9276
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-83, 2006-44 I.R.B.822
Ann. 2006-85, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
9277
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-72, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
9280
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-78, 2006-42 I.R.B.748
9281
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-82, 2006-44 I.R.B.821
Ann. 2006-84, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
December 11, 2006v2006–50 I.R.B.

2006–50 I.R.B.December 11, 2006

December 11, 20062006–50 I.R.B.

INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN
The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue
Bulletin is sold on a yearly subscription basis by the Superintendent of Documents. Current subscribers are notified by the Superin-
tendent of Documents when their subscriptions must be renewed.
CUMULATIVE BULLETINS
The contents of this weekly Bulletin are consolidated semiannually into a permanent, indexed, Cumulative Bulletin. These are
sold on a single copy basis andare notincluded as part of the subscription to the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Subscribers to the weekly
Bulletin are notified when copies of the Cumulative Bulletin are available. Certain issues of Cumulative Bulletins are out of print
and are not available. Persons desiring available Cumulative Bulletins, which are listed on the reverse, may purchase them from the
Superintendent of Documents.
ACCESS THE INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN ON THE INTERNET
You may view the Internal Revenue Bulletin on the Internet at www.irs.gov. Under information for: select Businesses. Under
related topics, select More Topics. Then select Internal Revenue Bulletins.
INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETINS ON CD-ROM
Internal Revenue Bulletins are available annually as part ofPublication 1796 (Tax Products CD-ROM). The CD-ROM can be
purchased from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on the Internet at www.irs.gov/cdorders (discount for online orders)
or by calling 1-877-233-6767. The first release is available in mid-December and the final release is available in late January.
HOW TO ORDER
Check the publications and/or subscription(s) desired on the reverse, complete the order blank, enclose the proper remittance,
detach entire page, and mail to the Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh PA, 15250–7954. Please allow two to
six weeks, plus mailing time, for delivery.
WE WELCOME COMMENTS ABOUT THE INTERNAL
REVENUE BUL
LETIN
If you have c
omments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it,
we would be p
leased to hear from you. You can e-mail us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page
(www.irs.g
ov) or write to the IRS Bulletin Unit, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224
Internal Revenue Service
W
ashington,DC20224
Official B
usiness
Penalty for
Private Use, $300