Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-49 (PDF rendition): IRS Announcements

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
6-49
December 4, 2006
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2006–61, page 1028.
Federal rates; adjusted federal rates; adjusted federal
long-termrateandthelong-termexemptrate.For pur-
poses of sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other sections
of the Code, tables set forth the rates for December 2006.
T.D. 9295,
page 1030.
Final and t
emporary regulations under sections 6011, 6111,
and 6112 of
the Code amend the rules relating to requests
for privat
e letter rulings regarding reportable transactions
and remov
e the tolling provision from the current regula-
tions. Th
ese regulations cross-reference REG–103038–05,
REG–1030
39–05, and REG–103043–05 in this Bulletin.
REG–103038–05, page 1049.
Proposed regulations under section 6011 of the Code amend
the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by taxpayers. These regulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in
this Bulletin.
REG–103039–05, page 1057.
Proposed regulations under section 6111 of the Code pro-
vide the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transac-
tions by material advisors. These regulations cross-reference
T.D. 9295 in this Bulletin.
REG–103
043–05, page 1063.
Propose
d regulations under section 6112 of the Code provide
the rule
s relating to the obligation of material advisors to pre-
pare and
maintain lists with respect to reportable transactions.
These r
egulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in this Bulletin.
EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
REG–103038–05, page 1049.
Proposed regulations under section 6011 of the Code amend
the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by taxpayers. These regulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in
this Bulletin.
ESTATE TAX
REG–103038–05, page 1049.
Proposed regulations under section 6011 of the Code amend
the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by taxpayers. These regulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in
this Bulletin.
GIFT TAX
REG–103
038–05, page 1049.
Proposed
regulations under section 6011 of the Code amend
the rule
s relating to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by taxpa
yers. These regulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in
this Bul
letin.
(Continued on the next page)
Announcements of Disbarments and Suspensions begin on page 1066.
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

EMPLOYMENT TAX
REG–103038–05, page 1049.
Proposed regulations under section 6011 of the Code amend
the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by taxpayers. These regulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in
this Bulletin.
Notice 2006–1
06, page 1033.
This notice pr
ovides tables that show the amount of an indi-
vidual’s wage
s, salary, or other income that is exempt from a
notice of levy
used to collect delinquent tax in 2007.
EXCISE TAX
REG–103038–05, page 1049.
Proposed regulations under section 6011 of the Code amend
the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by taxpayers. These regulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in
this Bulletin.
ADMINISTRATIVE
T.D. 9295, page 1030.
Final and temporary regulations under sections 6011, 6111,
and 6112 of the Code amend the rules relating to requests
for private letter rulings regarding reportable transactions
and remove the tolling provision from the current regula-
tions. These regulations cross-reference REG–103038–05,
REG–103039–05, and REG–103043–05 in this Bulletin.
REG–103039–05, page 1057.
Proposed regulations under section 6111 of the Code pro-
vide the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transac-
tions by material advisors. These regulations cross-reference
T.D. 9295 in this Bulletin.
REG–1030
43–05, page 1063.
Proposed
regulations under section 6112 of the Code provide
the rules
relating to the obligation of material advisors to pre-
pare and m
aintain lists with respect to reportable transactions.
These reg
ulations cross-reference T.D. 9295 in this Bulletin.
Rev. Proc. 2006–54, page 1035.
This document updates the procedures for requesting assis-
tance from the U.S. competent authority under the provisions of
an income, estate, or gift tax treaty to which the United States
is a party. Rev. Procs. 2002–52 and 2006–26 modified and
superseded. Rev. Proc. 2006–9 amplified. Rev. Rul. 92–75
clarified.
December 4, 20062006–49 I.R.B.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
2006–49 I.R.B.December 4, 2006

Place missing child here.
December 4, 20062006–49 I.R.B.

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 42.—Low-Income
Housing Credit
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section 280G.—Golden
Parachute Payments
Federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates
are set forth for the month of December 2006. See
Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page 1028.
Section 382.—Limitation
on Net Operating Loss
Carryforwards and Certain
Built-In Losses Following
Ownership Change
The adjusted applicable federal long-term rate is
set forth for the month of December 2006. See Rev.
Rul. 2006-61, page 1028.
Section 412.—Minimum
Funding Standards
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section
467.—Certain
Payment
sfortheUseof
Property or Services
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section 468.—Special
Rules for Mining and Solid
Waste Reclamation and
Closing Costs
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section 482.—Allocation
of Income and Deductions
Among Taxpayers
Federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates
are set forth for the month of December 2006. See
Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page 1028.
Section 483.—Interest on
Certain Deferred Payments
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section 642.—Special
Rules for Credits and
Deductions
Federal short-term, mid-term, and long-term rates
are set forth for the month of December 2006. See
Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page 1028.
Section 807.—Rules for
Certain Reserves
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section
846.—Discounted
Unpaid
Losses Defined
The adj
usted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, a
nd long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section 1274.—Determi-
nation of Issue Price in the
Case of Certain Debt Instru-
ments Issued for Property
(Also Sections 42, 280G, 382, 412, 467, 468, 482,
483, 642, 807, 846, 1288, 7520, 7872.)
Federal rates; adjusted federal rates;
adjusted federal long-term rate and the
long-term exempt rate.For purposes of
sections 382, 642, 1274, 1288, and other
sections of the Code, tables set forth the
rates for December 2006.
Rev. Rul. 2006–61
This revenue r
uling provides various
prescribed ra
tes for federal income tax
purposes for D
ecember 2006 (the current
month). Tabl
e 1 contains the short-term,
mid-term, an
d long-term applicable fed-
eral rates (A
FR) for the current month
for purposes
of section 1274(d) of the
Internal Re
venue Code. Table 2 contains
the short-t
erm, mid-term, and long-term
adjusted ap
plicable federal rates (adjusted
AFR) for the
current month for purposes
of section 1
288(b). Table 3 sets forth the
adjusted f
ederal long-term rate and the
long-term
tax-exempt rate described in
section 38
2(f). Table 4 contains the ap-
propriate
percentages for determining the
low-incom
e housing credit described in
section 4
2(b)(2) for buildings placed in
service d
uring the current month. Table 5
contains
the federal rate for determining
the prese
nt value of an annuity, an interest
for life o
r for a term of years, or a remain-
derorar
eversionary interest for purposes
of secti
on 7520. Finally, Table 6 contains
the 2007
interest rate for sections 846 and
807.
2006–49 I.R.B.1028December 4, 2006

REV. RUL. 2006–
61 TABLE 1
Applicable Federal Rates (AFR) for December 2006
Period for Compounding
AnnualSemiannualQuarterlyMonthly
Short-term
AFR4.97%4.91%4.88%4.86%
110% AFR5.47%5.40%5.36%5.34%
120% AFR5.98%5.89%5.85%5.82%
130% AFR6.48%6.38%6.33%6.30%
Mid-term
AFR4.73%4.68%4.65%4.64%
110% AFR5.22%5.15%5.12%5.10%
120% AFR5.70%5.62%5.58%5.56%
130% AFR6.17%6.08%6.03%6.00%
150% AFR7.14%7.02%6.96%6.92%
175% AFR8.36%8.19%8.11%8.05%
Long-te
rm
AFR4.90%4.84%4.81%4.79%
110% AFR5.39%5.32%5.29%5.26%
120% AFR5.89%5.81%5.77%5.74%
130% AFR6.39%6.29%6.24%6.21%
REV. RUL. 2006–61 TABLE 2
Adjusted AFR for December 2006
Perio
d for Compounding
AnnualSemiannualQuarterlyMonthly
Short-term adjusted
AFR
3.42%3.39%3.38%3.37%
Mid-term adjusted AFR3.59%3.56%3.54%3.53%
Long-term adjusted
AFR
4.14%4.10%4.08%4.07%
RE
V. RUL. 2006–61 TABLE 3
Rates Under Section 382 for December 2006
Adjusted federal long-term rate for the current month4.14%
Long-term tax-exempt rate for ownership changes during the current month (the highest of the adjusted
federal long-term rates for the current month and the prior two months.)4.22%
REV. RUL. 2006–61 TABLE 4
Appropriate Percentages Under Section 42(b)(2) for December 2006
Appropriate percentage for the 70% present value low-income housing credit8.12%
Appropriate percentage for the 30% present value low-income housing credit3.48%
December 4, 200610292006–49 I.R.B.

REV. RUL. 2006–
61 TABLE 5
Rate Under Section 7520 for December 2006
Applicable federal rate for determining the present value of an annuity, an interest for life or a term of years,
or a remainder or reversionary interest5.8%
REV. RUL. 2006–61 TABLE 6
Applicable rate of interest for 2007 for purposes of section 846 and 8073.97%
Section 1288.—Treatment
of Original Issue Discount
on Tax-Exempt Obligations
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section 6011.—General
Requirement of Return,
Statement, or List
26 CFR 1.6011–4: Requirement of statement disclos-
ing participation in certain transactions by taxpay-
ers.
26 CFR 301.6111–3T: Disclosure of reportable
transactions (temporary).
26 CFR 301.6112–1: Requirement to prepare, main-
tain, and furnish lists with respect to potentially abu-
sive tax shelters.
T.D. 9295
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 301
AJCA Modifications to the
Section 6011, 6111, and
6112 Regulations
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary regula-
tions.
SUMMARY: This document contains tem-
porary and final regulations under sections
6011, 6111, and 6112 of the Internal Rev-
enue Code that modify the rules relating
to the disclosure of reportable transactions
and the list maintenance requirements.
These regulations affect taxpayers partic-
ipating in reportable transactions under
section 6011, material advisors responsi-
ble for disclosing reportable transactions
under section 6111, and material advisors
responsible for keeping lists under section
6112. These temporary and final regula-
tions are being issued concurrently with
proposed regulations (REG–103038–05,
REG–103039–05, and REG–103043–05)
under sections 6011, 6111, and 6112 pub-
lished elsewhere in the Bulletin.
DATES:Effective Date:These regulations
are effective November 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Tara P. Volungis or
Charles Wien, 202–622–3070 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document amends 26 CFR parts
1 and 301 by modifying the rules relat-
ing to the disclosure of reportable transac-
tions under sections 6011 and 6111 and the
list maintenance rules under section 6112.
On February 28, 2003, the IRS issued final
regulations under sections 6011, 6111, and
6112 (T.D. 9046, 2003–1 C.B. 615) (the
February 2003 regulations). The Febru-
ary 2003 regulations were published in the
Federal Register(68 FR 10161) on March
4, 2003. On December 29, 2003, the IRS
issued final regulations under section 6011
and 6112 (T.D. 9108, 2004–1 C.B. 429)
(the December 2003 regulations). The De-
cember 2003 regulations were published in
theFederal Register(68 FR 75128) on
December 30, 2003.
Explanation of Provisions
These regulations relate to the provi-
sions for obtaining a private letter ruling
and the tolling of the time for providing
disclosure under §1.6011–4 and section
6111 and for maintaining a list under sec-
tion 6112 during the time the request for
a ruling is pending. Because the IRS and
Treasury Department believe that the re-
moval of the tolling provision will promote
effective tax administration, these regula-
tions eliminate the tolling of the time for
providing disclosure and for maintaining
the list when a taxpayer or a potential
material advisor requests a private letter
ruling. Proposed regulations removing the
tolling provision are being issued concur-
rently with these temporary regulations.
Taxpayers and potential material advisors
may still request a ruling on a transaction
under the regular procedures for request-
ing a ruling, provided the ruling request is
not factual or hypothetical, but the time for
providing disclosure or for maintaining a
list will not be tolled. The removal of the
tolling provision is effective for all ruling
requests received on or after November 1,
2006.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that these regu-
lations are not a significant regulatory ac-
tion as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not
required. It also has been determined that
section 553(b) of the Administrative Pro-
cedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not
apply to these regulations. For applica-
bility of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
please refer to the cross-reference notice of
proposed rulemaking published elsewhere
in this issue of the Bulletin. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, this regulation will be submitted to
2006–49 I.R.B.1030December 4, 2006

the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for com-
ment on its impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these reg-
ulations are Tara P. Volungis and
Charles Wien, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 301
are amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 is amended by adding an entry in
numerical order to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.6011–4T also issued under
26U.S.C.6011***
Par. 2. Section 1.6011–4 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraphs (f)(1) and
(f)(3).
2. Redesignating the text of paragraph
(h) as (h)(1) and adding a heading.
3. Adding paragraph (h)(2).
The revisions and additions read as fol-
lows:
§1.6011–4
Requirement of statement
disclosin
g participation in certain
transacti
ons by taxpayers.
*****
(f) * * * (1) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see §1.6011–4T(f)(1).
(2) * * *
(3) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see §1.6011–4T(f)(1).
*****
(h)Effective date—(1)In general.***
(2) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see §1.6011–4T(h)(2).
Par. 3. Section 1.6011–4T is added to
read as follows:
§1.6011–4T Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers (temporary).
(a) through (e) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see §1.6011–4(a) through (e).
(f)Rulings and protective disclo-
sures—(1)Rulings. If a taxpayer requests
a ruling on the merits of a specific trans-
action on or before the date that disclosure
would otherwise be required under this
section, and receives afavorable ruling
as to the transaction, the disclosure rules
under this section will be deemed to have
been satisfied by that taxpayer with regard
to that transaction, so long as the request
fully discloses all relevant facts relating to
the transaction which would otherwise be
required to be disclosed under this section.
If a taxpayer requests a ruling as to whether
a specific transaction is a reportable trans-
action on or before the date that disclosure
would otherwise be required under this
section, the Commissioner in his discre-
tion may determine that the submission
satisfies the disclosure rules under this
section for the taxpayer requesting the
ruling for that transaction if the request
fully discloses all relevant facts relating to
the transaction which would otherwise be
required to be disclosed under this section.
The potential obligation of the taxpayer to
disclose the transaction under this section
will not be suspended during the period
that the ruling request is pending.
(f)(2) through (g) [Reserved]. For fur-
ther guidance, see §1.6011–4(f)(2) through
(g).
(h)Effective date—(1) [Reserved]. For
further guidance, see §1.6011–4(h)(1).
(2)Tolling provision. Paragraph (f)(1)
of this section applies to ruling requests
received on or after November 1, 2006.
The applicability of this section expires on
or before November 2, 2009.
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Par. 4. The authority citation for part
301isamendedbyaddinganentryinnu-
merical order to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 301.6111–3T also issued under
26U.S.C.6111***
Par. 5. Section 301.6111–3T is added
to read as follows:
§301.6111–3T Disclosure of reportable
transactions (temporary).
(a) through (g) [Reserved].
(h)Rulings. If a potential material ad-
visor requests a ruling as to whether a spe-
cific transaction is a reportable transaction
on or before the date that disclosure would
otherwise be required under this section,
the Commissioner in his discretion may
determine that the submission satisfies the
disclosure rules under this section for that
transaction if the request fully discloses
all relevant facts relating to the transaction
which would otherwise be required to be
disclosed under this section. The poten-
tial obligation of the person to disclose the
transaction under this section (or to main-
tain or furnish the list under §301.6112–1)
will not be suspended during the period
that the ruling request is pending.
(i)Effective date—(1) [Reserved].
(2)Tolling provision. Paragraph (h) of
this section applies to ruling requests re-
ceived on or after November 1, 2006. The
applicability of this section expires on or
before November 2, 2009.
Par. 6. Section 301.6112–1 is amended
by revising paragraph (i) to read as fol-
lows:
§301.6112–1 Requirement to prepare,
maintain, and furnish lists with respect to
potentially abusive tax shelters.
*****
(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see §301.6111–3T(h).
*****
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved October 25, 2006.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 1,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for November 2, 2006, 71 F.R. 64458)
December 4, 200610312006–49 I.R.B.

Section 7520.—Valuation
Tables
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
Section 7872.—Treatment
of Loans With Below-Market
Interest Rates
The adjusted applicable federal short-term, mid-
term, and long-term rates are set forth for the month
of December 2006. See Rev. Rul. 2006-61, page
1028.
2006–49 I.R.B.1032December 4, 2006

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Tables for Figuring Amount
Exempt From Levy on Wages,
Salary, and Other Income
Notice 2006–106
1. Table for Figuring Amount Exempt From Levy on Wages, Salary, and Other Income
(Forms 668–W(c) and 668–W(c)(DO)) 2007
Publication 1494, shown below, provides tables that show the amount of an individual’s income that is exempt from a notice
of levy used to collect delinquent tax in 2007.
(Amounts are for each pay period.)
Filing Status: Single
Number of Exemptions Claimed on Statement
PayPeriod123456 MoreThan6
Daily33.6546.7359.8172.8885.9699.0420.58 plus 13.08 for
each exemption
Weekly168.27233.65299.04364.42429.81495.19 102.89 plus 65.39 for
each exemption
Biweekly336.54467.31598.08728.85859.62990.38 205.77 plus 130.77 for
each exemption
Semi-
monthly
364.58506.25647.92789.58931.251072.92 222.92 plus 141.67 for
each exemption
Monthly729.171012.501295.831579.171862.502145.83 445.83 plus 283.33 for
each exemption
Filing Status: Unmarried Head of Household
Number of Exemptions Claimed on Statement
PayPeriod123456 MoreThan6
Daily43.2756.3569.4282.5095.58108.6530.19 plus 13.08 for
each exemption
Weekly216.35281.73347.12412.50477.88543.27 150.96 plus 65.39 for
each exemption
Biweekly432.69563.46694.23825.00955.771086.54 301.92 plus 130.77 for
each exemption
Semi-
monthly
468.75610.42752.08893.751035.421177.08 327.08 plus 141.67 for
each exemption
Monthly937.501220.831504.171787.502070.832354.17 654.17 plus 283.33 for
each exemption
December 4, 200610332006–49 I.R.B.

Filing Status: Married Filing Joint Return (and Qualifying Widow(er)s)
Number of Exemptions Claimed on Statement
PayPeriod123456 MoreThan6
Daily54.2367.3180.3893.46106.54119.6241.15 plus 13.08 for
each exemption
Weekly271.15336.54401.92467.31532.69598.08 205.77 plus 65.39 for
each exemption
Biweekly542.31673.08803.85934.621065.381196.15 411.54 plus 130.77 for
each exemption
Semi-
monthly
587.50729.17870.831012.501154.171295.83 445.83 plus 141.67 for
each exemption
Monthly1175.001458.331741.672025.002308.332591.67 891.67 plus 283.33 for
each exemption
Filing Status: MarriedFiling Separate Return
Number of Exemptions Claimed on Statement
PayPeriod123456 MoreThan6
Daily33.6546.7359.8172.8885.9699.0420.58 plus 13.08 for
each exemption
Weekly168.27233.65299.04364.42429.81495.19 102.89 plus 65.39 for
each exemption
Biweekly336.54467.31598.08728.85859.62990.38 205.77 plus 130.77 for
each exemption
Semi-
monthly
364.58506.25647.92789.58931.251072.92 222.92 plus 141.67 for
each exemption
Monthly729.171012.501295.831579.171862.502145.83 445.83 plus 283.33 for
each exemption
2. Table for Figuring Additional Exempt Amountfor Taxpayers at Least 65 Years Old and/or Blind
Additional Exempt Amount
Filing Status* DailyWklyBi-WklySemi-MoMonthly
Single or Head
of Household
1
2
5.00
10.00
25.00
50.00
50.00
100.00
54.17
108.33
108.33
216.67
Any Other
Filing Status
1
2
3
4
4.04
8.08
12.12
16.15
20.19
40.38
60.58
80.77
40.38
80.77
121.15
161.54
43.75
87.50
131.25
175.00
87.50
175.00
262.50
350.00
* ADDITIONAL STANDARD DEDUCTION claimed on Parts 3, 4, & 5 of levy.
2006–49 I.R.B.1034December 4, 2006

Examples
These tables show the amount exempt from a levy on wages, salary, and other income.
For example:
1. A single taxpayer who is paid weekly and claims three exemptions (including one for the taxpayer) has $299.04 exempt
from levy.
2. If the taxpayer in number 1 is over 65 and writes 1 in the ADDITIONAL STANDARD DEDUCTION space on Parts 3, 4, & 5
of the levy, $324.04 is exempt from this levy ($299.04 plus $25.00).
3. A taxpayer who is married, files jointly, is paid biweekly, and claims two exemptions (including one for the taxpayer) has
$673.08 exempt from levy.
4. If the taxpayer in number 3 is over 65 and has a spouse who is blind, this taxpayer should write 2 in the ADDITIONAL
STANDARD DEDUCTION space on Parts 3, 4, & 5 of the levy. Then, $753.85 is exempt from this levy ($673.08 plus $80.77).
26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters.
Procedures for Requesting Competent Authority Assistance Under Tax Treaties
Rev. Proc. 2006–54
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
........................................................................ 1037
.01Purpose.................................................................................................... 1037
.02Background................................................................................................ 1037
.03Changes. .................................................................................................. 1037
SECTION 2. SCOPE.............................................................................................. 1037
.01InGeneral.................................................................................................. 1037
.02RequestsforAssistance...................................................................................... 1038
.03GeneralProcess............................................................................................. 1038
.04FailuretoRequestAssistance................................................................................. 1038
SECTION 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THIS PROCEDURE APPLIES................................... 1038
.01General.................................................................................................... 1038
.02RequirementsofaTreaty..................................................................................... 1038
.03ApplicableStandardsinAllocationCases...................................................................... 1038
.04WhoCanFileRequestsforAssistance......................................................................... 1038
.05ClosedCases............................................................................................... 1038
.06ForeignInitiatedCompetentAuthorityRequest................................................................. 1038
.07RequestsRelatingtoResidenceIssues......................................................................... 1038
.08DeterminationsRegardingLimitationonBenefits............................................................... 1039
SECTION 4. PROCEDURES FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.............................. 1039
.01TimeforFiling. ............................................................................................ 1039
.02PlaceofFiling.............................................................................................. 1039
.03AdditionalFiling............................................................................................ 1039
.04FormofRequest............................................................................................ 1039
.05InformationRequired........................................................................................ 1039
.06OtherDisputeResolutionPrograms........................................................................... 1040
.07OtherDocumentation........................................................................................ 1040
.08Updates.................................................................................................... 1040
.09Conferences................................................................................................ 1040
SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE................. 1041
December 4, 200610352006–49 I.R.B.

.01General.................................................................................................... 1041
.02SmallCaseStandards........................................................................................ 1041
.03SmallCaseFilingProcedure. ................................................................................ 1041
SECTION 6. RELIEF REQUESTED FOR FOREIGN INITIATED ADJUSTMENT WITHOUT COMPETENT
AUTHORITY INVOLVEMENT
......................................................................... 1041
SECTION 7. COORDINATION WITH OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL PROCEED
INGS
.......
................. 1041
.01 Suspension of Administrative Action with Respect to U.S. Adjustmen
ts..........................
................. 1041
.02CoordinationwithIRSAppeals............................................................................... 1042
.03CoordinationwithLitigation. ................................................................................ 1042
.04 Coordination with Other Alternative Dispute Resolution and Pre-
FilingProcedures................
................. 1042
.05 Effect of Agreements or JudicialDeterminations on Competent Aut
hority Proceedings.............
................. 1042
.06 Accelerated Competent Authority Procedure................................................................... 1042
SECTION 8. SIMULTANEOUS APPEALS PROCEDURE.............................................................. 1043
.01General.................................................................................................... 1043
.02TimeforRequestingtheSimultaneousAppealsProcedure. ...................................................... 1043
(1)WhenFilingforCompetentAuthorityAssistance............................................................ 1043
(2)AfterFilingforCompetentAuthorityAssistance. ........................................................... 1043
.03CasesPendinginCourt...................................................................................... 1043
.04RequestforSimultaneousAppealsProcedure................................................................... 1043
.05RoleofIRSAppealsintheSimultaneousAppealsProcedure..................................................... 1044
(1)IRSAppealsProcess..................................................................................... 1044
(2)AssistancetoU.S.CompetentAuthority.................................................................... 1044
.06DenialorTerminationofSimultaneousAppealsProcedure....................................................... 1044
(1)Taxpayer’sTermination. ................................................................................. 1044
(2)IRS’sDenialorTermination. ............................................................................. 1044
.07ReturningtoIRSAppeals.................................................................................... 1044
.08IRSAppeals’ConsiderationofNon-CompetentAuthorityIssues. ................................................ 1044
SECTION 9. PROTECTIVE MEASURES............................................................................ 1044
.01General.................................................................................................... 1044
.02FilingProtectiveClaimforCreditorRefundwithaCompetentAuthorityRequest.................................. 1044
(1)InGeneral.............................................................................................. 1044
(2)TreatmentofCompetentAuthorityRequestasProtectiveClaim............................................... 1045
.03ProtectiveFilingBeforeCompetentAuthorityRequest.......................................................... 1045
(1)Ingeneral............................................................................................... 1045
(2)LettertoCompetentAuthorityTreatedasProtectiveClaim. .................................................. 1045
(3)NotificationRequirement................................................................................. 1045
(4)NoConsultationbetweenCompetentAuthoritiesuntilFormalRequestisFiled.................................. 1045
.04EffectofaProtectiveClaim.................................................................................. 1045
.05TreatyProvisionsWaivingProceduralBarriers. ................................................................ 1045
SECTION 10. APPLICATION OF REV. PROC. 99–32.................................................................. 1045
SECTION 11. DETERMINATION OF CREDITABLE FOREIGN TAXES................................................. 1046
SECTION 12. ACTION BY U.S. COMPETENT AUTHORITY........................................................... 1046
.01NotificationofTaxpayer..................................................................................... 1046
.02DenialofAssistance......................................................................................... 1046
.03ExtendingPeriodofLimitationsforAssessment................................................................ 1046
.04NoReviewofDenialofRequestforAssistance................................................................. 1046
.05Notification................................................................................................ 1046
.06ClosingAgreement.......................................................................................... 1047
.07UnilateralWithdrawalorReductionofU.S.InitiatedAdjustments. ............................................... 1047
SECTION 13. REQUESTS FOR RULINGS........................................................................... 1047
.01General.................................................................................................... 1047
.02ForeignTaxRulings......................................................................................... 1047
2006–49 I.R.B.1036December 4, 2006

SECTION 14. FEES............................................................................................... 1047
.01RequeststoWhichaUserFeeDoesNotApply................................................................. 1047
.02RequeststoWhichaUserFeeApplies......................................................................... 1047
.03 Acceptance of Requests...................................................................................... 1047
.04AddresstoSendPayment.................................................................................... 1047
.05RefundsofUserFee......................................................................................... 1047
SECTION 15. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS................................................................... 1047
SECTION 16. EFFECTIVE DATE................................................................................... 1048
SECTION 17. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT...................................................................... 1048
SECTION 18. DRAFTING INFORMATION.......................................................................... 1048
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND
BACKGROUND
.01Purpose. This revenue procedure
explains the procedures by which taxpay-
ers may obtain assistance from the U.S.
competent authority under the provisions
of a tax treaty to which the United States
is a party. This revenue procedure up-
dates and supersedes Rev. Proc. 2002–52,
2002–2 C.B. 242.
.02Background. The U.S. competent
authority assists taxpayers with respect to
matters covered in the mutual agreement
procedure provisions of tax treaties. A tax
treaty generally permits taxpayers to re-
quest competent authority assistance when
they consider that the actions of the United
States, the treaty country, or both, result
or will result in taxation that is contrary
to the provisions of the treaty. For exam-
ple, tax treaties generally permit taxpayers
to request assistance in order to relieve
economic double taxation arising from an
allocation under section 482 of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code”) or an equiv-
alent provision under the laws of a treaty
country. Competent authority assistance
may also be available with respect to issues
specifically dealt with in other provisions
of a treaty. For example, many tax treaties
contain provisions permitting competent
authorities to resolve issues of fiscal res-
idence or allowing a competent authority
to make a discretionary determination that
a taxpayer is entitled to the benefits of a
treaty under specificlimitation on benefits
provisions.Seesections 3.07 and 3.08
of this revenue procedure. The Deputy
Commissioner (International), Large and
Mid-Size Business Division, acts as the
U.S. competent authority in administering
the operating provisions of tax treaties,
including reaching mutual agreements
in specific cases, and in interpreting and
applying tax treaties. In interpreting and
applying tax treaties, the Deputy Commis-
sioner (International), Large and Mid-Size
Business Division, acts only with the con-
currence of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International).SeeDelegation Order
4–12 (formerly DO–114, Rev. 13), In-
ternal Revenue Manual (“IRM”), Part
1 Organization, Finance and Manage-
ment, Chapter 2 Servicewide Policies and
Authorities, Section 43 Delegation of Au-
thorities for the Examining Process (IRM
1.2.43),http://www.irs.gov/irm/part1/
ch02s10.html#d0e33677.
.03
Changes. Although most of the
cha
nges made by this revenue procedure to
Rev
. Proc. 2002–52 are minor edits for or-
ga
nization, accuracy, readability, or updat-
in
g of citations to cross-referenced guid-
an
ce, substantive changes have also been
ma
de and may be summarized as follows:
(1
) Sections 3.04, 3.08 and 7.06 have
be
en revised to clarify standards for accep-
ta
nce of requests for competent authority
a
ssistance.
(2
) Sections 3.08, 4.04 and 5.03 have
b
een revised to clarify signature require-
m
ents for requests for determinations re-
g
arding limitation on treaty benefits.
(
3) Section 4.04 has been revised to pro-
v
ide for filing copies of submissions on
e
lectronic media.
(
4) Sections 4.05 and 5.03 have been re-
v
ised to provide additional detail regarding
i
nformation to be submitted with requests
f
or competent authority assistance.
(
5) Sections 7.02 and 7.05 have been re-
v
ised to clarify current practices regarding
coordination with IRS Appeals.
(
6) Section 7.06 has been revised to
clarify the coordination of the accelerated
competent authorityprocedure with re-
quests for Advance Pricing Agreements.
(7) Section 8.04 has been revised to
clarify current practices regarding the pro-
cessing of requests for the Simultaneous
Appeal procedure.
(8) Section 9.03(3) has been revised to
reduce the frequency with which taxpayers
filing protective claims are required to no-
tify the U.S. competent authority as to their
intent to file a request for assistance.
(9) Section 10 has been revised to clar-
ify the role of the U.S. competent author-
ity in considering requests regarding con-
forming a taxpayer’s accounts and allow-
ing repatriation of certain amounts follow-
ing an allocation of income between re-
lated U.S. and foreign corporations under
section 482 of the Code.
(10) Section 12.02(8) has been revised
to provide for denial of competent author-
ity assistance where the underlying trans-
action is listed for purposes of the applica-
ble Treasury regulations as a tax avoidance
transaction.
(11) Section 14 has been revised to im-
plement user fees for requests for determi-
nations regarding limitation on treaty ben-
efits.
SECTION 2. SCOPE
.01In General. This revenue procedure
addresses procedures for obtaining assis-
tance from the U.S. competent authority
under the provisions of an income, estate
or gift tax treaty entered into between the
United States and another country. The
U.S. competent authority assists taxpay-
ers with respect to matters covered in tax
treaties in the manner specified in the
mutual agreement procedure provisions
or other provisions of the relevant tax
treaty. Taxpayers are urged to examine
the specific provisions of the treaty under
which they seek relief, in order to deter-
December 4, 200610372006–49 I.R.B.

mine whether relief may be available in
their particular case. If, after examining
the applicable treaty, a taxpayer is unsure
whether relief is available, the taxpayer
should contact competent authority. This
revenue procedure is not intended to limit
any specific treaty provisions relating to
competent authority matters.
.02Requests for Assistance.Ingen-
eral, requests by taxpayers for competent
authority assistance must be submitted
in accordance with this revenue proce-
dure. However, where a treaty or other
published administrative guidance pro-
vides specific procedures for requests for
competent authority assistance, those pro-
cedures will apply, and the provisions of
this revenue procedure will not apply to
the extent inconsistent with such proce-
dures. Taxpayers may consult the “Tax
Information for International Businesses”
and “Competent Authority Agreements”
pages atwww.irs.govfor links to a variety
of agreements and other documents that
may modify the procedures set forth in
this revenue procedure.
.03General Process. If a taxpayer’s
request for competent authority assistance
is accepted, the U.S. competent authority
generally will consult with the appropriate
foreign competent authority and attempt to
reach a mutual agreement that is accept-
able to all parties. The U.S. competent au-
thority also may initiate competent author-
ity negotiations in any situation deemed
necessary to protect U.S. interests. Such
a situation may arise, for example, when
a taxpayer fails to request competent au-
thority assistance after agreeing to a U.S.
or foreign tax assessment that is contrary to
the provisions of an applicable tax treaty or
for which correlative relief may be avail-
able.
.04Failure to Request Assistance.Fail-
ure to request competent authority assis-
tance or to take appropriate steps as nec-
essary to maintain the availability of the
remedy may cause a denial of part or all of
any foreign tax credits claimed.SeeTreas.
Reg. §1.901–2(e)(5)(i).See alsosection 9
of this revenue procedure concerning pro-
tective measures and section 11 of this rev-
enue procedure concerning the determina-
tion of creditable foreign taxes.
SECTION 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS
UNDER WHICH THIS PROCEDURE
APPLIES
.01General. The exclusions, exemp-
tions, deductions, credits, reductions in
rate, and other benefits and safeguards
provided by treaties are subject to con-
ditions and restrictions that may vary in
different treaties. Taxpayers should exam-
ine carefully the specific treaty provisions
applicable in their cases to determine the
nature and extent of treaty benefits or
safeguards they are entitled to and the
conditions under which such benefits or
safeguards are available.Seesection 9 of
this revenue procedure, which prescribes
protective measures to be taken by the
taxpayer and any concerned related per-
son with respect to U.S. and foreign tax
authorities.See alsosection 12.02 of this
revenue procedure for circumstances in
which competent authority assistance may
be denied.
.02Requirements of a Treaty.Thereis
no authority for the U.S. competent author-
ity to provide relief from U.S. tax or to pro-
vide other assistance due to taxation aris-
ing under the tax laws of a foreign country
or the United States, unless such authority
is granted by a treaty.See alsoRev. Proc.
2006–23, 2006–20 I.R.B. 900, for proce-
dures for requestingthe assistance of the
IRS when a taxpayer is or may be subject
to inconsistent tax treatment by the IRS
and a U.S. possession tax agency.
.03Applicable Standards in Allocation
Cases. With respect to requests for com-
petent authority assistance involving the
allocation of income and deductions be-
tween a U.S. taxpayer and a related per-
son, the U.S. competent authority and its
counterpart in the treaty country will be
bound by the arm’s length standard pro-
vided by the applicable provisions of the
relevant treaty. The U.S. competent au-
thority will also be guided by the arm’s
length standard consistent with the regu-
lations under section 482 of the Code and
the Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multi-
national Enterprisesand Tax Administra-
tions as published from time to time by
the Organisation for Economic Co-opera-
tion and Development. When negotiating
mutual agreements on the allocation of in-
come and deductions, the U.S. competent
authority will take into account all of the
facts and circumstances of the particular
case and the purpose of the treaty, which
is to avoid double taxation.
.04Who Can File Requests for Assis-
tance. The U.S. competent authority will
consider requests for assistance from U.S.
persons, as defined in section 7701(a)(30)
of the Code, and from non-U.S. persons as
permitted under an applicable tax treaty.
As noted in section 12.02 of this rev-
enue procedure, there are circumstances
in which the U.S. competent authority
will not pursue assistance. For purposes
of this revenue procedure, except where
the context otherwise requires, the term
“taxpayer” refers to the person requesting
competent authority assistance.
.05Closed Cases. A case previously
closed after examination will not be re-
opened in order to make an adjustment
unfavorable to the taxpayer except in the
presence of an exceptional circumstance
described in Rev. Proc. 2005–32, 2005–23
I.R.B. 1206 (providing procedures for re-
opening cases if fraud, substantial error,
or certain other circumstances are present).
The U.S. competent authority may, but is
not required to, accept ataxpayer’s request
for competent authority consideration that
will require the reopening of a case closed
after examination.
.06Foreign Initiated Competent Au-
thority Request. When a foreign com-
petent authority refers a request from a
foreign person to the U.S. competent au-
thority for consultation under the mutual
agreement procedure, the U.S. competent
authority generallywill require the U.S.
related person (in the case of an allocation
of income or deductions between related
persons) or may require the foreign per-
son (in other cases) to file a request for
competent authority assistance under this
revenue procedure.
.07Requests Relating to Residence Is-
sues. U.S. competent authority assistance
may be available to taxpayers seeking
to clarify their residency status in the
United States. Examples include cases in
which taxpayers believe that they are er-
roneously treated as non-U.S. residents by
treaty countries or cases where taxpayers
are treated as dual residents despite the
objective tie-breakerprovisions contained
in the applicable treaties. Generally, com-
petent authority assistance is limited to
situations where resolution of a residency
2006–49 I.R.B.1038December 4, 2006

issue is necessary in order to avoid double
taxation or to determine the applicability
of a benefit under the treaty. Further, a re-
quest for assistance regarding a residency
issue will be accepted only if it is estab-
lished that the issue requires consultation
with the foreign competent authority in
order to ensure consistent treatment by
the United States and the applicable treaty
country. The U.S. competent authority
does not issue unilateral determinations
with respect to whether an individual is a
resident of the United States or of a treaty
country.
.08Determinations Regarding Limita-
tion on Benefits. Many treaties contain a
limitation on benefits article that enumer-
ates prescribed requirements that must be
met to be eligible for benefits under the
treaty. The U.S. competent authority will
not issue determinations regarding a tax-
payer’s status under one of the prescribed
requirements in a limitation on benefits
provision. However, certain treaties pro-
vide that the competent authority may,
as a matter of discretion, determine the
availability of treaty benefits where the
prescribed requirements are not met. Re-
quests for assistance in such cases should
comply with this revenue procedure and
any other specific procedures that may
be issued from time to time. A request
may be with respect to an initial dis-
cretionary determination, a renewal or
a redetermination. The request should
take the form of a letter as described in
section 4.04 of this revenue procedure,
except that if the requester does not file
federal tax returns and cannot identify a
person authorized to sign such returns,
the letter may be dated and signed by any
authorized representative or officer of the
requester. Taxpayers who are request-
ing a discretionary determination under
a limitation on benefits provision should
include the user fee as described in Sec-
tion 14 of this revenue procedure as well
as the information described in Exhibit
4.60.3–3 of the Internal Revenue Man-
ual (“IRM”), Part 4 Examining Process,
Chapter 60 International Procedure, Sec-
tion 3 Tax Treaty Related Matters (IRM
4.60.3),http://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/
ch45s03.html.
SECTION 4. PROCEDURES FOR
REQUESTING COMPETENT
AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE
.01Time for Filing. A request for com-
petent authority assistance generally may
be filed at any time after an action results
in taxation not in accordance with the pro-
visions of the applicable treaty. In a case
involving a U.S. initiated adjustment of tax
or income resulting from a tax examina-
tion, a request for competent authority as-
sistance may be submitted as soon as prac-
ticable after the amount of the proposed
adjustment is communicated in writing to
the taxpayer (e.g., a Notice of Proposed
Adjustment). Where a U.S. initiated ad-
justment has not yet been communicated
in writing to the taxpayer, the U.S. com-
petent authority generally will deny the re-
quest as premature. In the case of a foreign
examination, a request may be submitted
as soon as the taxpayer believes such fil-
ing is warranted based on the actions of
the country proposing the adjustment. In a
case involving the re-allocation of income
or deductions between related persons, the
request should not be filed until such time
that the taxpayer can establish that there is
a probability of double taxation. In cases
not involving an examination, a request
can be made when the taxpayer believes
that an action or potential action warrants
the assistance of the U.S. competent au-
thority. Examples of such action include:
(a) a ruling or promulgation by a foreign
tax authority concerning a taxation matter;
and (b) the withholding of tax by a with-
holding agent. Except where otherwise
provided in an applicable treaty, taxpayers
have discretion over the time for filing a
request; however, delays in filing may pre-
clude effective relief.Seesection 9 of this
revenue procedure, which explains protec-
tive measures to be taken by the taxpayer
and any concerned related person with re-
spect to U.S. and foreign tax authorities.
See alsosection 7.06 of this revenue pro-
cedure for rules relating to accelerated is-
sue resolution and competent authority as-
sistance.
.02Place of Filing. The taxpayer must
send all written requests for, or any in-
quiries regarding, U.S. competent author-
ity assistance to the Deputy Commissioner
(International), Large and Mid-Size Busi-
ness Division, Attn: Office of Tax Treaty,
Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitu-
tion Avenue, NW, Routing: MA3–322A,
Washington, D.C. 20224.
.03Additional Filing. In the case of
U.S. initiated adjustments, the taxpayer
also must file a copy of the request with
the office of the IRS where the taxpayer’s
case is pending. If the request is filed
after the matter has been designated for
litigation or while a suit contesting the
relevant tax liability of the taxpayer is
pending in a United States court, a copy
of the request also must be filed with the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Inter-
national), Internal Revenue Service, 1111
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20224, with a separate statement at-
tached identifying the court where the suit
is pending and the docket number of the
action.
.04Form of Request. A request for U.S.
competent authorityassistance must be in
the form of a letter addressed to the Deputy
Commissioner (International), Large and
Mid-Size Business Division. It must be
dated and signed by a person having the
authority to sign the taxpayer’s federal tax
returns. The request must contain a state-
ment that competent authority assistance is
being requested and must include the in-
formation described in section 4.05 of this
revenue procedure. In addition to the orig-
inal signed submission, a copy of the text
of the request and any materials contem-
poraneously prepared in support of the re-
quest must also be submitted, in Adobe
PDF or Microsoft Word format, in the form
of a CD, DVD, or 3.5-inch diskette.See
section 5 of this revenue procedure for re-
quests involving small cases.
.05Information Required. The follow-
ing information must be included in the re-
quest for competent authority assistance:
(1) a reference to the specific treaty and
the provisions therein pursuant to which
the request is made;
(2) the names, addresses, U.S. taxpayer
identification number and foreign taxpayer
identification number (if any) of the tax-
payer and, if applicable, all related persons
involved in the matter;
(3) a brief description of the issues for
which competent authority assistance is re-
quested, including a description of the rel-
evant transactions, activities or other cir-
cumstances involved in the issues raised
and the basis for the adjustment, if any;
December 4, 200610392006–49 I.R.B.

(4)ifapplicable,adescriptionofthe
control and business relationships between
the taxpayer and any relevant related per-
son for the years in issue, including any
changes in such relationship to the date of
filing the request;
(5) the years and amounts involved with
respect to the issues in both U.S. dollars
and foreign currency;
(6) the IRS office that has made or is
proposing to make the adjustment or, if
known, the IRS office with examination
jurisdiction over the taxpayer;
(7) an explanation of the nature of the
relief sought or the action requested in
the United States or in the treaty country
with respect to the issues raised, includ-
ing a statement as to whether the taxpayer
wishes to apply for treatment similar to
that provided under Rev. Proc. 99–32,
1999–2 C.B. 296 (referred to in this rev-
enue procedure as “Rev. Proc. 99–32
treatment” and explained in further detail
in section 10 of this revenue procedure);
(8) a statement whether the period of
limitations for the years for which relief is
sought has expired in the United States or
in the treaty country;
(9) a statement of relevant domestic and
foreign judicial or administrative proceed-
ings that involve the taxpayer and related
persons, including all information related
to notification of the treaty country;
(10) to the extent known by the tax-
payer, a statement of relevant foreign ju-
dicial or public administrative proceedings
that do not involve the taxpayer or re-
lated persons but involve the same issue
for which competent authority assistance
is requested;
(11) a statement whether the request
for competent authority assistance in-
volves issues that are currently, or were
previously, considered part of an Advance
Pricing Agreement (“APA”) proceeding
or other proceeding relevant to the issue
under consideration in the United States or
part of a similar proceeding in the foreign
country;
(12) if applicable, powers of attorney
with respect to the taxpayer, and the re-
quest should identify the individual to
serve as the taxpayer’s initial point of
contact for the competent authority;
(13) if the jurisdiction of an issue is with
an IRS Appeals office, a summary of prior
discussions of the issue with that office and
contact information regarding the IRS Ap-
peals officer handling the issue; also, if
appropriate, a statement whether the tax-
payer is requesting the Simultaneous Ap-
peals procedure as provided in section 8 of
this revenue procedure;
(14) in a separate section, the statement
andinformationrequiredbysection9.02
of this revenue procedure if the request is
to serve as a protective claim;
(15) on a separate document, a state-
ment that the taxpayer consents to the dis-
closure to the competent authority of the
treaty country (with the name of the treaty
country specifically stated) and that com-
petent authority’s staff, of any or all of the
items of information set forth or enclosed
in the request for U.S. competent author-
ity assistance within the limits contained in
the tax treaty under which the taxpayer is
seeking relief. The taxpayer may request,
as part of this statement, that its trade se-
crets not be disclosed to a foreign com-
petent authority. This statement must be
dated and signed by a person having au-
thority to sign the taxpayer’s federal tax
returns and is required to facilitate the ad-
ministrative handling of the request by the
U.S. competent authority for purposes of
the recordkeeping requirements of section
6103(p) of the Code. Failure to provide
such a statement will not prevent the U.S.
competent authority from disclosing infor-
mation under the terms of a treaty.See
section 6103(k)(4) of the Code. Taxpayers
are encouraged to provide duplicates to the
U.S. and foreign competent authorities of
all information otherwise disclosable un-
der the treaty;
(16) a penalties of perjury statement in
the following form:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare
that I have examined this request, in-
cluding accompanying documents, and,
to the best of my knowledge and be-
lief, the facts presented in support of
the request for competent authority as-
sistance are true, correct and complete.
The declaration must be dated and signed
by the person or persons on whose be-
half the request is being made and not by
the taxpayer’s representative. The person
signing for a corporate taxpayer must be
an authorized officer of the taxpayer who
has personal knowledge of the facts. The
person signing for a trust, an estate or a
partnership must be respectively, a trustee,
an executor or a partner who has personal
knowledge of the facts; and
(17) any other information required or
requested under this revenue procedure, as
applicable.See,e.g.,section7.06ofthis
revenue procedure, which requires the pro-
vision of certain information in the case of
a request for the accelerated competent au-
thority procedure, andsection10ofthis
revenue procedure, which requires the pro-
vision of certain information in the case
of a request for Rev. Proc. 99–32 treat-
ment. Requests for supplemental informa-
tion may include items such as detailed fi-
nancial information, comparability analy-
sis, or other material relevant to a transfer
pricing analysis.
.06Other Dispute Resolution Pro-
grams. Requests for competent authority
assistance that involve an APA or Pre-Fil-
ing Agreement request must include the
information required under Rev. Proc.
2006–9, 2006–2 I.R.B. 278 (concerning
APAs), and Rev. Proc. 2005–12, 2005–2
I.R.B. 311 (concerning Pre-Filing Agree-
ments).
.07Other Documentation.Inaddi-
tion, on request, the taxpayer must submit
any other information or documentation
deemed necessary by the U.S. or for-
eign competent authority for purposes
of reaching an agreement. This includes
English translations of any documentation
required in connection with the competent
authority request.
.08Updates. The taxpayer must keep
the U.S. competent authority informed of
all material changes in the information or
documentation previously submitted as
part of, or in connection with, the request
for competent authority assistance. The
taxpayer also must provide any updated
information or new documentation that
becomes known or is created after the re-
quest is filed and which is relevant to the
resolution of the issues under considera-
tion.
.09Conferences. To the extent possi-
ble, the U.S. competent authority will con-
sult with the taxpayer regarding the sta-
tus and progress of themutual agreement
proceedings. The taxpayer may request a
pre-filing conference with the U.S. compe-
tent authority to discuss the mutual agree-
ment process with respect to matters cov-
ered under a treaty, including discussion of
the proper time for filing, the practical as-
pects of obtaining relief and actions nec-
essary to facilitate the proceedings. Simi-
2006–49 I.R.B.1040December 4, 2006

larly, after a matter is resolved by the com-
petent authorities, a taxpayer may also re-
quest a conference with the U.S. compe-
tent authority to discuss the resolution.
SECTION 5. SMALL CASE
PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING
COMPETENT AUTHORITY
ASSISTANCE
.01General. To facilitate requests for
assistance involving small cases, this sec-
tion provides a special procedure simpli-
fying the form of a request for assistance
and, in particular, the amount of informa-
tion that initially must be submitted. All
other requirements of this revenue proce-
dure continue to apply to requests for as-
sistance made pursuant to this section.
.02Small Case Standards. A taxpayer
may file an abbreviated request for com-
petent authority assistance in accordance
with this section if the total proposed
adjustment involved in the matter is not
greater than the following:
TaxpayerProposed
Adjustment
Individual...............................................
$200,000
Corporation/Partnership...................................
$1,000,000
Other ...................................................
$200,000
.03Small Case Filing Procedure.The
abbreviated request for competent author-
ity assistance under the small case proce-
dure must be dated and signed by a per-
son having the authority to sign the tax-
payer’s federal tax returns. Although other
information and documentation may be re-
quested at a later date, the initial request for
assistance should include the following in-
formation and materials:
(1) a statement indicating that this is a
matter subject to the small case procedure;
(2) the name, address, U.S. taxpayer
identification number and foreign taxpayer
identification number (if any) of the tax-
payer and, if applicable, all related persons
involved in the matter;
(3) a description of the issue and the
nature of the relief sought;
(4) the taxable years and amounts in-
volved with respect to the issues in both
U.S. and foreign currency;
(5) the name of the treaty country;
(6) if applicable, powers of attorney
with respect to the taxpayer;
(7) on a separate document, a statement
that the taxpayer consents to the disclosure
to the competent authority of the treaty
country (with the name of the treaty coun-
try specifically stated) and that competent
authority’s staff, of any or all of the items
of information set forth or enclosed in the
request for U.S. competent authority assis-
tance within the limits contained in the tax
treaty under which the taxpayer is seek-
ing relief. The taxpayer may request, as
part of this statement, that its trade secrets
not be disclosed to a foreign competent au-
thority. This statement must be dated and
signed by a person having authority to sign
the taxpayer’s federal tax returns and is re-
quired to facilitate the administrative han-
dling of the request by the U.S. competent
authority for purposes of the recordkeep-
ing requirements of section 6103(p) of the
Code. Failure to provide such a statement
will not prevent the U.S. competent author-
ity from disclosing information under the
terms of a treaty.Seesection 6103(k)(4)
of the Code; and
(8) a penalties of perjury statement in
the following form:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare
that I have examined this request, in-
cluding accompanying documents, and,
to the best of my knowledge and be-
lief, the facts presented in support of
the request for competent authority as-
sistance are true, correct and complete.
The declaration must be dated and signed
by the person or persons on whose be-
half the request is being made and not by
the taxpayer’s representative. The person
signing for a corporate taxpayer must be
an authorized officer of the taxpayer who
has personal knowledge of the facts. The
person signing for a trust, an estate or a
partnership must be respectively, a trustee,
an executor or a partner who has personal
knowledge of the facts.
SECTION 6. RELIEF REQUESTED
FOR FOREIGN INITIATED
ADJUSTMENT WITHOUT
COMPETENT AUTHORITY
INVOLVEMENT
Taxpayers seeking correlative relief
with respect to a foreign initiated adjust-
ment involving a treaty matter should
present their request to the U.S. competent
authority. However, when the adjustment
involves years under the jurisdiction of
the Industry or Area Director or IRS Ap-
peals, taxpayers sometimes try to obtain
relief from these offices. This may occur,
for example, if the adjustment involves
a re-allocation of income or deductions
involving a related person in a country
with which the United States has an in-
come tax treaty. In these cases, taxpayers
will be advised to contact the U.S. com-
petent authority office. In appropriate
cases, the U.S. competent authority will
advise the Industry or Area Director or
IRS Appeals office on appropriate action.
The U.S. competent authority may request
the taxpayer to provide the information
described under sections 4.05 and 4.07 of
this revenue procedure. Failure to request
competent authority assistance may result
in denial of correlative relief with respect
to the issue, including applicable foreign
tax credits.
SECTION 7. COORDINATION WITH
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE OR
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
.01Suspension of Administrative Ac-
tion with Respect to U.S. Adjustments.
When a request for competent authority
assistance is accepted with respect to a
U.S. initiated adjustment, the IRS will
postpone further administrative action
with respect to the issues under competent
authority consideration (such as assess-
ment or collection procedures), except:
(a) in situations in which the IRS may be
December 4, 200610412006–49 I.R.B.

requested otherwise by the U.S. compe-
tent authority; or (b) in situations involv-
ing cases pending in court and in other
instances in which action must be taken to
avoid prejudicing the U.S. Government’s
interest. The normal administrative pro-
cedures continue to apply, however, to
all other issues not under U.S. competent
authority consideration. For example, if
there are other issues raised during the
examination and the taxpayer is not in
agreement with these issues, the usual
procedures for completing the examina-
tion with respect to these issues apply. If
thetaxpayerisissuedaNoticeofProposed
Adjustment with respect to these issues
and prepares a protest of the unagreed
issues, the taxpayer need not include any
unagreed issue under consideration by
the competent authority. Following the
receipt of a taxpayer’s protest, normal
IRS Appeals procedures will be initiated
with respect to those issues not subject to
competent authority consideration.
.02Coordination with IRS Appeals.
Taxpayers who disagree with a proposed
U.S. adjustment have the option of pur-
suing their right of administrative re-
view with IRS Appeals before requesting
competent authorityassistance; making
a request pursuant to the Simultaneous
Appeals procedure in section 8 of this
revenue procedure; or requesting com-
petent authority assistance immediately
for bilateral consideration. Taxpayers re-
questing unilateral withdrawal of a U.S.
adjustment without consultation with the
treaty country must direct such a request
to IRS Appeals rather than to the U.S.
competent authority. Taxpayers who are
pursuing their rights with IRS Appeals
may contact the U.S. competent authority
if they believe they have a potential com-
petent authority issue. If a taxpayer does
not go through the Simultaneous Appeals
procedure and instead enters into settle-
ment discussions with IRS Appeals before
making a competent authority request,
the U.S. competent authority may rely
upon, but will not necessarily be bound
by, such previous consideration by IRS
Appeals when considering the case (see
alsosection 7.05 of this revenue procedure
regarding settlements with IRS Appeals
and section 8.05 of this revenue procedure
regarding the role of IRS Appeals in the
Simultaneous Appeals procedure). If a
taxpayer enters into the Appeals arbitra-
tion program (seeRev. Proc. 2006–44,
2006–44 I.R.B. 800), the taxpayer gener-
ally may not request competent authority
assistance until the arbitration process
is completed. However, if the taxpayer
demonstrates that a request for competent
authority assistance is necessary to keep
open a statute of limitations in the treaty
country, then competent authority assis-
tance may be requested while arbitration is
pending, and the U.S. competent authority
will suspend action on the case until arbi-
tration is completed. If a taxpayer makes a
competent authority request, the taxpayer
is deemed to consent to communications
between the U.S. competent authority and
IRS Appeals regarding the matter.See
Rev. Proc. 2000–43, 2000–2 C.B. 404.
.03Coordination with Litigation.The
U.S. competent authority will not, without
the consent of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International), accept (or continue to con-
sider) a taxpayer’s request for assistance if
the request involves a taxable period pend-
ing in a United States court or involves a
matter pending in a United States court or
designated for litigation for any taxable pe-
riod. If the case is pending in the United
States Tax Court, the taxpayer may, in ap-
propriate cases, be asked to join the IRS in
a motion to sever issues or delay trial pend-
ing completion of the competent author-
ity proceedings. If the case is pending in
any other court, the Associate Chief Coun-
sel (International) will consult with the De-
partment of Justice about appropriate ac-
tion, and the taxpayer may, in appropriate
cases, be asked to join the U.S. Govern-
ment in a motion to sever issues or delay
trial pending completion of the competent
authority proceedings. Final decision on
severing issues or delaying trial rests with
the court. The filing of a competent author-
ity request does not, however, relieve the
taxpayer from taking any action that may
be necessary or required with respect to lit-
igation.
.04Coordination with Other Alterna-
tive Dispute Resolution and Pre-Filing
Procedures. Competent authority assis-
tance is available to taxpayers in con-
junction with other alternative dispute
resolution and pre-filing procedures in
order to ensure taxation in accordance
with tax treaty provisions. Other revenue
procedures and IRS publications should
be consulted as necessary with regard to
specific matters.See,e.g., Rev. Proc.
2006–9, 2006–2 I.R.B. 278 (concerning
APAs); Rev. Proc. 2005–12, 2005–2
I.R.B. 311 (concerning Pre-Filing Agree-
ments); or Rev. Proc. 98–21, 1998–1
C.B. 585 (concerning Article XIII(8) of
the U.S.-Canada treaty). Taxpayers with
applications under any other dispute reso-
lution procedures should seek competent
authority assistance as early as possible if
they believe they have potential competent
authority issues.
.05Effect of Agreements or Judicial De-
terminations on Competent Authority Pro-
ceedings. If a taxpayer either executes a
closing agreement with the IRS (whether
or not contingent upon competent author-
ity relief) with respect to a potential com-
petent authority issue or reaches a settle-
ment on the issue with IRS Appeals (in-
cluding an Appeals settlement through the
arbitration process) or with Chief Coun-
sel pursuant to an executed closing agree-
ment or other written agreement such as
Form 870–AD, the U.S. competent author-
ity will endeavor only to obtain a correla-
tive adjustment from the treaty country and
will not undertake any actions that would
otherwise change such agreements. How-
ever, the U.S. competent authority will,
in appropriate cases, consider actions nec-
essary for the purpose of providing treat-
ment similar to that provided in Rev. Proc.
99–32. Once a taxpayer’s tax liability for
the taxable periods in issue has been de-
termined by a U.S. court (including settle-
ment of the proceedings before or during
trial), the U.S. competent authority simi-
larly will endeavor only to obtain correla-
tive relief from the treaty country and will
not undertake any action that would other-
wise reduce the taxpayer’s federal tax lia-
bility for the taxable periods in issue as de-
termined by a U.S. court. Taxpayers there-
fore should be aware that in these situa-
tions, as well as in situations where a treaty
country takes a similar position with re-
spect to issues resolved under its domestic
laws, relief from double taxation may be
jeopardized.
.06Accelerated Competent Authority
Procedure. A taxpayer requesting compe-
tent authority assistance with respect to an
issue raised by the IRS also may request
that the competent authorities attempt to
resolve the issue for subsequent taxable
2006–49 I.R.B.1042December 4, 2006

periods for which returns have been filed,
if the same issue continues in those peri-
ods.See alsoRev. Proc. 94–67, 1994–2
C.B. 800, concerning the Accelerated Is-
sue Resolution (“AIR”) process. The U.S.
competent authoritywill consider the re-
quest and will contact the appropriate IRS
field office to consult on whether the issue
should be resolved for subsequent taxable
periods. If the IRS field office consents to
this procedure, the U.S. competent author-
ity will address with the foreign competent
authority the request for such taxable pe-
riods. For purposes of resolving the issue,
the taxpayer must furnish all relevant
information and statements that may be
requested by the U.S. competent authority
pursuant to this revenue procedure. In ad-
dition, if the case involves a Coordinated
Industry Case (“CIC”) taxpayer, the tax-
payer must furnish all relevant information
and statements requested by the IRS, as
described in Rev. Proc. 94–67, 1994–2
C.B. 800. If the case involves a non-CIC
taxpayer, the taxpayer must furnish all rel-
evant information and statements that may
be requested by the IRS field office. A
request for the accelerated competent au-
thority procedure may be made at the time
of filing a request for competent authority
assistance or at any time thereafter, but
generally before conclusion of the mutual
agreement in the case; however, taxpayers
are encouraged to request the procedure
as early as practicable. The application
of the accelerated procedure may require
the prior consent of the Associate Chief
Counsel (International).Seesection 7.03
of this revenue procedure. A request for
the accelerated competent authority pro-
cedure must contain a statement that the
taxpayer agrees that: (a) the inspection
of books of account or records under the
accelerated competent authority procedure
will not preclude or impede (under section
7605(b) or any administrative provision
adopted by the IRS) a later examination of
a return or inspection of books of account
or records for any taxable period covered
in the accelerated competent authority
assistance request; and (b) the IRS need
not comply with any applicable proce-
dural restrictions (for example, providing
notice under section 7605(b)) before be-
ginning such examination or inspection.
The accelerated competent authority pro-
cedure is not subject to the AIR process
limitations. The accelerated competent
authority procedure is implicitly invoked
when a taxpayer requests a rollback of its
requested bilateral APA to already filed
years. Thus, the provisions of section
7.06 of this revenue procedure also apply
when a rollback is requested pursuant to
Rev. Proc. 2006–9, which governs re-
quests for APAs filed with the Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (International),
Advance Pricing Agreement Program.
SECTION 8. SIMULTANEOUS
APPEALS PROCEDURE
.01General. A taxpayer filing a request
for competent authority assistance under
this revenue procedure may, at the same
time or at a later date, request IRS Ap-
peals’ consideration of the competent au-
thority issue under the procedures and con-
ditions provided in this section. The U.S.
competent authority also may request IRS
Appeals’ involvement if it is determined
that such involvement would facilitate the
negotiation of a mutual agreement in the
case or otherwise would serve the inter-
est of the IRS. The taxpayer may, at any
time, request a prefiling conference with
the offices of the Chief of IRS Appeals
and the U.S. competent authority to dis-
cuss the Simultaneous Appeals procedure.
See alsosection 7.02 of this revenue pro-
cedure for coordination with the compe-
tent authority of cases already in IRS Ap-
peals. However, arbitration or mediation
procedures that otherwise would be avail-
able through the IRS Appeals process are
not available for cases in the Simultane-
ous Appeals procedure.SeeRev. Proc.
2006–44, 2006–44 I.R.B. 800, and Rev.
Proc. 2002–44, 2002–2 C.B. 10.
.02Time for Requesting the Simultane-
ous Appeals Procedure.
(1)When Filing for Competent Author-
ity Assistance. The Simultaneous Appeals
procedure may be invoked at any of the
following times:
(a) When the taxpayer applies for com-
petent authority assistance with respect to
an issue for which the examining IRS of-
fice has proposed an adjustment and before
the protest is filed;
(b) When the taxpayer files a protest
and decides to sever the competent author-
ity issue and seek competent authority as-
sistance while other issues are referred to
IRS Appeals; and
(c) When the case is in IRS Appeals and
the taxpayer later decides to request com-
petent authority assistance with respect to
the competent authority issue. The tax-
payer may sever the competent authority
issue for referral to the U.S. competent au-
thority and invoke the Simultaneous Ap-
peals procedure at any time when the case
is in IRS Appeals but before settlement of
the issue. Taxpayers, however, are encour-
aged to invoke the Simultaneous Appeals
procedure as soon as possible, preferably
as soon as practicable after the first IRS
Appeals conference.
(2)After Filing for Competent Authority
Assistance. The taxpayer may request the
Simultaneous Appeals procedure at any
time after requesting competent authority
assistance. However, a taxpayer’s request
for the Simultaneous Appeals procedure
generally will be denied if made after the
date the U.S. position paper is communi-
cated to the foreign competent authority,
unless the U.S. competent authority deter-
mines that the procedure would facilitate
an early resolution of the competent au-
thority issue or otherwise is in the best in-
terest of the IRS.
.03Cases Pending in Court.Ifthemat-
ter is pending before a U.S. court or has
been designated for litigation and jurisdic-
tion has been released to the U.S. compe-
tent authority, a request for the Simulta-
neous Appeals procedure may be granted
only with the consent of the U.S. compe-
tent authority and the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (International).
.04Request for Simultaneous Appeals
Procedure. The taxpayer’s request for the
Simultaneous Appeals procedure should
be addressed to the U.S. competent au-
thority either as part of the initial compe-
tent authority assistance request or, if made
later, as a separate letter to the U.S. com-
petent authority. The request should state
whether the issue was previously protested
to IRS Appeals for the periods in compe-
tent authority or for prior periods (in which
case a copy of the relevant portions of the
protest and an explanation of the outcome,
if any, should be provided). The U.S. com-
petent authority will send a copy of the re-
quest to the Chief of IRS Appeals, who,
in turn, will forward a copy to the appro-
priate Area Director. The U.S. competent
authority will consult with IRS Appeals to
determine whether the Simultaneous Ap-
December 4, 200610432006–49 I.R.B.

peals procedure should be invoked. When
the U.S. competent authority invokes the
Simultaneous Appeals procedure, the tax-
payer will be notified. The U.S. competent
authority has jurisdiction of the issue when
the Simultaneous Appeals procedure is in-
voked.
.05Role of IRS Appeals in the Simulta-
neous Appeals Procedure.
(1)IRS Appeals Process.TheIRSAp-
peals representative assigned to the case
will consult with the taxpayer and the
U.S. competent authority for the purpose
of reaching a resolution of the unagreed
issue under competent authority juris-
diction before the issue is presented to
the foreign competent authority. For this
purpose, established IRS Appeals proce-
dures generally apply. The IRS Appeals
representative will consult with the U.S.
competent authority during this process
to ensure appropriate coordination of the
IRS Appeals process with the competent
authority procedure, so that the terms of a
tentative resolution and the principles and
facts upon which it is based are compatible
with the position that the U.S. competent
authority intends to present to the foreign
competent authority with respect to the is-
sue. Any resolution reached with the IRS
under this procedure is subject to the com-
petent authority process and, therefore, is
tentative and not binding on the IRS or
the taxpayer. The IRS will not request
the taxpayer to conclude the IRS Appeals
process with a written agreement. The
conclusions of the tentative resolution,
however, generally will be reflected in the
U.S. position paper used for negotiating a
mutual agreement with the foreign com-
petent authority. The procedures under
this section do not give taxpayers the right
to receive reconsideration of the issue by
IRS Appeals where the taxpayer applied
for competent authority assistance after
having received substantial IRS Appeals
consideration. Rather, the IRS may rely
upon, but will not necessarily be bound
by, such previous consideration by IRS
Appeals when considering the case under
the Simultaneous Appeals procedure.
(2)Assistance to U.S. Competent Au-
thority. The U.S. competent authority is
responsible for developing a U.S. position
paper with respect to the issue and for con-
ducting the mutual agreement procedure.
Generally, requesting IRS Appeals’ con-
sideration of an issue under competent au-
thority jurisdiction will not affect the man-
ner in which taxpayers normally are in-
volved in the competent authority process.
.06Denial or Termination of Simulta-
neous Appeals Procedure.
(1)Taxpayer’s Termination.Thetax-
payer may, at any time, withdraw its re-
quest for the Simultaneous Appeals proce-
dure.
(2)IRS’sDenialorTermination.The
U.S. competent authority, the Chief of
IRS Appeals or the appropriate Industry
or Area Director may decide to deny or
terminate the Simultaneous Appeals pro-
cedure if the procedure is determined to
be prejudicial to the mutual agreement
procedure or to the administrative appeals
process. For example, a taxpayer that re-
ceived IRS Appeals consideration before
requesting competent authority assistance,
but was unable to reach a settlement in
IRS Appeals, may be denied the Simul-
taneous Appeals procedure. A taxpayer
mayrequestaconferencewiththeoffices
of the U.S. competent authority and the
Chief of IRS Appeals to discuss the denial
or termination of the procedure.
.07ReturningtoIRSAppeals.Ifthe
competent authorities fail to agree or if the
taxpayer does not accept the mutual agree-
ment reached by the competent authorities,
the taxpayer will be permitted to refer the
issue to IRS Appeals for further consider-
ation.
.08IRS Appeals’ Consideration of Non-
Competent Authority Issues.TheSimul-
taneous Appeals procedure does not af-
fect the taxpayer’s rights to IRS Appeals’
consideration of other unresolved issues.
The taxpayer may pursue settlement dis-
cussions with respect to the other issues
without waiting for resolution of the issues
under competent authority jurisdiction.
SECTION 9. PROTECTIVE
MEASURES
.01General. In negotiating treaties, the
United States seeks to secure an agreement
with the treaty country that any compe-
tent authority agreement reached with
the treaty country will be implemented
notwithstanding any time limits or other
procedural limitations in the domestic law
of either country. However, treaty provi-
sions that provide a competent authority
with the ability to waive such limitations
do not affect the application of statutes of
limitation in the event that a request for
competent authority assistance is declined
or the competent authorities are unable
to reach an agreement. In addition, the
particular treaty or the posture of the par-
ticular case may indicate that the taxpayer
or a related person must take protective
measures with the U.S. and foreign tax
authorities so that the implementation of
any agreement reached by the competent
authorities or alternative remedies outside
of the competent authority process are not
barred by administrative, legal or proce-
dural barriers. Such barriers may arise
either before or after a competent author-
ity request is filed. Protective measures
include, but are not limited to: (a) filing
protective claims for refund or credit; (b)
extending any period of limitations on
assessment or refund; (c) avoiding the
lapse or termination of the taxpayer’s
right to appeal any tax determination;
(d) complying with all applicable proce-
dures for invoking competent authority
consideration, including applicable treaty
provisions dealing with time limits within
which to invoke such remedy; and (e)
contesting an adjustment or seeking an
appropriate correlative adjustment with
respect to the U.S. or treaty country tax. A
taxpayer should take protective measures
in a timely manner, that is, in a manner
that allows sufficient time for appropriate
procedures to be completed and effective
before barriers arise. Generally, a taxpayer
should consider, at the time an adjustment
is first proposed, which protective mea-
sures may be necessary and when such
measures should be taken. However, ear-
lier consideration of appropriate actions
may be desirable, for example, in the
case of a recurring adjustment or where
the taxpayer otherwise is on notice that
an adjustment is likely to be proposed.
Taxpayers may consult with the U.S. com-
petent authority to determine the need for
and timing of protective measures in their
particular case.
.02Filing Protective Claim for Credit
or Refund with a Competent Authority Re-
quest.
(1)In General. A valid protective claim
for credit or refund must meet the require-
ments of section 6402 of the Code and
the regulations thereunder. Accordingly, a
2006–49 I.R.B.1044December 4, 2006

protective claim must: (a) fully advise the
IRS of the grounds on which credit or re-
fund is claimed; (b) contain sufficient facts
to apprise the IRS of the exact basis of the
claim; (c) state the year for which the claim
is being made; (d) be on the proper form;
and (e) be verified by a written declaration
made under penalties of perjury.
(2)Treatment of Competent Authority
Request as Protective Claim.TheIRS
will treat a request for competent authority
assistance itself as one or more protective
claims for credit or refund with respect
to issues raised in the request and within
the jurisdiction of the U.S. competent
authority and will not require a taxpayer
to file the form described in Treas. Reg.
§301.6402–3 with respect to those issues,
provided that the request meets the other
requirements of section 6402 of the Code
and the regulations thereunder, as de-
scribed in section 9.02(1) of this revenue
procedure. The information constituting
the protective claim should be set forth in
a separate section of the request for as-
sistance and captioned “Protective claim
pursuant to section 9.02 of Rev. Proc.
2006–54.” The penalties of perjury state-
ment described in section 4.05(16) of this
revenue procedure satisfies the require-
ment for the written declaration and a
separate declaration is not required.
.03Protective Filing Before Competent
Authority Request.
(1)In general. There may be situa-
tions in which a taxpayer will be unable
to file a formal competent authority assis-
tance request before the period of limita-
tions expires with respect to the affected
U.S. return. In these situations, before the
period of limitations expires, the taxpayer
shouldfileaprotectiveclaimforcredit
or refund of the taxes attributable to the
potential competent authority issue to en-
sure that alternative remedies outside of
the competent authority process will not be
barred. A protective filing may be appro-
priate where: (a) the treaty country is con-
sidering but has not yet proposed an adjust-
ment; (b) the treaty country has proposed
an adjustment but the related taxpayer in
the treaty country decides to pursue admin-
istrative or judicial remedies in the foreign
country; or (c) the terms of the applicable
treaty require notification to be made to the
competent authority within a certain time
period. In considering whether to accept
a taxpayer’s request for competent author-
ity assistance, the U.S. competent author-
ity will consider whether the proper treaty
notification has been made in accordance
with this subsection.
(2)Letter to Competent Authority
Treated as Protective Claim. In situa-
tions in which a protective claim is filed
prior to submitting a request for compe-
tent authority assistance, the taxpayer may
make a protective claim in the form of a
letter to the competent authority. The letter
must indicate that the taxpayer is filing a
protective claim and set forth, to the extent
available, the information required under
section 4.05(1) through (17) or under sec-
tion 5.03(1) through (8) of this revenue
procedure, as applicable. The letter must
include a penalties of perjury statement as
described in sections 4.05(16) and 5.03(8)
of this revenue procedure. The letter must
be filed in the same place and manner as a
request for competent authority assistance.
The IRS will treat the letter as a protective
claim(s) with respect to issues raised in
the letter and within the jurisdiction of the
U.S. competent authority and will not re-
quire a taxpayer to file the form described
in Treas. Reg. §301.6402–3 with respect
to those issues, provided that the request
meets the other requirements described in
section 9.02(1) of this revenue procedure.
The letter must include the caption “Pro-
tective claim pursuant to section 9.03 of
Rev. Proc. 2006–54.”
(3)Notification Requirement. After fil-
ing a protective claim, the taxpayer period-
ically must notify the U.S. competent au-
thority whether the taxpayer still is consid-
ering filing for competent authority assis-
tance. The notification must be filed ev-
ery twelve months until the formal request
for competent authority assistance is filed.
The U.S. competent authority may deny
competent authority assistance if the tax-
payer fails to file this annual notification.
(4)No Consultation between Compe-
tent Authorities until Formal Request is
Filed. The U.S. competent authority gen-
erally will not undertake any consultation
with the foreign competent authority with
respect to a protective claim filed under
section 9.03 of this revenue procedure.
The U.S. competent authority will place
the protective claim in suspense until
either a formal request for competent au-
thority assistance is filed or the taxpayer
notifies the U.S. competent authority that
competent authority consideration is no
longer needed. In appropriate cases, the
U.S. competent authority will send the
taxpayer a formal notice of claim disal-
lowance.
.04Effect of a Protective Claim.
Protective claims filed under section
9.02 or 9.03 of this revenue procedure will
only allow a credit or refund to the extent
of the grounds set forth in the protective
claim and only to the extent agreed to by
the U.S. and foreign competent authorities
or to the extent unilaterally allowed by the
U.S. competent authority. This revenue
procedure does not grant a taxpayer the
right to invoke section 482 of the Code
in its favor or compel the IRS to allocate
income or deductions or grant a tax credit
or refund.
.05Treaty Provisions Waiving Proce-
dural Barriers.
In those cases where the mutual agree-
ment article authorizes a competent au-
thority to waive or remove procedural bar-
riers to the credit or refund of tax, tax-
payersmaybeallowedacreditorrefund
of tax even though the otherwise appli-
cable period of limitations has expired,
prior closing agreements have been en-
tered into, or other actions have been taken
or omitted that ordinarily would foreclose
relief in the form of a credit or refund
of tax. However, under these provisions
there may still be situations in which tax-
payers should take appropriate protective
measures as described under this revenue
procedure or under applicable foreign pro-
cedures. For example, procedural limi-
tations cannot be waived if a request for
competent authority assistance is declined
or the competent authorities are unable to
reach agreement. In addition, some coun-
tries may take the position that domestic
statutes of limitation on refunds cannot be
waived under the relevant treaty. Because
there are circumstances that are not under
the control of taxpayers or the U.S. com-
petent authority it is advisable that taxpay-
ers take protective measures to increase the
possibility that appropriate relief is avail-
able to them in all circumstances.
SECTION 10. APPLICATION OF
REV. PROC. 99–32
Rev. Proc. 99–32, 1999–2 C.B. 296,
generally provides a means to conform a
December 4, 200610452006–49 I.R.B.

taxpayer’s accounts and allow repatriation
of certain amounts following an allocation
of income between related U.S. and for-
eign corporations under section 482 of the
Code without the federal income tax con-
sequences of the adjustments that would
otherwise have been necessary to conform
the taxpayer’s accounts in light of the al-
location of income. In situations where a
section 482 allocation is the subject of a
request for competent authority assistance,
the competent authority may provide relief
consistent with the principles of Rev. Proc.
99–32 with respect to any new or pend-
ing requests for Rev. Proc. 99–32 treat-
ment relating to such allocation. Accord-
ingly, if a taxpayer intends to seek Rev.
Proc. 99–32 treatment in connection with
competent authority assistance relating to
a section 482 allocation, the taxpayer must
request Rev. Proc. 99–32 treatment in
conjunction with its request for competent
authority assistance. If a taxpayer has al-
ready requested Rev. Proc. 99–32 treat-
ment at the time it submits a request for
competent authority assistance relating to
a section 482 allocation, consideration of
Rev. Proc. 99–32 treatment must be trans-
ferred to the U.S. competent authority and
a copy of the pending Rev. Proc. 99–32 re-
quest forwarded along with the request for
competent authority assistance.
SECTION 11. DETERMINATION OF
CREDITABLE FOREIGN TAXES
For purposes of determining the amount
of foreign taxes creditable under sections
901 and 902 of the Code, any amounts
paid to foreign tax authorities that would
not have been due if the treaty country
had made a correlative adjustment may
not constitute a creditable foreign tax.See
Treas. Reg. §1.901–2(e)(5)(i) and Rev.
Rul. 92–75, 1992–2 C.B. 197. Acts or
omissions by the taxpayer that preclude
effective competent authority assistance,
including failure to take protective mea-
sures as described in section 9 of this
revenue procedure or failure to seek com-
petent authority assistance, may constitute
a failure to exhaust all effective and practi-
cal remedies as may be required to claim a
credit.SeeTreas. Reg. §1.901–2(e)(5)(i).
Further, the fact that the taxpayer has
sought competent authority assistance
but obtained no relief, either because the
competent authorities failed to reach an
agreement or because the taxpayer rejected
an agreement reached by the competent
authorities, generally will not, in and of
itself, demonstrate that the taxpayer has
exhausted all effective and practical reme-
dies to reduce the taxpayer’s liability for
foreign tax (including liability pursuant
to a foreign tax audit adjustment). Any
determination within the IRS of whether
a taxpayer has exhausted the competent
authority remedy must be made in consul-
tation with the U.S. competent authority.
SECTION 12. ACTION BY U.S.
COMPETENT AUTHORITY
.01Notification of Taxpayer. Upon re-
ceiving a request for assistance pursuant to
this revenue procedure, the U.S. competent
authority will notify the taxpayer whether
the facts provide a basis for assistance.
.02Denial of Assistance.TheU.S.
competent authority generally will not ac-
cept a request for competent authority as-
sistance or will cease providing assistance
to the taxpayer if:
(1) competent authority determines that
the taxpayer is not entitled to the treaty
benefit or safeguard in question or to the
assistance requested;
(2) the taxpayer is willing only to ac-
cept a competent authority agreement
under conditions that are unreasonable
or prejudicial to the interests of the U.S.
Government;
(3) the taxpayer rejected the competent
authority resolution of the same or similar
issue in a prior case;
(4) the taxpayer does not agree that
competent authority negotiations are a
government-to-government activity that
does not include the taxpayer’s participa-
tion in the negotiation proceedings;
(5) the taxpayer does not furnish upon
request sufficient information to determine
whether the treaty applies to the taxpayer’s
facts and circumstances;
(6) the taxpayer was found to have ac-
quiesced in a foreign initiated adjustment
that involved significant legal or factual
issues that otherwise would be properly
handled through the competent author-
ity process and then unilaterally made a
corresponding correlative adjustment or
claimed an increased foreign tax credit,
without initially seeking U.S. competent
authority assistance;
(7) the taxpayer: (a) fails to comply
with this revenue procedure; (b) failed to
cooperate with the IRS during the exam-
ination of the periods in issue and such
failure significantly impedes the ability of
the U.S. competent authority to negoti-
ate and conclude an agreement (e.g.,sig-
nificant factual development is required
that cannot effectively be completed out-
side the examination process); or (c) fails
to cooperate with the U.S. competent au-
thority (including failing to provide suffi-
cient facts and documentation to support
its claim of double taxation or taxation
contrary to the treaty) or otherwise signifi-
cantly impedes the ability of the U.S. com-
petent authority to negotiate and conclude
an agreement; or
(8) the transaction giving rise to the re-
quest for competent authority assistance:
(a) is more properly within the jurisdic-
tion of IRS Appeals; (b) includes an issue
pending in a U.S. Court, or designated for
litigation, unless competent authority con-
siderationisconcurredinbytheU.S.com-
petent authority and the Associate Chief
Counsel (International); (c) is a listed
transaction for purposes of Treas. Reg.
§1.6011–4(b)(2) and §301.6111–2(b)(2);
or (d) involves fraudulent activity by the
taxpayer.
.03Extending Period of Limitations for
Assessment. If the U.S. competent author-
ity accepts a request for assistance, the tax-
payer may be requested to execute a con-
sent to extend the period of limitations for
assessment of tax for the taxable periods
in issue. Failure to comply with the provi-
sions of this subsection can result in denial
of assistance by the U.S. competent author-
ity with respect to the request.
.04No Review of Denial of Request for
Assistance. The U.S. competent author-
ity’s denial of a taxpayer’s request for as-
sistance or dismissal of a matter previously
accepted for consideration pursuant to this
revenue procedure is final and not subject
to administrative review.
.05Notification. The U.S. competent
authority will notify a taxpayer requesting
assistance under this revenue procedure of
any agreement that the U.S. and the for-
eign competent authorities reach with re-
spect to the request. If the taxpayer ac-
cepts the resolution reached by the com-
petent authorities, the agreement will pro-
vide that it is final and is not subject to fur-
2006–49 I.R.B.1046December 4, 2006

ther administrative or judicial review. If
the competent authorities fail to agree, or
if the agreement reached is not acceptable
to the taxpayer, the taxpayer may withdraw
the request for competent authority assis-
tance and may then pursue all rights other-
wise available under the laws of the United
States and the treaty country. Where the
competent authorities fail to agree, no fur-
ther competent authority remedies gener-
ally are available, except with respect to
treaties that provide for arbitration of the
dispute.See,e.g.,Article25(5)ofthe
U.S.-German income tax treaty. A request
for arbitration must be made in accordance
with the procedures prescribed under the
applicable treaty and related documents,
including procedures that the IRS may pro-
mulgate from time to time.
.06Closing Agreement.Whenappro-
priate, the taxpayer may be requested to
enter into a closing agreement that reflects
the terms of the mutual agreement and
of the competent authority assistance pro-
vided and that is executed in conformity
with sections 6.07 and 6.17 of Rev. Proc.
68–16, 1968–1 C.B. 770 (as modified by
Rev. Proc. 94–67, 1994–2 C.B. 800).
.07Unilateral Withdrawal or Reduction
of U.S. Initiated Adjustments. With respect
to U.S. initiated adjustments under section
482 of the Code, the primary goal of the
mutual agreement procedure is to obtain
a correlative adjustment from the treaty
country. For other types of U.S. initiated
adjustments, the primary goal of the U.S.
competent authority is the avoidance of
taxation not in accordance with an applica-
ble treaty. Unilateralwithdrawal or reduc-
tion of U.S. initiated adjustments, there-
fore, generally will not be considered. For
example, the U.S. competent authority will
not withdraw or reduce an adjustment to
income, deductions, credits or other items
solely because the period of limitations has
expired in the foreign country and the for-
eign competent authority has declined to
grant any relief. If the period provided by
the foreign statute of limitations has ex-
pired, the U.S. competent authority may
take into account other relevant facts to
determine whether such withdrawal or re-
duction is appropriate and may, in extra-
ordinary circumstances and as a matter of
discretion, provide such relief with respect
to the adjustment to avoid actual or eco-
nomic double taxation. In no event, how-
ever, will relief be granted where there is
fraud or negligence with respect to the rel-
evant transactions. In keeping with the
U.S. Government’s view that tax treaties
should be applied in a balanced and recip-
rocal manner, the United States normally
will not withdraw or reduce an adjustment
where the treaty country does not grant
similar relief in equivalent cases.
SECTION 13. REQUESTS FOR
RULINGS
.01General. Requests for advance rul-
ings regarding the interpretation or appli-
cation of a tax treaty, as distinguished from
requests for assistance from the U.S. com-
petent authority pursuant to this revenue
procedure, must be submitted to the As-
sociate Chief Counsel (International).See
Rev. Proc. 2006–1, 2006–1 I.R.B. 1, and
Rev. Proc. 2006–7, 2006–1 I.R.B. 242.
.02Foreign Tax Rulings. The IRS does
not issue advance rulings on the effect of
a tax treaty on the tax laws of a treaty
country for purposes of determining the
tax of the treaty country.
SECTION 14. FEES
.01Requests to Which a User Fee Does
Not Apply. Except as provided in sec-
tion 14.02 of this revenue procedure, no
user fees are required with respect to a re-
quest for U.S. competent authority assis-
tance pursuant to this revenue procedure.
.02Requests to Which a User Fee Ap-
plies. In general, a $15,000 user fee ap-
plies to all requests for determinations on
limitation on benefits, as described in sec-
tion 3.08 of this revenue procedure. The
fee will apply regardless of whether the re-
quest is for: (a) an initial determination;
(b) a renewal of a previously issued deter-
mination; or (c) a supplemental determina-
tion required, for example, if there is a ma-
terial change in fact or if the taxpayer seeks
benefits with respect to a different type of
income or requests a lower rate of with-
holding tax on dividends. If a request is
submitted that requires the U.S. competent
authority to make a discretionary determi-
nation for more than one entity, a separate
user fee will be charged for each entity.
.03Acceptance of Requests.Auserfee
will not be charged until the U.S. compe-
tent authority has formally accepted the re-
quest for consideration. Within 30 days of
receipt of a complete submission, the U.S.
competent authority will provide written
notice to the taxpayer as to whether the re-
quest will be accepted or rejected for con-
sideration. If a request is accepted, the
taxpayer will be required to mail a check
or money order in the appropriate amount,
along with a copy of the written notice of
acceptance to the IRS office identified be-
low. The check or money order should be
payable to the United States Treasury. The
fee may be refunded as provided in section
14.05 of this revenue procedure.
.04Address to Send Payment. The user
fee should be sent along with a copy of the
written notice of acceptance to the mailing
address listed below:
IRS/BFC
P.O. Box 9002
Beckley, WV 25802
.05Refunds of User Fee. In general, a
user fee will not be refunded once the U.S.
competent authority accepts a request for
consideration and the user fee is paid. For
example, the IRS will not refund the user
fee if the request for a discretionary deter-
mination is withdrawn by the taxpayer or if
the taxpayer fails to submit additional in-
formation as requested by the U.S. compe-
tent authority. A user fee may be refunded,
however, if: (a) a higher user fee is paid
than is required; or (b) taking into account
all the facts and circumstances, including
the IRS’s resources devoted to the request,
the Competent Authority declines to rule
and, in his or her sole discretion, decides a
refund is appropriate.
SECTION 15. EFFECT ON OTHER
DOCUMENTS
Rev. Proc. 2006–26, 2006–21 I.R.B.
936, and Rev. Proc. 2002–52, 2002–2
C.B. 242, are modified and superseded
by this revenue procedure. Rev. Proc.
2006–9, 2006–9 I.R.B. 278 is amplified.
Rev. Rul. 92–75, 1992–2 C.B. 197, is
clarified. References in this revenue pro-
cedure to Rev. Proc. 99–32 will be treated
as references to Rev. Proc. 65–17, 1965–1
C.B. 833, as modified, amplified and clar-
ified from time to time, for taxable years
beginning before August 24, 1999.
December 4, 200610472006–49 I.R.B.

SECTION 16. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective for
requests for U.S. competent authority as-
sistance and Rev. Proc. 99–32 treatment
filed after December 4, 2006.
SECTION 17. PAPERWORK
REDUCTION ACT
The collection of information con-
tained in this revenue procedure has been
reviewed and approved by the Office
of Management and Budget in accor-
dance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. § 3507) under control number
1545–2044.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a valid
control number.
The collection of information in this
revenue procedure is in sections 4.04, 4.05,
5.03, 7.06, 8.04, and 9.03. This informa-
tion is required, and will be used, to eval-
uate and process the request for competent
authority assistance. The collection of in-
formation is required to obtain competent
authority assistance. The likely respon-
dents are individuals or business or other
for-profit institutions.
The estimated total annual reporting
and/or recordkeeping burden is 9,000
hours.
The estimated annual burden per re-
spondent/recordkeeper is 30 hours. The
estimated number of respondents and/or
recordkeepers is 300.
The estimated annual frequency of re-
sponses is on occasion.
Books or records relating to a collection
of information must be retained as long
as their contents may become material in
the administration of any internal revenue
law. Generally, tax returns and tax return
information are confidential, as required
by section 6103 of the Code.
SECTION 18. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal authors of this rev-
enue procedure are Aziz Benbrahim
and Vincent Salvo of the Office of the
Deputy Commissioner (International),
Large and Mid-Size Business Division,
and Mae J. Lew and Denen A. Norfleet
of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International). For further information
regarding this revenue procedure, contact
either Mr. Benbrahim or Mr. Salvo at
(202) 435–5000 or Ms. Norfleet at (202)
435–5262 (not toll-free calls).
2006–49 I.R.B.1048December 4, 2006

Part IV. Items of General Interest
Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking by
Cross-Reference to
Temporary Regulations
AJCA Modifications to the
Section 6011 Regulations
REG–103038–05
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
by cross-reference to temporary regula-
tions.
SUMMARY: This document contains pro-
posed regulations under section 6011 of
the Internal Revenue Code that modify
the rules relating to the disclosure of re-
portable transactions under section 6011.
These regulations affect taxpayers partici-
pating in reportable transactions under sec-
tion 6011, material advisors responsible
for disclosing reportable transactions un-
der section 6111, and material advisors re-
sponsible for keeping lists under section
6112.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must be
received by January 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103038–05), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washing-
ton, DC 20044. Submissions may be
hand delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103038–05),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service,
Crystal Mall 4 Building, 1901 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA, or sent electronically, via
the IRS Internet site atwww.irs.gov/regs
or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov(indicate IRS and
REG–103038–05).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Concerning the proposed reg-
ulations, Tara P. Volungis or Charles Wien,
202–622–3070; concerning the submis-
sions of comments and requests for hear-
ing, Kelly Banks, 202–622–0392 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEM
ENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document proposes to amend 26
CFR part 1 by modifying and clarifying
the rules relating to the disclosure of re-
portable transactions under section 6011.
This document also proposes to amend 26
CFR parts 20, 25, 31, 53, 54, and 56 by
modifying the rules for purposes of estate,
gift, employment, and pension and exempt
organizations excise taxes that require the
disclosure of listed transactions by certain
taxpayers on their Federal tax returns un-
der section 6011.
On February 28, 2003, the IRS issued
final regulations under sections 6011,
6111, and 6112 (T.D. 9046, 2003–1 C.B.
614) (the February 2003 regulations). The
February 2003 regulations were published
in theFederal Register(68 FR 10161) on
March 4, 2003. On December 29, 2003,
the IRS issued final regulations under sec-
tion 6011 and 6112 (T.D. 9108, 2004–1
C.B. 429) (the December 2003 regula-
tions). The December 2003 regulations
were published in theFederal Register
(68 FR 75128) on December 30, 2003.
Since the publication of the February
2003 regulations and the December 2003
regulations, the American Jobs Creation
Act of 2004, Public Law 108–357, 118
Stat. 1418, (AJCA) was enacted on Oc-
tober 22, 2004. The AJCA revised sec-
tions 6111 and 6112, thereby necessitating
changes to the rules under section 6011.
The IRS and Treasury Department also
have received various comments and ques-
tions regarding the rules under §1.6011–4.
Consequently, the IRS and Treasury De-
partment are proposing modifications to
the rules regarding the disclosure of re-
portable transactions under §1.6011–4.
It should be noted that section 516 of
the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconcil-
iation Act of 2005, Public Law 109–222,
120 Stat. 345, (TIPRA), enacted on May
17, 2006, includes new excise taxes that
target prohibited tax shelter transactions
to which a tax-exempt entity is a party.
Prohibited tax shelter transactions consist
of listed transactions, confidential trans-
actions, and transactions with contractual
protection under section 6011. TIPRA
also contains new disclosure requirements,
which apply not only to tax-exempt en-
tities but also to taxable entities that are
parties to prohibited tax shelter transac-
tions involving tax-exempt entities, and
makes penalties applicable for failure to
comply with each new disclosure require-
ment. The IRS and Treasury Department
will issue separate guidance regarding the
disclosure provision in TIPRA.
Explanation of Provisions
A. Removal of Transactions with a
Significant Book-Tax Difference
Under the current regulations in
§1.6011–4, there are six categories of
reportable transactions. In accordance
with the interim guidance provided in
Notice 2006–6, 2006–5 I.R.B. 385, these
proposed regulations eliminate thetrans-
actions with a significant book-tax differ-
encecategory of reportable transaction
that is in §1.6011–4(b)(6). The IRS and
Treasury Department have determined
that this category of reportable transaction
is no longer necessary due to the issuance
of the Schedule M–3, “Net Income (Loss)
Reconciliation For Corporations With To-
tal Assets of $10 Million or More”, which
now provides the IRS a more complete
disclosure of book-tax differences for cor-
porations. The Schedule M–3 reporting
requirements will be extended to partner-
ships and S corporations. The removal of
the book-tax difference category applies to
transactions that otherwise would have to
have been disclosed on or after January 6,
2006 (regardless of when the transaction
was entered into).
B. Transactions of Interest
The IRS and Treasury Department are
proposing as a new category of reportable
transaction thetransactions of interest
reportable transaction. A transaction of
interest is a transaction that the IRS and
Treasury Department believe has a po-
tential for tax avoidance or evasion, but
for which the IRS and Treasury Depart-
ment lack enough information to deter-
mine whether the transaction should be
identified specifically as a tax avoidance
December 4, 200610492006–49 I.R.B.

transaction. Transactions of interest will
be identified in published guidance. When
the IRS and Treasury Department have
gathered enough information to make an
informed decision as to whether the trans-
action of interest is a tax avoidance type
of transaction, the IRS and Treasury De-
partment may take one or more actions,
including removing the transaction from
the transactions of interest category in
published guidance, designating the trans-
action as a listed transaction, or providing
a new category of reportable transaction.
Listed transactions do not have to be iden-
tified as transactions of interest before
the transactions are identified as listed
transactions. It is anticipated that, upon
finalization of these proposed regulations,
the transactions of interest category of
reportable transaction will apply to trans-
actions entered into on or after November
2, 2006.
C. Lease Transactions
These proposed regulations also elimi-
nate the special rule for lease transactions.
Under the current regulations this spe-
cial rule provides that certain customary
commercial leases of tangible personal
property described in Notice 2001–18,
2001–1 C.B. 731, are excluded from
all of the reportabletransaction cate-
gories except listed transactions. Notice
2001–18 originally was published prior to
the AJCA to provide exceptions from the
confidential corporate tax shelter registra-
tion requirements under section 6111(d)
and the list maintenance requirements
under section 6112. The special rule for
lease transactions that cross-references
Notice 2001–18 was added to §1.6011–4
in T.D. 9046 in February 2003. At that
time, the IRS and Treasury Department
were concerned that customary commer-
cial lease transactions routinely would fall
under the significant book-tax difference
category of reportable transaction. The
public also expressed concern that many
customary leasing transactions would trig-
ger the confidential transaction category
of reportable transaction that was pub-
lished in the temporary regulations under
§1.6011–4T in T.D. 9017, 2002–2 C.B.
815, in October 2002 (and in the February
2003 regulations). Since the publication
of the February 2003 regulations, the IRS
and Treasury Department amended the
confidential transaction category of re-
portable transaction in the December 2003
regulations, the AJCA removed the con-
fidential corporate tax shelter provision
in section 6111(d) in October 2004, and
Notice 2006–6 signaled the removal of the
significant book-tax difference transaction
category of reportable transaction.
Because the confidential transaction
category has been narrowed and the sig-
nificant book-tax difference transaction
category is being removed, the IRS and
Treasury Department believe that leas-
ing transactions should be subject to the
same disclosure rules as other transac-
tions. While the IRS and Treasury De-
partment do believe the disclosure rules
should apply to all leasing transactions,
the IRS and Treasury Department also
believe that most customary commercial
leasing transactions will not meet the re-
portable transaction requirements and will
not be subject to disclosure. The IRS and
Treasury Department intend to obsolete
Notice 2001–18, 2001–1 C.B. 731, when
these proposed regulations are finalized.
Comments regarding the removal of this
exception, the transactions that will have
to be disclosed as a consequence, if any,
and the possibility of exceptions for spe-
cific types of leasing transactions as to
each category of reportable transaction are
requested.
D. Transactions Involving a Brief Asset
Holding Period
These proposed regulations also mod-
ify the transactions involving a brief as-
set holding period category of reportable
transaction in §1.6011–4(b)(7). Section
901(l), added to the Code by the AJCA,
and section 901(k) operate to disallow for-
eign tax credits for withholding and cer-
tain other foreign taxes imposed on divi-
dends or other income or gain with respect
to property if the taxpayer does not meet
a minimum holding period. In light of the
enactment of section 901(l), the proposed
regulations amend the brief asset holding
period category to exclude transactions re-
sultinginaclaimedforeigntaxcredit.
E. Protective Disclosures
The IRS receives disclosures that tax-
payers file on a protective basis, claim-
ing that the transactions are not subject
to disclosure under section 6011. Some
of those taxpayers fail to provide the IRS
with the information requested under sec-
tion 6011 and the regulations thereunder
that would enable the IRS to make a de-
termination as to whether the transaction
is subject to disclosure. Consequently, the
IRS and Treasury Department have added
clarifying language in the proposed regula-
tions that allows protective disclosures to
be filed in situations where a taxpayer is
unsure of whether the transaction should
be disclosed under section 6011 if the tax-
payer complies with the rules of §1.6011–4
as if the transaction is subject to disclosure
and the person furnishes the IRS the infor-
mation requested under these regulations.
F. Partners, Shareholders, and
Beneficiaries
The IRS and Treasury Department are
aware of situations in which partners,
shareholders, and beneficiaries have filed
their Federal tax returns before receiv-
ing Schedule K–1s from the partnership,
S corporation or trust that participated in a
reportable transaction. The proposed reg-
ulations address this problem by providing
that if a taxpayer in a partnership, S corpo-
ration, or trust receives a timely Schedule
K–1 less than 10 calendar days before the
due date of the taxpayer’s return (includ-
ing extensions) and, based on receipt of
the timely Schedule K–1, the taxpayer
determines that the taxpayer participated
in a reportable transaction, the disclosure
statement will not be considered late if the
taxpayer discloses the reportable trans-
actionbyfilingadisclosure statement
with OTSA within 45 calendar days after
the due date of the taxpayer’s return (in-
cluding extensions). A taxpayer filing a
disclosure statement in accordance with
this provision need only file the statement
with OTSA and need not file an amended
return to make the disclosure. This pro-
vision is proposed to be applicable for
transactions entered into on or after the
date these regulations are published as
final regulations in theFederal Register.
However, taxpayers currently may rely on
this provision in the proposed regulations,
and taxpayers who have filed a disclosure
statement with OTSA within 45 calendar
days after the due date of the taxpayer’s
return (including extensions) as provided
in this provision have satisfied the dis-
closure requirements under §1.6011–4.
2006–49 I.R.B.1050December 4, 2006

The IRS and Treasury Department solicit
comments on whether there may be other
situations in which a taxpayer may not
know or have reason to know of its par-
ticipation in a reportable transaction at the
time the return is filed and ways in which
the disclosure rules could address these
situations.
G. Tolling Provision
Other proposed changes relate to the
provisions for obtaining a private letter rul-
ing and the tolling of the time for pro-
viding disclosure during the time the re-
quest for a ruling is pending. Because the
IRS and Treasury Department believe that
the removal of the tolling provision will
promote effective tax administration, these
proposed regulations eliminate the tolling
of the time for providing disclosure when
a taxpayer requests a private letter ruling.
Temporary regulations (T.D. 9295) remov-
ing the tolling provision are being issued
concurrently with these proposed regula-
tions. Taxpayers may still request a rul-
ing on a transaction under the regular pro-
cedures for requesting a ruling, provided
the ruling request is not factual or hypo-
thetical, but the time for providing disclo-
sure will not be tolled. The removal of the
tolling provision is effective for all ruling
requests received on or after November 1,
2006.
H. Other Clarifications and Modifications
These proposed regulations also clar-
ify and/or modify other provisions under
§1.6011–4. The regulations for estate, gift,
employment, and pension and exempt or-
ganizations excise taxes are proposed to
be modified by making them applicable to
transactions of interest.
I. Comments
The IRS and Treasury Department are
aware of concerns expressed by commen-
tators regarding the patenting of tax ad-
vice or tax strategies. The IRS and Trea-
sury Department share these concerns and
are exploring ways in which they could
be addressed, including through the cre-
ation of a new category of reportable trans-
action. Comments are requested regard-
ing the creation of such a category of re-
portable transaction. Comments also are
requested on all proposed changes to the
regulations.
J. Effective Date
Generally, when these proposed reg-
ulations become final, they will apply to
transactions entered into on or after the
date these regulations are published as
final regulations in the Federal Regis-
ter. However, upon publication the final
regulations will apply to transactions of
interest entered into on or after November
2, 2006.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Executive
Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory as-
sessment is not required. It also has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Ad-
ministrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chap-
ter 5) does not apply to these regulations,
and because these regulations do not im-
pose a collection of information on small
entities, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) do not
apply. The disclosure statement referenced
in these regulations will be made available
for public comment in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35). Pursuant to section
7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
notice of proposed rulemaking will be sub-
mitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration for
comment on its impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations, consideration
will be given to any written comments
(a signed original and eight (8) copies)
or electronic comments that are submitted
timely to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury
Department request comments on the clar-
ity of the proposed rules, how they can be
made easier to understand, and the admin-
istrability of the rules in the proposed regu-
lations. All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public
hearing will be scheduled if requested in
writing by any person that submits timely
written or electronic comments. If a pub-
lic hearing is scheduled, notice of the date,
time, and place for the public hearing will
be published in theFederal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these reg-
ulations are Tara P. Volungis and
Charles Wien, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1, 20, 25,
31, 53, 54, and 56 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.6011–4 is revised to
read as follows:
§1.6011–4 Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers.
(a)In general. Every taxpayer that
has participated, as described in paragraph
(c)(3) of this section, in a reportable trans-
action within the meaning of paragraph
(b) of this section and who is required to
file a tax return must attach to its return
for the taxable year described in paragraph
(e) of this section a disclosure statement
in the form prescribed by paragraph (d)
of this section. The fact that a transac-
tion is a reportable transaction shall not af-
fect the legal determination of whether the
taxpayer’s treatment of the transaction is
proper.
(b)Reportable transactions—(1)In
general. A reportable transaction is a
transaction described in any of the para-
graphs (b)(2) through (7) of this section.
The term transaction includes all of the
factual elements relevant to the expected
tax treatment of any investment, entity,
plan, or arrangement, and includes any
series of steps carried out as part of a plan.
There are six categories of reportable
transactions: listed transactions, confi-
dential transactions, transactions with
December 4, 200610512006–49 I.R.B.

contractual protection, loss transactions,
transactions of interest, and transactions
involving a brief asset holding period.
(2)Listed transactions. A listed trans-
action is a transaction that is the same
as or substantially similar to one of the
types of transactions that the Internal Rev-
enue Service (IRS) has determined to be
a tax avoidance transaction and identified
by notice, regulation, or other form of pub-
lished guidance as a listed transaction.
(3)Confidential transactions—(i)In
general. A confidential transaction is a
transaction that is offered to a taxpayer
under conditions of confidentiality and for
which the taxpayer has paid an advisor a
minimum fee.
(ii)Conditions of confidentiality.A
transaction is considered to be offered to
a taxpayer under conditions of confiden-
tiality if the advisor who is paid the min-
imum fee places a limitation on disclosure
by the taxpayer of the tax treatment or tax
structure of the transaction and the limi-
tation on disclosure protects the confiden-
tiality of that advisor’s tax strategies. A
transaction is treatedas confidential even
if the conditions of confidentiality are not
legally binding on the taxpayer. A claim
that a transaction is proprietary or exclu-
sive is not treated as a limitation on dis-
closure if the advisor confirms to the tax-
payer that there is no limitation on disclo-
sure of the tax treatment or tax structure of
the transaction.
(iii)Minimum fee. For purposes of this
paragraph (b)(3), the minimum fee is:
(A) $250,000 for a transaction if the
taxpayer is a corporation.
(B) $50,000 for all other transactions
unless the taxpayer is a partnership or trust,
all of the owners or beneficiaries of which
are corporations (looking through any
partners or beneficiaries that are them-
selves partnerships or trusts), in which
case the minimum fee is $250,000.
(iv)Determination of minimum fee.For
purposes of this paragraph (b)(3), in de-
termining the minimum fee, all fees for
a tax strategy or for services for advice
(whether or not tax advice) or for the im-
plementation of a transaction are taken into
account. Fees include consideration in
whatever form paid, whether in cash or in
kind, for services to analyze the transaction
(whether or not related to the tax conse-
quences of the transaction), for services to
implement the transaction, for services to
document the transaction, and for services
to prepare tax returns to the extent return
preparation fees are unreasonable in light
of the facts and circumstances. For pur-
poses of this paragraph (b)(3), a taxpayer
also is treated as paying fees to an advisor
if the taxpayer knows or should know that
the amount it pays will be paid indirectly to
the advisor, such as through a referral fee
or fee-sharing arrangement. A fee does not
include amounts paid to a person, includ-
ing an advisor, in that person’s capacity as
a party to the transaction. For example,
a fee does not include reasonable charges
for the use of capital or the sale or use of
property. The IRS will scrutinize carefully
all of the facts and circumstances in deter-
mining whether consideration received in
connection with a confidential transaction
constitutes fees.
(v)Related parties. For purposes of
this paragraph (b)(3), persons who bear a
relationship to each other as described in
section 267(b) or 707(b) will be treated as
thesameperson.
(4)Transactions with contractual pro-
tection—(i)In general. A transaction with
contractual protection is a transaction for
which the taxpayer or a related party (as
described in section 267(b) or 707(b)) has
the right to a full or partial refund of fees
(as described in paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this
section) if all or part of the intended tax
consequences from the transaction are not
sustained. A transaction with contractual
protection also is a transaction for which
fees (as described in paragraph (b)(4)(ii)
of this section) are contingent on the tax-
payer’s realization of tax benefits from
the transaction. All the facts and circum-
stances relating to the transaction will be
considered when determining whether a
fee is refundable or contingent, including
the right to reimbursements of amounts
that the parties to the transaction have not
designated as fees or any agreement to pro-
vide services without reasonable compen-
sation.
(ii)Fees. Paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this sec-
tion only applies with respect to fees paid
by or on behalf of the taxpayer or a related
party to any person who makes or provides
a statement, oral or written, to the taxpayer
or related party (or for whose benefit a
statement is made or provided to the tax-
payer or related party) as to the potential
tax consequences that may result from the
transaction.
(iii)Exceptions—(A)Termination of
transaction. A transaction is not consid-
ered to have contractual protection solely
because a party to the transaction has the
right to terminate the transaction upon
the happening of an event affecting the
taxation of one or more parties to the
transaction.
(B)Previously reported transaction.If
a person makes or provides a statement to
a taxpayer as to the potential tax conse-
quences that may result from a transaction
only after the taxpayer has entered into the
transaction and reported the consequences
of the transaction on a filed tax return,
and the person has not previously received
fees from the taxpayer relating to the trans-
action, then any refundable or contingent
fees are not taken into account in determin-
ing whether the transaction has contrac-
tual protection. This paragraph (b)(4) does
not provide any substantive rules regard-
ing when a person may charge refundable
or contingent fees with respect to a trans-
action. See Circular 230, 31 CFR Part 10,
for the regulations governing practice be-
fore the IRS.
(5)Loss transactions—(i)In general.
A loss transaction is any transaction result-
inginthetaxpayerclaimingalossunder
section 165 of at least—
(A) $10 million in any single taxable
yearor$20millioninanycombinationof
taxable years for corporations;
(B) $10 million in any single taxable
year or $20 million in any combination
of taxable years for partnerships that have
only corporations as partners (looking
through any partners that are themselves
partnerships), whether or not any losses
flow through to one or more partners; or
$2 million in any single taxable year or
$4 million in any combination of taxable
years for all other partnerships, whether
or not any losses flow through to one or
more partners;
(C) $2 million in any single taxable year
or $4 million in any combination of tax-
able years for individuals, S corporations,
or trusts, whether or not any losses flow
through to one or more shareholders or
beneficiaries; or
(D) $50,000 in any single taxable year
for individuals or trusts, whether or not the
loss flows through from an S corporation
or partnership, if the loss arises with re-
spect to a section 988 transaction (as de-
2006–49 I.R.B.1052December 4, 2006

fined in section 988(c)(1) relating to for-
eign currency transactions).
(ii)Cumulative losses. In determin-
ing whether a transaction results in a tax-
payer claiming a loss that meets the thresh-
old amounts over a combination of taxable
years as described in paragraph (b)(5)(i) of
this section, only losses claimed in the tax-
able year that the transaction is entered into
and the five succeeding taxable years are
combined.
(iii)Section 165 loss. (A) For purposes
of this section, in determining the thresh-
olds in paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this section,
the amount of a section 165 loss is ad-
justed for any salvage value and for any
insurance or other compensation received.
See §1.165–1(c)(4). However, a section
165 loss does not take into account offset-
ting gains, or other income or limitations.
For example, a section 165 loss does not
take into account the limitation in section
165(d) (relating to wagering losses) or the
limitations in sections 165(f), 1211, and
1212 (relating to capital losses). The full
amount of a section 165 loss is taken into
account for the year in which the loss is
sustained, regardless of whether all or part
of the loss enters into the computation of
a net operating loss under section 172 or a
net capital loss under section 1212 that is a
carryback or carryover to another year. A
section 165 loss does not include any por-
tion of a loss, attributable to a capital loss
carryback or carryover from another year,
that is treated as a deemed capital loss un-
der section 1212.
(B) For purposes of this section, a
section 165 loss includes an amount de-
ductible pursuant to a provision that treats
a transaction as a sale or other disposition,
or otherwise results in a deduction under
section 165. A section 165 loss includes,
for example, a loss resulting from a sale or
exchange of a partnership interest under
section 741 and a loss resulting from a
section 988 transaction.
(6)Transactions of interest. A transac-
tion of interest is a transaction that is the
same as or substantially similar to one of
the types of transactions that the IRS has
identified by notice, regulation, or other
form of published guidance as a transac-
tion of interest.
(7)Transactions involving a brief asset
holding period. A transaction involving a
brief asset holding period is any transac-
tion resulting in the taxpayer claiming a
tax credit (other than a foreign tax credit)
exceeding $250,000 if the underlying asset
giving rise to the credit is held by the tax-
payer for 45 days or less. For purposes of
determining the holding period, the princi-
ples of section 246(c)(3) and (c)(4) apply.
(8)Exceptions—(i)In general.Atrans-
action will not be considered a reportable
transaction, or will be excluded from any
individual category of reportable transac-
tion under paragraphs (b)(3) through (7) of
this section, if the Commissioner makes a
determination by published guidance that
the transaction is not subject to the report-
ing requirements of this section. The Com-
missioner may make a determination by
individual letter ruling under paragraph (f)
of this section that an individual letter rul-
ing request on a specific transaction satis-
fies the reporting requirements of this sec-
tion with regard to that transaction for the
taxpayer who requests the individual letter
ruling.
(ii)Special rule for RICs. For pur-
poses of this section, a regulated invest-
ment company (RIC) as defined in section
851 or an investment vehicle that is owned
95 percent or more by one or more RICs at
all times during the course of the transac-
tion are not required to disclose a transac-
tion that is described in any of paragraphs
(b)(3) through (5) and (b)(7) of this section
unless the transaction is also a listed trans-
action or a transaction of interest.
(c)Definitions. For purposes of this
section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Taxpayer.Thetermtaxpayer
means any person described in section
7701(a)(1), including S corporations. Ex-
cept as otherwise specifically provided
in this section, the termtaxpayeralso in-
cludes an affiliated group of corporations
that joins in the filing of a consolidated
return under section 1501.
(2)Corporation. Whenusedspecifi-
cally in this section, the termcorporation
meansanentitythatisrequiredtofileare-
turn for a taxable year on any 1120 series
form, or successor form, excluding S cor-
porations.
(3)Participation—(i)In general—(A)
Listed transactions. A taxpayer has par-
ticipated in a listed transaction if the
taxpayer’s tax return reflects tax conse-
quences or a tax strategy described in the
published guidance that lists the transac-
tion under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
A taxpayer also has participated in a listed
transaction if the taxpayer knows or has
reason to know that the taxpayer’s tax
benefits are derived directly or indirectly
from tax consequences or a tax strategy
described in published guidance that lists a
transaction under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section. Published guidance may iden-
tify other types or classes of persons that
will be treated as participants in a listed
transaction. Published guidance also may
identify types or classes of persons that
will not be treated as participants in a
listed transaction.
(B)Confidential transactions.Atax-
payer has participated in a confidential
transaction if the taxpayer’s tax return
reflects a tax benefit from the transaction
and the taxpayer’s disclosure of the tax
treatment or tax structure of the transac-
tion is limited in the manner described
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. If a
partnership’s, S corporation’s or trust’s
disclosure is limited, and the partner’s,
shareholder’s, or beneficiary’s disclo-
sure is not limited, then the partnership,
S corporation, or trust, and not the partner,
shareholder, or beneficiary, has partici-
pated in the confidential transaction.
(C)Transactions with contractual pro-
tection. A taxpayer has participated in a
transaction with contractual protection if
the taxpayer’s tax return reflects a tax ben-
efit from the transaction and, as described
in paragraph (b)(4) of this section, the tax-
payer has the right to the full or partial re-
fund of fees or the fees are contingent. If a
partnership, S corporation, or trust has the
right to a full or partial refund of fees or
has a contingent fee arrangement, and the
partner, shareholder, or beneficiary does
not individually have the right to the re-
fund of fees or a contingent fee arrange-
ment, then the partnership, S corporation,
or trust, and not the partner, shareholder, or
beneficiary, has participated in the transac-
tion with contractual protection.
(D)Loss transactions. A taxpayer has
participated in a loss transaction if the
taxpayer’s tax return reflects a section
165 loss and the amount of the section
165 loss equals or exceeds the thresh-
old amount applicable to the taxpayer as
described in paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this
section. If a taxpayer is a partner in a
partnership, shareholder in an S corpora-
tion, or beneficiary of a trust and a section
165 loss as described in paragraph (b)(5)
of this section flows through the entity
December 4, 200610532006–49 I.R.B.

to the taxpayer (disregarding netting at
the entity level), the taxpayer has partici-
pated in a loss transaction if the taxpayer’s
tax return reflects a section 165 loss and
the amount of the section 165 loss that
flows through to the taxpayer equals or
exceeds the threshold amounts applicable
to the taxpayer as described in paragraph
(b)(5)(i) of this section. For this purpose,
a tax return is deemed to reflect the full
amount of a section 165 loss described
in paragraph (b)(5) of this section alloca-
ble to the taxpayer under this paragraph
(c)(3)(i)(D), regardless of whether all or
part of the loss enters into the computation
of a net operating loss under section 172
or net capital loss under section 1212 that
the taxpayer may carry back or carry over
to another year.
(E)Transactions of interest. A taxpayer
has participated in a transaction of interest
if the taxpayer is one of the types or classes
of persons identified as participants in the
transaction in the published guidance de-
scribing the transaction of interest.
(F)Transactions involving a brief as-
set holding period. A taxpayer has partici-
pated in a transaction involving a brief as-
set holding period if the taxpayer’s tax re-
turn reflects items giving rise to a tax credit
described in paragraph (b)(7) of this sec-
tion. If a taxpayer is a partner in a part-
nership, shareholder in an S corporation, or
beneficiary of a trust and the items giving
rise to a tax credit described in paragraph
(b)(7) of this section flow through the en-
tity to the taxpayer (disregarding netting at
the entity level), the taxpayer has partici-
pated in a transaction involving a brief as-
set holding period if the taxpayer’s tax re-
turn reflects the tax credit and the amount
of the tax credit claimed by the taxpayer
exceeds $250,000.
(G)Shareholders of foreign corpora-
tions—(1)In general. A reporting share-
holder of a foreign corporation participates
in a transaction described in paragraphs
(b)(2) through (5) and (b)(7) of this sec-
tion if the foreign corporation would be
considered to participate in the transac-
tion under the rules of this paragraph (c)(3)
if it were a domestic corporation filing
a tax return that reflects the items from
the transaction. A reporting shareholder
of a foreign corporation participates in a
transaction describedin paragraph (b)(6)
of this section only if the published guid-
ance identifying the transaction includes
the reporting shareholder among the types
or classes of persons identified as partic-
ipants. A reporting shareholder (and any
successor in interest) is considered to par-
ticipate in a transaction under this para-
graph (c)(3)(i)(G) only for its first tax-
able year with or within which ends the
first taxable year ofthe foreign corpora-
tion in which the foreign corporation par-
ticipates in the transaction, and for the re-
porting shareholder’s five succeeding tax-
able years.
(2)Reporting shareholder.Theterm
reporting shareholdermeans a United
States shareholder (as defined in section
951(b)) in a controlled foreign corporation
(as defined in section 957) or a 10 percent
shareholder (by vote or value) of a qual-
ified electing fund (as defined in section
1295).
(ii)Examples. The following exam-
ples illustrate the provisions of paragraph
(c)(3)(i) of this section:
Example 1. Notice 2003–55, 2003–2 C.B. 395,
which modified and superseded Notice 95–53,
1995–2 C.B. 334 (see §601.601(d)(2) of this chap-
ter), describes a lease stripping transaction in which
one party (the transferor) assigns the right to receive
future payments under a lease of tangible property
and treats the amount realized from the assignment
as its current income. The transferor later transfers
the property subject to the lease in a transaction
intended to qualify as a transferred basis transaction,
for example, a transaction described in section 351.
The transferee corporation claims the deductions
associated with the high basis property subject to the
lease. The transferor’s andtransferee corporation’s
tax returns reflect tax positions described in Notice
2003–55. Therefore, the transferor and transferee
corporation have participated in the listed transac-
tion. In the section 351 transaction, the transferor
will have received stock with low value and high ba-
sis from the transferee corporation. If the transferor
subsequently transfers the high basis/low value stock
to a taxpayer in another transaction intended to qual-
ify as a transferred basis transaction and the taxpayer
uses the stock to generate a loss, and if the taxpayer
knows or has reason to know that the tax loss claimed
was derived indirectly from the lease stripping trans-
action, then the taxpayer has participated in the listed
transaction. Accordingly, the taxpayer must disclose
the transaction and the manner of the taxpayer’s
participation in the transaction under the rules of this
section. For purposes of this example, if a bank lends
money to the transferor, transferee corporation, or
taxpayer for use in their transactions, the bank has
not participated in the listed transaction because the
bank’s tax return does not reflect tax consequences
or a tax strategy described in the listing notice (nor
does the bank’s tax return reflect a tax benefit derived
from tax consequences or a tax strategy described
in the listing notice) nor is the bank described as a
participant in the listing notice.
Example 2. XYZ is a limited liability company
treated as a partnership for tax purposes. X, Y, and
Z are members of XYZ. X is an individual, Y is an
S corporation, and Z is a partnership. XYZ enters
into a confidential transaction under paragraph (b)(3)
of this section. XYZ and X are bound by the confi-
dentiality agreement, but Y and Z are not bound by
the agreement. As a result of the transaction, XYZ,
X, Y, and Z all reflect a tax benefit on their tax re-
turns. Because XYZ’s and X’s disclosure of the tax
treatment and tax structure are limited in the manner
described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and their
tax returns reflect a tax benefit from the transaction,
both XYZ and X have participated in the confidential
transaction. Neither Y nor Z has participated in the
confidential transaction because they are not subject
to the confidentiality agreement.
Example 3. P, a corporation, has an 80% partner-
ship interest in PS, and S, an individual, has a 20%
partnership interest in PS. P, S, and PS are calendar
year taxpayers. In 2006, PS enters into a transac-
tion and incurs a section 165 loss (that does not meet
any of the exceptions to a section 165 loss identi-
fied in published guidance) of $12 million and off-
setting gain of $3 million. On PS’ 2006 tax return,
PS includes the section 165 loss and the correspond-
ing gain. PS must disclose the transaction under this
section because PS’ section 165 loss of $12 million
is equal to or greater than $2 million. P is allocated
$9.6 million of the section 165 loss and $2.4 million
of the offsetting gain. P does not have to disclose the
transaction under this section because P’s section 165
loss of $9.6 million is not equal to or greater than $10
million. S is allocated $2.4 million of the section 165
loss and $600,000 of the offsetting gain. S must dis-
close the transaction under this section because S’s
section 165 loss of $2.4 million is equal to or greater
than $2 million.
(4)Substantially similar.Thetermsub-
stantially similarincludes any transaction
that is expected to obtain the same or simi-
lar types of tax consequences and that is ei-
ther factually similar or based on the same
or similar tax strategy. Receipt of an opin-
ion regarding the tax consequences of the
transaction is not relevant to the determi-
nation of whether the transaction is the
same as or substantially similar to another
transaction. Further, the termsubstantially
similarmust be broadly construed in fa-
vor of disclosure. For example, a transac-
tion may be substantially similar to a listed
transaction even though it involves differ-
ent entities or uses different Code provi-
sions. (Seee.g., Notice 2003–54, 2003–2
C.B. 363, describing a transaction substan-
tially similar to the transactions in No-
tice 2002–50, 2002–2 C.B. 98, and Notice
2002–65, 2002–2 C.B. 690.) The follow-
ing examples illustrate situations where a
transaction is the same as or substantially
similar to a listed transaction under para-
graph (b)(2) of this section. (Such trans-
actions may also be reportable transac-
tions under paragraphs (b)(3) through (7)
of this section.) The following examples
2006–49 I.R.B.1054December 4, 2006

illustrate the provisions of this paragraph
(c)(4):
Example 1. Notice 2000–44, 2000–2 C.B. 255
(see §601.601(d)(2) of this chapter), sets forth a listed
transaction involving offsetting options transferred to
a partnership where the taxpayer claims basis in the
partnership for the cost of the purchased options but
does not adjust basis under section 752 as a result of
the partnership’s assumption of the taxpayer’s obli-
gation with respect to the options. Transactions using
short sales, futures, derivatives or any other type of
offsetting obligations to inflate basis in a partnership
interest would be the same as or substantially sim-
ilar to the transaction described in Notice 2000–44.
Moreover, use of the inflated basis in the partner-
ship interest to diminish gain that would otherwise
be recognized on the transfer of a partnership asset
would also be the same as or substantially similar to
the transaction described in Notice 2000–44.
Example 2. Notice 2001–16, 2001–1 C.B. 730
(see §601.601(d)(2) of this chapter), sets forth a listed
transaction involving a seller (X) who desires to sell
stock of a corporation (T), an intermediary corpora-
tion (M), and a buyer (Y) who desires to purchase
the assets (and not the stock) of T. M agrees to fa-
cilitate the sale to prevent the recognition of the gain
that T would otherwise report. Notice 2001–16 de-
scribes M as a member of a consolidated group that
has a loss within the group or as a party not subject to
tax. Transactions utilizing different intermediaries to
prevent the recognition of gain would be the same as
or substantially similar to the transaction described
in Notice 2001–16. An example is a transaction in
which M is a corporation that does not file a consol-
idated return but which buys T stock, liquidates T,
sells assets of T to Y, and offsets the gain recognized
on the sale of those assets with currently generated
losses.
(5)Tax. For purposes of this section,
the termtaxmeans Federal income tax.
(6)Tax benefit. A tax benefit includes
deductions, exclusions from gross income,
nonrecognition of gain, tax credits, adjust-
ments (or the absence of adjustments) to
the basis of property, status as an entity ex-
empt from Federal income taxation, and
any other tax consequences that may re-
duce a taxpayer’s Federal income tax li-
ability by affecting the amount, timing,
character, or source of any item of income,
gain, expense, loss, or credit.
(7)Tax return. For purposes of this sec-
tion, the termtax returnmeans a Federal
income tax return and a Federal informa-
tion return.
(8)Tax treatment. The tax treatment of
a transaction is the purported or claimed
Federal income tax treatment of the trans-
action.
(9)Tax structure. The tax structure of a
transaction is any fact that may be relevant
to understanding the purported or claimed
Federal income tax treatment of the trans-
action.
(d)Form and content of disclosure
statement. A taxpayer required to file
a disclosure statement under this sec-
tion must file a completed Form 8886,
“Reportable Transaction Disclosure State-
ment” (or a successor form), in accordance
with this paragraph (d) and the instructions
to the form. The Form 8886 (or a successor
form) is the disclosure statement required
under this section. The form must be
attached to the appropriate tax return(s)
as provided in paragraph (e) of this sec-
tion. If a copy of a disclosure statement
is required to be sent to the Office of Tax
Shelter Analysis (OTSA) under paragraph
(e) of this section, it must be sent in accor-
dance with the instructions to the form. To
be considered complete, the information
provided on the form must describe the
expected tax treatment and all potential tax
benefits expected to result from the trans-
action, describe any tax result protection
(as defined in §301.6111–3(c)(12) of this
chapter) with respect to the transaction,
and identify and describe the transaction
in sufficient detail for the IRS to be able
to understand the tax structure of the re-
portable transaction and the identity of all
parties involved in the transaction. An in-
complete Form 8886 (or a successor form)
containing a statement that information
will be provided upon request is not con-
sidered a complete disclosure statement.
If the form is not completed in accordance
with the provisions in this paragraph
(d) and the instructions to the form, the
taxpayer will not be considered to have
complied with the disclosure requirements
of this section. If a taxpayer receives one
or more reportable transaction numbers
for a reportable transaction, the taxpayer
must include the reportable transaction
number(s) on the Form 8886 (or a succes-
sor form). See §301.6111–3(d)(2) of this
chapter.
(e)Time of providing disclosure—(1)
In general. The disclosure statement for
a reportable transaction must be attached
to the taxpayer’s tax return for each tax-
able year for which a taxpayer participates
in a reportable transaction. In addition, a
disclosure statement for a reportable trans-
action must be attached to each amended
return that reflects a taxpayer’s participa-
tion in a reportable transaction. A copy
of the disclosure statement must be sent to
OTSAatthesametimethatanydisclosure
statement is first filed by the taxpayer per-
taining to a particular reportable transac-
tion. If a reportable transaction results in a
loss which is carried back to a prior year,
the disclosure statement for the reportable
transaction must be attached to the tax-
payer’s application for tentative refund or
amended tax return for that prior year. In
the case of a taxpayer that is a partnership,
S corporation, or trust, the disclosure state-
ment for a reportable transaction must be
attached to the partnership, S corporation,
or trust’s tax return for each taxable year
in which the partnership, S corporation, or
trust participates in the transaction under
the rules of paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this sec-
tion. If a taxpayer in a partnership, S cor-
poration, or trust receives a timely Sched-
ule K–1 less than 10 calendar days be-
fore the due date of the taxpayer’s return
(including extensions) and, based on re-
ceipt of the timely Schedule K–1, the tax-
payer determines that the taxpayer partici-
pated in a reportable transaction within the
meaning of paragraph (c)(3) of this sec-
tion, the disclosure statement will not be
considered late if the taxpayer discloses
the reportable transaction by filing a dis-
closure statementwith OTSA within 45
calendar days after the due date of the tax-
payer’s return (including extensions).
(2)Special rules—(i)Listed transac-
tions and transactions of interest.Ingen-
eral, if a transaction becomes a listed trans-
action or a transaction of interest after the
filing of a taxpayer’s tax return (includ-
ing an amended return) reflecting the tax-
payer’s participation in the listed trans-
action or transaction of interest and be-
fore the end of the period of limitations
for assessment of tax for any taxable year
in which the taxpayer participated in the
listed transaction or transaction of interest,
then a disclosure statement must be filed,
regardless of whether the taxpayer partic-
ipated in the transaction in the year the
transaction became a listed transaction or a
transaction of interest, with OTSA within
60 calendar days after the date on which
the transaction became alisted transaction
or a transaction of interest. The Commis-
sioner also may determine the time for dis-
closure of listed transactions and transac-
tions of interest in the published guidance
identifying the transaction.
(ii)Loss transactions. If a transac-
tion becomes a loss transaction because
the losses equal or exceed the thresh-
old amounts as described in paragraph
December 4, 200610552006–49 I.R.B.

(b)(5)(i) of this section, a disclosure state-
ment must be filed as an attachment to the
taxpayer’s tax return for the first taxable
year in which the threshold amount is
reached and to any subsequent tax return
that reflects any amount of section 165
loss from the transaction.
(3)Multiple disclosures. The taxpayer
must disclose the transaction in the time
and manner provided for under the provi-
sions of this section regardless of whether
the taxpayer also plans to disclose the
transaction under other published guid-
ance, for example, §1.6662–3(c)(2).
(4)Example. The following example
illustrates the application of this paragraph
(e):
Example. In January of 2006, F, a calendar year
taxpayer, enters into a transaction that at the time is
not a listed transaction and is not a transaction de-
scribed in any of the paragraphs (b)(3) through (7)
of this section. All the tax benefits from the transac-
tion are reported on F’s 2006 tax return filed timely in
April 2007. On May 1, 2009, the IRS publishes a no-
tice identifying the transaction as a listed transaction
described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Upon
issuance of the May 1, 2009 notice, the transaction
becomes a reportable transaction described in para-
graph (b) of this section. The period of limitations on
assessment for F’s 2006 taxable year is still open. F
is required to file Form 8886 for the transaction with
OTSA within 60 calendar days after May 1, 2009.
(f) [The text of the proposed amend-
ment to §1.6011–4(f)(1) is the same as the
text for §1.6011–4T(f)(1) published else-
where in this issue of the Bulletin].
(2)Protective disclosures. If a taxpayer
is uncertain whether a transaction must be
disclosed under this section, the taxpayer
may disclose the transaction in accordance
with the requirements of this section and
comply with all the provisions of this sec-
tion, and indicate on the disclosure state-
ment that the disclosure statement is be-
ingfiledonaprotectivebasis. TheIRS
will not treat disclosure statements filed
on a protective basis any differently than
other disclosure statements filed under this
section. For a protective disclosure to be
effective, the taxpayer must comply with
these disclosure regulations by providing
to the IRS all information requested by the
IRS under this section.
(g)Retention of documents. In accor-
dance with the instructions to Form 8886
(or a successor form), the taxpayer must
retain a copy of all documents and other
records related to a transaction subject to
disclosure under this section that are ma-
terial to an understanding of the tax treat-
ment or tax structure of the transaction.
The documents must be retained until the
expiration of the statute of limitations ap-
plicable to the final taxable year for which
disclosure of the transaction was required
under this section. (This document re-
tention requirement is in addition to any
document retention requirements that sec-
tion 6001 generally imposes on the tax-
payer.) The documents may include the
following: marketing materials related to
the transaction; written analyses used in
decision-making related to the transaction;
correspondence and agreements between
the taxpayer and any advisor, lender, or
other party to the reportable transaction
that relate to the transaction; documents
discussing, referringto, or demonstrating
the purported or claimed tax benefits aris-
ing from the reportable transaction; and
documents, if any, referring to the busi-
ness purposes for the reportable transac-
tion. A taxpayer is not required to retain
earlier drafts of a document if the taxpayer
retains a copy of the final document (or, if
there is no final document, the most recent
draft of the document) and the final docu-
ment (or most recent draft) contains all the
information in the earlier drafts of the doc-
ument that is material to an understanding
of the purported tax treatment or tax struc-
ture of the transaction.
(h)Effective date—(1)In general.In
general, this section applies to transactions
entered into on or after the date these regu-
lations are published as final regulations in
theFederal Register. However, upon the
publication of final regulations, this sec-
tion will apply to transactions of interest
entered into on or after November 2, 2006.
(2) [The text of the proposed amend-
ment to §1.6011–4(h)(2) is the same as the
text for §1.6011–4T(h)(2) published else-
where in this issue of the Bulletin].
PART 20— ESTATE TAX; ESTATES
OF DECEDENTS DYING AFTER
AUGUST 16, 1954
Par. 3. The authority citation for part
20 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 4. Section 20.6011–4 is amended
as follows:
1. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding
the language “or atransaction of interest”
after the first occurrence of “listed transac-
tion” and by adding the language “or trans-
action of interest” after the second occur-
rence of “listed transaction”.
2. Paragraph (b) is revised.
The revision reads as follows:
§20.6011–4 Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers.
*****
(b)Effective date. This section applies
to listed transactions entered into on or af-
ter January 1, 2003. Upon the publication
of final regulations, this section will apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006.
PART 25—GIFT TAX; GIFTS MADE
AFTER DECEMBER 31, 1954
Par. 5. The authority citation for part
25 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 6. Section 25.6011–4 is amended
as follows:
1. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding
the language “or atransaction of interest”
after the first occurrence of “listed transac-
tion” and by adding the language “or trans-
action of interest” after the second occur-
rence of “listed transaction”.
2. Paragraph (b) is revised.
The revision reads as follows:
§25.6011–4 Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers.
*****
(b)Effective date. This section applies
to listed transactions entered into on or af-
ter January 1, 2003. Upon the publication
of final regulations, this section will apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006.
PART 31—EMPLOYMENT TAXES
AND COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX
AT SOURCE
Par. 7. The authority citation for part
31 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 8. Section 31.6011–4 is amended
as follows:
1. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding
the language “or atransaction of interest”
2006–49 I.R.B.1056December 4, 2006

after the first occurrence of “listed transac-
tion” and by adding the language “or trans-
action of interest” after the second occur-
rence of “listed transaction”.
2. Paragraph (b) is revised.
The revision reads as follows:
§31.6011–4 Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers.
*****
(b)Effective date. This section applies
to listed transactions entered into on or af-
ter January 1, 2003. Upon the publication
of final regulations, this section will apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006.
PART 53—FOUNDATION AND
SIMILAR EXCISE TAXES
Par. 9. The authority citation for part
53 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 10. Section 53.6011–4 is amended
as follows:
1. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding
thelanguage“oratransaction of interest”
after the first occurrence of “listed transac-
tion” and by adding the language “or trans-
action of interest” after the second occur-
rence of “listed transaction”.
2. Paragraph (b) is revised.
The revision reads as follows:
§53.6011–4 Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers.
*****
(b)Effective date. This section applies
to listed transactions entered into on or af-
ter January 1, 2003. Upon the publication
of final regulations, this section will apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006.
PART 54—PENSION EXCISE TAXES
Par. 11. The authority citation for part
54 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 12. Section 54.6011–4 is amended
as follows:
1. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding
thelanguage“oratransaction of interest”
after the first occurrence of “listed transac-
tion” and by adding the language “or trans-
action of interest” after the second occur-
rence of “listed transaction”.
2. Paragraph (b) is revised.
The revision reads as follows:
§54.6011–4 Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers.
*****
(b)Effective date. This section applies
to listed transactions entered into on or af-
ter January 1, 2003. Upon the publication
of final regulations, this section will apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006.
PART 56—PUBLIC CHARITY EXCISE
TAXES
Par. 13. The authority citation for part
56 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 14. Section 56.6011–4 is amended
as follows:
1. Paragraph (a) is amended by adding
the language “or atransaction of interest”
after the first occurrence of “listed transac-
tion” and by adding the language “or trans-
action of interest” after the second occur-
rence of “listed transaction”.
2. Paragraph (b) is revised.
The revision reads as follows:
§56.6011–4 Requirement of statement
disclosing participation in certain
transactions by taxpayers.
*****
(b)Effective date. This section applies
to listed transactions entered into on or af-
ter January 1, 2003. Upon the publication
of final regulations, this section will apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 1,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for November 2, 2006, 71 F.R. 64488)
Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking by
Cross-Reference to
Temporary Regulations
AJCA Modifications to the
Section 6111 Regulations
REG–103039–05
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
by cross-reference to temporary regula-
tions.
SUMMARY: This document contains pro-
posed regulations under section 6111 of
the Internal Revenue Code which provide
the rules relating to the disclosure of re-
portable transactionsby material advisors.
These regulations affect material advisors
responsible for disclosing reportable trans-
actions under section 6111 and material ad-
visors responsible for keeping lists under
section 6112.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must be
received by January 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103039–05), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washing-
ton, DC 20044. Submissions may be
hand delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103039–05),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service,
Crystal Mall 4 Building, 1901 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA, or sent electronically, via
the IRS Internet site atwww.irs.gov/regs
or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov(indicate IRS and
REG–103039–05).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Concerning the proposed reg-
ulations, Tara P. Volungis or Charles Wien,
202–622–3070; concerning the submis-
sions of comments and requests for hear-
ing, Kelly Banks, 202–622–0392 (not
toll-free numbers).
December 4, 200610572006–49 I.R.B.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document proposes to amend 26
CFR part 301 by providing rules relating
to the disclosure of reportable transactions
by material advisors under section 6111.
The American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, Public Law 108–357, 118 Stat.
1418, (AJCA) was enacted on October 22,
2004. Section 815 of the AJCA amended
section 6111 to require each material ad-
visor with respect to any reportable trans-
action to make a return (in such form as
the Secretary may prescribe) setting forth:
(1) information identifying and describing
the transaction; (2) information describ-
ing any potential tax benefits expected to
result from the transaction; and (3) such
other information as the Secretary may
prescribe. Section 6111(a), as amended,
also provides that the return must be filed
not later than the date specified by the Sec-
retary. Section 6111(b)(1), as amended,
provides a definition for the term mate-
rial advisor and includes as part of that
definition a requirement that the material
advisor derive certain threshold amounts
of gross income that the Secretary may
prescribe. The AJCA amendments to
section 6111 also authorize the Secretary
to prescribe regulations that provide: (1)
that only one person shall be required to
meet the requirements of section 6111(a)
in cases in which two or more persons
would otherwise be required to meet such
requirements; (2) exemptions from the
requirements of section 6111; and (3)
rules as may be necessary or appropriate
to carry out the purposes of section 6111.
Section 815 of the AJCA is effective for
transactions with respect to which material
aid, assistance, or advice is provided after
October 22, 2004.
Prior to these amendments, section
6111(a) required an organizer of a tax
shelter to register the tax shelter with
the Secretary not later than the day on
which interests in the tax shelter were first
offered for sale. Under former section
6111(c), the term tax shelter was defined
as any investment with respect to which
any person could reasonably infer from
the representations made or to be made,
in connection with the offering for sale
of interests in the investments that the tax
shelter ratio for any investor as of the close
of any of the first five years ending after
the date on which the investment was of-
fered for sale may have been greater than
twotooneandwhichwas: (1)required
to be registered under a Federal or State
law regulating securities; (2) sold pursuant
to an exemption from registration requir-
ing the filing of a notice with a Federal
or State agency regulating the offering
or sale of securities; or (3) a substantial
investment (the aggregate amount which
may have been offered for sale exceeded
$250,000 and the expected involvement
of five or more investors). Under former
section 6111(d), for purposes of section
6111(a), the term tax shelter included any
entity, plan, arrangement or transaction:
(1) a significant purpose of the structure
of which is the avoidance or evasion of
Federal income tax for a direct or indirect
participant which is a corporation; (2)
which is offered to any potential partici-
pant under conditions of confidentiality;
and (3) for which the tax shelter promoters
may receive fees in excess of $100,000 in
the aggregate.
In response to the AJCA, the IRS and
Treasury Department issued interim guid-
ance on section 6111 in Notice 2004–80,
2004–2 C.B. 963; Notice 2005–17,
2005–1 C.B. 606; Notice 2005–22,
2005–1 C.B. 756; and Notice 2006–6,
2006–5 I.R.B. 385 (see §601.601(d)(2)).
The IRS and Treasury Department have
received various comments and questions
regarding the application of section 6111.
Consequently, the IRS and Treasury De-
partment propose new rules relating to the
disclosure of reportable transactions by
material advisors under section 6111.
Explanation of Provisions
A. In General
These proposed regulations are
being issued concurrently with pro-
posed regulations under §301.6112–1
(REG–103043–05) and §1.6011–4
(REG–103038–05) published elsewhere
in the Bulletin. Under these proposed
regulations, each material advisor with
respect to any reportable transaction (as
defined in §1.6011–4(b)(1)) must file a
return by the date prescribed in the reg-
ulations. For this purpose, a person is a
material advisor with respect to a trans-
action if the person provides any material
aid, assistance, or advice with respect to
organizing, managing, promoting, selling,
implementing, insuring, or carrying out
any reportable transaction, and directly or
indirectly derives gross income in excess
of the threshold amount for the material
aid, assistance, or advice. A person pro-
vides material aid, assistance, or advice
with respect to organizing, managing, pro-
moting, selling, implementing, insuring,
or carrying out any transaction if the per-
son makes or provides a tax statement to or
for the benefit of certain persons. The IRS
and Treasury Department also may iden-
tify other types or classes of persons as
material advisors in published guidance.
Further, these proposed regulations pro-
vide that the threshold amount of gross in-
come that a person may derive, directly or
indirectly, for providing any material aid,
assistance or advice is $50,000 in the case
of a reportable transaction substantially all
of the tax benefits from which are pro-
vided to natural persons ($10,000 in the
case of a listed transaction). This thresh-
old amount of gross income is increased to
$250,000 in any other case ($25,000 in the
case of a listed transaction). For transac-
tions of interest, the IRS and Treasury De-
partment also may identify reduced thresh-
old amounts in published guidance. A per-
son will be treated as becoming a material
advisor when all of the following events
have occurred (in no particular order): (A)
the person provides material aid, assis-
tance or advice; (B) the person directly or
indirectly derives gross income in excess
of the threshold amount; and (C) the trans-
action is entered into by the taxpayer.
The disclosure statement for a re-
portable transaction must be filed by the
last day of the month that follows the end
of the calendar quarter in which the advi-
sor became a material advisor with respect
to the reportable transaction. Form 8918,
“Material Advisor Disclosure Statement,”
will be published for use by material ad-
visors to disclose reportable transactions
and will supersede the Form 8264 which
is currently being used for material ad-
visor disclosures. The IRS will issue a
reportable transaction number to material
advisors who file the Form 8918. Mate-
rial advisors must provide the reportable
transaction number issued by the IRS to
persons to whom the material advisor
makes or provides tax statements with re-
spect to the transaction. Public comment
2006–49 I.R.B.1058December 4, 2006

on the Form 8918 will be solicited in ac-
cordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)).
B. Incomplete Disclosure Statements
Persons who file incomplete disclo-
sures under section 6111 are subject to
penalties under section 6707. The pro-
posed regulations include clarifying lan-
guage to the regulation reminding taxpay-
ers that for a disclosure to be considered
complete, the information provided on
Form 8918 must describe the expected
tax treatment and all potential tax benefits
expected to result from the transaction,
describe any tax result protection with
respect to the transaction, and identify and
describe the transaction in sufficient detail
for the IRS to be able to understand the
tax structure of the reportable transaction
and the identity of the material advisor(s).
An incomplete form containing a state-
ment that information will be provided
upon request is not considered a complete
disclosure statement.
C. Tax Result Protection
Previous comments to the regulations
under §1.6011–4 stated that it is inappro-
priate to require reporting of transactions
under the contractual protection filter of
§1.6011–4(b)(4) for which the taxpayer
obtains tax result protection (sometimes
referred to as “tax result insurance”) be-
cause numerous legitimate business trans-
actions with tax indemnities would be
subject to reporting. The IRS and Trea-
sury Department removed tax result pro-
tection from that category of reportable
transaction but cautioned that if the IRS
and Treasury Department became aware
of abusive transactions utilizing tax result
protection, the issue would be reconsid-
ered.
The IRS and Treasury Department have
since become aware of taxpayers who have
obtained tax result protection for the tax
benefits of a listed transaction from a third
party provider. In the AJCA, Congress ex-
pressed concern about tax result protection
for reportable transactions and included
insuring in the list of activities added to
the statutory language under section 6111.
The IRS, Treasury Department, and Con-
gress have an interest in learning more
about the insuring of reportable transac-
tions. Accordingly, while a transaction
will not be a reportable transaction simply
because there is tax result protection for
the transaction, tax result protection pro-
vided for a reportable transaction may sub-
ject a person to the material advisor dis-
closure rules under section 6111 because a
tax statement includes third party tax result
protection that insures the tax benefits of a
reportable transaction.
D. Designation Agreements
The proposed regulations include a pro-
vision allowing designation agreements
for disclosure of reportable transactions
similar to the provision in the current reg-
ulations under §301.6112–1 that allows
material advisors to have a designation
agreement authorizing one material advi-
sor to maintain a list of investors in the
transaction. However, parties to the desig-
nation agreement may still be liable for the
penalty under section 6707 if the desig-
nated material advisor fails to disclose the
reportable transaction under section 6111.
E. Post-Filing Advice
The current regulations under
§301.6112–1 provide that a person will
not be considered to be a material advisor
with respect to a transaction if that person
does not make or provide a tax statement
regarding the transaction until after the
first tax return reflecting tax benefit(s) of
the transaction is filed with the IRS. The
IRS and Treasury Department, however,
believe that a person should be considered
a material advisor for certain post-filing
advice. Consequently, the proposed rule
provides that the exception will not apply
toapersonwhomakesataxstatementwith
respect to the transaction if it is expected
that the taxpayer will file a supplemental
or amended return reflecting additional
tax benefits from the transaction.
F. Protective Disclosures
The IRS receives disclosures filed on a
protective basis from persons claiming that
the transactions are not subject to disclo-
sure under section 6111. Some of those
disclosures fail to provide the IRS with the
information requested under sections 6111
and 6112 and the regulations thereunder
that would enable the IRS to make a de-
termination as to whether the transaction
is subject to disclosure. Consequently, the
IRS and Treasury Department have added
clarifying language in the proposed regu-
lation that allows protective disclosures to
be filed in situations where a person is un-
sure of whether the transaction should be
disclosed under section 6111. However,
the disclosure is effective only if the rules
of §301.6111–3 and §301.6112–1 are fol-
lowed.
G. Tolling Provision
In response to comments that asked
whether the tolling provisions of
§1.6011–4(f) would apply to requests
from a potential material advisor for a
letter ruling under section 6111, Notice
2005–22 provided that, until further guid-
ance is issued, if an advisor submits a
request for a letter ruling on or before the
date the return under section 6111 is due
and fully discloses all relevant facts relat-
ing to the transaction, the obligation of the
potential material advisor to disclose the
transaction will be suspended as provided
in §1.6011–4(f). The IRS and Treasury
Department believe that removing the
tolling provision will promote effective
tax administration. Consequently, these
proposed regulations do not include a
provision to toll the time for providing
disclosure when a potential material ad-
visor requests a ruling on a transaction.
Potential material advisors may request a
ruling under section 6111 on a transaction
under the regular procedures for request-
ing a ruling, provided the ruling request is
not factual or hypothetical, but the time for
providing disclosure under section 6111
will not be tolled. The temporary regu-
lations (T.D. 9295) issued concurrently
with these proposed regulations supersede
the tolling provision in Notice 2005–22,
effective for all ruling requests received
on or after November 1, 2006.
H. Effective Date
Generally, when these proposed regula-
tions become final, they will apply to trans-
actions with respect to which a material ad-
visor makes a tax statement on or after the
date the regulations are published as final
regulations in theFederal Register.How-
ever, upon publication the final regulations
will apply to transactions of interest en-
tered into on or after November 2, 2006
with respect to which a material advisor
December 4, 200610592006–49 I.R.B.

makes a tax statement under §301.6111–3
on or after November 2, 2006.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Executive
Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory as-
sessment is not required. It also has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Ad-
ministrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chap-
ter 5) does not apply to these regulations,
and because these regulations do not im-
pose a collection of information on small
entities, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) do not
apply. The return referenced in these reg-
ulations will be made available for pub-
lic comment in accordance with the Paper-
work Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). Pursuant to section 7805(f)
of the Internal Revenue Code, this notice
of proposed rulemaking will be submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for com-
ment on its impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations, consideration
will be given to any written comments
(a signed original and eight (8) copies)
or electronic comments that are submitted
timely to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury
Department request comments on the clar-
ity of the proposed rules, how they can be
made easier to understand, and the admin-
istrability of the rules in the proposed regu-
lations. All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public
hearing will be scheduled if requested in
writing by any person that submits timely
written or electronic comments. If a pub-
lic hearing is scheduled, notice of the date,
time, and place for the public hearing will
be published in theFederal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these reg-
ulations are Tara P. Volungis and
Charles Wien, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is pro-
posed to be amended as follows:
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 301 continues to read, in part, as fol-
lows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.6111–3 is added to
read as follows:
§301.6111–3 Disclosure of reportable
transactions.
(a)In general. Each material advisor,
as defined in paragraph (b) of this section,
with respect to any reportable transaction,
as defined in §1.6011–4(b) of this chapter,
must file a return as described in paragraph
(d) of this section by the date described in
paragraph (e) of this section.
(b)Material advisor—(1)In general.A
person is a material advisor with respect
to a transaction if the person provides any
material aid, assistance, or advice with re-
spect to organizing, managing, promoting,
selling, implementing, insuring, or carry-
ing out any reportable transaction, and di-
rectly or indirectly derives gross income
in excess of the threshold amount as de-
fined in paragraph (b)(3) of this section for
the material aid, assistance, or advice. The
term transaction includes all of the factual
elements relevant to the expected tax treat-
ment of any investment, entity, plan or ar-
rangement, and includes any series of steps
carried out as part of a plan.
(2)Material aid, assistance, or ad-
vice—(i)In general. Except as provided
in paragraph (b)(5) of this section, a per-
son provides material aid, assistance, or
advice with respect to organizing, man-
aging, promoting, selling, implementing,
insuring, or carrying out any transaction if
the person makes or provides a tax state-
ment to or for the benefit of—
(A)Ataxpayerwhoeitherisre-
quired to disclose the transaction un-
der §§1.6011–4, 20.6011–4, 25.6011–4,
31.6011–4, 53.6011–4, 54.6011–4, or
56.6011–4 of this chapter because the
transaction is a listed transaction or a
transaction of interest, or would have been
required to disclose the transaction un-
der §§1.6011–4, 20.6011–4, 25.6011–4,
31.6011–4, 53.6011–4, 54.6011–4, or
56.6011–4 of this chapter if the transac-
tion had become a listed transaction or a
transaction of interest within the period of
limitations in §1.6011–4(e) of this chapter;
(B) A taxpayer who the potential ma-
terial advisor knows is or reasonably ex-
pects to be required to disclose the trans-
action under §1.6011–4 of this chapter be-
cause the transaction is or is reasonably ex-
pected to become a transaction described
in §1.6011–4(b)(3) through (5) or (7) of
this chapter;
(C) A material advisor who is required
to disclose the transaction under this sec-
tion because it is a listed transaction or a
transaction of interest; or
(D) A material advisor who the poten-
tial material advisor knows is or reason-
ably expects to be required to disclose
the transaction under this section because
the transaction is or is reasonably ex-
pected to become a transaction described
in §1.6011–4(b)(3) through (5) or (7) of
this chapter.
(ii)Tax statement—(A)In general.A
tax statement is any statement (includ-
ing another person’s statement), oral or
written, that relates to a tax aspect of a
transaction that causes the transaction to
be a reportable transaction as defined in
§1.6011–4(b)(2) through (7) of this chap-
ter. A tax statement under this section
includes tax result protection that insures
some or all of the tax benefits of a re-
portable transaction.
(B)Confidential transactions. A state-
ment relates to a tax aspect of a transaction
that causes it to be a confidential transac-
tion if the statement concerns a tax benefit
related to the transaction and either the tax-
payer’s disclosure of the tax treatment or
tax structure of the transaction is limited in
the manner described in §1.6011–4(b)(3)
of this chapter by or for the benefit of the
person making the statement, or the per-
son making the statement knows the tax-
payer’s disclosure of the tax structure or
tax aspects of the transaction is limited in
the manner described in §1.6011–4(b)(3)
of this chapter.
(C)Transactions with contractual pro-
tection. A statement relates to a tax as-
pect of a transaction that causes it to be
a transaction with contractual protection if
2006–49 I.R.B.1060December 4, 2006

the statement concerns a tax benefit related
to the transaction and either—
(1) The taxpayer has the right to a
full or partial refund of fees paid to the
person making the statement or the fees
are contingent in the manner described in
§1.6011–4(b)(4) of this chapter; or
(2) The person making the statement
knows or has reason to know that the tax-
payer has the right to a full or partial refund
of fees (described in §1.6011–4(b)(4)(ii) of
this chapter) paid to another if all or part
of the intended tax consequences from the
transaction are not sustained or that fees
(as described in §1.6011–4(b)(4)(ii) of this
chapter) paid by the taxpayer to another
are contingent on the taxpayer’s realiza-
tion of tax benefits from the transaction in
the manner described in §1.6011–4(b)(4)
of this chapter.
(D)Loss transactions. A statement re-
lates to a tax aspect of a transaction that
causes it to be a loss transaction if the state-
ment concerns an item that gives rise to a
loss described in §1.6011–4(b)(5) of this
chapter.
(E)Transactions involving a brief asset
holding period. A statement relates to a
tax aspect of a transaction involving a brief
asset holding period if the statement con-
cerns an item that gives rise to a tax credit
described in §1.6011–4(b)(7) of this chap-
ter.
(iii)Special rules—(A)Capacity as an
employee. A material advisor generally
does not include a person who makes a tax
statement solely in the person’s capacity as
an employee, shareholder, partner or agent
of another person. Any tax statement made
by that person will be attributed to that per-
son’s employer, corporation, partnership
or principal. However, a person shall be
treated as a material advisor if that person
forms or avails of an entity with the pur-
pose of avoiding the rules of section 6111
or 6112 or the penalties under section 6707
or 6708.
(B)Post-filing advice.Apersonwill
not be considered to be a material advi-
sor with respect to a transaction if that per-
son does not make or provide a tax state-
ment regarding the transaction until after
the first tax return reflecting tax benefit(s)
of the transaction is filed with the IRS.
However, this exception does not apply to
a person who makes a tax statement with
respect to the transaction if it is expected
that the taxpayer will file a supplemental
or amended return reflecting additional tax
benefits from the transaction.
(C)Publicly filed statements.Atax
statement with respect to a transaction that
includes only information about the trans-
action contained in publicly available doc-
uments filed with the Securities and Ex-
change Commission no later than the close
of the transaction will not be considered a
tax statement to or for the benefit of a per-
son described in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section.
(3)Gross income derived for material
aid, assistance, or advice—(i)Threshold
amount—(A)In general. The threshold
amount of gross income is $50,000 in the
case of a reportable transaction substan-
tially all of the tax benefits from which
are provided to natural persons (looking
through any partnerships, S corporations,
or trusts). For all other transactions, the
threshold amount is $250,000.
(B)Listed transactions and transac-
tions of interest. For listed transactions
described in §§1.6011–4, 20.6011–4,
25.6011–4, 31.6011–4, 53.6011–4,
54.6011–4, or 56.6011–4 of this chap-
ter, the threshold amounts in paragraph
(b)(3)(i)(A) of this section are reduced
from $50,000 to $10,000 and from
$250,000 to $25,000. For transactions
of interest described in §§1.6011–4,
20.6011–4, 25.6011–4, 31.6011–4,
53.6011–4, 54.6011–4, or 56.6011–4 of
this chapter, the threshold amounts in
paragraph (b)(3)(i)(A) of this section may
be reduced as identified in the published
guidance describing the transaction.
(ii)Gross income derived directly or
indirectly for the material aid, assistance,
or advice. In determining the amount of
gross income a person derives directly or
indirectly for material aid, assistance, or
advice, all fees for a tax strategy or for ser-
vices for advice (whether or not tax advice)
or for the implementation of a reportable
transaction are taken into account. Fees
include consideration in whatever form
paid, whether in cash or in kind, for ser-
vices to analyze the transaction (whether
or not related to the tax consequences of
the transaction), for services to implement
the transaction, for services to document
the transaction, and for services to prepare
tax returns to the extent return preparation
fees are unreasonable in light of all of the
facts and circumstances. A fee does not
include amounts paid to a person, includ-
ing an advisor, in that person’s capacity as
a party to the transaction. For example,
a fee does not include reasonable charges
for the use of capital or the sale or use of
property. The IRS will scrutinize carefully
all of the facts and circumstances in deter-
mining whether consideration received in
connection with a reportable transaction
constitutes gross income derived directly
or indirectly for aid, assistance, or advice.
For purposes of this section, the thresh-
old amount must be met independently
for each transaction that is a reportable
transaction and aggregation of fees among
transactions is not required.
(4)Date a person becomes a material
advisor—(i)In general. A person will
be treated as becoming a material advisor
when all of the following events have oc-
curred (in no particular order)—
(A) The person provides material aid,
assistance or advice as described in para-
graph(b)(2)ofthissection;
(B) The person directly or indirectly
derives gross income in excess of the
threshold amount as described in para-
graph (b)(3) of this section; and
(C) The transaction is entered into by
the taxpayer to whom or for whose benefit
the person provided the tax statement, or
in the case of a tax statement provided to
another material advisor, when the transac-
tion is entered into by a taxpayer to whom
or for whose benefit that material advisor
provided a tax statement.
(ii)Determining if the taxpayer entered
into the transaction. Material advisors,
including those whocease providing ser-
vices before the time the transaction is en-
tered into, must make reasonable and good
faith efforts to determine whether the event
described in paragraph (b)(4)(i)(C) of this
section has occurred.
(iii)Listed transactions and transac-
tions of interest. If a transaction that was
not a reportable transaction is identified as
a listed transaction or a transaction of inter-
est in published guidance after the occur-
rence of the events described in paragraph
(b)(4)(i) of this section, the person will be
treated as becoming a material advisor on
the date the transaction is identified as a
listed transaction or a transaction of inter-
est.
(5)Other persons designated as ma-
terial advisors. Published guidance may
identify other types or classes of persons
as material advisors.
December 4, 200610612006–49 I.R.B.

(c)Definitions. For purposes of this
section, the following definitions apply:
(1)Reportable transaction.The
termreportable transactionis defined
in §1.6011–4(b)(1) of this chapter.
(2)Listed transaction.Thetermlisted
transactionis defined in §1.6011–4(b)(2)
of this chapter. See also §§20.6011–4(a),
25.6011–4(a), 31.6011–4(a), 53.6011–
4(a), 54.6011–4(a), or 56.6011–4(a) of
this chapter.
(3)Derive.Thetermderivemeans re-
ceive or expect to receive.
(4)Person.Thetermpersonmeans any
person described in section 7701(a)(1), in-
cluding an affiliated group of corporations
that join in the filing of a consolidated re-
turn under section 1501.
(5)Substantially similar.Theterm
substantially similaris defined in
§1.6011–4(c)(4) of this chapter.
(6)Tax.Thetermtaxmeans Federal
tax.
(7)Tax benefit. A tax benefit includes
deductions, exclusions from gross income,
nonrecognition of gain, tax credits, adjust-
ments (or the absence of adjustments) to
the basis of property, status as an entity ex-
empt from Federal income taxation, and
any other tax consequences that may re-
duce a taxpayer’s Federal tax liability by
affecting the amount, timing, character, or
source of any item of income, gain, ex-
pense, loss, or credit.
(8)Tax return.Thetermtax return
means a Federal tax return and a Federal
information return.
(9)Tax structure. The tax structure of a
transaction is any fact that may be relevant
to understanding the purported or claimed
Federal tax treatment of the transaction.
(10)Tax treatment. The tax treatment
of a transaction is the purported or claimed
Federal tax treatment of the transaction.
(11)Taxpayer.Thetermtaxpayeris
defined in §1.6011–4(c)(1) of this chapter.
(12)Tax result protection.Thetermtax
result protectionincludes insurance com-
pany and other third party products com-
monly described as tax result insurance.
(13)Transaction of interest.The
termtransaction of interestis defined
in §1.6011–4(b)(6) of this chapter. See
also §§20.6011–4(a), 25.6011–4(a),
31.6011–4(a), 53.6011–4(a), 54.6011–
4(a), or 56.6011–4(a) of this chapter.
(d)Form and content of material advi-
sor’s disclosure statement—(1)In general.
A material advisor required to file a dis-
closure statement under this section must
file a completed Form 8918, “Material Ad-
visor Disclosure Statement” (or successor
form) in accordance with this paragraph
(d) and the instructions to the form. To be
considered complete, the information pro-
vided on the form must describe the ex-
pected tax treatment and all potential tax
benefits expected to result from the trans-
action, describe any tax result protection
with respect to the transaction, and iden-
tify and describe the transaction in suffi-
cient detail for the IRS to be able to un-
derstand the tax structure of the reportable
transaction and the identity of the mate-
rial advisor(s). An incomplete form con-
taining a statement that information will be
provided upon request is not considered a
complete disclosure statement. A material
advisor may file a single form for substan-
tially similar transactions. An amended
form must be filed if information previ-
ously provided is no longer accurate, if ad-
ditional information that was not disclosed
becomes available, or if there are material
changes to the transaction. A material ad-
visor is not required to file an additional
form for each additional taxpayer that en-
ters into the same or substantially similar
transaction. If the form is not completed
in accordance with the provisions in this
paragraph (d) and the instructions to the
form, the material advisor will not be con-
sideredtohavecompliedwiththedisclo-
sure requirements of this section.
(2)Reportable transaction number.
The IRS will issue to a material advi-
sor a reportable transaction number with
respect to the disclosed reportable trans-
action. Receipt of a reportable transaction
number does not indicate that the dis-
closure statement is complete, nor does
it indicate that the transaction has been
reviewed, examined, or approved by the
IRS. Material advisors must provide the
reportable transaction number to all tax-
payers and material advisors to whom the
material advisor makes or provides tax
statements. The reportable transaction
number must be provided at the time the
transaction is entered into, or, if the trans-
action is entered into prior to the material
advisor receiving the reportable transac-
tion number, within 60 calendar days from
the date the reportable transaction number
is mailed to the material advisor.
(e)Time of providing disclosure.The
material advisor’s disclosure statement for
areportabletransactionmustbefiledwith
the Office of Tax Shelter Analysis (OTSA)
by the last day of the month that follows
the end of the calendar quarter in which
the advisor became a material advisor with
respect to the reportable transaction or in
which the circumstances necessitating an
amended disclosure statement occur. The
disclosure statement must be sent to OTSA
at the address provided in the instructions
for Form 8918 (or a successor form).
(f)Designation agreements.Ifmore
than one material advisor is required to dis-
close a reportable transaction under this
section, the material advisors may desig-
nate by written agreement a single mate-
rial advisor to disclose the transaction. The
transaction must be disclosed by the last
day of the month following the end of the
calendar quarter that includes the earliest
date on which a material advisor who is a
party to the agreement became a material
advisor with respect to the transaction as
described in paragraph (b)(4) of this sec-
tion. The designation of one material ad-
visor to disclose the transaction does not
relieve the other material advisors of their
obligation to disclose the transaction to the
IRS in accordance with this section, if the
designated material advisor fails to dis-
close the transaction to the IRS in a timely
manner.
(g)Protective disclosures. If a poten-
tial material advisor is uncertain whether
a transaction must be disclosed under this
section, the advisor may disclose the trans-
action in accordance with the requirements
of this section and comply with all the
provisions of this section, and indicate on
the disclosure statement that the disclosure
statement is being filed on a protective ba-
sis. The IRS will not treat disclosure state-
ments filed on a protective basis any differ-
ently than other disclosure statements filed
under this section. For a protective disclo-
sure to be effective, the advisor must com-
ply with the regulations under this section
and §301.6112–1 by providing to the IRS
all information requested by the IRS under
these sections.
(h) [The text of the proposed
§301.6111–3(h) is the same as the text
for §301.6111–3T(h) published elsewhere
in this issue of the Bulletin].
(i) Effective date—(1)In general.In
general, this section applies to transac-
2006–49 I.R.B.1062December 4, 2006

tions with respect to which a material
advisor makes a tax statement on or after
the date these regulations are published
as final regulations in theFederal Reg-
ister. However, upon the publication of
final regulations, this section will apply
to transactions of interest entered into on
or after November 2, 2006 with respect
to which a material advisor makes a tax
statement under §301.6111–3 on or after
November 2, 2006.
(2) [The text of the proposed
§301.6111–3(i)(2) is the same as the text
for §301.6111–3T(i)(2) published else-
where in this issue of the Bulletin].
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 1,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for November 2, 2006, 71 F.R. 64496)
Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
AJCA Modifications to the
Section 6112 Regulations
REG–103043–05
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document contains pro-
posed regulations under section 6112 of
the Internal Revenue Code which provide
the rules relating to the obligation of mate-
rial advisors to prepare and maintain lists
with respect to reportable transactions.
These regulations affect material advisors
responsible for keeping lists under section
6112.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must be
received by January 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103043–05), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washing-
ton, DC 20044. Submissions may be
hand delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103043–05),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service,
Crystal Mall 4 Building, 1901 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA, or sent electronically, via
the IRS Internet site atwww.irs.gov/regs
or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov(indicate IRS and
REG–103043–05).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Concerning the proposed reg-
ulations, Tara P. Volungis or Charles Wien,
202–622–3070; concerning the submis-
sions of comments and requests for hear-
ing, Kelly Banks, 202–622–0392 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained
in this notice of proposed rulemaking has
been submitted to the Office of Manage-
ment and Budget for review in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). Comments on the
collection of information should be sent to
theOffice of Management and Budget,
Attn: Desk Officer for the Department
of the Treasury, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503, with copies to theInternal Rev-
enue Service, Attn: IRS Reports Clear-
ance Officer, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP,
Washington, DC 20224. Comments on
the collection of information should be
received by January 2, 2007.
Comments are specifically requested
concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of in-
formation is necessary for the proper per-
formance of the functions of the Internal
Revenue Service, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
The accuracy of the estimated burden
associated with the proposed collection of
information (see below);
How the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected may be en-
hanced;
How the burden of complying with the
proposed collections of information may
be minimized, including through the appli-
cation of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information technology;
and
Estimates of capital or start-up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance, and
purchase of service to provide information.
The collection of information in this
proposed regulation is in §301.6112–1(b)
and (d). This information is required in or-
der for a material advisor to comply with
the list maintenance rules under section
6112. This information will be used to im-
prove compliance with the tax laws by giv-
ing the IRS earlier notification of transac-
tions that may not comport with the tax
laws. The collection of information is
mandatory. The likely respondents are
business or other for-profit institutions or
individuals.
Estimated total annual reporting bur-
den: 50,000 hours.
Estimated average annual burden hours
per respondent: 100 hours.
Estimated number of respondents: 500.
Estimated annual frequency of re-
sponses: on occasion.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays
a valid control number assigned by the Of-
fice of Management and Budget.
Books or records relating to a collection
of information must be retained as long
as their contents may become material in
the administration of any internal revenue
law. Generally, tax returns and tax return
information are confidential, as required
by 26 U.S.C. 6103.
Background
This document proposes to amend 26
CFR part 301 by amending the rules re-
lating to the list maintenance requirements
of material advisors with respect to re-
portable transactions under section 6112.
The American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, Public Law 108–357, 118 Stat.
1418, (AJCA) was enacted on October 22,
2004. Section 815 of the AJCA amended
section 6112 to provide that each mate-
rial advisor (as defined in section 6111, as
amended by the AJCA) with respect to any
reportable transaction is required to main-
tain a list (in such manner as the Secretary
may by regulations prescribe) identifying
each person with respect to whom the
advisor acted as a material advisor with
respect to the transaction, and containing
other information as the Secretary may
by regulations require. Section 815 of the
AJCA is effective for transactions with
respect to which material aid, assistance,
or advice is provided after October 22,
December 4, 200610632006–49 I.R.B.

2004. Prior to the amendments to section
6111 made by the AJCA, the definition of
material advisor was in §301.6112–1 of
the Procedure and Administration Regula-
tions.
In response to the AJCA, the IRS
and Treasury Department issued interim
guidance affecting section 6112 in No-
tice 2004–80, 2004–2 C.B. 963; No-
tice 2005–17, 2005–1 C.B. 606; Notice
2005–22, 2005–1 C.B. 756; and No-
tice 2006–6, 2006–5 I.R.B. 385 (see
§601.601(d)(2)). The IRS and Trea-
sury Department have received various
comments and questions regarding the ap-
plication of section 6112 under the AJCA.
Consequently, the IRS and Treasury De-
partment propose amendments to the rules
relating to the list maintenance obligation
of material advisors under section 6112.
Explanation of Provisions
A. In General
These proposed regulations are being
issued concurrently with proposed regula-
tions under §1.6011–4 (REG–103038–05)
and §301.6111–3 (REG–103039–05) pub-
lished elsewhere in the Bulletin. The
definition of material advisor is pro-
vided in the proposed regulations under
§301.6111–3(b). The definition of re-
portable transaction is provided in the pro-
posed regulations under §1.6011–4(b)(1).
Under these proposed regulations, each
material advisor for any reportable trans-
action must maintain a list identifying
each person with respect to whom the
advisor acted as a material advisor and
containing other information described in
the regulations.
B. The List
The information that must be contained
in the list under these proposed regulations
is similar to the information required to
be included on the list under the current
§301.6112–1 regulations, with some addi-
tions or clarifications, such as, the name
of each other material advisor to the trans-
action, if known by the material advisor,
and any designation agreement to which
the material advisor is a party. The IRS and
Treasury Department believe that this in-
formation is required to be provided under
the current regulations. However, due to
questions raised by material advisors un-
der the current regulations, these proposed
amendments clarify that the name of other
material advisors and designation agree-
ments are required to be maintained.
To date, the IRS has received lists un-
der the current regulations that are not in
a form that enables the IRS to determine
without undue delay or difficulty the in-
formation required under the regulation.
Some material advisors have merely pro-
duced boxes of documents rather than a
list as required under §301.6112–1. Un-
der section 6708 as amended by the AJCA,
anypersonwhoisrequiredtomaintain
a list under section 6112(a) who fails to
make the list available to the Secretary
upon written request within 20 business
days after the date of the request, must
pay a penalty of $10,000 for each day
of such failure. Failure to maintain the
list in accordance with these regulations
also subjects a person to the penalty un-
der section 6708. The proposed regula-
tions specifically clarify that the list to be
maintained by the material advisor and fur-
nished to the IRS upon request consists of
three separate components: (1) an item-
ized statement of information, (2) a de-
tailed description of the transaction, and
(3) copies of documents relating to the
transaction. The itemized statement of in-
formation must contain all of the requested
informationinaformthatiseasytoun-
derstand (for example, in a format such as
a list, spreadsheet, or table). In order for
the material advisor to be in compliance
with its obligations under section 6112, the
material advisor must maintain and furnish
in the time prescribed the itemized state-
ment of information, the description of the
transaction, and the copies of documents.
Under the proposed regulations, the Secre-
tary, in published guidance, may provide a
form or method for maintaining and/or fur-
nishing a list.
C. Other Clarifications and Modifications
The proposed regulations remove the
provision detailing how a privilege is
claimed with regard to certain informa-
tion on the list. The regulations continue
to require that if a claim of privilege is
made, the material advisor must continue
to maintain the list in accordance with
these regulations.
Similar to provisions in the current
§301.6112–1 regulations, material advi-
sors under the proposed regulations may
have a designation agreement authoriz-
ing one material advisor to maintain and
furnish the list. However, the designation
agreement does not relieve the other mate-
rial advisors of their obligation to furnish
the list if the designated material advisor
fails to furnish the list in a timely manner.
Thus, parties to a designation agreement
may still be liable for the penalty under
section 6708.
Contrary to the provisions in the cur-
rent regulations under §301.6112–1, these
proposed regulations contain no provision
to toll the requirement for maintaining the
list when a potential material advisor re-
quests a private letter ruling on a specific
transaction. The IRS and Treasury Depart-
ment believe that removing the tolling pro-
vision will promote effective tax adminis-
tration. Consequently, potential material
advisorsmayrequestarulingonatrans-
action, as provided in the temporary regu-
lations under §301.6111–3T(h), under the
regular procedures for requesting a ruling,
provided the ruling request is not factual or
hypothetical, but the requirement for dis-
closing the transaction under section 6111
and maintaining the list under section 6112
will not be tolled. Final regulations remov-
ing the tolling provision are being issued
concurrently with these proposed regula-
tions. The removal of the tolling provision
is effective for all ruling requests received
on or after November 1, 2006.
D. Effective Date
Generally, when these proposed regula-
tions become final, they will apply to trans-
actions with respect to which a material ad-
visor makes a tax statement on or after the
date the regulations are published as final
regulations in theFederal Register.How-
ever, upon publication the final regulations
will apply to transactions of interest en-
tered into on or after November 2, 2006
with respect to which a material advisor
makes a tax statement under §301.6111–3
on or after November 2, 2006.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a signifi-
cant regulatory action as defined in Exec-
utive Order 12866. Therefore, a regula-
tory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the
2006–49 I.R.B.1064December 4, 2006

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 5) does not apply to these regu-
lations. It is hereby certified that the col-
lection of information in these regulations
will not have a significant economic im-
pact on a substantial number of small en-
tities. This certification is based upon the
fact that most of the information is already
required to be reported under the current
regulations; the clarifications and new in-
formation required by the proposed regu-
lations add little or no new burden to the
existing requirements. Therefore, a Regu-
latory Flexibility Analysis under the Reg-
ulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6)
is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f)
of the Internal Revenue Code, this notice
of proposed rulemaking will be submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for com-
ment on its impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations, consideration
will be given to any written comments
(a signed original and eight (8) copies)
or electronic comments that are submitted
timely to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury
Department request comments on the clar-
ity of the proposed rules, how they can be
made easier to understand, and the admin-
istrability of the rules in the proposed regu-
lations. All comments will be available for
public inspection and copying. A public
hearing will be scheduled if requested in
writing by any person that submits timely
written or electronic comments. If a pub-
lic hearing is scheduled, notice of the date,
time, and place for the public hearing will
be published in theFederal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these reg-
ulations are Tara P. Volungis and
Charles Wien, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries). However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is pro-
posed to be amended as follows:
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 301 continues to read, in part, as fol-
lows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.6112–1 is revised
to read as follows:
§301.6112–1 Material advisors of
reportable transactions must keep lists of
advisees, etc.
(a)In general. Each material advisor,
as defined in §301.6111–3(b), with respect
to any reportable transaction, as defined
in §1.6011–4(b) of this chapter, shall pre-
pare and maintain a list in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section and shall fur-
nish such list to the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice (IRS) in accordance with paragraph
(e)ofthissection.
(b)Preparation and maintenance of
lists—(1)In general. A separate list must
be prepared and maintained for each re-
portable transaction. However, one list
must be maintained for substantially simi-
lar transactions. A list must be maintained
in a form that enables the IRS to determine
without undue delay or difficulty the in-
formation required in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section. The Secretary may, by pub-
lication in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
(see §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter),
provide a form or method for maintaining
and/or furnishing a list.
(2)Persons required to be included on
lists. A material advisor is required to
maintain a list identifying each person with
respect to whom the advisor acted as a ma-
terial advisor with respect to the reportable
transaction. However, a material advisor is
not required to identify a person on the list
if the person entered into a listed transac-
tion or a transaction of interest more than 6
years before the transaction was identified
in published guidance as a listed transac-
tion or a transaction of interest.
(3)Contents. Each list must include the
three components described in paragraph
(b)(3)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this section.
(i)Statement. An itemized statement
containing the following information—
(A) The name of each reportable trans-
action, the citation to the published guid-
ance number identifying the transaction if
the transaction is a listed transaction or a
transaction of interest, and the reportable
transaction number obtained under section
6111;
(B) The name, address, and TIN of each
person required to be included on the list;
(C) The date on which each person re-
quired to be included on the list entered
into each reportable transaction, if known
by the material advisor;
(D) The amount invested in each re-
portable transaction by each person re-
quired to be included on the list, if known
by the material advisor;
(E) A summary or schedule of the tax
treatment that each person is intended or
expected to derive from participation in
each reportable transaction; and
(F) The name of each other material
advisor to the transaction, if known by the
material advisor.
(ii)Description of the transaction.A
detailed description of each reportable
transaction that describes both the tax
structure of the transaction and the pur-
ported tax treatment of the transaction.
(iii)Documents. The following docu-
ments—
(A) A copy of any designation agree-
ment (as described in paragraph (f) of this
section) to which the material advisor is a
party; and
(B) Copies of any additional written
materials, including tax analyses or opin-
ions, relating to each reportable transaction
that are material to an understanding of the
purported tax treatment or tax structure of
the transaction that have been shown or
provided to any person who acquired or
may acquire an interest in the transactions,
or to their representatives, tax advisors, or
agents, by the material advisor or any re-
lated party or agent of the material advisor.
However, a material advisor is not required
to retain earlier drafts of a document pro-
vided the material advisor retains a copy
of the final document (or, if there is no fi-
nal document, the most recent draft of the
document) and the final document (or most
recent draft) contains all the information
in the earlier drafts of such document that
is material to an understanding of the pur-
December 4, 200610652006–49 I.R.B.

ported tax treatment or the tax structure of
the transaction.
(c)Definitions. For purposes of this
section, the following terms are defined as:
(1)Material advisor.Thetermmaterial
advisoris defined in §301.6111–3(b).
(2)Reportable transaction.The
termreportable transactionis defined
in §1.6011–4(b)(1) of this chapter.
(3)Listed transaction.Thetermlisted
transactionis defined in §1.6011–4(b)(2)
of this chapter. See also §§20.6011–4(a),
25.6011–4(a), 31.6011–4(a), 53.6011–
4(a), 54.6011–4(a), or 56.6011–4(a) of
this chapter.
(4)Substantially similar.Theterm
substantially similaris defined in
§1.6011–4(c)(4) of this chapter.
(5)Person.Thetermpersonis defined
in §301.6111–3(c)(4).
(6)Related party. A person is a re-
lated party with respect to another person
if such person bears a relationship to such
other person described in section 267(b) or
707(b).
(7)Tax.Thetermtaxis defined in
§301.6111–3(c)(6).
(8)Tax benefit.Thetermtax benefitis
defined in §301.6111–3(c)(7).
(9)Tax return.Thetermtax returnis
defined in §301.6111–3(c)(8).
(10)Tax structure.Thetermtax struc-
tureis defined in §301.6111–3(c)(9).
(11)Tax treatment.Thetermtax treat-
mentis defined in §301.6111–3(c)(10).
(12)Transaction of interest.The
termtransaction of interestis defined
in §1.6011–4(b)(6) of this chapter. See
also §§20.6011–4(a), 25.6011–4(a),
31.6011–4(a), 53.6011–4(a), 54.6011–
4(a), or 56.6011–4(a) of this chapter.
(d)Retention of lists. Each material
advisor must maintain each component of
the list described in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section in a readily accessible form
for seven years following the earlier of
the date on which the material advisor last
made a tax statement relating to the trans-
action, or the date the transaction was last
entered into, if known. If the material ad-
visor required to prepare, maintain, and
furnish the list is a corporation, partner-
ship, or other entity (entity) that has dis-
solved or liquidated before completion of
the seven-year period, the person respon-
sible under state law for winding up the
affairs of the entitymust prepare, main-
tain and furnish each component of the list
on behalf of the entity, unless the entity
submits the list to the Office of Tax Shel-
ter Analysis (OTSA) within 60 days after
the dissolution or liquidation. If state law
does not specify any person as responsi-
ble for winding up the affairs, then each of
the directors of the corporation, the general
partners of the partnership, or the trustees,
owners, or members of the entity are re-
sponsible for preparing, maintaining and
furnishing each component of the list on
behalf of the entity, unless the entity sub-
mits the list to the OTSA within 60 days
after the dissolution or liquidation. The re-
sponsible person must also provide notice
to OTSA of such dissolution or liquidation
within 60 days after the dissolution or liq-
uidation. The list and the notice provided
to OTSA must be sent to: Internal Rev-
enue Service, OTSA Mail Stop 4915, 1973
North Rulon White Blvd., Ogden, Utah
84404, or to such other address as provided
by the Commissioner.
(e)Furnishing of lists—(1)In gen-
eral. Each material advisor responsible
for maintaining a list must, upon written
request by the IRS, make each component
of the list described in paragraph (b)(3) of
this section available to the IRS by fur-
nishing each component of the list to the
IRS within 20 business days from the day
on which the request is provided. The 20
business-dayperiodshallbeginonthefirst
business day following the earlier of the
date that the IRS mails a request for the
list by certified or registered mail to the
last known address of the material advisor
required to maintain the list, or hand-deliv-
ers the written request in person. Business
days include every calendar day other than
Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays.
For purposes of this paragraph (e),legal
holidayshall have the same meaning pro-
vided in section 7503. The request is not
required to be in the form of an adminis-
trative summons. Each component of the
list must be furnished to the IRS in a form
that enables the IRS to determine without
undue delay or difficulty the information
required in paragraph (b)(3) of this sec-
tion. If any component of the list is not
in a form that enables the IRS to deter-
mine without undue delay or difficulty the
information required in paragraph (b)(3)
of this section, the material advisor will
not be considered to have complied with
the list maintenanceprovisions in section
6112 and this section.
(2)Claims of privilege. Each mate-
rial advisor who is required to maintain a
list with respect to a reportable transaction,
must still maintain the list pursuant to the
requirements of this section even if a per-
son asserts a claim of privilege with re-
spect to the information specified in para-
graph (b)(3)(iii)(B) of this section.
(f)Designation agreements.Ifmore
than one material advisor is required to
maintain a list of persons for a reportable
transaction, in accordance with paragraph
(b) of this section, the material advisors
may designate by written agreement a sin-
gle material advisor to maintain the list or a
portion of the list. The designation of one
material advisor to maintain the list does
not relieve the other material advisors from
their obligation to furnish the list to the IRS
in accordance with paragraph (e)(1) of this
section, if the designated material advisor
fails to furnish the list to the IRS in a timely
manner. A material advisor is not relieved
from the requirement of this section be-
cause a material advisor is unable to obtain
the list from any designated material ad-
visor, any designated material advisor did
not maintain a list, or the list maintained
by any designated material advisor is not
complete.
(g)Effective date. In general, this sec-
tion applies to transactions with respect to
which a material advisor makes a tax state-
ment under §301.6111–3 on or after the
date these regulations are published as fi-
nal regulations in theFederal Register.
However, upon the publication of final
regulations, this section will apply to trans-
actions of interest entered into on or after
November 2, 2006 with respect to which a
material advisor makes a tax statement un-
der §301.6111–3 on or after November 2,
2006.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 1,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for November 2, 2006, 71 F.R. 64501)
2006–49 I.R.B.1066December 4, 2006

Announcement of Disciplinary Actions Involving
Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents,
and Enrolled Actuaries — Suspensions, Censures,
Disbarments, and Resignations
Announcement 2006-94
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries may not accept assistance from,
or assist, any person who is under disbar-
ment or suspension from practice before
the Internal Revenue Service if the assis-
tance relates to a matter constituting prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service
and may not knowingly aid or abet another
person to practice before the Internal Rev-
enue Service during a period of suspen-
sion, disbarment, or ineligibility of such
other person.
To enable attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries to identify persons to whom
these restrictions apply, the Director, Of-
fice of Professional Responsibility, will
announce in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
their names, their city and state, their pro-
fessional designation, the effective date
of disciplinary action, and the period of
suspension. This announcement will ap-
pear in the weekly Bulletin at the earliest
practicable date after such action and will
continue to appear in the weekly Bulletins
for five successive weeks.
Consent Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid the institution
or conclusion of a proceeding for his or
her disbarment or suspension from prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service,
may offer his or her consent to suspension
from such practice. The Director, Office
of Professional Responsibility, in his dis-
cretion, may suspend an attorney, certified
public accountant, enrolled agent, or en-
rolled actuary in accordance with the con-
sent offered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent suspension from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Tomasulo, Maria V.Wantagh, NYCPAIndefinite
from
August 7, 2006
Maloy, Jr., Robert J.Galion, OHCPAIndefinite
from
August 15, 2006
Pate, Janet M.Broadview, NMCPAIndefinite
from
August 15, 2006
Scott, HowardMiami, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 15, 2006
Adamic, Jonathan E.San Lorenzo, CACPAIndefinite
from
August 18, 2006
Becker, Ira S.Wilmette, ILCPAAugust 22, 2006
to
August 21, 2008
December 4, 200610672006–49 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Snigur, Virginia IaquintaWarwick, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
Galpern, Joel G.North Miami, FLCPAIndefinite
from
September 1, 2006
DiSiena, Frank E.Katonah, NYCPAIndefinite
from
September 4, 2006
Carusona, Thomas M.Huntington, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 15, 2006
Shaikh, Firoz A.Melville, NYCPAIndefinite
from
September 15, 2006
Wickline, Ella L.Ronceverte, WVEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
September 15, 2006
Smith, Daniel B.Garden City, NYCPAIndefinite
from
September 18, 2006
Carlin, Charles R.South Bend, INCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Devine, Daniel M.Boca Raton, FLCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Dupont, Hewitt, J.Daytona Beach, FLCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Farrell, Raymond J.Matawan, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Kelligrew, John R.White Plains, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Klein, Robert B.Bardonia, NYEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Long, Gregory S.Hutchinson, KSAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Moore, Ronald L.Cayce, SCCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
2006–49 I.R.B.1068December 4, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Schaffer, Robert J.Calverton, NYCPAIndefinite
from
October 1, 2006
Berlin, StanleyErie, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Briscoe, JackDrexel Hill, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Buzzeo, Michael V.New Canaan, CTCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Sacco, John M.Pound Ridge, NYCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Sheiman, Alan P.Sherman Oaks,CAEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Tourin, MarkMiami, FLCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Burns, William J.Randolph, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 16, 2006
Webb, Norman R.Daphne, ALCPAIndefinite
from
October 16, 2006
Brown, Guia EPHobe Sound, FLEnrolled AgentOctober 20, 2006
to
April 19, 2008
Gram, John A.Gainesville, GAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Herzog, Samuel A.Jericho, NYCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Kellicker, John F.Cleveland, OHCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Krieger, Robert M.Hampton, NHCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Minsky, Neil J.Randolph, NJCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
O’Brien, TimothyNewton Center, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
December 4, 200610692006–49 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Sukenik, MartinKew Gardens, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Savoy, CassandraEast Orange, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 7, 2006
Bonner, Charles B.Athens, GACPAIndefinite
from
November 15, 2006
Levine, Barton P.New York, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 15, 2006
Taves, Joseph G.Provincetown, MACPAIndefinite
from
November 15, 2006
Young, RonaldFairfield, CTCPAIndefinite
from
November 16, 2006
Brush, Charles, H.Southbury, CTCPAIndefinite
from
December 1, 2006
Jacob, Robert T.Tucson, AZCPAIndefinite
from
December 15, 2006
Expedited Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, the Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, is authorized to
immediately suspend from practice before
the Internal RevenueService any practi-
tioner who, within five years from the date
the expedited proceeding is instituted (1)
has had a license to practice as an attor-
ney, certified public accountant, or actuary
suspended or revoked for cause or (2) has
been convicted of certain crimes.
The following individuals have been
placed under suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service by virtue
of the expedited proceeding provisions:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Williams, Donna M.York, PACPAIndefinite
from
July 25, 2006
Foushee, Wayne H.Winston-Salem, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
Kronegold, Sheldon H.Englewood, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
2006–49 I.R.B.1070December 4, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Norman, ClarenceBrooklyn, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
Chin, ArnoldSan Francisco, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
McCann, ThomasDes Moines, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
Whaley, Daniel P.Hood, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 31, 2006
Chukumba, Stephen C.Montclair, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 12, 2006
Katz, Edward C.New York, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 12, 2006
Kadunce, Darrell L.Butler,PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 18, 2006
Allen, Robert W.Torrance, CACPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Brown, Davin W.Raleigh, NCCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Cunningham, R. ScottDalton, GAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Eilers, Tom D.Raleigh, NCCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Gerdes, Roger A.Carpinteria, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Kurth, Richard FrederickDanville, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Mitchell, McArthur D.Charlotte, NCCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Ragusa, Patricia A.Spring, TXCPAIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
December 4, 200610712006–49 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Wulfsberg, David E.Murrieta, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2006
Cox, Brian J.Plymouth, MICPAIndefinite
from
September 25, 2006
Mandelman, Michael D.Mequon, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 25, 2006
Miller, Steven L.Canal Winchester, OHAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 25, 2006
Felli, Jay A.Mequon, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 2, 2006
Schoch V, Arch K.High Point, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 2, 2006
Andre, Patrick F.Manchester, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Brill, Kevin MichaelDowners Grove, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Day, Richard G.Largo, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Dull, Kay E.Miami Shores, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Frank, Arthur J.Chicago, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Gackle, Thomas E.Plymouth, MIAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Hamilton, Howard D.Fort Dodge, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Hodge, Robert M.Lafayette, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Lesyshen, Donna P.Waterloo, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Peiss, John H.Downers Grove, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
2006–49 I.R.B.1072December 4, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Petty, James E.Austin, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Ruffin-Hudson, Linda C.Saint Louis, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Schaefer, James E.St. LouisPark, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Schmitt, Martha G.Minneapolis, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Shannon, Terrance J.Mission Viejo, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Smith, Matthew S.Denver, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Swanson, RichardWest Chicago, ILCPAIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Thomas, Kenneth A.Farmers Branch, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Tomasa, Ryan H.Honolulu, HIAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Williams, Jr., Harry D.San Antonio, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Wilson, Jr., Robert N.Ayer, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Yum, Chris ChulhoWoodbridge, VAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 12, 2006
Dunham, Richard G.Irvine, CAEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Housman, DavidAlbuquerque, NMAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Malitz, Charles P.Beachwood, OHCPAIndefinite
from
October 15, 2006
Emig, Robert W.Houston, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 24, 2006
December 4, 200610732006–49 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Freese, Scott D.Norfolk, NEAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 24, 2006
Rambo, Byron L.Sanford, FLEAIndefinite
from
October 24, 2006
Ask, Ronald W.Riverside, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Berry, Richard S.Tempe, AZAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Burkhardt, William R.Canyon Lake, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Callaway, Jr., Paul F.Greensboro, NCCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Doyle, David W.Arvada,COAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Elmore, III, VirgilBirmingham, ALAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Grandt, Lawrence E.Gurnee, ILCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Hanson, Steven G.Lodi, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Omodele, BoluwajiHouston, TXCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Rahden, Horst R.Fort Wayne, INCPAIndefinite
from
October 30, 2006
Censoprano, SalvatoreFoster City, CACPAIndefinite
from
October 31, 2006
Powell, James S.Lakewood, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 31, 2006
Allen, Leonard G.Mesa, AZCPAIndefinite
from
November 1, 2006
Parker, Donald A.Benson, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 6, 2006
2006–49 I.R.B.1074December 4, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Rogers, James M.Tulsa, OKAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 6, 2006
Coopet, Michael W.Saint Paul, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Day, Jr., John TaylorHingham, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Grella, Paul J.Canton, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Meggers, Theodore M.Des Moines, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Tolbert, James L.Los Angeles, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
November 8, 2006
Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, after notice and an op-
portunity for a proceeding before an ad-
ministrative law judge, the following indi-
viduals have been placed under suspension
from practice before the Internal Revenue
Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Lazaro, CharlesVisalia, CAAttorneyJuly 20, 2006
to
January 19, 2010
Wasilowski, RonaldNatrona Heights, PACPAJuly 21, 2006
to
July 20, 2011
Wellbery, William J.Deerfield Beach, FLCPAOctober 12, 2006
to
October 11, 2008
Clapper, Gary L.La Mesa, CAEnrolled AgentNovember 2, 2006
to
November 1, 2008
December 4, 200610752006–49 I.R.B.

Consent Disbarments From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid institution or con-
clusion of a proceeding for his or her dis-
barment or suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service, may of-
fer his or her consent to disbarment from
such practice. The Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, in his discretion,
may disbar an attorney, certified public ac-
countant, enrolled agent, or enrolled actu-
ary in accordance with the consent offered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent disbarment from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Disbarment
Grossman, Robert S.Ardmore, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 4, 2006
Disbarments From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, after notice and an oppor-
tunity for a proceeding before an adminis-
trative law judge, the following individu-
als have been disbarred from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Hubbard, MurphySpringfield, MOCPASeptember 20, 2006
Kardos, Sandra E.Van Nuys, CACPAOctober 2, 2006
Jewett,
Jerry A.
Fremont
,OH
Enrolle
dAgent
Novembe
r 2, 2006
Censure Issued by Consent
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, in lieu of a proceeding
being instituted or continued, an attorney,
certified public accountant, enrolled agent,
or enrolled actuary, may offer his or her
consent to the issuance of a censure. Cen-
sure is a public reprimand.
The following individuals have con-
sented to the issuance of a Censure:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure
Applegate, William F.Madison, NJCPASeptember 12, 2006
Vigliotti, Anthony J.East Haven, CTEnrolled AgentSeptember 12, 2006
Bolgiani, Janette A.Brooklyn, NYEnrolled AgentSeptember 14, 2006
Cheney, James E.Phelps, NYCPASeptember 18, 2006
Dollinger, DouglasMiddletown, NYAttorneyOctober 2, 2006
Reeves, Zak E.Denver, COEnrolled AgentOctober 2, 2006
2006–49 I.R.B.1076December 4, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure
Castiglione, JohnPittsfield, MAAttorneyOctober 4, 2006
Shannon, James P.Rochester, NHAttorneyOctober 4, 2006
Kuller, Mark A.Bethesda, MDAttorneyOctober 6, 2006
Resignations of Enrolled Agents
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an enrolled agent, in or-
der to avoid the institution or conclusion
of a proceeding for his or her disbarment
or suspension from practice before the In-
ternal Revenue Service, may offer his or
her resignation as an enrolled agent. The
Director, Office of Professional Responsi-
bility, in his discretion, may accept the of-
fered resignation.
The Director, Office of Professional
Responsibility, has accepted offers of res-
ignation as an enrolled agent from the
following individuals:
NameAddressDate of Resignation
Schwartz, JudyLas Vegas, NVOctober 13, 2006
December 4, 200610772006–49 I.R.B.

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
2006–49 I.R.B.iDecember 4, 2006

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–49
Announcements:
2006-42, 2006-27 I.R.B.48
2006-43, 2006-27 I.R.B.48
2006-44, 2006-27 I.R.B.49
2006-45, 2006-31 I.R.B.121
2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
2006-47, 2006-28 I.R.B.78
2006-48, 2006-31 I.R.B.135
2006-49, 2006-29 I.R.B.89
2006-50, 2006-34 I.R.B.321
2006-51, 2006-32 I.R.B.222
2006-52, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-53, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-54, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-55, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
2006-56, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
2006-57, 2006-35 I.R.B.343
2006-58, 2006-36 I.R.B.388
2006-59, 2006-36 I.R.B.388
2006-60, 2006-36 I.R.B.389
2006-61, 2006-36 I.R.B.390
2006-62, 2006-37 I.R.B.444
2006-63, 2006-37 I.R.B.445
2006-64, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
2006-65, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
2006-66, 2006-37 I.R.B.448
2006-67, 2006-38 I.R.B.509
2006-68, 2006-38 I.R.B.510
2006-69, 2006-37 I.R.B.449
2006-70, 2006-40 I.R.B.629
2006-71, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
2006-72, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
2006-73, 2006-42 I.R.B.745
2006-74, 2006-42 I.R.B.746
2006-75, 2006-42 I.R.B.746
2006-76, 2006-42 I.R.B.746
2006-77, 2006-42 I.R.B.748
2006-78, 2006-42 I.R.B.748
2006-79, 2006-43 I.R.B.792
2006-80, 2006-45 I.R.B.840
2006-81, 2006-44 I.R.B.821
2006-82, 2006-44 I.R.B.821
2006-83, 2006-44 I.R.B.822
2006-84, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
2006-85, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
2006-86, 2006-45 I.R.B.842
2006-87, 2006-44 I.R.B.822
2006-88, 2006-46 I.R.B.910
2006-89, 2006-44 I.R.B.826
2006-90, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
2006-91, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
2006-92, 2006-48 I.R.B.
1014
2006-93, 2006-48 I.R.B.1017
Announcements— Continued:
2006-94, 2006-48 I.R.B.1017
Notices:
2006-56, 2006-28 I.R.B.58
2006-57, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2006-58, 2006-28 I.R.B.59
2006-59, 2006-28 I.R.B.60
2006-60, 2006-29 I.R.B.82
2006-61, 2006-29 I.R.B.85
2006-62, 2006-29 I.R.B.86
2006-63, 2006-29 I.R.B.87
2006-64, 2006-29 I.R.B.88
2006-65, 2006-31 I.R.B.102
2006-66, 2006-30 I.R.B.99
2006-67, 2006-33 I.R.B.248
2006-68, 2006-31 I.R.B.105
2006-69, 2006-31 I.R.B.107
2006-70, 2006-33 I.R.B.252
2006-71, 2006-34 I.R.B.316
2006-72, 2006-36 I.R.B.363
2006-73, 2006-35 I.R.B.339
2006-74, 2006-35 I.R.B.339
2006-75, 2006-36 I.R.B.366
2006-76, 2006-38 I.R.B.459
2006-77, 2006-40 I.R.B.590
2006-78, 2006-41 I.R.B.675
2006-79, 2006-43 I.R.B.763
2006-80, 2006-40 I.R.B.594
2006-81, 2006-40 I.R.B.595
2006-82, 2006-39 I.R.B.529
2006-83, 2006-40 I.R.B.596
2006-84, 2006-41 I.R.B.677
2006-85, 2006-41 I.R.B.677
2006-86, 2006-41 I.R.B.680
2006-87, 2006-43 I.R.B.766
2006-88, 2006-42 I.R.B.686
2006-89, 2006-43 I.R.B.772
2006-90, 2006-42 I.R.B.688
2006-91, 2006-42 I.R.B.688
2006-92, 2006-43 I.R.B.774
2006-93, 2006-44 I.R.B.798
2006-94, 2006-43 I.R.B.777
2006-95, 2006-45 I.R.B.848
2006-96, 2006-46 I.R.B.902
2006-97, 2006-46 I.R.B.904
2006-98, 2006-46 I.R.B.906
2006-99, 2006-46 I.R.B.907
2006-101, 2006-47 I.R.B.930
2006-102, 2006-46 I.R.B.909
2006-103, 2006-47 I.R.B.931
2006-104, 2006-48 I.R.B.995
2006-106, 2006-49 I.R.B.1033
Proposed Regulations:
REG-208270-86, 2006-42 I.R.B.698
Proposed Regulations— Continued:
REG-121509-00, 2006-40 I.R.B.602
REG-135866-02, 2006-27 I.R.B.34
REG-140379-02, 2006-44 I.R.B.808
REG-142599-02, 2006-44 I.R.B.808
REG-146893-02, 2006-34 I.R.B.317
REG-159929-02, 2006-35 I.R.B.341
REG-148864-03, 2006-34 I.R.B.320
REG-168745-03, 2006-39 I.R.B.532
REG-105248-04, 2006-43 I.R.B.787
REG-103038-05, 2006-49 I.R.B.1049
REG-103039-05, 2006-49 I.R.B.1057
REG-103043-05, 2006-49 I.R.B.1063
REG-109512-05, 2006-30 I.R.B.100
REG-110405-05, 2006-48 I.R.B.1004
REG-141901-05, 2006-47 I.R.B.947
REG-142270-05, 2006-43 I.R.B.791
REG-145154-05, 2006-39 I.R.B.567
REG-148576-05, 2006-40 I.R.B.627
REG-109367-06, 2006-41 I.R.B.683
REG-112994-06, 2006-27 I.R.B.47
REG-118775-06, 2006-28 I.R.B.73
REG-118897-06, 2006-31 I.R.B.120
REG-120509-06, 2006-39 I.R.B.570
REG-124152-06, 2006-36 I.R.B.368
REG-125071-06, 2006-36 I.R.B.375
REG-127819-06, 2006-48 I.R.B.1013
REG-136806-06, 2006-47 I.R.B.950
Revenue Procedures:
2006-29, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2006-30, 2006-31 I.R.B.110
2006-31, 2006-27 I.R.B.32
2006-32, 2006-28 I.R.B.61
2006-33, 2006-32 I.R.B.140
2006-34, 2006-38 I.R.B.460
2006-35, 2006-37 I.R.B.434
2006-36, 2006-38 I.R.B.498
2006-37, 2006-38 I.R.B.499
2006-38, 2006-39 I.R.B.530
2006-39, 2006-40 I.R.B.600
2006-40, 2006-42 I.R.B.694
2006-41, 2006-43 I.R.B.777
2006-42, 2006-47 I.R.B.931
2006-43, 2006-45 I.R.B.849
2006-44, 2006-44 I.R.B.800
2006-45, 2006-45 I.R.B.851
2006-46, 2006-45 I.R.B.859
2006-47, 2006-45 I.R.B.869
2006-48, 2006-47 I.R.B.934
2006-49, 2006-47 I.R.B.936
2006-50, 2006-47 I.R.B.944
2006-51, 2006-47 I.R.B.945
2006-52, 2006-48 I.R.B.995
2006-53, 2006-48 I.R.B.996
2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–1 through 2006–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2006–26, dated June 26, 2006.
December 4, 2006ii2006–49 I.R.B.

Revenue Rulings:
2006-35, 2006-28 I.R.B.50
2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2006-37, 2006-30 I.R.B.91
2006-38, 2006-29 I.R.B.80
2006-39, 2006-32 I.R.B.137
2006-40, 2006-32 I.R.B.136
2006-41, 2006-35 I.R.B.331
2006-42, 2006-35 I.R.B.337
2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
2006-44, 2006-36 I.R.B.361
2006-45, 2006-37 I.R.B.423
2006-46, 2006-39 I.R.B.511
2006-47, 2006-39 I.R.B.511
2006-48, 2006-39 I.R.B.516
2006-49, 2006-40 I.R.B.584
2006-50, 2006-41 I.R.B.672
2006-51, 2006-41 I.R.B.632
2006-52, 2006-43 I.R.B.761
2006-53, 2006-44 I.R.B.796
2006-54, 2006-45 I.R.B.834
2006-55, 2006-45 I.R.B.837
2006-56, 2006-46 I.R.B.874
2006-57, 2006-47 I.R.B.911
2006-58, 2006-46 I.R.B.876
2006-59, 2006-48 I.R.B.992
2006-60, 2006-48 I.R.B.977
2006-61, 2006-49 I.R.B.1028
Social Security Contribution and Benefit
Base; Domestic Employee Coverage
Threshold:
2006-102, 2006-46 I.R.B.909
Tax Conventions:
2006-80, 2006-45 I.R.B.840
2006-86, 2006-45 I.R.B.842
Treasury Decisions:
9265, 2006-27 I.R.B.1
9266, 2006-28 I.R.B.52
9267, 2006-34 I.R.B.313
9268, 2006-30 I.R.B.94
9269, 2006-30 I.R.B.92
9270, 2006-33 I.R.B.237
9271, 2006-33 I.R.B.224
9272, 2006-35 I.R.B.332
9273, 2006-37 I.R.B.394
9274, 2006-33 I.R.B.244
9275, 2006-35 I.R.B.327
9276, 2006-37 I.R.B.424
9277, 2006-33 I.R.B.226
9278, 2006-34 I.R.B.256
9279, 2006-36 I.R.B.355
9280, 2006-38 I.R.B.450
9281, 2006-39 I.R.B.517
9282, 2006-39 I.R.B.512
9283, 2006-41 I.R.B.633
Treasury Decisions— Continued:
9284, 2006-40 I.R.B.582
9285, 2006-41 I.R.B.656
9286, 2006-43 I.R.B.750
9287, 2006-46 I.R.B.896
9288, 2006-44 I.R.B.794
9289, 2006-45 I.R.B.827
9290, 2006-46 I.R.B.879
9291, 2006-46 I.R.B.887
9292, 2006-47 I.R.B.914
9293, 2006-48 I.R.B.957
9294, 2006-48 I.R.B.979
9295, 2006-49 I.R.B.1030
2006–49 I.R.B.iiiDecember 4, 2006

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–49
Announcements:
2005-59
Updated and superseded by
Ann. 2006-45, 2006-31 I.R.B.121
Notices:
88-128
Supplemented by
Notice 2006-95, 2006-45 I.R.B.848
2002-45
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2003-69
Amplified and superseded by
Notice 2006-101, 2006-47 I.R.B.930
2004-61
Modified and superseded by
Notice 2006-95, 2006-45 I.R.B.848
2006-20
Supplemented and modified by
Notice 2006-56, 2006-28 I.R.B.58
2006-27
Modified by
Ann. 2006-88, 2006-46 I.R.B.910
2006-28
Modified by
Ann. 2006-88, 2006-46 I.R.B.910
2006-53
Modified by
Notice 2006-71, 2006-34 I.R.B.316
2006-67
Modified and superseded by
Notice 2006-77, 2006-40 I.R.B.590
Proposed Regulations:
REG-135866-02
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-64, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
Ann. 2006-65, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
REG-134317-05
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-47, 2006-28 I.R.B.78
REG-112994-06
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-79, 2006-43 I.R.B.792
REG-118775-06
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-71, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
Proposed Regulations— Continued:
REG-124152-06
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-90, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
Revenue Procedures:
99-35
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-40, 2006-42 I.R.B.694
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Notice 2006-67, 2006-33 I.R.B.248
Notice 2006-77, 2006-40 I.R.B.590
Rev. Proc. 2006-43, 2006-45 I.R.B.849
2002-37
Clarified, modified, amplified, and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-45, 2006-45 I.R.B.851
2002-38
Clarified, modified, amplified, and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-46, 2006-45 I.R.B.859
2002-41
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-53, 2006-48 I.R.B.996
2002-52
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
2004-63
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-34, 2006-38 I.R.B.460
2005-41
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-29, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2005-49
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-33, 2006-32 I.R.B.140
2005-67
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-41, 2006-43 I.R.B.777
2005-70
Amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-51, 2006-47 I.R.B.945
2005-78
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-49, 2006-47 I.R.B.936
2006-9
Amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
2006-12
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-37, 2006-38 I.R.B.499
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2006-26
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
2006-33
Updated and clarified by
Ann. 2006-73, 2006-42 I.R.B.745
2006-35
Modified by
Notice 2006-90, 2006-42 I.R.B.688
Revenue Rulings:
72-238
Obsoleted by
REG-109367-06, 2006-41 I.R.B.683
73-558
Obsoleted by
REG-109367-06, 2006-41 I.R.B.683
75-296
Distinguished by
Rev. Rul. 2006-52, 2006-43 I.R.B.761
80-31
Distinguished by
Rev. Rul. 2006-52, 2006-43 I.R.B.761
81-35
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
81-36
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
87-10
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
92-75
Clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2006-54, 2006-49 I.R.B.1035
2002-41
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2003-43
Amplified by
Notice 2006-69, 2006-31 I.R.B.107
2005-24
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
Treasury Decisions:
9244
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-91, 2006-47 I.R.B.953
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–1 through 2006–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006–26, dated June 26, 2006.
December 4, 2006iv2006–49 I.R.B.

Treasury Decisions— Continued:
9254
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-44, 2006-27 I.R.B.49
Ann. 2006-66, 2006-37 I.R.B.448
9258
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
9260
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-67, 2006-38 I.R.B.509
9262
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-56, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
9264
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
9272
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-68, 2006-38 I.R.B.510
9274
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-89, 2006-44 I.R.B.826
9276
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-83, 2006-44 I.R.B.822
Ann. 2006-85, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
9277
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-72, 2006-40 I.R.B.630
9280
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-78, 2006-42 I.R.B.748
9281
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-82, 2006-44 I.R.B.821
Ann. 2006-84, 2006-45 I.R.B.873
2006–49 I.R.B.vDecember 4, 2006

December 4, 20062006–49 I.R.B.

2006–49 I.R.B.December 4, 2006

December 4, 20062006–49 I.R.B.

INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN
The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue
Bulletin is sold on a yearly subscription basis by the Superintendent of Documents. Current subscribers are notified by the Superin-
tendent of Documents when their subscriptions must be renewed.
CUMULATIVE BULLETINS
The contents of this weekly Bulletin are consolidated semiannually into a permanent, indexed, Cumulative Bulletin. These are
sold on a single copy basis andare notincluded as part of the subscription to the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Subscribers to the weekly
Bulletin are notified when copies of the Cumulative Bulletin are available. Certain issues of Cumulative Bulletins are out of print
and are not available. Persons desiring available Cumulative Bulletins, which are listed on the reverse, may purchase them from the
Superintendent of Documents.
ACCESS THE INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN ON THE INTERNET
You may view the Internal Revenue Bulletin on the Internet at www.irs.gov. Under information for: select Businesses. Under
related topics, select More Topics. Then select Internal Revenue Bulletins.
INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETINS ON CD-ROM
Internal Revenue Bulletins are available annually as part ofPublication 1796 (Tax Products CD-ROM). The CD-ROM can be
purchased from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on the Internet at www.irs.gov/cdorders (discount for online orders)
or by calling 1-877-233-6767. The first release is available in mid-December and the final release is available in late January.
HOW TO ORDER
Check the publications and/or subscription(s) desired on the reverse, complete the order blank, enclose the proper remittance,
detach entire page, and mail to the Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh PA, 15250–7954. Please allow two to
six weeks, plus mailing time, for delivery.
WE WELCOME COMMENTS ABOUT THE INTERNAL
REVENUE BUL
LETIN
If you have c
omments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it,
we would be p
leased to hear from you. You can e-mail us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page
(www.irs.g
ov) or write to the IRS Bulletin Unit, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224
Internal Revenue Service
W
ashington,DC20224
Official B
usiness
Penalty for
Private Use, $300