us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-e5aa91b07ed1c136e5bbbe81207d5a28•8405009 Informal Interpretation
8405009 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-e5aa91b07ed1c136e5bbbe81207d5a288405009 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
(redacted) (Redacted) (redacted)
(Redacted)
May 31, 1984
VIA MESSENGER
Re: Definition of Parent Entity
for purposes of the Hart-Scott
Rodino Antitrust Improvements
Act of 1976
Premerger Notification Office
Bureau of Competition
Room 301
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580
Attention: Wayne E. Kaplan
Staff Attorney
Dear Sirs:
The purpose of this letter is to confirm my understanding that two limited partnerships with the same managing general partner are each considered to be a parent entity for filing purposes pursuant to the premerger notification reporting requirements promulgated under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976 (the Act). Therefore, a separate determination must be made with respect to each limited partnership regarding the filing of a premerger notification report where each of the limited partnerships is acquiring assets or voting securities from a corporate entity. This, of course, is assuming that the limited partnerships were not formed nor structured in a manner to intentionally avoid the filing requirement of the Act.
Unless I am otherwise notified in writing by the Premerger Notification Office within seven days after the date of this letter, I will assume that I may make, within thirty days of this letter, filings pursuant to the premerger notification reporting requirements promulgated under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act of 1976 in accordance with the understanding expressed above.
Very truly yours,
(Redacted)
(redacted)
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.