us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-a488cc000529ee1d6f03b2299d17aec3•0905001 Informal Interpretation
0905001 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-a488cc000529ee1d6f03b2299d17aec30905001 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From:
(redacted)
Sent:
Friday, May 01, 2009 9:55 AM
To:
Verne, B. Michael
Subject: HSR Question
Mike,
Thank you for your help on this transaction. I amwriting this note to confirm my understanding of our discussion.
Our client, Company X proposes to acquire fromEntity A a Note issued by Company Y. The collateral for the Note is votingshares of Company Z. The parties and the price of the note all exceed thethresholds. Under the terms of the Note, Company X at any time may convert allor part of the note into a percentage of the shares that are serving ascollateral. The Note also provides that for the next five years Company Y shallnot vote its shares "without [Company X's] consent (to be granted at[Company X's] sole discretion." We understand that this is being done inorder to prevent the wasting of the underlying assets by the Note issuer. Theclient understands that the act of converting the shares is likely a reportableevent subject to the waiting periods.
Applicable rules: 802.31 ("Acquisition ofconvertible voting securities shall be exempt from the requirements of the Act.") and 802.1 (f)(2)("The term 'convertible voting security' means avoting security which presently does not entitle its owner to vote for thedirectors of any entity.") Under these rules it appears that the noteshould be treated as a convertible voting security and therefore exempt fromthe Act.
This conclusion does not appear inconsistent withthe informal interpretations I have reviewed. There is a note from you onInterpretation 080002 (0810002 MV) that "[g]enerally, the onlytime that a convertible security is deemed a voting security prior toconversion is if the security carriers an irrevocable proxy to vote the underlyingshares as if the conversion had already occurred." We agreed that therights that Company X would acquire here is not equivalent to the voting rightsmentioned in your note.
If you disagree with the above in any way, pleaselet me know as soon as possible.
Thank you again,
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.