2312001 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-6873423b1565e7107a15e2483c9f30482312001 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.30
Staff
Nora Whitehead
Response/Comments

It is acceptable to file under 801.30(a)(6), and explain further in Item 3a.

Question

From: Whitehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:03:23 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: RE: Categorization of Shares Acquired pursuant to an ESPP Plan (801.30 or non-801.30)

It is acceptable to file under 801.30(a)(6), and explain further in Item 3a.

From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:18:49 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: Categorization of Shares Acquired pursuant to an ESPP Plan (801.30 or non-801.30)

Dear all - I have a quick question on how best to categorize an acquisition for an upcoming filing and would very much appreciate your thoughts.

My situation involves a company insider who appears likely to trigger a filing in the near future - although not in the more typical ways (e.g., vesting of RSUs or exercise of options - both of which neatly fall into 801.30). Instead, the issuer that employs the insider has an ESPP plan. Unlike some other ESPPs, for this one when share purchases are made under the play by employees, the shares are directly transferred into the brokerage accounts of the participating employees (which should then make them the holders of those shares, and not implicate 801.1(c)(3)-(5) and a situation in which the plan is deemed to hold the shares on behalf of its beneficiaries).

Functionally this looks very similar to the RSU vesting scenario, which is deemed to be 801.30(a)(6) conversion. However, it's not technically a conversion and - with this particular plan it appears to be a plan controlled by the issuer in the HSR sense (so I don't have the easy out of a purchase from a third party to lope it back into 801.30(a)(5)).

Assuming it is an acquisition "from" the issuer (with them controlling the plan) should I treat this as 801.30 (and under which subsection) or a non-801.30? If non-801.30, there really isn't any "agreement" to speak of here, so please let me know if there's something you customarily want to have included (or if it's a non-801.30 but an odd one with no agreement to attach).

Thank you in advance.

---
Sheinberg, Samuel I.
From: 	HSRHelp
Sent: 	Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:03 AM
To: 	Walsh, Kathryn E.; Berg, Karen E.; Musick, Vesselina; Shaffer, Kristin; Sheinberg, Samuel I.; Six, Anne;
Fetterman, Michelle; Burton, June; Larson, Peter
Subject: 	FW: Categorization of Shares Acquired pursuant to an ESPP Plan (801.30 or non-801.30)
To:
Cc: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
From: Whitehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:03:23 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Subject: RE: Categorization of Shares Acquired pursuant to an ESPP Plan (801.30 or non-801.30)
It is acceptable to file under 801.30(a)(6), and explain further in Item 3a.
From: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:20 PM
To: Walsh, Kathryn E. <kwalsh@ftc.gov>; Berg, Karen E. <KBERG@ftc.gov>; Musick, Vesselina <vmusick@ftc.gov>;
Shaffer, Kristin <kshaffer@ftc.gov>; Sheinberg, Samuel I. <SSHEINBERG@ftc.gov>; Six, Anne <asix@ftc.gov>; Whitehead,
Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>; Fetterman, Michelle <mfetterman@ftc.gov>; Burton, June <jburton@ftc.gov>; Larson,
Peter <plarson@ftc.gov>
Subject: FW: Categorization of Shares Acquired pursuant to an ESPP Plan (801.30 or non-801.30)
From:
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:18:49 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: Categorization of Shares Acquired pursuant to an ESPP Plan (801.30 or non-801.30)
Dear all - I have a quick question on how best to categorize an acquisition for an upcoming filing and would very much
appreciate your thoughts.
My situation involves a company insider who appears likely to trigger a filing in the near future - although not in the
more typical ways (e.g., vesting of RSUs or exercise of options - both of which neatly fall into 801.30). Instead, the issuer
that employs the insider has an ESPP plan. Unlike some other ESPPs, for this one when share purchases are made under
the play by employees, the shares are directly transferred into the brokerage accounts of the participating employees
(which should then make them the holders of those shares, and not implicate 801.1(c)(3)-(5) and a situation in which the
plan is deemed to hold the shares on behalf of its beneficiaries).
Functionally this looks very similar to the RSU vesting scenario, which is deemed to be 801.30(a)(6) conversion.
However, it's not technically a conversion and - with this particular plan it appears to be a plan controlled by the issuer
in the HSR sense (so I don't have the easy out of a purchase from a third party to lope it back into 801.30(a)(5)).
Assuming it is an acquisition "from" the issuer (with them controlling the plan) should I treat this as 801.30 (and under
which subsection) or a non-801.30? If non-801.30, there really isn't any "agreement" to speak of here, so please let me
know if there's something you customarily want to have included (or if it's a non-801.30 but an odd one with no
agreement to attach).
Thank you in advance, and wishing you all the best for the holidays,
1
Complete printed PDF page 1
□
-
2
Complete printed PDF page 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.