HQ 086689: Footwear for Scuba Diving and Other Watersports

us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-086689HQ 086689: Footwear for Scuba Diving and Other WatersportsGuidance

Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.





                            HQ 086689

                          May 15, 1990



CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 086689 CRS

CATEGORY:  Classification

TARIFF NO.:  6404.19.3500

Mr. Tony Shih
Action Plus/N.Y.C. Corporation
17531 Railroad St., #C
City of Industry, CA 91748

RE:  Footwear for Scuba Diving and Other Watersports

Dear Mr. Shih:

     This is in response to your letter dated January 30, 1990,
addressed to our New York office, in which you requested a tariff
classification ruling under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States Annotated (HTSUSA) regarding the above-referenced
merchandise.  A sample was submitted with your request.

FACTS:

     The article in question is a slip-on boot, size medium,
approximately six inches high, made from 1/8 inch thick neoprene
rubber sandwiched between two layers of nylon knit fabric.  The
nylon fabric of the outer sole is covered with plastic diamond-
shaped dots designed to provide traction.  The traction dots do
not completely cover the sole but are spaced roughly 1/16 of an
inch apart, thus permitting some of the nylon fabric to remain
visible.  The boot is manufactured in and imported from Taiwan
and is used for scuba diving and other water sports.

ISSUE:

     Whether scuba diving footwear with textile outer soles
covered with plastic diamond-shaped traction dots are considered
to be covered with plastics within the meaning of Note 3, Chapter
64, such that they are classifiable in heading 6404, HTSUSA.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

     Heading 6404, HTSUSA, provides for footwear with outer soles
of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of
textile materials.  According to Note 3, Chapter 64, HTSUSA, the
expression "rubber or plastics" includes any textile material
visibly coated (or covered) externally with one or both of these
materials.  While the plastic dots do not completely cover the
boot's outer sole, Note 3 does not require that the coating be
uniform, but merely that it be visible.  Since the plastic dots
are an obvious feature of the boot, it is Customs' position that
they constitute a visible covering within the meaning of Note 3.

     This view finds further support in Note 4(b), Chapter 64,
HTSUSA, which provides, subject to Note 3, that the material
having the greatest surface area in contact with the ground will
be deemed the constituent material of the outer sole.  The
plastic dots not only have the greatest surface area of the outer
sole but also are the first point of contact with the ground as
they are designed to give added traction.

     Subheading 6404.11 provides for sports footwear.  However,
according to Subheading Note 1, Chapter 64, HTSUSA, the
expression "sports footwear" applies only to footwear which is
designed for a sporting activity and has, or has provision for,
spikes, sprigs, cleats, stops, clips, bars or the like, or
alternatively, to certain specific articles of sports footwear,
e.g., ski-boots.  Customs does not consider traction dots of the
type applied to the scuba boots at issue to be analogous to
spikes or cleats.

     Subheading 6404.19.20 provides for footwear designed to be
worn over, or in lieu of, other footwear as a protection against
water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement weather.
Customs has previously held that scuba diving boots neither keep
the wearer's feet dry since water will seep through at the top of
the boot, nor do they offer protection against cold or inclement
weather as would, for example, an insulated hunting boot.  See
New York Ruling Letters 811066 dated November 24, 1984, and
811929 dated March 5, 1985.  We continue to adhere to this
position.

HOLDING:

     In view of the above, the article in question is
classifiable in subheading 6404.19.3560, HTSUSA, under the
provision for footwear with outer soles of rubber or plastics,
other, footwear with open toes or open heels; footwear of the
slip-on type, that is held to the foot without the use of laces
or buckles or other fasteners..., other, other, for women, and
are dutiable at 37.5 percent ad valorem.

     Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation
(the ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the
restraint (quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local

Customs office prior to importation of this merchandise to
determine the current status of any import restraints or
requirements.

                         Sincerely,





                         Jerry Laderberg, Acting Director
                         Commercial Rulings Division

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.