Union Bank, N.a., Appellant V. Raymond E. Pelzel, Et Al., Respondents

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION ONE
UNION BANK, N.A., as successor-in-
interest to the FDIC as Receiver for
Frontier Bank,
Appellant,
v.
RAYMOND E. PELZEL, an individual,
and the marital community of
RAYMOND E. and MERILEE PELZEL;
PELZEL DEVELOPMENT, INC., a
Washington corporation; KAREL A.
PELTRAM, an individual, and the
marital community of KAREL A. and
AMY M. PELTRAM; KAREL Z.
PELTRAM, an individual, and the
marital community of KAREL Z. and
LIBUSE PELTRAM; RANDY L.
CAMPADORE, an individual; and
CROSSMARK CAPITAL LLC, a
Washington limited liability company,
Respondents.
No. 70869-4-1
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: April 13,2015
ro» 	o
a 	t»o
URT
TATE
5D
-n 	-,,
CO 	<-cr
§2o
3*
to 	£T>GO
— 	—<o
\o 	z<
Per Curiam — Following the Washington Supreme Court's decision in
Washington Federal v. Harvey 	Wn.2d 	, 340 P.3d 846, 2015 WL 114165
(2015), the parties in this appeal filed a stipulation to the reversal of "the Superior
Court's orders granting the defendant guarantors summary judgment and their
attorneys' fees and the judgment resulting from those orders." The parties also

No. 70869-4-1/2
stipulate that the trial court on remand shall determine the amount of any award for
attorney fees and costs incurred in the appellate proceedings.
We accept the parties' concession, reverse, and remand for further
proceedings.
FOR THE COURT:
A^tsAf 	jf.