State Of Washington, Respondent V. Douglas Alexander Richards, Appellant

77647-9Washctapp10.09.2018

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 111%, c,
) No. 77647-9-1 —4=
Respondent, )
) DIVISION ONE fyl
-0
rnCZ	0-11
>--
DOUGLAS ALEXANDER RICHARDS,
)
)
)
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
SEP 1 0 2018
cm
2	. 3P-um
CA m
=r- ,
Appellant. .) FILED:,
PER CURIAM — Douglas Richards appeals from the judgment and sentence
entered after he pleaded guilty to felony murder in the second degree based on assault.
See RCW 9A.32.050(1)(b). Our Supreme Court has held that at the time of the charged
crime in April 1980, felony murder could not be predicated on assault. In re Pers.
Restraint of Andress, 147 Wn. 2d 602, 616, 56 P.3d 981 (2002). The holding in
Andress is retroactive. In re Pers. Restraint of Hinton, 152 Wn. 2d 853, 861, 100 P.3d
801 (2004). The State of Washington concedes that in light of the date of the charged
crime, the trial court lacked authority to accept Richards plea or impose sentence. See
Hinton, 152 Wn.2d at 861 (defendant cannot agree to Plead guilty to nonexistent crime).
We accept the State's concession. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is
vacated and the matter remanded for further proceedings. See Andress, 147 Wn.2d at
616.
Vacated and remanded for further proceedings:
FOR THE COURT: w
4411.4.44)1

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.