Union Bank, N.a., Appellant V. Scott J. Edwards, John & Marion Bechtholt, Et Ux, Respondents

45966-3Washctapp17.03.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
2015 MAR 17 AM 8: 42
STATE'- V' S tl
BY
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II
UNION BANK, N.A.,
Appellant,
v.
SCOTT J. EDWARDS, an individual; and
JOHN W. BECHTHOLT and MARION A.
BECHTHOLT, husband and wife,
Respondents.
No. 45966 -3 -II
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
LEE, J. — Union Bank appealed a trial court judgment in favor of Scott Edwards, John
Bechtholt and Marion Bechtholt. The parties now stipulate that that judgment should be vacated
and the case be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Washington
Federal v. Harvey _ Wn.2d —, 340 P. 3d 846 ( 2015). The parties further stipulate that Union
Bank should be awarded its costs on appeal of $851. 79 and that the issue of Union Bank' s fees on
appeal should be determined by the trial court on remand.
No. 45966 -3 - II
We accept the parties' stipulation. The trial court judgment is vacated and remanded to the
trial court. Union Bank is awarded its costs on appeal and the issue of Union Bank' s fees on appeal
is remanded to the trial court.
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2. 06.040,
it is so ordered.
We concur:
Vie. —rt.
FBjorgen, A.C. J.
2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.