80008-6•State Of Washington, Respondent V. Karl Duzell, Appellant
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Karl Duzell, Appellant
80008-6Washctapp16.03.2020
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE In the Matter of the Detention of ) No. 80008-6-I K.D. ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) __________________________________ ) FILED: MAR 1 6 2020 PER CURIAM — K.D. appeals an order committing him for up to 14 days of involuntary treatment. K.D. was released from his commitment in May, 2019. He contends, and the State concedes, that the order must be vacated because the court entered insufficient findings to support revocation. ~ In the Matter of the Detention of G.D., — Wn.App.2d —, 450 P.3d 668 (2019) (boilerplate findings insufficient to permit meaningful review of determination that appellant presented a likelihood of serious harm to herself). The State does not dispute K.D.’s argument that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he was not a good faith voluntary patient, and does not seek a remand for entry of additional findings. Accordingly, we accept the concession of error and remand solely for an order vacating the order of commitment and dismissing the petition. FORTHECOURT: _______________________ / /
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.