85471-2•Personal Restraint Petition Of Eddie Darnell Brown
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE IN THE MATTER OF THE PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF: EDDIE BROWN, Petitioner. No. 85471-2-I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION P ER CURIAM — Eddie Brown challenges multiple prison disciplinary infractions imposed by the Department of Corrections (DOC). DOC argues that Brown’s petition should be dismissed as moot because Brown has since been released from confinement and DOC has expunged the challenged infractions. Brown does not argue otherwise. We dismiss Brown’s petition as moot. See In re Pers. Restraint of White, 25 Wn. App. 911, 912, 612 P.2d 10 (1980) (court need not consider moot issues); In re Det. of Cross, 99 Wn.2d 373, 376-77, 662 P.2d 828 (1983) (issue is moot if a court can no longer provide effective relief); see also In re Pers. Restraint of Higgins, 152 Wn.2d 155, 163, 95 P.3d 330 (2004) (expungement adequately addresses challenge to prison disciplinary infraction). Dismissed.
No. 85471-2-I/2 -2- FOR THE COURT:
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FILED 9/16/2024 Court of Appeals Division I State of Washington IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE IN THE MATTER OF THE PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF: EDDIE BROWN, Petitioner. No. 85471-2-I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION PER CURIAM - Eddie Brown challenges multiple prison disciplinary infractions imposed by the Department of Corrections (DOC). DOC argues that Brown's petition should be dismissed as moot because Brown has since been released from confinement and DOC has expunged the challenged infractions. Brown does not argue otherwise. We dismiss Brown's petition as moot. See In re Pers. Restraint of White, 25 Wn. App. 911, 912, 612 P.2d 10 (1980) (court need not consider moot issues); In re Det. of Cross, 99 Wn.2d 373, 376-77, 662 P.2d 828 (1983) (issue is moot if a court can no longer provide effective relief); see also In re Pers. Restraint of Higgins, 152 Wn.2d 155, 163, 95 P.3d 330 (2004) (expungement adequately addresses challenge to prison disciplinary infraction). Dismissed. No. 85471-2-1/2 FOR THE COURT: Lote a7,
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.