David Hanscom v. Advance Auto Parts and Royal Insurance Company of America

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata
DAVID HANSCOM
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1321-05-1 	PER CURIAM
NOVEMBER 29, 2005
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS AND
ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(David Hanscom, pro se, on brief).
(Robert A. Rapaport; Jennifer Tatum Atkinson; Clarke, Dolph,
Rapaport, Hardy & Hull, P.L.C., on brief), for appellees.
David Hanscom appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding
that (1) he failed to prove he remained partially disabled after June 13, 2002, as a result of his
compensable injury by accident; and (2) he was not entitled to a change in treating physicians.
We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without
merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See
Hanscom v. Advance Auto Parts, VWC File No. 202-41-09 (May 3, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.