0078941•Aaron Augustis Witts v Commonwealth
Gesamter Gesetzestext
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia AARON AUGUSTIS WITTS v. Record No. 0078-94-1 ORDER COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA UPON A REHEARING EN BANC Thomas W. Carpenter (Overman, Cowardin & Martin, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant. Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. By memorandum opinion issued April 4, 1995, a panel of this Court affirmed the conviction of Aaron Augustis Witts (appellant) for use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public airways, in violation of Code § 18.2-427. Witts v. Commonwealth, No. 0078-94-1, 1995 WL 143096 (Va. Ct. App. April 4, 1995) (Benton, J., dissenting). On appellant's motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc which was heard on October 5, 1995. For the reasons stated in the panel majority opinion, the stay of the mandate of the April 4, 1995 opinion is vacated, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder, and Fitzpatrick, for the reasons stated in Judge Benton's panel dissent, would reverse the conviction.
- 2 - This order shall be published and certified to the trial court. Affirmed.
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman, Willis, Elder, Bray, Fitzpatrick, Annunziata and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia AARON AUGUSTIS WITTS Vv. Record No. 0078-94-1 ORDER COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA UPON A REHEARING EN BANC Thomas W. Carpenter (Overman, Cowardin & Martin, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant. Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. By memorandum opinion issued April 4, 1995, a panel of this Court affirmed the conviction of Aaron Augustis Witts (appellant) for use of profane, threatening, or indecent language over public airways, in violation of Code § 18.2-427. Witts v. Commonwealth, No. 0078-94-1, 1995 WL 143096 (Va. Ct. App. April 4, 1995) (Benton, J., dissenting). On appellant's motion, we stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc which was heard on October 5, 1995. For the reasons stated in the panel majority opinion, the stay of the mandate of the April 4, 1995 opinion is vacated, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Judges Benton, Coleman, Elder, and Fitzpatrick, for the reasons stated in Judge Benton's panel dissent, would reverse the conviction. This order shall be published and certified to the trial court. Affirmed.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.