Mary Ellen Hines, etc. v Larry Joe Wagstaff

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis

MARY ELLEN HINES, f£/k/a
MARY ELLEN WAGSTAFF

Vv. Record No. 0750-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
LARRY JOE WAGSTAFF SEPTEMBER 19, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
Richard J. Jamborsky, Judge

(Mary Ellen Hines, pro se, on brief).

(Susan Massie Hicks; Thomas P. Sotelo; Leiner, Hicks &
Sotelo, on brief), for appellee.

Mary Ellen Hines contends the trial judge erred by failing
to include the closing date of December 31, 1995 in the text of
an injunction order barring her from harassing her former
husband, Larry Joe Wagstaff. Upon reviewing the record and
briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without
merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the
trial judge. Rule 5A:27.

In his ruling from the bench, the trial judge extended the
injunction against Hines until December 31, 1995. The transcript
from that ruling was attached to and incorporated by reference
into the order entered March 7, 1995. The order thus contains a
closing date for the temporary injunction and is in compliance

with Code § 8.01-624.

"Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the judgment order.

Affirmed.